Files
Oleksandr ShyshatskyiandClaude Opus 5 15aa6abdda The boot database is compiled on the printer too, not only by the build
s6-rc's database is generated from anvil-core's etc/s6-rc/source, and the
only thing that ran s6-rc-compile was the payload build. So `opkg upgrade
anvil-core` on a printer wrote new service definitions and left the machine
booting the database compiled from the old ones -- the upgrade landed and
changed nothing.

anvil-core ships bin/anvil-s6-rc-compile.sh and its postinst calls it.
anvil-s6-rc calls it too, because s6-rc-compile writes its own execline
shebang and oneshot runner into every database it produces, so one left by
the previous s6-rc is not one this s6-rc should run.

The payload build calls the same script rather than its own copy of the
compile, passing the database name: given one the script prunes every other
database, which is what keeps two builds of one commit byte-identical.
Without a name it timestamps and keeps the database it replaced, so a printer
that will not boot has one to point `current` back at. Nothing live is
touched either way -- a running supervision tree keeps its database until the
next boot, so an upgrade cannot restart services mid-print.

anvil-s6-rc gains PKG_STAMP_EXTRA: its version comes from the tarball and
cannot see control/postinst, and a stamp that cannot see an input reports
"already current" and ships the previous .ipk.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01AVUMfbNuKUWWV32PBcydwb
2026-08-31 12:22:48 +03:00
..
2026-08-30 16:25:37 +03:00