docs: describe RuView-focused README animation

docs: focus animation on RuView sensing and spatial awareness
docs: add ruOS animation below RuView header
2026-10-19 05:10:13 -05:00 · 2026-10-06 09:25:36 -07:00 · 2026-10-06 09:25:34 -07:00 · 2026-10-06 09:12:38 -07:00 · 2026-10-06 09:12:36 -07:00 · 2026-10-05 13:52:42 -07:00
961 changed files with 149311 additions and 154982 deletions
@@ -10,6 +10,11 @@
      "name": "ruview",
      "source": "./plugins/ruview",
      "description": "End-to-end RuView toolkit: getting started, ESP32 hardware setup, configuration, sensing applications (presence / vitals / pose / sleep / MAT), camera-free + camera-supervised model training, advanced multistatic sensing, CLI / API / WASM, mmWave radar, and witness verification"
+    },
+    {
+      "name": "ruview-live",
+      "source": "./harness/ruview/mod",
+      "description": "Claude Code mod: /ruview opens a live pane with your CSI nodes (ESP32, Realtek) and ESPHome radar (presence, distance, device-reported vitals), refreshed on a timer, plus a one-line status. Read-only; ships inside @ruvnet/ruview. Mods are early access (CLAUDE_CODE_ENABLE_FUNCTION_HOOKS=1)."
    }
  ]
 }
@@ -1 +1 @@
-{"sessionId":"d80c93c2-51b7-42e8-a0fc-dc47cff1200f","pid":45748,"acquiredAt":1779668018388}
+{"sessionId":"905385c4-b13f-5091-96df-5752fb109cf5","pid":509,"procStart":"527","acquiredAt":1786922977672}
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+# The contributor harness hashes provenance inputs byte-for-byte. Keep text
+# files in this boundary on LF even when Windows enables core.autocrlf.
+harness/ruview/** text=auto eol=lf
@@ -135,6 +135,10 @@ async function runProcess(command, args, {
        resolve(result);
      });
    });
+    // A child that never reads stdin (e.g. `git check-ignore`) may exit and
+    // close the pipe before this write flushes; the resulting EPIPE is not a
+    // failure of the command, whose real outcome the 'close' handler reports.
+    child.stdin.on('error', () => {});
    child.stdin.end(input);
  });
 }
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ jobs:
      run:
        working-directory: v2
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ jobs:
        run: rustup show && rustc --version

      - name: Cache cargo
-        uses: actions/cache@v4
+        uses: actions/cache@0057852bfaa89a56745cba8c7296529d2fc39830
        with:
          path: |
            ~/.cargo/registry
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ jobs:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Checkout (recursive — wifi-densepose-rufield path-deps vendor/rufield)
-        uses: actions/checkout@v4
+        uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          # The workspace includes `wifi-densepose-rufield`, which path-deps the
          # `vendor/rufield` submodule crates. Without a recursive checkout the
@@ -100,10 +100,10 @@ jobs:
            pkg-config

      - name: Install Rust toolchain
-        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
+        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@4cda84d5c5c54efe2404f9d843567869ab1699d4

      - name: Cache cargo (Swatinem/rust-cache)
-        uses: Swatinem/rust-cache@v2
+        uses: Swatinem/rust-cache@e18b497796c12c097a38f9edb9d0641fb99eee32
        with:
          workspaces: v2
          # Distinct cache scope from ci.yml's rust-tests so the bench profile
@@ -150,15 +150,15 @@ jobs:
    needs: [bench-compile]
    steps:
      - name: Checkout (recursive)
-        uses: actions/checkout@v4
+        uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

      - name: Install Rust toolchain
-        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
+        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@4cda84d5c5c54efe2404f9d843567869ab1699d4

      - name: Cache cargo (Swatinem/rust-cache)
-        uses: Swatinem/rust-cache@v2
+        uses: Swatinem/rust-cache@e18b497796c12c097a38f9edb9d0641fb99eee32
        with:
          workspaces: v2
          key: bench-regression
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ jobs:

      - name: Upload informational bench logs
        if: always()
-        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02
        with:
          name: bench-fast-run-logs
          path: bench-out/
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+name: BFI Research Tools
+
+on:
+  pull_request:
+    paths:
+      - 'tools/bfi/**'
+      - 'tools/bfi_learning/**'
+      - '.github/workflows/bfi-research.yml'
+  push:
+    branches: [main]
+    paths:
+      - 'tools/bfi/**'
+      - 'tools/bfi_learning/**'
+      - '.github/workflows/bfi-research.yml'
+  workflow_dispatch:
+
+permissions:
+  contents: read
+
+concurrency:
+  group: bfi-research-${{ github.ref }}
+  cancel-in-progress: true
+
+jobs:
+  offline-tests:
+    name: BFI offline tests (Linux, CPU)
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    timeout-minutes: 15
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
+        with:
+          persist-credentials: false
+      - uses: actions/setup-python@ece7cb06caefa5fff74198d8649806c4678c61a1
+        with:
+          python-version: '3.13'
+      - name: Install numeric test dependencies
+        run: python -m pip install numpy==2.4.2 scipy==1.17.1
+      - name: Install CPU PyTorch
+        run: python -m pip install torch==2.11.0 --index-url https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cpu
+      - name: Test capture parsing and bounded runners
+        run: python -B -m unittest discover -s tools/bfi -v
+      - name: Test offline learning and data admission
+        run: python -B -m unittest discover -s tools/bfi_learning -v
@@ -52,17 +52,17 @@ jobs:

    steps:
      - name: Checkout
-        uses: actions/checkout@v4
+        uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

      - name: Install Rust toolchain
-        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
+        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@4cda84d5c5c54efe2404f9d843567869ab1699d4
        with:
          components: clippy

      - name: Cache cargo registry + target
-        uses: actions/cache@v4
+        uses: actions/cache@0057852bfaa89a56745cba8c7296529d2fc39830
        with:
          path: |
            ~/.cargo/registry
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ jobs:
      image_tag: ${{ steps.determine-tag.outputs.tag }}
    steps:
    - name: Checkout code
-      uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
      with:
        ref: ${{ github.event.workflow_run.head_sha || github.sha }}
        submodules: recursive
@@ -96,12 +96,12 @@ jobs:
      url: https://staging.wifi-densepose.com
    steps:
    - name: Checkout code
-      uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
      with:
        submodules: recursive

    - name: Set up kubectl
-      uses: azure/setup-kubectl@v3
+      uses: azure/setup-kubectl@901a10e89ea615cf61f57ac05cecdf23e7de06d8
      with:
        version: 'v1.28.0'

@@ -147,12 +147,12 @@ jobs:
      url: https://wifi-densepose.com
    steps:
    - name: Checkout code
-      uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
      with:
        submodules: recursive

    - name: Set up kubectl
-      uses: azure/setup-kubectl@v3
+      uses: azure/setup-kubectl@901a10e89ea615cf61f57ac05cecdf23e7de06d8
      with:
        version: 'v1.28.0'

@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ jobs:
        # kubectl scale rs -n wifi-densepose -l app=wifi-densepose,version!=green --replicas=0

    - name: Upload deployment artifacts
-      uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+      uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02
      with:
        name: production-deployment-${{ github.run_number }}
        path: |
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ jobs:
      name: ${{ needs.pre-deployment.outputs.deploy_env }}
    steps:
    - name: Set up kubectl
-      uses: azure/setup-kubectl@v3
+      uses: azure/setup-kubectl@901a10e89ea615cf61f57ac05cecdf23e7de06d8
      with:
        version: 'v1.28.0'

@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ jobs:
        done

    - name: Update deployment status
-      uses: actions/github-script@v7
+      uses: actions/github-script@f28e40c7f34bde8b3046d885e986cb6290c5673b
      with:
        script: |
          const deployEnv = '${{ needs.pre-deployment.outputs.deploy_env }}';
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ jobs:
    steps:
    - name: Notify Slack on success
      if: needs.deploy-production.result == 'success' || needs.deploy-staging.result == 'success'
-      uses: 8398a7/action-slack@v3
+      uses: 8398a7/action-slack@77eaa4f1c608a7d68b38af4e3f739dcd8cba273e
      with:
        status: success
        channel: '#deployments'
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ jobs:

    - name: Notify Slack on failure
      if: needs.deploy-production.result == 'failure' || needs.deploy-staging.result == 'failure'
-      uses: 8398a7/action-slack@v3
+      uses: 8398a7/action-slack@77eaa4f1c608a7d68b38af4e3f739dcd8cba273e
      with:
        status: failure
        channel: '#deployments'
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ jobs:

    - name: Create deployment issue on failure
      if: needs.deploy-production.result == 'failure'
-      uses: actions/github-script@v7
+      uses: actions/github-script@f28e40c7f34bde8b3046d885e986cb6290c5673b
      with:
        script: |
          github.rest.issues.create({
@@ -27,14 +27,14 @@ jobs:
    steps:
    - name: Checkout code
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
      with:
        submodules: recursive
        fetch-depth: 0

    - name: Set up Python
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: actions/setup-python@v6
+      uses: actions/setup-python@ece7cb06caefa5fff74198d8649806c4678c61a1
      with:
        python-version: ${{ env.PYTHON_VERSION }}
        cache: 'pip'
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ jobs:

    - name: Upload security reports
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+      uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02
      if: always()
      with:
        name: security-reports
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ jobs:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
    - name: Checkout code
-      uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
      with:
        submodules: recursive
      # ADR-262 P1: `wifi-densepose-rufield` path-deps the `vendor/rufield`
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ jobs:
          pkg-config

    - name: Install Rust toolchain
-      uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
+      uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@4cda84d5c5c54efe2404f9d843567869ab1699d4

    # Swatinem/rust-cache replaces a naive `actions/cache` of the whole
    # `v2/target`. That manual cache of a 38-crate target dir (multi-GB) was an
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ jobs:
    # reliably (and faster) on large workspaces. `workspaces: v2` points it at
    # the v2/ cargo workspace (keys on v2/Cargo.lock, caches v2/target).
    - name: Cache cargo (Swatinem/rust-cache)
-      uses: Swatinem/rust-cache@v2
+      uses: Swatinem/rust-cache@e18b497796c12c097a38f9edb9d0641fb99eee32
      with:
        workspaces: v2

@@ -196,15 +196,15 @@ jobs:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
    - name: Checkout code
-      uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262

    - name: Set up Node
-      uses: actions/setup-node@v4
+      uses: actions/setup-node@49933ea5288caeca8642d1e84afbd3f7d6820020
      with:
        node-version: '22'

    - name: Run UI unit tests
-      run: node --test ui/sw.test.mjs ui/services/ws-ticket.test.mjs ui/services/websocket.service.test.mjs
+      run: node --test ui/sw.test.mjs ui/services/ws-ticket.test.mjs ui/services/websocket.service.test.mjs ui/services/sensing.service.test.mjs ui/components/DashboardTab.test.mjs v2/crates/wifi-densepose-desktop/ui/build-config.test.mjs

  # Unit and Integration Tests
  # Python pytest matrix — runs against the archived v1 Python tree.
@@ -222,6 +222,8 @@ jobs:
      postgres:
        image: postgres:15
        env:
+          # Ephemeral CI-only credential; this service is isolated to the job.
+          # kics-scan ignore-line
          POSTGRES_PASSWORD: postgres
          POSTGRES_DB: test_wifi_densepose
        options: >-
@@ -245,13 +247,13 @@ jobs:
    steps:
    - name: Checkout code
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
      with:
        submodules: recursive

    - name: Set up Python ${{ matrix.python-version }}
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: actions/setup-python@v6
+      uses: actions/setup-python@ece7cb06caefa5fff74198d8649806c4678c61a1
      with:
        python-version: ${{ matrix.python-version }}
        cache: 'pip'
@@ -266,6 +268,8 @@ jobs:
    - name: Run unit tests
      continue-on-error: true
      env:
+        # Ephemeral CI-only service URL; never used outside this job.
+        # kics-scan ignore-line
        DATABASE_URL: postgresql://postgres:postgres@localhost:5432/test_wifi_densepose
        REDIS_URL: redis://localhost:6379/0
        ENVIRONMENT: test
@@ -275,6 +279,8 @@ jobs:
    - name: Run integration tests
      continue-on-error: true
      env:
+        # Ephemeral CI-only service URL; never used outside this job.
+        # kics-scan ignore-line
        DATABASE_URL: postgresql://postgres:postgres@localhost:5432/test_wifi_densepose
        REDIS_URL: redis://localhost:6379/0
        ENVIRONMENT: test
@@ -283,7 +289,7 @@ jobs:

    - name: Upload coverage reports
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: codecov/codecov-action@v6
+      uses: codecov/codecov-action@fb8b3582c8e4def4969c97caa2f19720cb33a72f
      with:
        files: ./coverage.xml
        flags: unittests
@@ -291,7 +297,7 @@ jobs:

    - name: Upload test results
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+      uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02
      if: always()
      with:
        name: test-results-${{ matrix.python-version }}
@@ -312,12 +318,12 @@ jobs:
    if: github.event_name == 'push' && github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'
    steps:
    - name: Checkout code
-      uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
      with:
        submodules: recursive

    - name: Set up Python
-      uses: actions/setup-python@v6
+      uses: actions/setup-python@ece7cb06caefa5fff74198d8649806c4678c61a1
      with:
        python-version: ${{ env.PYTHON_VERSION }}
        cache: 'pip'
@@ -361,7 +367,7 @@ jobs:

    - name: Upload performance results
      if: always()
-      uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+      uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02
      with:
        name: performance-results
        path: archive/v1/perf-junit.xml
@@ -382,17 +388,17 @@ jobs:
    steps:
    - name: Checkout code
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
      with:
        submodules: recursive

    - name: Set up Docker Buildx
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3
+      uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@8d2750c68a42422c14e847fe6c8ac0403b4cbd6f

    - name: Log in to Container Registry
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: docker/login-action@v3
+      uses: docker/login-action@c94ce9fb468520275223c153574b00df6fe4bcc9
      with:
        registry: ${{ env.REGISTRY }}
        username: ${{ github.actor }}
@@ -401,7 +407,7 @@ jobs:
    - name: Extract metadata
      continue-on-error: true
      id: meta
-      uses: docker/metadata-action@v6
+      uses: docker/metadata-action@dc802804100637a589fabce1cb79ff13a1411302
      with:
        images: ${{ env.REGISTRY }}/${{ env.IMAGE_NAME }}
        tags: |
@@ -412,7 +418,7 @@ jobs:

    - name: Build and push Docker image
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: docker/build-push-action@v7
+      uses: docker/build-push-action@53b7df96c91f9c12dcc8a07bcb9ccacbed38856a
      with:
        context: .
        target: production
@@ -441,7 +447,7 @@ jobs:

    - name: Upload Trivy scan results
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
+      uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@a2983b8bed1923f44751c5c43237f479442827b3
      if: always()
      with:
        sarif_file: 'trivy-results.sarif'
@@ -456,12 +462,12 @@ jobs:
      contents: write   # gh-pages deploy needs write (GITHUB_TOKEN is read-only by default -> 403)
    steps:
    - name: Checkout code
-      uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
      with:
        submodules: recursive

    - name: Set up Python
-      uses: actions/setup-python@v6
+      uses: actions/setup-python@ece7cb06caefa5fff74198d8649806c4678c61a1
      with:
        python-version: ${{ env.PYTHON_VERSION }}
        cache: 'pip'
@@ -484,7 +490,7 @@ jobs:
        "

