mirror of
https://github.com/Klipper4FlashForge/firmware.git
synced 2026-10-23 13:52:16 -05:00
Oleksandr ShyshatskyiandClaude Opus 5
f70369155b
The replica gates -- the only ones that decide whether a package bricks a
printer -- had never run in CI. They were gated on a STOCK_URL_CREATOR5PRO
secret that was never set, so printer-sim rendered as a grey dash beside
two green ticks and read as "CI passed".
The packages it needs are already public. ghzserg/FF publishes both stock
packages and the factory image, and this repo already points at that
release in docs/printer-replica.md. All three are now pinned in ci.yml by
sha256 and verified byte-for-byte against the copies used locally:
Creator5Pro-1.9.7-1.2.9-20260810.tgz 1f3252fe... 93MB
Creator5-1.9.7-1.2.9-20260810.tgz 72009be1... 93MB
Creator5Pro-factory.tar.xz 45657924... 190MB
Nothing proprietary is redistributed from here; the workflow fetches what
is published elsewhere, cached on their checksums so an unchanged pin
costs that archive nothing. Secrets still override for a fork with its own
firmware -- but a URL override without a matching checksum now refuses to
run rather than downloading something nobody verified. have-firmware is
gone with the `if:` it fed.
Rehearsing that job locally found the reason it would have failed anyway.
The replica gates call ./bin/patch.sh directly, and patch.sh expects
vendor/ already populated -- bin/build.sh is what fetches Mainsail and
HelixScreen, and the gates do not go through build.sh. No local run ever
noticed, because vendor/ was always already there. Both workflows now
fetch assets before the suite; in release.yml that step has to precede the
gates, since `make release` would otherwise fetch them one step too late.
Second half: a skip must be legible.
ALLOW_SKIP=1 silenced the explanation as well as the exit code -- the
summary printed "2 skipped" and then nothing about what or why. That is
the disease this harness exists to treat, reintroduced by the flag meant
to manage it. Now:
- Every skip is listed again in the summary with its reason and whether
it was accepted, whatever ALLOW_SKIP says, and becomes a GitHub
annotation. Nobody reads a green job's log.
- ALLOW_SKIP takes names: ALLOW_SKIP="pytest,the printer replica". `1`
still accepts everything, but it is a standing promise never to notice
a skip again, so CI uses the list and a third skip fails there.
- The pytest gate names the tests that skipped instead of counting them.
That immediately showed the exec-bit test skipping wherever .git is
absent -- a bare "6 skipped" would not have.
VERIFIED:
- printer-sim rehearsed end to end on the actual published bytes, real
git checkout, REQUIRE_PRINTER_SIM=1 and no ALLOW_SKIP: 12 passed,
0 failed, 0 skipped, exit 0, in about four minutes. Before the vendor
step it failed at patch.sh, which is what CI would have done.
- The four ALLOW_SKIP cases, in the build image with no firmware: none
set -> exit 1 naming both gaps; "pytest" only -> exit 1, replica still
NOT ACCEPTED; both named -> exit 0, both still printed; and under
GITHUB_ACTIONS the ::warning:: annotations appear.
- pytest 30 passed. Both workflows parse.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>