Files
firmware/qa/static/test_shell_syntax.py
T
Oleksandr ShyshatskyiandClaude Opus 5 c185ef3285 The replica is a build tool; test/ is 28 unit tests
Two changes that turned out to be one.

MOVED, NOT DELETED. `test/ffsim/` and `test/integration/printer/` are
`tools/replica/`. They were never tests: bin/patch.sh calls
bin/build-payload.py, which starts a replica and assembles the payload by
running the PRINTER'S OWN opkg against / inside it -- so the "test harness"
was on the build path, and deleting it as asked would have broken `make
build`. qa/lib/replica.py drives the same directory unmodified. No content
changed; what changed is qa/lib/replica.py's build directory, three launcher
sys.path lines, the Makefile targets and the CI shellcheck glob.
tools/replica/README.md says who drives it and why it is not under test/.

CUT TO 28. The five surviving modules were 136 tests; they are 28, chosen on
one question: would this failure be SILENT? What is kept is the mistakes that
run perfectly and are wrong --

  test_startup       8  no stamp unless the values are verifiably saved (a
                        stamp written early is a printer that has lost its
                        factory calibration for good), and the handover order
  test_tool_transform 7 every one is a move to the wrong place: a sign, a
                        frame left applied while probing, a stale gcode_move
                        cache, a config a calibrated printer cannot parse
  test_ffscreen      5  the four ways it can do harm rather than look wrong
  test_chamber       4  the chamber mistakes that cost a print before anyone
                        sees them, plus the parse gate they rest on
  test_gcode         4  a renamed macro, and the safe file being cold

What went: the panel narration, the geometry probe and parse_geometry, the
z_adjust and per-job-Z bookkeeping, the config layout checks, the G-code
bounds checks. Each is either a wrong number shown to a person, or a failure
the printer reports loudly the first time -- and qa/replica/test_boot_screen.py
already renders the real frames on the real machine.

The rewrite is not a delete: assertions were folded so a kept test asks its
question in every direction it can be got wrong (both models, both rotations,
all four ways the migration can fail), and each file's header now says what it
dropped and why, where the next person will open it.

Also gone: conftest's `rootfs` fixture, orphaned two commits ago. Nothing under
test/ needs the firmware, docker, or a network any more.

28 host-side tests pass in 0.15s. qa/static unchanged at 218. `make rootfs`
re-verified end to end from its new path.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UzLebCrvc8ssWR5JuEsha4
2026-08-29 23:27:34 +03:00