    - name: Deploy to GitHub Pages
-      uses: peaceiris/actions-gh-pages@v4
+      uses: peaceiris/actions-gh-pages@84c30a85c19949d7eee79c4ff27748b70285e453
      continue-on-error: true   # openapi generation above is the real validation; deploy is best-effort (Pages may be disabled)
      with:
        github_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
@@ -507,7 +513,7 @@ jobs:
    steps:
    - name: Notify Slack on success
      if: ${{ env.SLACK_WEBHOOK_URL != '' && needs.code-quality.result == 'success' && needs.test.result == 'success' && needs.docker-build.result == 'success' }}
-      uses: 8398a7/action-slack@v3
+      uses: 8398a7/action-slack@77eaa4f1c608a7d68b38af4e3f739dcd8cba273e
      with:
        status: success
        channel: '#ci-cd'
@@ -515,7 +521,7 @@ jobs:

    - name: Notify Slack on failure
      if: ${{ env.SLACK_WEBHOOK_URL != '' && (needs.code-quality.result == 'failure' || needs.test.result == 'failure' || needs.docker-build.result == 'failure') }}
-      uses: 8398a7/action-slack@v3
+      uses: 8398a7/action-slack@77eaa4f1c608a7d68b38af4e3f739dcd8cba273e
      with:
        status: failure
        channel: '#ci-cd'
@@ -523,7 +529,7 @@ jobs:

    - name: Create GitHub Release
      if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main' && needs.docker-build.result == 'success'
-      uses: softprops/action-gh-release@v2
+      uses: softprops/action-gh-release@3bb12739c298aeb8a4eeaf626c5b8d85266b0e65
      with:
        tag_name: v${{ github.run_number }}
        name: Release v${{ github.run_number }}
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ jobs:
  snapshot:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

@@ -27,17 +27,17 @@ jobs:
    name: Build x86_64
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

      - name: Setup Rust
-        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
+        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@4cda84d5c5c54efe2404f9d843567869ab1699d4
        with:
          targets: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

      - name: Cache cargo registry
-        uses: actions/cache@v4
+        uses: actions/cache@0057852bfaa89a56745cba8c7296529d2fc39830
        with:
          path: |
            ~/.cargo/registry
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ jobs:
          echo "Signed cog-ha-matter-x86_64 ($(wc -c < dist/cog-ha-matter-x86_64.sig) bytes)"

      - name: Upload workflow artifact
-        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02
        with:
          name: cog-ha-matter-x86_64
          path: |
@@ -79,12 +79,12 @@ jobs:
    name: Build aarch64 (arm)
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

      - name: Setup Rust
-        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
+        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@4cda84d5c5c54efe2404f9d843567869ab1699d4
        with:
          targets: aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu

@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ jobs:
          sudo apt-get install -y gcc-aarch64-linux-gnu

      - name: Cache cargo registry
-        uses: actions/cache@v4
+        uses: actions/cache@0057852bfaa89a56745cba8c7296529d2fc39830
        with:
          path: |
            ~/.cargo/registry
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ jobs:
          echo "Signed cog-ha-matter-arm ($(wc -c < dist/cog-ha-matter-arm.sig) bytes)"

      - name: Upload workflow artifact
-        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02
        with:
          name: cog-ha-matter-arm
          path: |
@@ -148,29 +148,29 @@ jobs:
      github.event_name == 'push' &&
      vars.HAS_GCP_CREDENTIALS == 'true'
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

      - name: Download x86_64 artifact
-        uses: actions/download-artifact@v4
+        uses: actions/download-artifact@d3f86a106a0bac45b974a628896c90dbdf5c8093
        with:
          name: cog-ha-matter-x86_64
          path: dist/

      - name: Download arm artifact
-        uses: actions/download-artifact@v4
+        uses: actions/download-artifact@d3f86a106a0bac45b974a628896c90dbdf5c8093
        with:
          name: cog-ha-matter-arm
          path: dist/

      - name: Auth to GCP
-        uses: google-github-actions/auth@v2
+        uses: google-github-actions/auth@c200f3691d83b41bf9bbd8638997a462592937ed
        with:
          credentials_json: ${{ secrets.GCP_CREDENTIALS }}

      - name: Set up gcloud
-        uses: google-github-actions/setup-gcloud@v2
+        uses: google-github-actions/setup-gcloud@e427ad8a34f8676edf47cf7d7925499adf3eb74f

      - name: Upload binaries + sidecars
        run: |
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+name: CSI data policy (ADR-299)
+
+# ADR-299 repository CSI data-incident guard. Fails when CSI-format files
+# (*.csi.jsonl / *.csi.meta.json) or oversized JSONL captures are tracked in
+# git. Raw CSI is person data and must never be committed (CLAUDE.md, ADR-299).
+#
+# NOTE: the tree currently still contains the pre-existing incident recordings
+# under data/recordings/ and v2/data/recordings/, whose removal is gated on
+# data-owner sign-off (ADR-299). Until they are removed this job is EXPECTED to
+# fail, and that failure documents the incident. To make it green in a
+# follow-up without weakening the guard for NEW files, set CSI_POLICY_BASELINE
+# to a file listing the acknowledged paths (see the script header).
+#
+# Checker: scripts/csi-data-policy-check.sh   Run locally: bash the same script.
+
+on:
+  push:
+    branches:
+      - main
+      - master
+  pull_request:
+  workflow_dispatch:
+
+permissions:
+  contents: read
+
+jobs:
+  csi-data-policy:
+    name: CSI data policy check
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
+        with:
+          persist-credentials: false
+
+      - name: Self-test the policy checker (deterministic, offline)
+        run: bash scripts/csi-data-policy-check.sh --self-test
+
+      - name: Enforce CSI data policy on tracked files
+        # CSI_POLICY_BASELINE can point at an acknowledged-paths file once the
+        # owner remediates the tree; unset here so a regression fails loudly.
+        run: bash scripts/csi-data-policy-check.sh --tracked
+
+      - name: Summarize result
+        if: always()
+        run: |
+          {
+            echo '### CSI data policy (ADR-299)'
+            echo ''
+            echo '```'
+            bash scripts/csi-data-policy-check.sh --tracked 2>&1 || true
+            echo '```'
+          } >> "$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY"
@@ -19,11 +19,11 @@ jobs:
  a11y:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

-      - uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
+      - uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@4cda84d5c5c54efe2404f9d843567869ab1699d4
        with: { targets: wasm32-unknown-unknown }

      - name: Install wasm-pack
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ jobs:
            --out-dir ../../dashboard/public/nvsim-pkg \
            --release -- --no-default-features --features wasm

-      - uses: actions/setup-node@v6
+      - uses: actions/setup-node@249970729cb0ef3589644e2896645e5dc5ba9c38
        with: { node-version: 20, cache: npm, cache-dependency-path: dashboard/package-lock.json }

      - working-directory: dashboard
@@ -25,17 +25,17 @@ jobs:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Checkout main
-        uses: actions/checkout@v4
+        uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

      - name: Install Rust + wasm32 target
-        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
+        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@4cda84d5c5c54efe2404f9d843567869ab1699d4
        with:
          targets: wasm32-unknown-unknown

      - name: Cache cargo registry
-        uses: actions/cache@v4
+        uses: actions/cache@0057852bfaa89a56745cba8c7296529d2fc39830
        with:
          path: |
            ~/.cargo/registry
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ jobs:
            -- --no-default-features --features wasm

      - name: Setup Node 20
-        uses: actions/setup-node@v6
+        uses: actions/setup-node@249970729cb0ef3589644e2896645e5dc5ba9c38
        with:
          node-version: 20
          cache: npm
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ jobs:
        run: npm run build

      - name: Deploy to gh-pages/nvsim/
-        uses: peaceiris/actions-gh-pages@v4
+        uses: peaceiris/actions-gh-pages@84c30a85c19949d7eee79c4ff27748b70285e453
        with:
          github_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
          publish_dir: ./dashboard/dist
@@ -27,17 +27,17 @@ jobs:
        target: [aarch64-apple-darwin, x86_64-apple-darwin]
    steps:
      - name: Checkout
-        uses: actions/checkout@v4
+        uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

      - name: Setup Node.js
-        uses: actions/setup-node@v6
+        uses: actions/setup-node@249970729cb0ef3589644e2896645e5dc5ba9c38
        with:
          node-version: '20'

      - name: Setup Rust
-        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
+        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@4cda84d5c5c54efe2404f9d843567869ab1699d4
        with:
          targets: ${{ matrix.target }}

@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ jobs:
          zip -r "RuView-Desktop-${{ github.event.inputs.version || '0.4.0' }}-macos-${{ steps.arch.outputs.arch }}.zip" "RuView Desktop.app"

      - name: Upload macOS artifact
-        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02
        with:
          name: ruview-macos-${{ steps.arch.outputs.arch }}
          path: v2/target/${{ matrix.target }}/release/bundle/macos/*.zip
@@ -84,17 +84,17 @@ jobs:
    runs-on: windows-latest
    steps:
      - name: Checkout
-        uses: actions/checkout@v4
+        uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

      - name: Setup Node.js
-        uses: actions/setup-node@v6
+        uses: actions/setup-node@249970729cb0ef3589644e2896645e5dc5ba9c38
        with:
          node-version: '20'

      - name: Setup Rust
-        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
+        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@4cda84d5c5c54efe2404f9d843567869ab1699d4

      - name: Install frontend dependencies
        working-directory: v2/crates/wifi-densepose-desktop/ui
@@ -115,13 +115,13 @@ jobs:
          TAURI_SIGNING_PRIVATE_KEY_PASSWORD: ${{ secrets.TAURI_SIGNING_PRIVATE_KEY_PASSWORD }}

      - name: Upload Windows MSI artifact
-        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02
        with:
          name: ruview-windows-msi
          path: v2/target/release/bundle/msi/*.msi

      - name: Upload Windows NSIS artifact
-        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02
        with:
          name: ruview-windows-nsis
          path: v2/target/release/bundle/nsis/*.exe
@@ -134,12 +134,12 @@ jobs:
      contents: write
    steps:
      - name: Checkout
-        uses: actions/checkout@v4
+        uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

      - name: Download all artifacts
-        uses: actions/download-artifact@v4
+        uses: actions/download-artifact@d3f86a106a0bac45b974a628896c90dbdf5c8093
        with:
          path: artifacts

@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ jobs:
        run: find artifacts -type f

      - name: Create or Update Release
-        uses: softprops/action-gh-release@v2
+        uses: softprops/action-gh-release@3bb12739c298aeb8a4eeaf626c5b8d85266b0e65
        with:
          name: RuView Desktop v${{ github.event.inputs.version || '0.4.0' }}
          tag_name: ${{ github.event.inputs.attach_to_existing || format('desktop-v{0}', github.event.inputs.version || '0.4.0') }}
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ jobs:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    if: github.ref_type == 'tag'
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive
      - name: Check firmware version.txt == tag
@@ -53,7 +53,9 @@ jobs:
            sdkconfig: sdkconfig.defaults
            partition_table_name: partitions_display.csv
            size_warn_kb: 1100
-            size_limit_kb: 1152
+            # Current 8 MB image is 1163 KiB after USB onboarding. The OTA app
+            # partition is 2048 KiB; retain a 1200 KiB hard gate and warning.
+            size_limit_kb: 1200
            artifact_app: esp32-csi-node.bin
            artifact_pt: partition-table.bin
          - variant: 4mb
@@ -75,7 +77,7 @@ jobs:
            artifact_pt: partition-table-c6.bin

    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

@@ -92,12 +94,11 @@ jobs:
          idf.py set-target ${{ matrix.target }}
          idf.py build

-      - name: Build and run host-side ADR-110 unit tests
+      - name: Build and run host-side firmware unit tests
        if: matrix.variant == 'c6-4mb'
        working-directory: firmware/esp32-csi-node/test
        run: |
-          make test_adr110
-          ./test_adr110
+          make host_tests

      - name: Verify binary size budget
        working-directory: firmware/esp32-csi-node
@@ -162,10 +163,14 @@ jobs:
          mkdir -p release-staging
          cp build/esp32-csi-node.bin                      release-staging/${{ matrix.artifact_app }}
          cp build/partition_table/partition-table.bin     release-staging/${{ matrix.artifact_pt }}
-          if [ "${{ matrix.variant }}" = "8mb" ]; then
-            cp build/bootloader/bootloader.bin             release-staging/bootloader.bin
-            cp build/ota_data_initial.bin                  release-staging/ota_data_initial.bin
-          fi
+          cp build/bootloader/bootloader.bin               release-staging/bootloader.bin
+          cp build/ota_data_initial.bin                    release-staging/ota_data_initial.bin
+          cp version.txt                                   release-staging/version.txt
+          (cd release-staging && sha256sum \
+            "${{ matrix.artifact_app }}" \
+            "${{ matrix.artifact_pt }}" \
+            bootloader.bin ota_data_initial.bin version.txt \
+            > SHA256SUMS.txt)
          ls -la release-staging/

      - name: Check QEMU ESP32-S3 support status
@@ -175,8 +180,59 @@ jobs:
          echo "See: https://github.com/espressif/qemu/wiki"

      - name: Upload firmware artifact (${{ matrix.variant }})
-        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02
        with:
          name: esp32-csi-node-firmware-${{ matrix.variant }}
          path: firmware/esp32-csi-node/release-staging/
          retention-days: 90
+
+  build-c6-idf6:
+    name: Build XIAO C6 external antenna (ESP-IDF 6.0.2)
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    container:
+      image: espressif/idf:v6.0.2
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
+        with:
+          submodules: recursive
+
+      - name: Build the IDF 6 canary image
+        working-directory: firmware/esp32-csi-node
+        run: |
+          . $IDF_PATH/export.sh
+          idf.py -D SDKCONFIG_DEFAULTS="sdkconfig.defaults;sdkconfig.defaults.esp32c6;sdkconfig.defaults.xiao-external" set-target esp32c6
+          idf.py build
+          test "$(stat -c%s build/esp32-csi-node.bin)" -le $((1152 * 1024))
+          strings build/esp32-csi-node.bin | grep -F "external U.FL"
+
+  publish-release-assets:
+    name: Publish firmware release assets
+    if: github.ref_type == 'tag'
+    needs: [version-guard, build, build-c6-idf6]
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    permissions:
+      contents: write
+    steps:
+      - name: Download the exact-run firmware artifacts
+        uses: actions/download-artifact@d3f86a106a0bac45b974a628896c90dbdf5c8093
+        with:
+          pattern: esp32-csi-node-firmware-*
+          path: release-downloads
+
+      - name: Package variants without filename collisions
+        run: |
+          mkdir -p release-assets
+          for directory in release-downloads/esp32-csi-node-firmware-*; do
+            variant="${directory##*/}"
+            tar -C "$directory" -czf "release-assets/${variant}.tar.gz" .
+          done
+          (cd release-assets && sha256sum *.tar.gz > SHA256SUMS.txt)
+
+      - name: Publish the downloadable firmware bundles
+        uses: softprops/action-gh-release@3bb12739c298aeb8a4eeaf626c5b8d85266b0e65
+        with:
+          name: ESP32 firmware ${{ github.ref_name }}
+          body: |
+            Exact-run ESP32-S3 8 MB, ESP32-S3 4 MB, and ESP32-C6 4 MB firmware bundles.
+            Verify each archive against `SHA256SUMS.txt` before flashing.
+          files: release-assets/*
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ jobs:
    steps:
      - name: Cache QEMU build
        id: cache-qemu
-        uses: actions/cache@v4
+        uses: actions/cache@0057852bfaa89a56745cba8c7296529d2fc39830
        with:
          path: /opt/qemu-esp32
          # Include date component so cache refreshes monthly when branch updates
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ jobs:
          echo "QEMU binary size: $(file_size /opt/qemu-esp32/bin/qemu-system-xtensa) bytes"

      - name: Upload QEMU artifact
-        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02
        with:
          name: qemu-esp32
          path: /opt/qemu-esp32/
@@ -99,12 +99,12 @@ jobs:
          - boundary-min

    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

      - name: Download QEMU artifact
-        uses: actions/download-artifact@v4
+        uses: actions/download-artifact@d3f86a106a0bac45b974a628896c90dbdf5c8093
        with:
          name: qemu-esp32
          path: /opt/qemu-esp32
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ jobs:

      - name: Upload test logs
        if: always()
-        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02
        with:
          name: qemu-logs-${{ matrix.nvs_config }}
          path: |
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ jobs:
    name: Fuzz Testing (ADR-061 Layer 6)
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ jobs:

      - name: Upload fuzz artifacts
        if: failure()
-        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02
        with:
          name: fuzz-crashes
          path: |
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ jobs:
    name: NVS Matrix Generation
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

@@ -322,12 +322,12 @@ jobs:
      image: espressif/idf:v5.4

    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

      - name: Download QEMU artifact
-        uses: actions/download-artifact@v4
+        uses: actions/download-artifact@d3f86a106a0bac45b974a628896c90dbdf5c8093
        with:
          name: qemu-esp32
          path: /opt/qemu-esp32
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ jobs:

      - name: Upload swarm results
        if: always()
-        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02
        with:
          name: swarm-results
          path: |
@@ -21,11 +21,11 @@ jobs:
    name: Verify fix markers
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

-      - uses: actions/setup-python@v6
+      - uses: actions/setup-python@ece7cb06caefa5fff74198d8649806c4678c61a1
        with:
          python-version: '3.11'

@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ jobs:

      - name: Upload result artifact
        if: always()
-        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02
        with:
          name: fix-markers-result
          path: fix-markers-result.json
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+name: iPhone LiDAR integration
+
+on:
+  push:
+    branches: [main]
+    paths:
+      - 'integrations/iphone-lidar/**'
+      - 'docs/adr/ADR-340-iphone-lidar-sensor-bridge.md'
+      - '.github/workflows/iphone-lidar.yml'
+  pull_request:
+    paths:
+      - 'integrations/iphone-lidar/**'
+      - 'docs/adr/ADR-340-iphone-lidar-sensor-bridge.md'
+      - '.github/workflows/iphone-lidar.yml'
+
+permissions:
+  contents: read
+
+jobs:
+  web:
+    name: Node relay and codec
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    defaults:
+      run:
+        working-directory: integrations/iphone-lidar/web
+    steps:
+      - name: Checkout code
+        uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
+
+      - name: Set up Node
+        uses: actions/setup-node@49933ea5288caeca8642d1e84afbd3f7d6820020
+        with:
+          node-version: '22'
+          cache: npm
+          cache-dependency-path: integrations/iphone-lidar/web/package-lock.json
+
+      - name: Install dependencies
+        run: npm ci --ignore-scripts
+
+      - name: Run tests
+        run: npm test
+
+      - name: Audit runtime dependencies
+        run: npm audit --omit=optional --audit-level=high
+
+  ios:
+    name: iOS 17 compile
+    runs-on: macos-15
+    steps:
+      - name: Checkout code
+        uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
+
+      - name: Compile native sources with strict concurrency
+        shell: bash
+        run: |
+          set -euo pipefail
+          sdk="$(xcrun --sdk iphoneos --show-sdk-path)"
+          build_dir="$RUNNER_TEMP/ruview-lidar-build"
+          mkdir -p "$build_dir"
+          cd "$build_dir"
+          xcrun swiftc \
+            -parse-as-library \
+            -target arm64-apple-ios17.0 \
+            -sdk "$sdk" \
+            -module-name RuViewLiDAR \
+            -strict-concurrency=complete \
+            -warnings-as-errors \
+            -emit-module \
+            -emit-module-path "$build_dir/RuViewLiDAR.swiftmodule" \
+            -c "$GITHUB_WORKSPACE"/integrations/iphone-lidar/native/RuViewLiDAR/*.swift
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+name: Model release gate (ADR-298)
+
+# ADR-298 model-release sanity gates (issue #1521): structural checks that
+# block a degenerate/mislabeled classifier head (unreachable decision
+# boundary, near-constant output, degenerate class balance, a metric
+# surfaced under a task name it wasn't computed as) before it ships.
+#
+# Checker: v2/crates/wifi-densepose-train/src/model_gates.rs
+#
+# IMPORTANT — the honest scope of this job: it protects the *checker itself*
+# from regressing (the gate logic + its issue-1521 regression fixture are
+# exercised on every push/PR that touches this crate), and running it is
+# required before ADR-298 can be called "wired in" at all. It does NOT gate
+# an actual model publish — this repository does not automate uploading to
+# the HuggingFace model repo (`ruvnet/wifi-densepose-pretrained`); that
+# remains a manual, human-run step. Before publishing or replacing a model
+# artifact there, run this gate against the real head weights locally:
+#
+#   cargo test -p wifi-densepose-train model_gates
+#
+# and, until a CLI entry point exists to run `evaluate_linear_head` against an
+# arbitrary `.safetensors`/`.rvf` file, load the head's `weight`/`bias` in a
+# short script and call `wifi_densepose_train::evaluate_linear_head` directly.
+
+on:
+  push:
+    branches:
+      - main
+      - master
+    paths:
+      - "v2/crates/wifi-densepose-train/**"
+  pull_request:
+    paths:
+      - "v2/crates/wifi-densepose-train/**"
+  workflow_dispatch:
+
+permissions:
+  contents: read
+
+jobs:
+  model-release-gate:
+    name: Model release gate check
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
+        with:
+          persist-credentials: false
+          submodules: recursive
+
+      - name: Install Rust toolchain
+        run: rustup toolchain install stable --profile minimal
+
+      - name: Run the model-release gate's own test suite
+        working-directory: v2
+        run: cargo test -p wifi-densepose-train --no-default-features model_gates -- --nocapture
+
+      - name: Summarize result
+        if: always()
+        run: |
+          {
+            echo '### Model release gate (ADR-298)'
+            echo ''
+            echo 'This job protects `model_gates.rs` from regressing. It does not itself'
+            echo 'gate a real HuggingFace model publish — that upload is a manual step'
+            echo 'outside this repository; run `cargo test -p wifi-densepose-train model_gates`'
+            echo 'against real head weights before publishing one.'
+          } >> "$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY"
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ jobs:
      RUST_BACKTRACE: 1

    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

@@ -70,12 +70,12 @@ jobs:
          exit 1

      - name: Install Rust toolchain
-        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
+        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@4cda84d5c5c54efe2404f9d843567869ab1699d4
        with:
          toolchain: stable

      - name: Cache cargo registry + build
-        uses: Swatinem/rust-cache@v2
+        uses: Swatinem/rust-cache@e18b497796c12c097a38f9edb9d0641fb99eee32
        with:
          workspaces: v2 -> target

@@ -40,8 +40,13 @@ jobs:
          - dir: harness/ruview
            build: false
            publishable: true
-            # ADR-283: brain + local hosts + replay assets; still runtime-dependency-free.
-            unpacked_budget: 131072
+            # ADR-283/325: brain + local hosts + replay assets + guarded Spaces OAuth adapter;
+            # still runtime-dependency-free. ADR-369..374 add the SDK, firmware
+            # flashing, training runner/gate, doctor, device access, and SSH
+            # hosts. ADR-375 adds the MCP Apps console widget (~12 KB), the
+            # Streamable HTTP transport and the terminal UI (384 KiB); ADR-378 the
+            # ruview-live showcase views (~37 KB): 448 KiB reviewed ceiling.
+            unpacked_budget: 458752
          - dir: harness/homecore
            build: false
            publishable: true
@@ -130,13 +135,19 @@ jobs:
          npm i --no-fund --no-audit "$TGZ"
          case "${{ matrix.package.dir }}" in
            harness/ruview)
-              ./node_modules/.bin/ruview --version
-              ./node_modules/.bin/ruview doctor
+              ./node_modules/.bin/ruview-harness --version
+              ./node_modules/.bin/ruview-harness doctor
              # the honesty gate must fail closed on empty input (ADR-263 F1)
-              if ./node_modules/.bin/ruview claim-check; then
+              if ./node_modules/.bin/ruview-harness claim-check; then
                echo 'claim-check passed with no input — fail-open regression'; exit 1
              fi
              node --input-type=module -e "const m = await import('@ruvnet/ruview'); if (!m.TOOLS) process.exit(1);"
+              # ADR-369: the typed SDK resolves and the evidence gate refuses a baseline-free score
+              node --input-type=module -e "const { createRuView } = await import('@ruvnet/ruview/sdk'); const r = createRuView(); if (r.tools().length < 22) process.exit(1); const g = await r.training.gate({ model_score: 0.93 }); if (g.verdict !== 'FAIL') process.exit(1);"
+              ./node_modules/.bin/ruview-harness doctor --json --group runtime,harness,firmware > doctor.json
+              if ./node_modules/.bin/ruview-harness train-gate --model-score 0.93 > /dev/null; then
+                echo 'train-gate passed without a baseline'; exit 1
+              fi
              ;;
            harness/homecore)
              ./node_modules/.bin/homecore --version
@@ -25,13 +25,13 @@ jobs:
  build-and-publish:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

-      - uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3
+      - uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@8d2750c68a42422c14e847fe6c8ac0403b4cbd6f

-      - uses: docker/login-action@v3
+      - uses: docker/login-action@c94ce9fb468520275223c153574b00df6fe4bcc9
        with:
          registry: ghcr.io
          username: ${{ github.actor }}
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ jobs:

      - name: Extract metadata
        id: meta
-        uses: docker/metadata-action@v6
+        uses: docker/metadata-action@dc802804100637a589fabce1cb79ff13a1411302
        with:
          images: ghcr.io/ruvnet/nvsim-server
          tags: |
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ jobs:
            type=raw,value=latest,enable={{is_default_branch}}

      - name: Build + push
-        uses: docker/build-push-action@v7
+        uses: docker/build-push-action@53b7df96c91f9c12dcc8a07bcb9ccacbed38856a
        with:
          context: v2
          file: v2/crates/nvsim-server/Dockerfile
@@ -90,19 +90,19 @@ jobs:
            arch: AMD64
    runs-on: ${{ matrix.os }}
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

      # Linux aarch64 needs QEMU for cross-build on x86_64 runners.
      - name: Set up QEMU
        if: matrix.os == 'ubuntu-latest' && matrix.arch == 'aarch64'
-        uses: docker/setup-qemu-action@v3
+        uses: docker/setup-qemu-action@c7c53464625b32c7a7e944ae62b3e17d2b600130

      # ADR-117 §5.4: abi3-py310 — one binary per OS/arch covers all
      # Python minor versions ≥ 3.10. Build only cp310 wheels.
      - name: Build wheels (cibuildwheel)
-        uses: pypa/cibuildwheel@v2.21
+        uses: pypa/cibuildwheel@7940a4c0e76eb2030e473a5f864f291f63ee879b
        env:
          CIBW_BUILD: "cp310-*"
          CIBW_ARCHS_LINUX: ${{ matrix.arch }}
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ jobs:
          package-dir: python
          output-dir: wheelhouse

-      - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+      - uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02
        with:
          name: wheels-${{ matrix.os }}-${{ matrix.arch }}
          path: wheelhouse/*.whl
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ jobs:
      startsWith(github.ref, 'refs/tags/v2.')
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive
      - name: Install maturin
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ jobs:
      - name: Build sdist
        working-directory: python
        run: maturin sdist --out ../sdist
-      - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+      - uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02
        with:
          name: sdist
          path: sdist/*.tar.gz
@@ -158,8 +158,8 @@ jobs:
      startsWith(github.ref, 'refs/tags/v2.')
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
-      - uses: actions/setup-python@v6
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
+      - uses: actions/setup-python@ece7cb06caefa5fff74198d8649806c4678c61a1
        with:
          python-version: '3.12'
      - name: Verify lock-step package versions
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ jobs:
        run: |
          python -m pip install --upgrade pip build
          python -m build python/ruview-meta --outdir ruview-dist
-      - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+      - uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02
        with:
          name: ruview
          path: ruview-dist/*
@@ -202,10 +202,10 @@ jobs:
      startsWith(github.ref, 'refs/tags/v1.99')
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive
-      - uses: actions/setup-python@v5
+      - uses: actions/setup-python@a26af69be951a213d495a4c3e4e4022e16d87065
        with:
          python-version: '3.12'
      - name: Install build backend
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ jobs:
            exit 1
          fi
          echo "Tombstone wheel correctly raises ImportError with migration URL."
-      - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+      - uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02
        with:
          name: tombstone
          path: tombstone-dist/*
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ jobs:
      )
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
      - name: Enforce production witness gate
        if: |
          startsWith(github.ref, 'refs/tags/v2.') ||
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ jobs:
            exit 1
          }
      - name: Gather all artifacts into dist/
-        uses: actions/download-artifact@v4
+        uses: actions/download-artifact@d3f86a106a0bac45b974a628896c90dbdf5c8093
        with:
          path: dist-staging
      - name: Flatten artifacts
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ jobs:
      # before replacing `password:` with the OIDC id-token permission.
      - name: Publish to TestPyPI (dry-run target)
        if: github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' && inputs.publish_to == 'testpypi'
-        uses: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@release/v1
+        uses: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@dc37677b2e1c63e2034f94d8a5b11f265b73ba33
        with:
          repository-url: https://test.pypi.org/legacy/
          password: ${{ secrets.TESTPYPI_API_TOKEN }}
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ jobs:
        if: |
          startsWith(github.ref, 'refs/tags/v2.') ||
          (github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' && inputs.publish_to == 'pypi')
-        uses: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@release/v1
+        uses: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@dc37677b2e1c63e2034f94d8a5b11f265b73ba33
        with:
          password: ${{ secrets.PYPI_API_TOKEN }}
          packages-dir: dist
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ jobs:
      )
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/download-artifact@v4
+      - uses: actions/download-artifact@d3f86a106a0bac45b974a628896c90dbdf5c8093
        with:
          name: tombstone
          path: dist
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ jobs:
      # before replacing `password:` with the OIDC id-token permission.
      - name: Publish to TestPyPI (dry-run target)
        if: github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' && inputs.publish_to == 'testpypi'
-        uses: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@release/v1
+        uses: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@dc37677b2e1c63e2034f94d8a5b11f265b73ba33
        with:
          repository-url: https://test.pypi.org/legacy/
          password: ${{ secrets.TESTPYPI_API_TOKEN }}
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ jobs:
        if: |
          startsWith(github.ref, 'refs/tags/v1.99') ||
          (github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' && inputs.publish_to == 'pypi')
-        uses: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@release/v1
+        uses: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@dc37677b2e1c63e2034f94d8a5b11f265b73ba33
        with:
          password: ${{ secrets.PYPI_API_TOKEN }}
          packages-dir: dist
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ jobs:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Checkout main
-        uses: actions/checkout@v4
+        uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ jobs:
          EOF

      - name: Deploy to gh-pages/pointcloud/
-        uses: peaceiris/actions-gh-pages@v4
+        uses: peaceiris/actions-gh-pages@84c30a85c19949d7eee79c4ff27748b70285e453
        with:
          github_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
          publish_dir: ./_site/pointcloud
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ jobs:
    name: Wheel + parity tests (features=sota)
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          # The python/ crate path-deps v2/crates/* and (transitively via
          # train) the vendored ruvector submodule — recursive checkout keeps
@@ -76,15 +76,15 @@ jobs:
          submodules: recursive

      - name: Set up Python
-        uses: actions/setup-python@v6
+        uses: actions/setup-python@ece7cb06caefa5fff74198d8649806c4678c61a1
        with:
          python-version: '3.11'

      - name: Install Rust toolchain
-        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
+        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@4cda84d5c5c54efe2404f9d843567869ab1699d4