308 lines
14 KiB
Python

"""Every script parses, and none of them is secretly bash.
Ported from test/run-tests.py's check_shell_syntax and check_no_bashisms. The
logic is theirs; what changes is the granularity. There, one gate covered ~25
files and reported one bit, so a syntax error in S62moonraker and a syntax
error in patch.sh were the same red line. Here each file is its own test, named
after itself, and `pytest -k S62moonraker` runs exactly one.
The original's docstring made a deliberate choice worth preserving:
One line per check, not one per file: 25 green lines saying "syntax ok"
hide the two that matter.
That reasoning was about output noise, and it was right. pytest solves it a
different way -- passes collapse to dots, and only failures print -- so the
granularity and the quiet are no longer in tension.
WHY THE PAYLOAD IS CHECKED TWICE, WITH DIFFERENT DIALECTS
`bash -n` proves a file parses at all. shellcheck's dash dialect proves it uses
nothing bash-only, which is what matters for anything a recipe ships: the
printer runs busybox ash, not bash, and a bash-only construct parses perfectly
here and fails there. dash rather than sh as the dialect because busybox ash,
like dash, supports `local`, which the payload uses.
"""
import importlib.util
import os
import shutil
import subprocess
import sys
import pytest
from lib.paths import ROOT
pytestmark = pytest.mark.static
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ the sets
# Everything that must at least parse. bin/ and test/ run under bash on the
# build image; the printer's scripts run under its ash but bash parses them
# too, and a file that does not parse under either is broken beyond dialect.
#
# THE PRINTER'S SCRIPTS ARE ADDRESSED BY THE SHAPE OF A RECIPE, not by a
# top-level directory: pkgs/<recipe>/payload/ is what that recipe installs
# under $MODDIR, and pkgs/<recipe>/payload/prog/ is the part of that which
# anvil-link-prog.sh points the stock /usr/prog paths at. Neither is named
# recipe by recipe here, so a new recipe with scripts in it is covered the day
# it lands.
#
# The s6-rc `run` scripts are in the list because s6-supervise execs them on
# the printer, under the printer's ash, and a bashism in one is a service that
# never starts and says so only in s6's own log.
SYNTAX_GLOBS = ("bin/*.sh", "pkgs/*/payload/*.sh",
"pkgs/*/payload/prog/*.sh", "pkgs/*/payload/prog/firmwareExe",
"pkgs/*/payload/prog/klipperDaemon",
"pkgs/*/payload/etc/s6-rc/" + "source/*/run",
"installer/*.sh",
"tools/replica/printer/*.sh",
"qa/replica/actions/*.sh",
# BOTH RECIPE LEVELS. pkgs/*/build.sh alone silently
# stopped covering thirty-four of the thirty-eight the day
# they moved under 3rdparty/ -- a glob that matches fewer
# files does not fail, it just checks less. _files() now
# refuses a pattern that matches nothing, so the next one
# fails instead of quietly shrinking.
"pkgs/*.sh", "pkgs/*/build.sh", "pkgs/3rdparty/*/build.sh")
# NOT the oneshots' `up`/`down`. Those are execline command lines, and the
# shell they carry is inside a `/bin/sh -c "..."` argument -- `bash -n` and
# shellcheck would both parse the wrapper, pass, and check none of the code
# that actually runs. Extracting the body and checking THAT belongs in the
# replica lane beside the rest of the s6-rc assertions.
# The subset executed by the printer's busybox ash. bin/ and test/ are
# deliberately absent: they run on the build image, where bash is the shell and
# a bashism is not a defect.
#
# qa/replica/actions/ IS here, and that is not a formality. Those scripts are
# handed to entrypoint.sh and run inside the chroot exactly as a case script
# is, so they are as exposed to ash as anything under payload/. A bashism in
# hold.sh would fail at container start and read as "the replica is broken on
# this machine" -- a harness failure wearing a machine failure's clothes, which
# is the hardest kind to diagnose.
# pkgs/*/build.sh is deliberately not here: the recipes are build-host bash,
# like everything in bin/, and a bashism in one is not a defect.
#
# installer/ is here too: run-pre.sh and run-append.sh are spliced into
# FlashForge's own run.sh and execute inside the stock installer's shell,
# which is the same busybox.
#
# NOT here, and it is a real gap rather than a decision:
# pkgs/*/payload/bin/*.sh. wifi-action.sh runs on the printer and no lane
# checks its dialect.
ASH_GLOBS = ("pkgs/*/payload/*.sh",