      - name: Cache cargo (Swatinem/rust-cache)
-        uses: Swatinem/rust-cache@v2
+        uses: Swatinem/rust-cache@e18b497796c12c097a38f9edb9d0641fb99eee32
        with:
          workspaces: |
            v2
@@ -133,20 +133,20 @@ jobs:
    name: Default wheel <= 5 MiB (ADR-117 §5.4)
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

      - name: Set up Python
-        uses: actions/setup-python@v6
+        uses: actions/setup-python@ece7cb06caefa5fff74198d8649806c4678c61a1
        with:
          python-version: '3.11'

      - name: Install Rust toolchain
-        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
+        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@4cda84d5c5c54efe2404f9d843567869ab1699d4

      - name: Cache cargo (Swatinem/rust-cache)
-        uses: Swatinem/rust-cache@v2
+        uses: Swatinem/rust-cache@e18b497796c12c097a38f9edb9d0641fb99eee32
        with:
          workspaces: python

@@ -0,0 +1,627 @@
+name: RuForecast Rust CI
+
+on:
+  push:
+    branches: [main, develop, 'feat/*', 'feature/*']
+    paths:
+      - 'v2/crates/ruforecast'
+      - 'v2/Cargo.toml'
+      - 'v2/Cargo.lock'
+      - 'v2/rust-toolchain.toml'
+      - 'scripts/csi-data-policy-check.sh'
+      - 'scripts/run-ruforecast-benchmarks.sh'
+      - 'docs/adr/ADR-348-*.md'
+      - 'docs/adr/ADR-349-*.md'
+      - 'docs/adr/ADR-350-*.md'
+      - 'docs/adr/README.md'
+      - 'docs/benchmarks/ruforecast.md'
+      - 'docs/huggingface/RUVIEW_FORECAST_MODEL_CARD_TEMPLATE.md'
+      - 'docs/security/ruview-forecast-*'
+      - 'docs/validation/ruforecast-requirements-evidence.md'
+      - '.github/workflows/ruforecast-ci.yml'
+  pull_request:
+    branches: [main, develop]
+    paths:
+      - 'v2/crates/ruforecast'
+      - 'v2/Cargo.toml'
+      - 'v2/Cargo.lock'
+      - 'v2/rust-toolchain.toml'
+      - 'scripts/csi-data-policy-check.sh'
+      - 'scripts/run-ruforecast-benchmarks.sh'
+      - 'docs/adr/ADR-348-*.md'
+      - 'docs/adr/ADR-349-*.md'
+      - 'docs/adr/ADR-350-*.md'
+      - 'docs/adr/README.md'
+      - 'docs/benchmarks/ruforecast.md'
+      - 'docs/huggingface/RUVIEW_FORECAST_MODEL_CARD_TEMPLATE.md'
+      - 'docs/security/ruview-forecast-*'
+      - 'docs/validation/ruforecast-requirements-evidence.md'
+      - '.github/workflows/ruforecast-ci.yml'
+  workflow_dispatch:
+
+permissions:
+  contents: read
+
+concurrency:
+  group: ruforecast-${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }}
+  cancel-in-progress: true
+
+env:
+  CARGO_TERM_COLOR: always
+  CARGO_PROFILE_DEV_DEBUG: '0'
+  CARGO_PROFILE_TEST_DEBUG: '0'
+  CARGO_PROFILE_BENCH_DEBUG: '0'
+  CARGO_PROFILE_RELEASE_DEBUG: '0'
+
+jobs:
+  contract-rust-189:
+    name: Forecast contract and feature-off boundary (Rust 1.89)
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    timeout-minutes: 45
+    steps:
+      - name: Checkout recursively
+        uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
+        with:
+          persist-credentials: false
+          submodules: recursive
+
+      - name: Install Rust 1.89 with lint components
+        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@4cda84d5c5c54efe2404f9d843567869ab1699d4
+        with:
+          toolchain: 1.89.0
+          components: rustfmt,clippy
+
+      - name: Cache Cargo artifacts
+        uses: Swatinem/rust-cache@e18b497796c12c097a38f9edb9d0641fb99eee32
+        with:
+          workspaces: v2/crates/ruforecast
+          key: ruforecast-rust-189
+
+      - name: Validate benchmark runner and evidence contract
+        shell: bash
+        run: |
+          set -euo pipefail
+          bash -n scripts/run-ruforecast-benchmarks.sh
+          test -x scripts/run-ruforecast-benchmarks.sh
+          test -f docs/benchmarks/ruforecast.md
+          test -f docs/huggingface/RUVIEW_FORECAST_MODEL_CARD_TEMPLATE.md
+          test -f docs/security/ruview-forecast-clean-room.md
+          test -f docs/security/ruview-forecast-threat-model.md
+          test -f docs/validation/ruforecast-requirements-evidence.md
+
+          for adr_number in 348 349 350; do
+            mapfile -t adr_files < <(
+              find docs/adr -maxdepth 1 -type f -name "ADR-${adr_number}-*.md" -print
+            )
+            if [[ "${#adr_files[@]}" -ne 1 ]]; then
+              echo "Expected exactly one ADR-${adr_number} file, found ${#adr_files[@]}" >&2
+              exit 1
+            fi
+            grep -q "^# ADR-${adr_number}:" "${adr_files[0]}"
+            grep -Eq '^[-*] \*\*Status\*\*: (Proposed|Accepted|Superseded|Deprecated)( |$|—)|^## Status' "${adr_files[0]}"
+          done
+
+          grep -q '^## Requirements' docs/adr/ADR-348-*.md
+          grep -q '^## Acceptance gates' docs/adr/ADR-348-*.md
+          grep -q '^## Requirements and acceptance' docs/adr/ADR-349-*.md
+          grep -q '^## Requirements and acceptance' docs/adr/ADR-350-*.md
+          for adr_number in 348 349 350; do
+            grep -q "| \[ADR-${adr_number}\](ADR-${adr_number}-" docs/adr/README.md \
+              || { echo "ADR-${adr_number} is missing from the ADR index" >&2; exit 1; }
+          done
+
+          for number in $(seq 1 12); do
+            requirement="$(printf 'RF-%03d' "$number")"
+            grep -q "| ${requirement} |" docs/validation/ruforecast-requirements-evidence.md \
+              || { echo "Missing evidence row for ${requirement}" >&2; exit 1; }
+          done
+          for number in $(seq 1 8); do
+            requirement="$(printf 'FT-%03d' "$number")"
+            grep -q "| ${requirement} |" docs/validation/ruforecast-requirements-evidence.md \
+              || { echo "Missing evidence row for ${requirement}" >&2; exit 1; }
+          done
+          for number in $(seq 1 9); do
+            requirement="$(printf 'PM-%03d' "$number")"
+            grep -q "| ${requirement} |" docs/validation/ruforecast-requirements-evidence.md \
+              || { echo "Missing evidence row for ${requirement}" >&2; exit 1; }
+          done
+
+          python3 - <<'PY'
+          from pathlib import Path
+          import tomllib
+
+          root = Path("v2/crates/ruforecast/crates")
+          core = tomllib.loads((root / "ruforecast-core/Cargo.toml").read_text())
+          model = tomllib.loads((root / "ruforecast-model/Cargo.toml").read_text())
+          train = tomllib.loads((root / "ruforecast-train/Cargo.toml").read_text())
+
+          assert core.get("features", {}).get("default", []) == []
+          assert model["features"]["default"] == [], "model defaults must stay backend-free"
+          assert train["features"]["default"] == [], "train defaults must stay backend-free"
+          assert {"model", "cpu", "cuda", "wgpu", "ruvector"} <= model["features"].keys()
+          assert {"cpu", "cuda", "training", "cli", "server", "fal-client"} <= train["features"].keys()
+          assert {"model", "dep:burn-ndarray"} <= set(model["features"]["cpu"])
+          assert {"model", "dep:burn-cuda"} <= set(model["features"]["cuda"])
+          assert {"model", "dep:burn-wgpu"} <= set(model["features"]["wgpu"])
+          assert "dep:ruvector-core" in model["features"]["ruvector"]
+          assert {"ruforecast-model/cpu", "training"} <= set(train["features"]["cpu"])
+          assert {"ruforecast-model/cuda", "training"} <= set(train["features"]["cuda"])
+
+          bins = {entry["name"]: entry for entry in train.get("bin", [])}
+          assert bins["ruforecast"]["required-features"] == ["cli"]
+
+          model_benches = {entry["name"]: entry for entry in model.get("bench", [])}
+          train_benches = {entry["name"]: entry for entry in train.get("bench", [])}
+          assert model_benches["forecast_inference"]["harness"] is False
+          assert model_benches["forecast_inference"]["required-features"] == ["cpu"]
+          assert train_benches["data_pipeline"]["harness"] is False
+          assert train_benches["data_pipeline"]["required-features"] == ["cpu"]
+          PY
+
+      - name: Check formatting for forecast packages only
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        run: >-
+          cargo +1.89.0 fmt
+          -p ruforecast-core
+          -p ruforecast-model
+          -p ruforecast-train
+          -- --check
+
+      - name: Prove feature-off graph excludes Burn and CubeCL
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        shell: bash
+        run: |
+          set -euo pipefail
+          : > forecast-feature-off-tree.txt
+          for package in ruforecast-core ruforecast-model ruforecast-train; do
+            cargo +1.89.0 tree --locked -e normal,build -p "$package" --no-default-features \
+              >> forecast-feature-off-tree.txt
+          done
+          if grep -Eiq '(^|[[:space:]])(burn|cubecl)(-|[[:space:]])' forecast-feature-off-tree.txt; then
+            echo 'Burn/CubeCL entered the Rust 1.89 feature-off dependency graph.' >&2
+            cat forecast-feature-off-tree.txt >&2
+            exit 1
+          fi
+
+      - name: Check feature-off packages
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        run: >-
+          cargo +1.89.0 check --locked
+          -p ruforecast-core
+          -p ruforecast-model
+          -p ruforecast-train
+          --no-default-features --all-targets
+
+      - name: Test model-neutral core
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        run: >-
+          cargo +1.89.0 test --locked
+          -p ruforecast-core
+          --no-default-features --lib --tests
+
+      - name: Test model contracts without a model backend
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        run: >-
+          cargo +1.89.0 test --locked
+          -p ruforecast-model
+          --no-default-features --lib --tests
+
+      - name: Test RuVector retrieval boundary without a model backend
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        run: >-
+          cargo +1.89.0 test --locked
+          -p ruforecast-model
+          --no-default-features --features ruvector --lib --tests
+
+      - name: Clippy RuVector retrieval boundary
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        run: >-
+          cargo +1.89.0 clippy --locked
+          -p ruforecast-model
+          --no-default-features --features ruvector --all-targets -- -D warnings
+
+      - name: Clippy forecast packages without backend features
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        run: >-
+          cargo +1.89.0 clippy --locked
+          -p ruforecast-core
+          -p ruforecast-model
+          -p ruforecast-train
+          --no-default-features --all-targets -- -D warnings
+
+      - name: Upload feature-off dependency tree
+        if: always()
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02
+        with:
+          name: ruforecast-feature-off-tree
+          path: v2/crates/ruforecast/forecast-feature-off-tree.txt
+          if-no-files-found: error
+
+  hosted-boundaries-rust-189:
+    name: Forecast hosted boundaries and privacy contract (Rust 1.89)
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    timeout-minutes: 45
+    steps:
+      - name: Checkout recursively
+        uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
+        with:
+          persist-credentials: false
+          submodules: recursive
+
+      - name: Install Rust 1.89 with Clippy
+        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@4cda84d5c5c54efe2404f9d843567869ab1699d4
+        with:
+          toolchain: 1.89.0
+          components: clippy
+
+      - name: Cache Cargo artifacts
+        uses: Swatinem/rust-cache@e18b497796c12c097a38f9edb9d0641fb99eee32
+        with:
+          workspaces: v2/crates/ruforecast
+          key: ruforecast-hosted-rust-189
+
+      - name: Enforce clean-room source, secret, and hosted-wire boundary
+        shell: bash
+        run: |
+          set -euo pipefail
+          python3 - <<'PY'
+          from pathlib import Path
+          import re
+          import sys
+
+          roots = [
+              Path("v2/crates/ruforecast/crates/ruforecast-core"),
+              Path("v2/crates/ruforecast/crates/ruforecast-model"),
+              Path("v2/crates/ruforecast/crates/ruforecast-train"),
+          ]
+          text_suffixes = {".json", ".py", ".rs", ".sh", ".toml", ".yaml", ".yml"}
+          forbidden_source = re.compile(r"(?i)\b(?:times[ _-]?fm|google[ _/-]?research)\b")
+          secret_patterns = {
+              "private key": re.compile(r"-----BEGIN (?:RSA |EC |OPENSSH )?PRIVATE KEY-----"),
+              "AWS access key": re.compile(r"\bAKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}\b"),
+              "JWT": re.compile(r"\beyJ[A-Za-z0-9_-]{8,}\.[A-Za-z0-9_-]{8,}\.[A-Za-z0-9_-]{8,}\b"),
+              "presigned URL": re.compile(r"(?i)[?&](?:X-Amz-Signature|X-Goog-Signature)="),
+              "literal FAL_KEY": re.compile(r"(?i)\bFAL_KEY\b\s*[:=]\s*['\"][^'$<{\"\n]{8,}['\"]"),
+          }
+          forbidden_blobs = {".ckpt", ".mpk", ".npy", ".npz", ".onnx", ".pt", ".pth", ".safetensors"}
+
+          errors = []
+          for root in roots:
+              for path in root.rglob("*"):
+                  if not path.is_file() or "target" in path.parts:
+                      continue
+                  if path.suffix.lower() in forbidden_blobs:
+                      errors.append(f"forbidden checked-in model/data blob: {path}")
+                      continue
+                  if path.suffix.lower() not in text_suffixes:
+                      continue
+                  text = path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
+                  if forbidden_source.search(text):
+                      errors.append(f"forbidden clean-room source/import reference: {path}")
+                  for label, pattern in secret_patterns.items():
+                      if pattern.search(text):
+                          errors.append(f"possible {label} in {path}")
+
+          fal_source = Path("v2/crates/ruforecast/crates/ruforecast-train/src/fal.rs").read_text()
+          for struct_name in ("HostedOptimizer", "HostedBudget", "HostedSyntheticPayload"):
+              match = re.search(
+                  rf"pub struct {struct_name}\s*\{{(?P<body>.*?)^\}}",
+                  fal_source,
+                  flags=re.MULTILINE | re.DOTALL,
+              )
+              if match is None:
+                  errors.append(f"missing hosted wire struct: {struct_name}")
+                  continue
+              body = match.group("body")
+              fields = re.findall(r"^\s*pub\s+([A-Za-z0-9_]+)\s*:", body, re.MULTILINE)
+              forbidden_fields = (
+                  "account", "data_policy", "dataset", "device", "identity", "path",
+                  "person", "room", "session", "site", "split", "subject", "tenant",
+                  "workspace",
+              )
+              for field in fields:
+                  lowered = field.lower()
+                  if any(fragment in lowered for fragment in forbidden_fields):
+                      errors.append(f"forbidden hosted field {struct_name}.{field}")
+                  if "bytes" in lowered and field not in {
+                      "max_artifact_bytes",
+                      "max_memory_bytes",
+                  }:
+                      errors.append(f"unapproved hosted byte field {struct_name}.{field}")
+              if "DataPolicy" in body:
+                  errors.append(f"DataPolicy entered hosted wire struct {struct_name}")
+
+          if errors:
+              print("\n".join(errors), file=sys.stderr)
+              raise SystemExit(1)
+          PY
+
+      - name: Enforce tracked-data policy
+        run: |
+          set -euo pipefail
+          bash scripts/csi-data-policy-check.sh --self-test
+          bash scripts/csi-data-policy-check.sh --tracked
+
+      - name: Validate minimal fal deployment archive policy
+        run: >-
+          python3
+          v2/crates/ruforecast/crates/ruforecast-train/deploy/fal/deploy.py
+          self-test
+
+      - name: Prove hosted feature graph excludes Burn and CubeCL
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        shell: bash
+        run: |
+          set -euo pipefail
+          cargo +1.89.0 tree --locked -e normal,build \
+            -p ruforecast-train \
+            --no-default-features --features cli,server,fal-client \
+            > forecast-hosted-feature-tree.txt
+          if grep -Eiq '(^|[[:space:]])(burn|cubecl)(-|[[:space:]])' \
+            forecast-hosted-feature-tree.txt; then
+            echo 'Burn/CubeCL entered the Rust 1.89 hosted dependency graph.' >&2
+            cat forecast-hosted-feature-tree.txt >&2
+            exit 1
+          fi
+
+      - name: Require named hosted boundary regressions
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        shell: bash
+        env:
+          FAL_KEY: ''
+        run: |
+          set -euo pipefail
+          cargo +1.89.0 test --locked \
+            -p ruforecast-train \
+            --no-default-features --features cli,server,fal-client \
+            --lib --bins --tests -- --list \
+            | tee hosted-boundary-tests.txt
+          for regression in \
+            fal_app_rejects_path_and_host_confusion \
+            fal_urls_require_exact_origin_path_and_no_query \
+            fal_submit_headers_disable_retry_and_omit_store_io \
+            hosted_payload_dto_has_no_customer_fields \
+            queue_status_discards_provider_error_body \
+            result_url_accepts_exact_response_suffix \
+            artifact_file_url_uses_expected_api_path \
+            fal_key_debug_is_redacted \
+            hosted_payload_rejects_app_field \
+            hosted_reservation_cannot_exceed_source_retention \
+            artifact_handoff_expiry_boundary_is_fail_closed \
+            fal_result_enforces_cumulative_artifact_budget_boundary \
+            fal_download_rejects_over_budget_without_writing \
+            direct_server_train_requires_request_id_header \
+            request_id_rejects_path_injection \
+            unknown_cancel_is_not_success \
+            privacy_external_dataset_payload_is_denied; do
+            grep -q "$regression" hosted-boundary-tests.txt \
+              || { echo "Missing hosted boundary regression: $regression" >&2; exit 1; }
+          done
+
+      - name: Exercise hosted external-data rejection
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        env:
+          FAL_KEY: ''
+        run: >-
+          cargo +1.89.0 test --locked
+          -p ruforecast-train
+          --no-default-features --features cli,server,fal-client
+          privacy_external_dataset_payload_is_denied
+
+      - name: Test server and fal client with mock integrations
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        env:
+          FAL_KEY: ''
+        run: >-