"pkgs/*/payload/prog/*.sh", "pkgs/*/payload/prog/firmwareExe",
"pkgs/*/payload/prog/klipperDaemon",
"pkgs/*/payload/etc/s6-rc/" + "source/*/run",
"installer/*.sh", "qa/replica/actions/*.sh")
PY_GLOBS = ("bin/*.py", "pkgs/*/payload/bin/*.py",
"pkgs/*/payload/klipper/klippy/extras/*.py", "test/*.py",
"test/integration/*.py", "tools/replica/*.py",
"tools/replica/ffsim/*.py", "qa/*.py", "qa/lib/*.py",
"qa/static/*.py", "qa/replica/*.py")
def _files(globs):
"""Expand the globs, and refuse one that matches nothing.
A glob that stops matching does not fail -- it checks less, and the lane
stays green while doing it. That is not hypothetical: moving thirty-four
recipes under pkgs/3rdparty/ left "pkgs/*/build.sh" matching the four that
had not moved, and the only visible sign was a test count dropping by
thirty-four in a run nobody was counting.
So an empty pattern is a collection error, which is as loud as this file
can be, and the message says the two things that cause it: a file that
moved, or a pattern that was never right.
"""
found = []
for pattern in globs:
hits = sorted(p for p in ROOT.glob(pattern) if p.is_file())
if not hits:
raise AssertionError(
"%r matches no files -- either something moved and this "
"pattern did not follow it, or the pattern is wrong. Either "
"way this lane was checking less than it claimed." % pattern)
found += hits
return found
def _ids(paths):
return [str(p.relative_to(ROOT)) for p in paths]
SHELL_FILES = _files(SYNTAX_GLOBS)
ASH_FILES = _files(ASH_GLOBS)
PY_FILES = _files(PY_GLOBS)
# --------------------------------------------------------- the globs are live
#
# Each lane below asserts its own inputs exist. This is not defensive noise: it
# is the exact bug the original guarded against, quoted from check_no_bashisms:
#
# With no targets shellcheck writes usage to stderr and exits 1, leaving
# `hits` empty -- a green gate that examined nothing. check_shell_syntax
# guards this; this one did not, so moving payload/ would have retired the
# ash-compatibility check silently.
#
# Parametrized tests fail the same way, and worse: zero parameters is zero
# tests, which is not even a red line. It is an empty run that reads as clean.
def test_shell_globs_match_something():
assert SHELL_FILES, "no scripts to parse -- the globs in SYNTAX_GLOBS rotted"
def test_ash_globs_match_something():
assert ASH_FILES, "no on-printer scripts -- has the recipe layout moved?"
def test_python_globs_match_something():
assert PY_FILES, "no python files -- have the globs in PY_GLOBS rotted?"
ACTIONS = sorted((ROOT / "qa" / "replica" / "actions").glob("*.sh"))
@pytest.mark.parametrize("script", ACTIONS, ids=_ids(ACTIONS))
def test_action_scripts_are_executable(script):
"""qa/replica/actions/*.sh are handed to docker, not sourced.
bake.sh is a `--entrypoint` and the others are mounted in and run, so a
missing executable bit is not a style problem -- the container dies at
init with `exec: permission denied` before a single test runs, and the
43 errors that follow all say "could not install the package", which
points at the installer rather than at a file mode.
Caught here because it happened: bake.sh was written without the bit and
the whole lane failed in 1.6 seconds with an error about the mod. It is
the same failure the payload's own s6 `run` scripts have a check for --
"s6 reports a non-executable run in its own log and nowhere else" -- and
it deserved the same treatment here.
"""
assert os.access(str(script), os.X_OK), (
"%s is not executable, so docker cannot run it. `chmod +x` it and "
"commit the mode." % script.name)
# ------------------------------------------------------------------- it parses
@pytest.mark.parametrize("script", SHELL_FILES, ids=_ids(SHELL_FILES))
def test_parses(script):
parsed = subprocess.run(["bash", "-n", str(script)],
capture_output=True, text=True)
assert parsed.returncode == 0, parsed.stderr.strip()
# ------------------------------------------------------ it is not secretly bash
@pytest.fixture(scope="session")
def bashisms():
"""shellcheck over every payload script at once, indexed by file.
One process, not one per file. shellcheck spends most of a run starting
up, so per-file invocation cost more than everything else in this lane
combined -- but per-file REPORTING is the whole point of the port. The
gcc output format is `path:line:col: level: message [SCxxxx]`, so the