+          cargo +1.89.0 test --locked
+          -p ruforecast-train
+          --no-default-features --features cli,server,fal-client
+          --lib --bins --tests
+
+      - name: Clippy server and fal client boundaries
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        env:
+          FAL_KEY: ''
+        run: >-
+          cargo +1.89.0 clippy --locked
+          -p ruforecast-train
+          --no-default-features --features cli,server,fal-client
+          --all-targets -- -D warnings
+
+      - name: Clippy standalone CLI feature boundary
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        env:
+          FAL_KEY: ''
+        run: >-
+          cargo +1.89.0 clippy --locked
+          -p ruforecast-train
+          --no-default-features --features cli
+          --bin ruforecast -- -D warnings
+
+      - name: Upload hosted dependency tree
+        if: always()
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02
+        with:
+          name: ruforecast-hosted-feature-tree
+          path: v2/crates/ruforecast/forecast-hosted-feature-tree.txt
+          if-no-files-found: error
+
+  burn-cpu-rust-192:
+    name: Forecast Burn CPU tests and bench compile (Rust 1.92)
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    timeout-minutes: 90
+    steps:
+      - name: Checkout recursively
+        uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
+        with:
+          persist-credentials: false
+          submodules: recursive
+
+      - name: Install Rust 1.92 with Clippy
+        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@4cda84d5c5c54efe2404f9d843567869ab1699d4
+        with:
+          toolchain: 1.92.0
+          components: clippy
+
+      - name: Cache Cargo artifacts
+        uses: Swatinem/rust-cache@e18b497796c12c097a38f9edb9d0641fb99eee32
+        with:
+          workspaces: v2/crates/ruforecast
+          key: ruforecast-rust-192-cpu
+
+      - name: Test model with Burn CPU backend
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        run: >-
+          cargo +1.92.0 test --locked
+          -p ruforecast-model
+          --no-default-features --features cpu --lib --tests
+
+      - name: Test trainer and CLI with Burn CPU backend
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        run: >-
+          cargo +1.92.0 test --locked
+          -p ruforecast-train
+          --no-default-features --features cpu,cli --lib --bins
+
+      - name: Run one-step local JSONL training smoke
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        run: >-
+          cargo +1.92.0 test --locked
+          -p ruforecast-train
+          --no-default-features --features cpu
+          --test local_jsonl_smoke --
+          --exact local_hash_addressed_jsonl_executes_one_real_optimizer_step
+
+      - name: Run idempotent synthetic CLI training smoke
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        run: >-
+          cargo +1.92.0 test --locked
+          -p ruforecast-train
+          --no-default-features --features cpu,cli
+          --test cli_smoke --
+          --exact cli_smoke_trains_and_writes_the_complete_candidate_set
+
+      - name: Test combined CPU and hosted feature surface
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        env:
+          FAL_KEY: ''
+        run: >-
+          cargo +1.92.0 test --locked
+          -p ruforecast-train
+          --no-default-features --features cpu,cli,server,fal-client
+          --lib --bins
+
+      - name: Clippy model with Burn CPU backend
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        run: >-
+          cargo +1.92.0 clippy --locked
+          -p ruforecast-model
+          --no-default-features --features cpu --all-targets -- -D warnings
+
+      - name: Clippy trainer and CLI with Burn CPU backend
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        env:
+          FAL_KEY: ''
+        run: >-
+          cargo +1.92.0 clippy --locked
+          -p ruforecast-train
+          --no-default-features --features cpu,cli,server,fal-client
+          --all-targets -- -D warnings
+
+      - name: Compile forecast inference benchmark
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        run: >-
+          cargo +1.92.0 bench --locked
+          -p ruforecast-model
+          --no-default-features --features cpu
+          --bench forecast_inference --no-run
+
+      - name: Compile forecast data-pipeline benchmark
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        run: >-
+          cargo +1.92.0 bench --locked
+          -p ruforecast-train
+          --no-default-features --features cpu
+          --bench data_pipeline --no-run
+
+      - name: Run quick inference benchmark for trend visibility
+        continue-on-error: true
+        timeout-minutes: 15
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        run: |
+          set -o pipefail
+          mkdir -p ../../bench-out/ruforecast
+          cargo +1.92.0 bench --locked \
+            -p ruforecast-model \
+            --no-default-features --features cpu \
+            --bench forecast_inference -- \
+            --warm-up-time 1 --measurement-time 2 --sample-size 10 \
+            | tee ../../bench-out/ruforecast/forecast-inference.txt
+
+      - name: Run quick data-pipeline benchmark for trend visibility
+        continue-on-error: true
+        timeout-minutes: 15
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        run: |
+          set -o pipefail
+          mkdir -p ../../bench-out/ruforecast
+          cargo +1.92.0 bench --locked \
+            -p ruforecast-train \
+            --no-default-features --features cpu \
+            --bench data_pipeline -- \
+            --warm-up-time 1 --measurement-time 2 --sample-size 10 \
+            | tee ../../bench-out/ruforecast/data-pipeline.txt
+
+      - name: Upload informational benchmark logs
+        if: always()
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02
+        with:
+          name: ruforecast-informational-cpu-benchmarks
+          path: bench-out/ruforecast/
+          if-no-files-found: warn
+
+  burn-cuda-compile-rust-192:
+    name: Forecast Burn CUDA/WGPU compile checks only (Rust 1.92)
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    timeout-minutes: 60
+    steps:
+      - name: Checkout recursively
+        uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
+        with:
+          persist-credentials: false
+          submodules: recursive
+
+      - name: Install Rust 1.92
+        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@4cda84d5c5c54efe2404f9d843567869ab1699d4
+        with:
+          toolchain: 1.92.0
+
+      - name: Cache Cargo artifacts
+        uses: Swatinem/rust-cache@e18b497796c12c097a38f9edb9d0641fb99eee32
+        with:
+          workspaces: v2/crates/ruforecast
+          key: ruforecast-rust-192-cuda-check
+
+      - name: Check model CUDA feature
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        run: >-
+          cargo +1.92.0 check --locked
+          -p ruforecast-model
+          --no-default-features --features cuda --lib
+
+      - name: Check model WGPU feature
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        run: >-
+          cargo +1.92.0 check --locked
+          -p ruforecast-model
+          --no-default-features --features wgpu --lib
+
+      - name: Check trainer CUDA and hosted-server feature combination
+        working-directory: v2/crates/ruforecast
+        env:
+          FAL_KEY: ''
+        run: >-
+          cargo +1.92.0 check --locked
+          -p ruforecast-train
+          --no-default-features --features cuda,cli,server
+          --lib --bins
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+# ADR-373/374 — device-access end-to-end through the real @ruvnet/ruview CLI.
+# MR60BHA2 (60 GHz) and RPLIDAR are emulated on pseudo-terminals and read via
+# real pyserial; an ESP32 node is emulated over UDP; the iPhone LiDAR path
+# uses the repository's real relay. All results are SYNTHETIC: this proves
+# the transports and parsers, not hardware behaviour.
+
+name: ruview device e2e
+
+on:
+  push:
+    branches: [main]
+    paths:
+      - 'harness/ruview/src/**'
+      - 'harness/ruview/bin/**'
+      - 'harness/ruview/test/e2e/**'
+      - 'integrations/iphone-lidar/web/**'
+      - '.github/workflows/ruview-device-e2e.yml'
+  pull_request:
+    paths:
+      - 'harness/ruview/src/**'
+      - 'harness/ruview/bin/**'
+      - 'harness/ruview/test/e2e/**'
+      - 'integrations/iphone-lidar/web/**'
+      - '.github/workflows/ruview-device-e2e.yml'
+
+permissions:
+  contents: read
+
+concurrency:
+  group: ruview-device-e2e-${{ github.ref }}
+  cancel-in-progress: true
+
+jobs:
+  devices:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    timeout-minutes: 15
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@3d3c42e5aac5ba805825da76410c181273ba90b1 # v7.0.1
+        with:
+          persist-credentials: false
+
+      - uses: actions/setup-node@820762786026740c76f36085b0efc47a31fe5020 # v7.0.0
+        with:
+          node-version: '22'
+
+      - uses: actions/setup-python@ece7cb06caefa5fff74198d8649806c4678c61a1
+        with:
+          python-version: '3.12'
+
+      - name: Install pyserial
+        run: python -m pip install pyserial==3.5
+
+      - name: Install the iPhone LiDAR relay
+        working-directory: integrations/iphone-lidar/web
+        run: npm ci --ignore-scripts
+
+      - name: Install harness
+        working-directory: harness/ruview
+        run: npm ci --ignore-scripts
+
+      # Missing prerequisites fail instead of skipping (RUVIEW_E2E_REQUIRE).
+      # The suite links each emulator pty to /dev/ttyRUVIEWE2E<n> with
+      # `sudo -n`, because the harness refuses /dev/pts/* port names.
+      - name: Device e2e (SYNTHETIC devices)
+        working-directory: harness/ruview
+        env:
+          RUVIEW_E2E_REQUIRE: '1'
+        run: npm run test:e2e:devices
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+# ADR-368 — @ruvnet/ruview-kernel: build the WASM and napi-rs transports from
+# source on every OS, run the Rust ABI tests, the package unit/security/e2e
+# tests with the native addon REQUIRED, the wasm↔napi parity check, artifact
+# verification, and the cross-package e2e through the @ruvnet/ruview
+# metaharness. No publish step: publication stays CI-only via the release
+# workflow and requires explicit maintainer approval (ADR-265).
+
+name: ruview-kernel npm
+
+on:
+  push:
+    branches: [main]
+    paths:
+      - 'v2/crates/ruview-kernel/**'
+      - 'v2/crates/ruview-kernel-napi/**'
+      - 'v2/crates/wifi-densepose-vitals/**'
+      - 'harness/ruview-kernel/**'
+      - 'harness/ruview/src/kernel.js'
+      - 'harness/ruview/test/kernel.test.mjs'
+      - '.github/workflows/ruview-kernel-npm.yml'
+  pull_request:
+    paths:
+      - 'v2/crates/ruview-kernel/**'
+      - 'v2/crates/ruview-kernel-napi/**'
+      - 'v2/crates/wifi-densepose-vitals/**'
+      - 'harness/ruview-kernel/**'
+      - 'harness/ruview/src/kernel.js'
+      - 'harness/ruview/test/kernel.test.mjs'
+      - '.github/workflows/ruview-kernel-npm.yml'
+
+permissions:
+  contents: read
+
+concurrency:
+  group: ruview-kernel-${{ github.ref }}
+  cancel-in-progress: true
+
+jobs:
+  kernel:
+    name: kernel (${{ matrix.os }})
+    runs-on: ${{ matrix.os }}
+    timeout-minutes: 45
+    strategy:
+      fail-fast: false
+      matrix:
+        os: [ubuntu-latest, macos-latest, windows-latest]
+    defaults:
+      run:
+        shell: bash
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@3d3c42e5aac5ba805825da76410c181273ba90b1 # v7.0.1
+        with:
+          persist-credentials: false
+          # The v2 workspace lists submodule crates as members; cargo must be
+          # able to load every member manifest.
+          submodules: recursive
+
+      - name: Install Rust + wasm32 target
+        uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@4cda84d5c5c54efe2404f9d843567869ab1699d4
+        with:
+          targets: wasm32-unknown-unknown
+
+      # v2/rust-toolchain pins its own channel; the target must be installed
+      # for that toolchain, not only for the action's default `stable`.
+      - name: Add wasm32 target to the pinned v2 toolchain
+        working-directory: v2
+        run: rustup target add wasm32-unknown-unknown
+
+      - name: Cache cargo
+        uses: Swatinem/rust-cache@e18b497796c12c097a38f9edb9d0641fb99eee32
+        with:
+          workspaces: |
+            v2 -> target
+            v2/crates/ruview-kernel-napi -> target
+
+      - uses: actions/setup-node@820762786026740c76f36085b0efc47a31fe5020 # v7.0.0
+        with:
+          node-version: '22'
+
+      - name: Rust ABI tests
+        run: cargo test --manifest-path v2/Cargo.toml -p ruview-kernel --locked
+
+      - name: Build WASM + napi-rs artifacts from source
+        working-directory: harness/ruview-kernel
+        run: npm run build
+
+      - name: Verify artifacts (checksums, zero WASM imports, ABI)
+        working-directory: harness/ruview-kernel
+        run: node scripts/verify-artifacts.mjs --require-wasm
+
+      - name: Package tests (napi required)
+        working-directory: harness/ruview-kernel
+        env:
+          RUVIEW_KERNEL_REQUIRE_NAPI: '1'
+        run: npm test
+
+      - name: Doctor, self-test, and wasm↔napi parity (SYNTHETIC)
+        working-directory: harness/ruview-kernel
+        run: |
+          node bin/cli.js doctor --strict-napi
+          node bin/cli.js selftest --backend wasm
+          node bin/cli.js selftest --backend napi
+          node bin/cli.js parity
+
+      - name: Pack
+        working-directory: harness/ruview-kernel
+        run: |
+          npm pack --dry-run
+          # Relative destination: Windows runner temp paths contain
+          # backslashes that bash globbing would mangle.
+          mkdir -p dist-pack
+          npm pack --pack-destination dist-pack
+
+      - name: Cross-package e2e through the @ruvnet/ruview metaharness
+        working-directory: harness/ruview
+        run: |
+          npm ci --ignore-scripts
+          npm install --no-save --ignore-scripts ../ruview-kernel/dist-pack/ruvnet-ruview-kernel-*.tgz
+          node --test test/kernel.test.mjs
+          node bin/cli.js kernel --backend auto
+
+      - name: Upload built artifacts
+        if: matrix.os == 'ubuntu-latest'
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@043fb46d1a93c77aae656e7c1c64a875d1fc6a0a # v7.0.1
+        with:
+          name: ruview-kernel-linux-x64
+          path: |
+            harness/ruview-kernel/wasm/ruview_kernel.wasm
+            harness/ruview-kernel/wasm/SHA256SUMS
+            harness/ruview-kernel/native/*.node
+            harness/ruview-kernel/native/SHA256SUMS
+          retention-days: 14
@@ -104,8 +104,10 @@ jobs:
        run: |
          set -euo pipefail
          case "${{ inputs.package }}" in
-            # ADR-283: brain + local hosts + replay assets; no runtime deps.
-            harness/ruview) export UNPACKED_BUDGET=131072 ;;
+            # ADR-283/325/369-374: brain + hosts + replay + Spaces OAuth + SDK,
+            # flashing, training, doctor, device access, SSH hosts; ADR-375 console
+            # widget, HTTP transport, terminal UI; ADR-378 mod showcase; no runtime deps.
+            harness/ruview) export UNPACKED_BUDGET=458752 ;;
            # ADR-285: CLI + MCP + reviewed brain + WASM-kernel adapter.
            harness/homecore) export UNPACKED_BUDGET=180000 ;;
            # ADR-264 O2: map-free tarball (was 188 kB with maps).
@@ -140,12 +142,12 @@ jobs:
          npm i --no-fund --no-audit "$TGZ"
          case "${{ inputs.package }}" in
            harness/ruview)
-              ./node_modules/.bin/ruview --version
-              ./node_modules/.bin/ruview doctor
-              ./node_modules/.bin/ruview guidance --topic homecore --query restore --limit 1 \
+              ./node_modules/.bin/ruview-harness --version
+              ./node_modules/.bin/ruview-harness doctor
+              ./node_modules/.bin/ruview-harness guidance --topic homecore --query restore --limit 1 \
                | grep -q '"homecore-runtime-restore"'
              # the honesty gate must fail closed on empty input (ADR-263 F1)
-              if ./node_modules/.bin/ruview claim-check; then
+              if ./node_modules/.bin/ruview-harness claim-check; then
                echo 'claim-check passed with no input — fail-open regression'; exit 1
              fi
              node --input-type=module -e "const m = await import('@ruvnet/ruview'); if (!m.TOOLS) process.exit(1);"
@@ -39,12 +39,12 @@ jobs:
          - { label: 'ruflo',            flags: '--features ruflo' }
          - { label: 'full+train',       flags: '--features full,train' }
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive
-      - uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
+      - uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@4cda84d5c5c54efe2404f9d843567869ab1699d4
      - name: Cache cargo
-        uses: actions/cache@v4
+        uses: actions/cache@0057852bfaa89a56745cba8c7296529d2fc39830
        with:
          path: |
            ~/.cargo/registry
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ jobs:
    name: clippy (-D warnings, --no-deps)
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive
      # v2/rust-toolchain.toml pins channel "1.89" with profile "minimal" (no
@@ -69,12 +69,12 @@ jobs:
      # toolchain, but the override makes cargo use the separate "1.89"
      # toolchain — so `cargo clippy` errors "cargo-clippy is not installed for
      # 1.89". Install clippy on the pinned toolchain that cargo actually uses.
-      - uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
+      - uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@4cda84d5c5c54efe2404f9d843567869ab1699d4
        with:
          toolchain: "1.89"
          components: clippy
      - name: Cache cargo
-        uses: actions/cache@v4
+        uses: actions/cache@0057852bfaa89a56745cba8c7296529d2fc39830
        with:
          path: |
            ~/.cargo/registry
@@ -96,12 +96,12 @@ jobs:
    name: build train_marl bin
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive
-      - uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
+      - uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@4cda84d5c5c54efe2404f9d843567869ab1699d4
      - name: Cache cargo
-        uses: actions/cache@v4
+        uses: actions/cache@0057852bfaa89a56745cba8c7296529d2fc39830
        with:
          path: |
            ~/.cargo/registry
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ jobs:
    name: ITAR / publish guard
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive
      - name: publish = false is present (no accidental crates.io publish)
@@ -14,6 +14,33 @@ env:
  PYTHON_VERSION: '3.11'

 jobs:
+  # Rust dependency advisories are deterministic for the checked-in lockfile,
+  # so this job gates the PR and retains the exact machine-readable report.
+  rust-audit:
+    name: Rust Dependency Audit
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    permissions:
+      contents: read
+    steps:
+    - name: Checkout code
+      uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262 # v4
+
+    - name: Install cargo-audit
+      run: cargo install cargo-audit --locked --version 0.22.2
+
+    - name: Audit the checked-in Rust lockfile
+      run: |
+        set -o pipefail
+        cargo audit --file v2/Cargo.lock --json | tee v2/cargo-audit.json
+
+    - name: Upload Rust advisory report
+      uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02 # v4
+      if: always()
+      with:
+        name: cargo-audit-report
+        path: v2/cargo-audit.json
+        if-no-files-found: error
+
  # Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
  sast:
    name: Static Application Security Testing
@@ -26,14 +53,13 @@ jobs:
    steps:
    - name: Checkout code
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262 # v4
      with:
-        submodules: recursive
        fetch-depth: 0

    - name: Set up Python
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: actions/setup-python@v6
+      uses: actions/setup-python@ece7cb06caefa5fff74198d8649806c4678c61a1 # v6
      with:
        python-version: ${{ env.PYTHON_VERSION }}
        cache: 'pip'
@@ -47,15 +73,18 @@ jobs:

    - name: Run Bandit security scan
      run: |
-        # The Python codebase lives under archive/v1/src (it moved there when
-        # the runtime was rewritten in Rust). Scanning `src/` matched nothing,
-        # so this SAST step was a silent no-op.
-        bandit -r archive/v1/src/ -f sarif -o bandit-results.sarif
+        # archive/v1 is frozen research code and is not shipped. Scan the
+        # maintained Python packages and operator scripts instead.
+        # Keep the Security tab actionable: publish high-severity findings.
+        # Medium/low findings are reviewed during focused local audits.
+        bandit -lll -r python/ scripts/ firmware/esp32-csi-node/ aether-arena/ \
+          -x '*/tests/*,*/test/*,*/test_*.py,*/bench/*' \
+          -f sarif -o bandit-results.sarif
      continue-on-error: true

    - name: Upload Bandit results to GitHub Security
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
+      uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@a2983b8bed1923f44751c5c43237f479442827b3 # v3
      if: always()
      with:
        sarif_file: bandit-results.sarif
@@ -74,12 +103,16 @@ jobs:
        semgrep \
          --config=p/security-audit --config=p/secrets --config=p/python \
          --config=p/docker --config=p/kubernetes \
-          --sarif --output=semgrep.sarif archive/v1/src/
+          --severity=ERROR \
+          --exclude='**/tests/**' --exclude='**/test/**' \
+          --exclude='**/test_*.py' --exclude='**/bench/**' \
+          --sarif --output=semgrep.sarif \
+          python/ scripts/ firmware/esp32-csi-node/ aether-arena/
      continue-on-error: true

    - name: Upload Semgrep results to GitHub Security
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
+      uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@a2983b8bed1923f44751c5c43237f479442827b3 # v3
      if: always()
      with:
        sarif_file: semgrep.sarif
@@ -97,13 +130,11 @@ jobs:
    steps:
    - name: Checkout code
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: actions/checkout@v4
-      with:
-        submodules: recursive
+      uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262 # v4

    - name: Set up Python
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: actions/setup-python@v6
+      uses: actions/setup-python@ece7cb06caefa5fff74198d8649806c4678c61a1 # v6
      with:
        python-version: ${{ env.PYTHON_VERSION }}
        cache: 'pip'
@@ -135,7 +166,7 @@ jobs:

    - name: Upload Snyk results to GitHub Security
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
+      uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@a2983b8bed1923f44751c5c43237f479442827b3 # v3
      if: always()
      with:
        sarif_file: snyk-results.sarif
@@ -143,7 +174,7 @@ jobs:

    - name: Upload vulnerability reports
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+      uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02 # v4
      if: always()
      with:
        name: vulnerability-reports
@@ -157,7 +188,6 @@ jobs:
    name: Container Security Scan
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    continue-on-error: true   # third-party scanners are flaky / SARIF uploads can 403; don't gate the PR
-    needs: []
    if: github.event_name == 'push' || github.event_name == 'schedule'
    permissions:
      security-events: write
@@ -166,20 +196,20 @@ jobs:
    steps:
    - name: Checkout code
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262 # v4
      with:
        submodules: recursive

    - name: Set up Docker Buildx
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3
+      uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@8d2750c68a42422c14e847fe6c8ac0403b4cbd6f # v3

    - name: Build Docker image for scanning
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: docker/build-push-action@v7
+      uses: docker/build-push-action@53b7df96c91f9c12dcc8a07bcb9ccacbed38856a # v7
      with:
        context: .
-        target: production
+        file: docker/Dockerfile.rust
        load: true
        tags: wifi-densepose:scan
        cache-from: type=gha
@@ -192,50 +222,21 @@ jobs:
        image-ref: 'wifi-densepose:scan'
        format: 'sarif'
        output: 'trivy-results.sarif'
+        severity: 'CRITICAL,HIGH'
+        ignore-unfixed: true
+        limit-severities-for-sarif: true

    - name: Upload Trivy results to GitHub Security
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
+      uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@a2983b8bed1923f44751c5c43237f479442827b3 # v3
      if: always()
      with:
        sarif_file: 'trivy-results.sarif'
        category: trivy

-    - name: Run Grype vulnerability scanner
-      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: anchore/scan-action@v7
-      id: grype-scan
-      with:
-        image: 'wifi-densepose:scan'
-        fail-build: false
-        severity-cutoff: high
-        output-format: sarif
-
-    - name: Upload Grype results to GitHub Security
-      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
-      if: always()
-      with:
-        sarif_file: ${{ steps.grype-scan.outputs.sarif }}
-        category: grype
-
-    - name: Run Docker Scout
-      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: docker/scout-action@v1
-      if: always()
-      with:
-        command: cves
-        image: wifi-densepose:scan
-        sarif-file: scout-results.sarif
-        summary: true
-
-    - name: Upload Docker Scout results
-      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
-      if: always()
-      with:
-        sarif_file: scout-results.sarif
-        category: docker-scout
+    # Trivy is the single container SARIF authority. Grype and Docker Scout
+    # produced duplicate alerts for the same image packages and obscured the
+    # actionable high/critical findings.

  # Infrastructure as Code security scanning
  iac-scan:
@@ -249,52 +250,25 @@ jobs:
    steps:
    - name: Checkout code
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: actions/checkout@v4
-      with:
-        submodules: recursive
-
-    - name: Run Checkov IaC scan
-      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: bridgecrewio/checkov-action@99bb2caf247dfd9f03cf984373bc6043d4e32ebf # v12.1347.0
-      with:
-        directory: .
-        framework: kubernetes,dockerfile,terraform,ansible
-        output_format: sarif
-        output_file_path: checkov-results.sarif
-        quiet: true
-        soft_fail: true
-
-    - name: Upload Checkov results to GitHub Security
-      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
-      if: always()
-      with:
-        sarif_file: checkov-results.sarif
-        category: checkov
-
-    - name: Run Terrascan IaC scan
-      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: tenable/terrascan-action@3a6e87da8e244513bd77b631e624552643f794c6 # v1.4.1
-      with:
-        iac_type: 'k8s'
-        iac_version: 'v1'
-        policy_type: 'k8s'
-        only_warn: true
-        sarif_upload: true
+      uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262 # v4

    - name: Run KICS IaC scan
      continue-on-error: true
      uses: checkmarx/kics-github-action@05aa5eb70eede1355220f4ca5238d96b397e30a6 # v2.1.20
      with:
-        path: '.'
+        # Scan RuView-owned operational IaC only. Submodules are audited and
+        # fixed in their owning repositories; archived/benchmark fixtures are
+        # intentionally not production infrastructure.
+        path: '.github/workflows,docker,logging,v2/crates/nvsim-server/Dockerfile'
        output_path: kics-results
        output_formats: 'sarif'
        exclude_paths: '.git,node_modules'
        exclude_queries: 'a7ef1e8c-fbf8-4ac1-b8c7-2c3b0e6c6c6c'
+        exclude_severities: 'info'

    - name: Upload KICS results to GitHub Security
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
+      uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@a2983b8bed1923f44751c5c43237f479442827b3 # v3
      if: always()
      with:
        sarif_file: kics-results/results.sarif
@@ -312,9 +286,8 @@ jobs:
    steps:
    - name: Checkout code
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262 # v4
      with:
-        submodules: recursive
        fetch-depth: 0

    - name: Run TruffleHog secret scan
@@ -328,7 +301,7 @@ jobs:

    - name: Run GitLeaks secret scan
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: gitleaks/gitleaks-action@v2
+      uses: gitleaks/gitleaks-action@dcedce43c6f43de0b836d1fe38946645c9c638dc # v2
      env:
        GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
        GITLEAKS_LICENSE: ${{ secrets.GITLEAKS_LICENSE }}
@@ -348,13 +321,11 @@ jobs:
    steps:
    - name: Checkout code
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: actions/checkout@v4
-      with:
-        submodules: recursive
+      uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262 # v4

    - name: Set up Python
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: actions/setup-python@v6
+      uses: actions/setup-python@ece7cb06caefa5fff74198d8649806c4678c61a1 # v6
      with:
        python-version: ${{ env.PYTHON_VERSION }}
        cache: 'pip'
@@ -374,7 +345,7 @@ jobs:

    - name: Upload license report
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+      uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02 # v4
      with:
        name: license-report
        path: licenses.json
@@ -387,9 +358,7 @@ jobs:
    steps:
    - name: Checkout code
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: actions/checkout@v4
-      with:
-        submodules: recursive
+      uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262 # v4

    - name: Check security policy files
      continue-on-error: true
@@ -444,7 +413,7 @@ jobs:
    steps:
    - name: Download all artifacts
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: actions/download-artifact@v4
+      uses: actions/download-artifact@d3f86a106a0bac45b974a628896c90dbdf5c8093 # v4

    - name: Generate security summary
      continue-on-error: true
@@ -464,7 +433,7 @@ jobs:

    - name: Upload security summary
      continue-on-error: true
-      uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+      uses: actions/upload-artifact@ea165f8d65b6e75b540449e92b4886f43607fa02 # v4
      with:
        name: security-summary
        path: security-summary.md
@@ -475,7 +444,7 @@ jobs:
    - name: Notify security team on critical findings
      continue-on-error: true
      if: ${{ env.SECURITY_SLACK_WEBHOOK_URL != '' && (needs.sast.result == 'failure' || needs.dependency-scan.result == 'failure' || needs.container-scan.result == 'failure') }}
-      uses: 8398a7/action-slack@v3
+      uses: 8398a7/action-slack@77eaa4f1c608a7d68b38af4e3f739dcd8cba273e # v3
      with:
        status: failure
        channel: '#security'
@@ -491,7 +460,7 @@ jobs:
    - name: Create security issue on critical findings
      continue-on-error: true
      if: needs.sast.result == 'failure' || needs.dependency-scan.result == 'failure'
-      uses: actions/github-script@v6
+      uses: actions/github-script@00f12e3e20659f42342b1c0226afda7f7c042325 # v6
      with:
        script: |
          github.rest.issues.create({
@@ -518,4 +487,4 @@ jobs:
            **Security Dashboard:** Check the Security tab for detailed findings.
            `,
            labels: ['security', 'vulnerability', 'urgent']
-          })
+          })
@@ -32,10 +32,10 @@ jobs:
      WEAVER_SHA256: a9822c712d6871bd89d6530f18c5df5cea3821f642e7b8e5e49e985917f7d12d
    steps:
      - name: Checkout code
-        uses: actions/checkout@v4
+        uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          persist-credentials: false
-      - uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
+      - uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@4cda84d5c5c54efe2404f9d843567869ab1699d4
        with:
          components: rustfmt
      - name: Install weaver
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ on:
      - 'v2/crates/wifi-densepose-wifiscan/**'
      - 'v2/crates/wifi-densepose-bfld/**'
      - 'v2/crates/cog-ha-matter/**'
+      - 'v2/crates/homecore*/**'
      - 'v2/Cargo.toml'
      - 'v2/Cargo.lock'
      - 'ui/**'
@@ -48,7 +49,7 @@ jobs:
    name: build · push · smoke-test
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

@@ -56,9 +57,9 @@ jobs:
      # linux/arm64 layer below (Dockerfile.rust is arch-agnostic — no `--target`
      # flag — so buildx + QEMU is all that's needed; arm64 builds are emulated
      # by the runner, not built on a separate arm64 host).
-      - uses: docker/setup-qemu-action@v3
+      - uses: docker/setup-qemu-action@c7c53464625b32c7a7e944ae62b3e17d2b600130

-      - uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3
+      - uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@8d2750c68a42422c14e847fe6c8ac0403b4cbd6f

      - name: Log in to Docker Hub
        # Bypassing docker/login-action@v3: the action kept emitting
@@ -73,7 +74,7 @@ jobs:
          printf '%s' "$DH_TOKEN" | docker login docker.io -u "$DH_USER" --password-stdin

      - name: Log in to ghcr.io
-        uses: docker/login-action@v3
+        uses: docker/login-action@c94ce9fb468520275223c153574b00df6fe4bcc9
        with:
          registry: ghcr.io
          username: ${{ github.actor }}
@@ -81,7 +82,7 @@ jobs:

      - name: Compute tags
        id: meta
-        uses: docker/metadata-action@v6
+        uses: docker/metadata-action@dc802804100637a589fabce1cb79ff13a1411302
        with:
          images: |
            docker.io/ruvnet/wifi-densepose
@@ -94,7 +95,7 @@ jobs:

      - name: Build + push
        id: build
-        uses: docker/build-push-action@v7
+        uses: docker/build-push-action@53b7df96c91f9c12dcc8a07bcb9ccacbed38856a
        with:
          context: .
          file: docker/Dockerfile.rust
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ jobs:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Checkout main
-        uses: actions/checkout@v4
+        uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ jobs:
          ls -R _site/three.js/ | head -30

      - name: Deploy to GitHub Pages
-        uses: peaceiris/actions-gh-pages@v3
+        uses: peaceiris/actions-gh-pages@373f7f263a76c20808c831209c920827a82a2847
        with:
          github_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
          publish_dir: _site
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ jobs:
  update:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: true
          fetch-depth: 0
@@ -29,12 +29,12 @@ jobs:

    steps:
      - name: Checkout repository
-        uses: actions/checkout@v4
+        uses: actions/checkout@11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262
        with:
          submodules: recursive

      - name: Set up Python ${{ matrix.python-version }}
-        uses: actions/setup-python@v6
+        uses: actions/setup-python@ece7cb06caefa5fff74198d8649806c4678c61a1
        with:
          python-version: ${{ matrix.python-version }}

@@ -17,19 +17,29 @@ firmware/esp32-csi-node/sdkconfig.defaults.bak
 firmware/esp32-hello-world/sdkconfig.old

 # Host-built firmware test binaries (compiled from test/*.c, not source)
-firmware/esp32-csi-node/test/test_adr110
-firmware/esp32-csi-node/test/test_vitals
-firmware/esp32-csi-node/test/fuzz_serialize
-firmware/esp32-csi-node/test/fuzz_edge
-firmware/esp32-csi-node/test/fuzz_nvs
+# Compiled host-test and fuzz binaries. The Makefile writes them beside their
+# sources, so they land in a tracked directory. Ignore them by SHAPE rather
+# than by name: every source here carries an extension and no binary does.
+#
+# This replaced a hand-maintained list of five targets, which had gone stale --
+# test_csi_sanitize, test_mmwave_detect and test_thermal were all built by
+# `make host_tests`, ignored by nothing, and got committed by accident.
+firmware/esp32-csi-node/test/test_*
+firmware/esp32-csi-node/test/fuzz_*
+!firmware/esp32-csi-node/test/*.*
 firmware/esp32-csi-node/test/*.exe
 firmware/esp32-csi-node/test/*.obj

 # Claude Flow swarm runtime state
 .swarm/

-# CSI recordings (local training data, machine-specific)
+# CSI recordings (local training/capture data — CSI is person data per
+# CLAUDE.md; never commit). Covers current and legacy layouts. See ADR-299.
+data/recordings/
+v2/data/recordings/
 rust-port/wifi-densepose-rs/data/recordings/
+**/*.csi.jsonl
+**/*.csi.meta.json

 # NVS partition images and CSVs (contain WiFi credentials)
 nvs.bin
@@ -298,4 +308,20 @@ ruvector.db
 # sensing-server runtime artifacts written by its test suite (trained model
 # snapshots + the generated session-secret) — never tracked
 v2/crates/wifi-densepose-sensing-server/data/
+# The server also writes this secret when launched from v2/. Keep the rule
+# file-specific so tracked datasets below v2/data remain visible.
+/v2/data/session-secret
 *.proptest-regressions
+
+# ADR-324: wasm-bindgen output for ruview-offaxis is generated locally
+# (see the crate README); never commit generated artifacts.
+v2/crates/ruview-offaxis/pkg/
+
+# fal.ai visual-teacher LoRA training data/weights -- regenerable, never
+# commit training images or model weights (ADR-353)
+scripts/fal-visual-teacher/training-data/
+scripts/fal-visual-teacher/training-data.zip
+scripts/fal-visual-teacher/output/
+
+# Trained adaptive classifier (auto-created at runtime; #2135)
+/v2/data/adaptive_model.json
@@ -33,3 +33,7 @@
 	path = vendor/metaharness
 	url = https://github.com/ruvnet/metaharness
 	branch = main
+[submodule "v2/crates/ruforecast"]
+	path = v2/crates/ruforecast
+	url = https://github.com/ruvnet/RuForecast.git
+	branch = main
@@ -47,17 +47,18 @@ from the current tree when needed.

 ## RuView contributor harness

-`@ruvnet/ruview@0.3.1` is the runtime-dependency-free contributor interface
+`@ruvnet/ruview@0.5.0` is the runtime-dependency-free contributor interface
 defined by ADR-283.

 ```bash
-npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.3.1 doctor
-npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.3.1 guidance --topic homecore --query "restore and plugins"
-npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.3.1 agent run \
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.5.0 doctor
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.5.0 guidance --topic homecore --query "restore and plugins"
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.5.0 agent run \
  --host codex --repo . --prompt "Find the nearest tests and cite files"
-npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.3.1 brain search --query "community memory"
-npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.3.1 brain verify --repo .
-npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.3.1 mcp start
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.5.0 brain search --query "community memory"
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.5.0 brain verify --repo .
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.5.0 spaces
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.5.0 mcp start
 ```

 Start unfamiliar repository work with `ruview_guidance`. It returns reviewed
@@ -7,8 +7,29 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0

 ## [Unreleased]

+### Community batch (PRs #2100-#2157 by aepod, reviewed and integrated)
+
+Integrated as one set: conflicts resolved, review findings fixed, validated on the integrated branch. Hardware figures cited by the PRs are the author's own live runs on ESP32-S3 nodes and were not independently reproduced here.
+
+- **Security and honest status.** Refuse a routable HTTP bind when API auth is off (#2134). `--privacy-mode` now strips biometrics from REST, WebSocket and recordings, not only MQTT (#2125; the stripped-key list is an exact-match allowlist, so a new biometric field must be added to it). `/api/v1/status` waits for a real frame and unknown `--source` values are rejected (#2126; breaking for `--source macos|linux|windows`). A stale `/sensing/latest` reports `{"status":"stale"}` after 10 s (#2119). Measured stream fps and real WebSocket client counts (#2127). Absent nodes no longer count as one person (#2132). ESP32 frames with zero antennas or subcarriers are dropped (#2118). Dead nodes are evicted on a timer (#2120). Recordings and models stay under `--data-dir` (#2129). Boolean env flags accept 1/0/yes/no/on/off (#2108). Docker UDP ingest posture is explicit (#2107).
+- **CSI pipeline.** The grid gate locks on the majority frame shape and `/health` reports a stalled pipeline (#2157; a partial fix, mixed 192/306 frame shapes still drop frames, so it does not close #1894). Phase is combined across nodes only when they declare a shared reference (#2156). Point-cloud and hardware parsers use the ADR-018 layout and accept more than 256 subcarriers (#2155; the bandwidth rule for counts above 64 is CLAIMED, inferred from the datasheet). Per-node adaptive training from real recordings (#2101, #2103); a run that fell back to the live buffer now reports `degraded: true`. Gaussian decay no longer compounds across calls (#2140).
+- **MediaTek (ADR-266/267).** Legacy and unknown PPDU types in MTC1 (#2112), per-device ingest capped at 64 devices (#2113), a labelled amplitude heuristic and activity index (#2114; CLAIMED, not an occupancy estimate), an MT7981 bridge (#2115), and the OpenWrt WN586X3 patch set and guide (#2116; the vendored CSI patch is BSD-3-Clause-Clear, see `NOTICE`).
+- **MQTT / Home Assistant.** Semantic states wired into the publisher, entities announced only when sourced, persisted client id (#2117). Existing Home Assistant installs keep retained discovery configs for the six removed entities until they are cleared manually.
+- **Provisioning and firmware.** Wi-Fi password kept owner-only and out of argv and `--state` (#2153); state keyed by board MAC (#2152); `--dry-run` and a failed `--reset` leave state intact (#2111); OTA images confirmed by a bounded health check, which means only "reached the network and sent CSI" (#2100, ADR-379).
+- **Ground truth and spatial.** Radar window adapter and auto-labeller with a session-disjoint split and a median count baseline; radar labels carry `evidence: CLAIMED` (#2143, #2144). Node self-survey, check-only (#2145, ADR-381). The `spatial.evidence.v1` export defaults to the CODE proof grade and MEASURED requires a reproducer (#2141, ADR-382). Loopback UDP tee (#2102, ADR-380).
+- **Tooling.** `prove.sh` reports INCOMPLETE instead of PASS when a gate is skipped (#2130); ADR-018 capture scripts (#2131); API token on the ground-truth script (#2104); the UI asks for the API token instead of retrying forever (#2128); macOS redacted-link handling (#2105).
+- **Not included:** #2106 (MacWifi.app, draft) and #2142 (MR60 probe change, needs a captured MR60BHA2 boot log). `v2/data/adaptive_model.json` (41.5% training accuracy) is no longer tracked (#2135).
+
 ### Added

+- **`@ruvnet/ruview` 0.9.1: live sensing views inside Claude Code (ADR-377, ADR-378).** The package now ships `ruview-live`, a Claude Code mod. Type `/ruview` and a pane opens next to the conversation showing what your sensors see right now, refreshed automatically. It has three views, switched with keys `1` `2` `3` or with `/ruview overview|waterfall|radar`:
+  - **Overview**: the CSI nodes streaming to your machine (rate, packet loss, signal strength) and an optional 60 GHz radar kit (presence, distance, heart and breathing rates).
+  - **CSI waterfall**: the Wi-Fi signal itself, the strength of every subcarrier over time, drawn in colour and scrolling as frames arrive. The new `ruview esp32 --spectrum` option supplies the data.
+  - **Radar**: a top-down range fan with an animated ping out to the measured distance, plus heart, breathing and distance charts.
+
+  Every reading is labelled honestly: MEASURED or SYNTHETIC from the packets themselves; radar vitals as "device-reported, not validated"; range-only radar as "distance, not direction". The pane only reads; it never flashes or configures a device.
+
+  Verified on real hardware: an ESP32-C6 streaming CSI and a Seeed MR60BHA2 radar kit (MEASURED; reproducer `npx @ruvnet/ruview esp32 --seconds 4 --spectrum --json`). The package's size ceiling rises from 384 KiB to 448 KiB; it still has no runtime dependencies.
 - **`wifi-densepose-sar` — coherent wideband RF tomography research crate (ADR-287).** New standalone leaf crate (the `nvsim` pattern; zero coupling to `wifi-densepose-hardware` or any real ingestion path) implementing the synthetic-aperture-radar reconstruction primitive a handheld through-wall RF imaging device would need — motivated by comparison against Applied Electrodynamics' "WaveSight" launch, and explicitly scoped below ADR-278's RISE/DiffRadar/GeRaF reproduction gates. Ships: (1) a stepped-frequency, multi-position complex forward measurement simulator (`y_{m,k} = Σ σ_j/R² · exp(-i·4π·f·R/c) + noise`, deterministic ChaCha20 seeding); (2) delay-and-sum backprojection reconstruction onto a 3D voxel grid, rayon-parallelized over voxels; (3) threshold + local-maximum point-cloud extraction; (4) closed-form range/cross-range resolution and antenna-pose coherence-budget formulas (`ΔR=c/2B`, `δ_CR≈λR/2L`, `Δp≤λ/8`) checked against the reconstruction's *actual* behavior in `tests/physics_validation.rs` rather than merely documented — forward-simulating two targets at controlled separations and proving they resolve or merge exactly where the formulas predict, and that reconstructed focus at a known target degrades as injected antenna-pose error grows. Every number is SYNTHETIC/L0 (ADR-282) — no real wideband RF hardware backs this crate; see the crate README and `docs/tutorials/coherent-rf-tomography-backprojection.md` for the full honesty boundary and a worked walkthrough. `focus_at_point` exploits the evenly-spaced-by-construction frequency sweep (an arithmetic progression in per-term phase) to evaluate each pose's phasor once and advance it by a fixed complex-multiply step per frequency instead of one `sin`/`cos` pair per frequency — **MEASURED ~4.4-4.5x faster** (criterion regression detection, p < 0.001) than the first-shipped direct-computation version, proven equivalent (not just faster) to an independently reimplemented reference across four sweep sizes and on-/off-target points. 25 tests (22 unit + 3 integration), 0 failed, clippy-clean; MEASURED backprojection throughput ~1.7-2.3M voxels/sec (criterion, 21 poses × 32 freq steps).
 - **HOMECORE platform runtime completion — secure native/Wasmtime plugins, authenticated HAP IP, expanded Home Assistant APIs, durable restoration/migration, and voice protocols.** `homecore-server` now owns deterministic compiled-in native plugin registration plus explicitly configured, path-bounded, Ed25519 publisher-verified Wasm packages executed through Wasmtime with setup/state-change/teardown lifecycle; arbitrary native dynamic libraries remain intentionally unsupported. The optional HAP server implements persisted accessory identity and controller records, SRP-6a Pair-Setup M1–M6, X25519/Ed25519 Pair-Verify M1–M4, HKDF-SHA512/ChaCha20-Poly1305 record framing, authenticated/admin endpoint gates, replay/tamper closure, live entity synchronization, and paired-state `_hap._tcp` mDNS updates (45 focused tests; external Apple certification is not claimed). Startup restores device/entity registries and deterministic latest recorder states before plugins, and migration now atomically preserves forward-compatible device/config-entry fields. The HA-compatible surface adds events, templates, config checks, components, registries, history/logbook with SQL-enforced global response bounds, calendar/camera provider routes, and modern WebSocket negotiation while retaining a machine-readable limitations matrix for integration-specific behavior. Assist adds bounded PCM16, async STT/TTS contracts, an end-to-end speech pipeline, and an authenticated satellite session protocol; real deployments still provide the speech engines.
 - **`ruview-unified` increment 3 — Gaussian update-loop completion, separable delay-Doppler, and property-tested boundary hardening.** (1) `GaussianMap::merge_overlapping` (ADR-275 step 5: mutual-Mahalanobis + semantic-compatibility dedup catching drift the insert-time gate misses) and lifetime-aware decay (`τ_eff = τ·(1+ln(1+lifetime/τ))` — confirmed structures outlive transients at equal nominal τ). (2) `delay_doppler_map` reimplemented separably (`O(B²S+S²B)`), proven equivalent to the direct reference to <1e-10 and **measured 8.3× faster** (520 µs vs 4.34 ms at 56×8). (3) `tests/security_boundaries.rs` — 8 `proptest` properties over the boundary surfaces (arbitrary values incl. NaN/±inf via `f64::from_bits`) that found and fixed three input-controlled defects: a BLE-CS phase-unwrap infinite loop on non-finite phases and an ~1e299-iteration loop on finite-huge phases (now O(1) modular unwrap + plausibility bound), and a subnormal Gaussian scale overflowing `1/σ²` to NaN density (now physical σ/occupancy bounds). (4) New criterion benches for all increment-2 hot paths (`to_canonical` 38 µs, `ble_cs_range` 481 ns, AoI planner 647 ns/200 regions, coherent fusion 1.5 µs/32 members, factorized pose 521 ns). ruview-unified now 98 tests (87 lib + 3 acceptance + 8 security), 0 failed, clippy-clean.
@@ -25,6 +46,7 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0
 - **`archive/v1` (the original pure-Python implementation) formally deprecated (ADR-187)** — commits `1fb5397dd`, `b1417fb6e`; refs #509, #1125. Added `archive/v1/DEPRECATED.md` (a loud tombstone) and a `> ⚠️ DEPRECATED` notice atop `archive/v1/README.md`, both pointing at the maintained `v2/` workspace and the `wifi-densepose 2.x` / `ruview` pip wheel (ADR-117). Records the honest fact behind #509: `archive/v1`'s `DensePoseHead` is **architecture-only** — random `kaiming_normal_` init with **zero committed checkpoints** under `archive/v1/` (MEASURED by Glob over `**/*.{pth,onnx,safetensors,pt,ckpt,bin}`). The ADR-028 deterministic proof `archive/v1/data/proof/verify.py` stays live and is explicitly out of scope. The same effort added a **"Model weights: what's real, what's not" three-tier table** to `README.md` + `docs/user-guide.md`, separating real-and-validated checkpoints (presence 82.3% held-out temporal-triplet, MM-Fi pose 82.69% torso-PCK@20, `count_v1`) from the real-but-weak on-device `pose_v1` (PCK@20 = 3.0%, runtime `confidence=0` stub, below the ADR-079 ≥35% target) from the architecture-only `archive/v1` head — and caveated every live single-ESP32 17-keypoint advertisement accordingly. Docs/labeling only; no code or model behavior changed.