findings can be split back apart by path afterwards and each test can ask
only about itself.
"""
# A failure, not a skip. There is no configuration in which running this
# suite without shellcheck is a complete run, so calling it "skipped" would
# describe a machine that is not set up as though it were a decision
# somebody made. See qa/conftest.py.
#
# pytest.fail rather than a bare assert on which(): `assert None` is what
# an assert would lead with, and the sentence explaining how to fix it
# would be the part that got truncated in the summary.
if not shutil.which("shellcheck"):
pytest.fail(
"shellcheck is not installed, so nothing checked that the payload "
"is free of bash-only constructs -- the printer runs busybox ash. "
"The build image has it: run `make qa`, or install it locally "
"(dnf install ShellCheck / apt install shellcheck).")
checked = subprocess.run(
["shellcheck", "-s", "dash", "-f", "gcc"]
+ [str(p) for p in ASH_FILES],
capture_output=True, text=True, cwd=str(ROOT))
# SC3xxx is shellcheck's "not supported in POSIX sh" family; SC2039 is its
# older spelling of the same thing. Everything else it says here is style,
# and a gate that goes red for style gets switched off.
found = {}
for line in (checked.stdout or "").splitlines():
if "SC3" not in line and "SC2039" not in line:
continue
path = line.split(":", 1)[0]
found.setdefault(path, []).append(line)
# shellcheck exits 1 for findings, which `found` covers, but also for a
# usage or file error -- which would otherwise pass unnoticed as "no
# findings". Raised here rather than returned so it fails every test in
# the lane instead of hiding behind whichever file happens to be clean.
if not found and checked.returncode not in (0, 1):
raise AssertionError(
"shellcheck failed to run (exit %d): %s"
% (checked.returncode, (checked.stderr or "").strip()[:200]))
return found
@pytest.mark.parametrize("script", ASH_FILES, ids=_ids(ASH_FILES))
def test_no_bash_only_constructs(script, bashisms):
# shellcheck echoes back the path it was given. It was given absolute
# paths, but match on both spellings so a future cwd-relative call site
# does not silently stop matching and report every file clean.
rel = str(script.relative_to(ROOT))
hits = bashisms.get(str(script), []) + bashisms.get(rel, [])
assert not hits, "bash-only constructs:\n " + "\n ".join(hits)
# ------------------------------------------------------- every name is bound
# One test, not one per file: pyflakes resolves names within a module, so the
# per-file split buys nothing here and costs an interpreter start each. The
# failure message names the files itself.
def test_no_undefined_names():
"""A name that does not exist anywhere it is read.
py_compile catches typos in syntax; nothing caught typos in names, so a
rename that renamed an assignment and missed one of its uses stayed green
through both lanes and waited for the line to execute on the printer. That
is how `_plate_check` came to reach for `z_trigger` when what it had bound
was `station_z` -- on the one path that runs BEFORE a nozzle is allowed to
descend.
"""
# The debian package ships the module without putting a pyflakes
# executable on PATH, so shutil.which() -- the shape the shellcheck test
# above uses -- reports it missing on the very image that has it.
#
# A failure, not a skip, for the same reason as shellcheck above.
if importlib.util.find_spec("pyflakes") is None:
pytest.fail(
"pyflakes is not installed, so nothing checked that every name is "
"bound -- which is the gate that catches a rename missing one of "
"its uses. The build image has it: run `make qa`, or install it "
"locally (apt install python3-pyflakes / pip install pyflakes).")
checked = subprocess.run(
[sys.executable, "-m", "pyflakes"] + [str(p) for p in PY_FILES],
capture_output=True, text=True, cwd=str(ROOT))
# Only the fatal findings count. pyflakes also reports unused imports and
# the like, which are untidy but cannot fail at runtime.
fatal = ("undefined name", "referenced before assignment",
"syntax error", "invalid syntax")
hits = [line for line in (checked.stdout or "").splitlines()
if any(marker in line.lower() for marker in fatal)]
assert hits or checked.returncode in (0, 1), (
"pyflakes failed to run (exit %d): %s"
% (checked.returncode, (checked.stderr or "").strip()[:200]))
assert not hits, "names used but never bound:\n " + "\n ".join(hits)