 ### Fixed
+- **Pose-vitals, desktop, and repository-integrity issue remediation.** Breathing confidence now measures periodic autocorrelation at the estimated respiratory frequency instead of penalizing clean sinusoidal signals via crest factor (#1610). The desktop launcher resolves the Windows `.exe`, uses `where` for PATH lookup, and passes log filtering through `RUST_LOG`; its React versions, Vite type declarations, and Tauri UI hook working directories are aligned (#1516, #1517, #1518). Runtime session secrets written from `v2/` are ignored, and contributor-harness provenance inputs are pinned to LF across Windows checkouts (#1519, #1520). With explicit owner authorization, the six raw CSI/person-data capture and metadata files identified by ADR-299 were removed from the current tree; historical copies remain pending separately coordinated incident response.
 - **`docs/huggingface/MODEL_CARD.md` had drifted from the model card actually published on the Hub (issue #1481).** Every filename in its "Files in this repo" table (`pretrained-encoder.onnx`, `pretrained-heads.onnx`, `pretrained.rvf`, `room-profiles.json`) pointed at files never uploaded to `ruvnet/wifi-densepose-pretrained` — only `config.json` existed. Replaced the in-repo card with the content actually live on the Hub (`model.safetensors`, `model-q{2,4,8}.bin`, `node-{1,2}.json`, `presence-head.json`, `csi-embed-v2.*`, honest v1→v2 retraction of the single-class "100%" presence claim) and added a "Using with the Rust sensing server (RVF conversion)" section documenting the `--convert-model`/`--convert-out` and `--model` auto-convert paths that neither card previously mentioned.
 - **`--convert-model` failed on the published `model.safetensors`: NUL-padded safetensors header rejected by strict JSON parse (issue #1480, #894 follow-up).** The reference safetensors format pads its JSON header to an 8-byte boundary with trailing NUL bytes; `safetensors_to_rvf` (`wifi-densepose-sensing-server/src/model_format.rs`) fed the full declared-length header slice straight to `serde_json::from_slice`, which rejects the padding as "trailing characters." Since the only published full-precision weight file exercises this padding, `--convert-model` could not convert it at all. Fixed by trimming trailing NUL/whitespace bytes before parsing. Pinned by `safetensors_nul_padded_header_converts` (a header padded to the 8-byte boundary, matching the real HF file, converts and round-trips its weights through `ProgressiveLoader`).
 - **In-server training reconnected — "Start Training" no longer silently no-ops; `/ws/train/progress` streams real progress (ADR-186, issue #1233).** The dashboard's Start Training button POSTed a config, got `success:true`, and nothing happened: `/api/v1/train/start` was a stub that flipped a status string and logged one line, and `/ws/train/progress` 404'd. The full pure-Rust trainer in `training_api.rs` (loads recorded CSI, gradient-descent, exports a `.rvf`) already existed but was **orphaned** — never declared as a module (no `mod training_api;`), so it wasn't compiled at all. Fix (`wifi-densepose-sensing-server`): declared the module, reconciled `AppStateInner` (replaced the `training_status`/`training_config` stub fields with a shared `TrainingState` status handle + cooperative cancel flag + a `training_progress_tx` broadcast), deleted the stub handlers, and merged the real `training_api::routes()` (so `/api/v1/train/{start,stop,status,pretrain,lora}` and `/ws/train/progress` resolve under the existing `/api/v1/*` bearer gate). The training core was decoupled from the ~60-field server state so it is unit-testable. **P5 honesty guarantee:** with `RUVIEW_DISABLE_SERVER_TRAINING` set, start returns a structured `{enabled:false, cli:"wifi-densepose train-room"}` HTTP 409 — never a silent success — and the dashboard disables the Start buttons with a CLI tooltip (enablement is surfaced on `/api/v1/train/status`). Pinned by 8 new tests incl. a **live-socket** test that completes a genuine 101 WebSocket handshake and receives a real progress frame after a POST start, a full POST→poll-status→`.rvf`-exists round-trip, a path-traversal rejection, cancellation, and the disabled-409 path. `cargo test -p wifi-densepose-sensing-server -p wifi-densepose-train --no-default-features` — 0 failed.
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ retrieved memories, generated proposals, and old test counts are not.
 Do not hardcode crate, ADR, or test counts in instructions; derive them when a
 task needs them.

-## Contributor metaharness (`@ruvnet/ruview@0.3.1`)
+## Contributor metaharness (`@ruvnet/ruview@0.4.0`)

 ADR-283 defines the current community metaharness. It adds secure local
 Claude/Codex execution, a reviewed shared brain, default-deny MCP mutation
@@ -54,21 +54,24 @@ free of runtime dependencies.

 ```bash
 # Diagnose the installed harness
-npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.3.1 doctor
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.4.0 doctor

 # Get a source-cited capability map before unfamiliar work
-npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.3.1 guidance --topic homecore --query "restore and plugins"
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.4.0 guidance --topic homecore --query "restore and plugins"

 # Explore this trusted checkout through Claude Code (stdin, plan/safe mode)
-npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.3.1 agent run \
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.4.0 agent run \
  --host claude-code --repo . --prompt "Map the relevant subsystem and cite files"

 # Search reviewed, source-cited repository knowledge
-npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.3.1 brain search --query "community memory"
-npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.3.1 brain verify --repo .
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.4.0 brain search --query "community memory"
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.4.0 brain verify --repo .
+
+# Read the OAuth-bound Cognitum Spaces projection
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.4.0 spaces

 # Run the dependency-free RuView MCP server
-npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.3.1 mcp start
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.4.0 mcp start
 ```

 `ruview_guidance` returns reviewed capability maturity, repository citations,
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+RuView third-party notices
+
+This repository is licensed MIT OR Apache-2.0 (see LICENSE). The items below
+are vendored third-party material that keeps its own licence and is not
+covered by that dual licence.
+
+firmware/openwrt-wn586x3/patches/1001-mtk-mt76-mt7915-csi-implement-csi-support-REBASED.patch
+  What:     MediaTek's mt76 mt7915 CSI patch, rebased onto openwrt/mt76
+            eb567bc7 (the revision pinned by OpenWrt 24.10.8).
+  Author:   Bo Jiao <Bo.Jiao@mediatek.com> (original author line kept in the
+            patch header); copyright MediaTek Inc.
+  Origin:   mediatek/mtk-openwrt-feeds @ a15454c888f4f4144c50e33b5feef4f247c5f78b
+  Licence:  BSD-3-Clause-Clear (SPDX identifier,
+            https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause-Clear.html). The patch
+            carries the SPDX tags and MediaTek copyright lines in its added
+            files; the licence text is not reproduced here.
+  Scope:    A vendored patch applied to an OpenWrt/mt76 build. It is not part
+            of the Rust crates, is not compiled by the Cargo workspace, and is
+            not linked into any RuView binary.
+
+See firmware/openwrt-wn586x3/README.md for the other patches in that
+directory and the licence each one keeps.
@@ -2,20 +2,17 @@

 <p align="center">
  <a href="https://cognitum.one/seed">
-    <img src="assets/ruview-seed.png" alt="RuView - WiFi DensePose" width="100%">
+    <img src="assets/ruview-hero-h3-v3.gif" alt="RuView - WiFi DensePose — animated visualization of real-time pose estimation, breathing, and heart-rate sensing through WiFi" width="100%">
  </a>
 </p>
+
 <p align="center">
-  <a href="https://cognitum.one/marketplace">
-    <img src="assets/musica-promo.png" alt="Cognitum Musica" width="100%">
-  </a>
-</p>
-<p align="center">
-  <a href="https://github.com/ruvnet/RuCelium">
-    <img src="assets/rucelium-hero.png" alt="RuCelium — environmental intelligence" width="100%">
+  <a href="https://ruos.cognitum.one">
+    <img src="assets/ruos-animated.svg" alt="RuView — WiFi becomes spatial awareness, with Ruflo coordination and a ruOS sensing workspace" width="100%">
  </a>
 </p>

+
 ## **See through walls with WiFi** ##

 **Turn ordinary WiFi into a spatial intelligence / sensing system.** Detect people, measure breathing and heart rate, track movement, and monitor rooms — through walls, in the dark, with no cameras or wearables. Just physics.
@@ -49,28 +46,56 @@ Every WiFi router already fills your space with radio waves. When people move, b
 <details>
 <summary><strong>RuView MetaHarness</strong> — guided operation for humans and AI agents</summary>

-The RuView-specific metaharness we created is published as [`@ruvnet/ruview`](harness/ruview/README.md). It provides source-cited guidance, guarded Claude Code/Codex agents, deterministic verification, and an honesty check for accuracy claims.
+The RuView-specific metaharness we created is published as [`@ruvnet/ruview`](harness/ruview/README.md). It provides:
+- source-cited guidance;
+- device access for CSI nodes, radar and LiDAR;
+- firmware flashing with boot evidence;
+- one MCP server, usable over stdio or HTTP for ChatGPT, with a live console widget;
+- a Claude Code mod;
+- guarded Claude Code/Codex agents;
+- deterministic verification;
+- an honesty check for accuracy claims.
+
+Companion packages: [`homecore`](harness/homecore/README.md) (Homecore developer metaharness) and [`@ruvnet/ruview-kernel`](harness/ruview-kernel/README.md) (the vitals pipeline as WASM).

 ```bash
 # Check the local setup and get source-cited guidance
-npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.3.1 doctor
-npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.3.1 guidance --topic sensing --query "model loading"
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.9.1 doctor
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.9.1 guidance --topic sensing --query "model loading"
+
+# Hardware: what is plugged in, live CSI from your nodes, a 60 GHz radar kit
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.9.1 devices
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.9.1 esp32 --watch                       # ESP32 + Realtek RAC1 nodes, live view
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.9.1 esp32 --seconds 45 --analyze        # live CSI through the vitals kernel
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.9.1 mmwave --source esphome --host <kit-ip>
+
+# Agents: MCP over stdio, or over HTTP for ChatGPT (token-protected, read tools only)
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.9.1 mcp start
+RUVIEW_MCP_GRANTS=device-access npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.9.1 mcp start --http
+
+# Claude Code: a live sensing pane (/ruview), shipped in the package
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.9.1 mod

 # Run a read-only RuView agent through Codex
-npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.3.1 agent run --host codex --repo . \
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.9.1 agent run --host codex --repo . \
  --prompt "Find the nearest tests and cite the source files"

-# Search or verify the reviewed contributor brain
-npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.3.1 brain search --query "calibration"
-npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.3.1 brain verify --repo .
-
-# Check claims, replay the deterministic proof, or expose the MCP server
-npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.3.1 claim-check --file REPORT.md
-npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.3.1 verify
-npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.3.1 mcp start
+# Check claims, replay the deterministic proof, search the reviewed brain
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.9.1 claim-check --file REPORT.md
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.9.1 verify
+npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.9.1 brain search --query "calibration"
 ```

-Agent runs are read-only by default. Workspace writes require both `--allow-write` and `--confirm`; retrieved brain content is evidence, not authority.
+**Safety:**
+- Agent runs are read-only by default. Workspace writes require both `--allow-write` and `--confirm`.
+- Hardware reads need the `device-access` grant.
+- Flashing and calibration never run over the HTTP transport.
+- Device-reported vitals are labelled as unvalidated.
+- Retrieved brain content is evidence, not authority.
+
+A single `npx ruview` package bundling all of this is ready (ADR-376). It is waiting on npm to release the unscoped name.
+
+Full walkthrough: [user guide → RuView npm toolkit](docs/user-guide.md#ruview-npm-toolkit-ruvnetruview).

 </details>

@@ -122,8 +147,11 @@ RuView turns ordinary WiFi into a contactless sensor. A $9 ESP32 board reads the
 ```bash
 # Option 1: Docker (simulated data, no hardware needed)
 docker pull ruvnet/wifi-densepose:latest
-docker run -p 3000:3000 ruvnet/wifi-densepose:latest
+export RUVIEW_API_TOKEN=$(openssl rand -hex 32)   # required; the container exits 64 without it
+docker run -p 127.0.0.1:3000:3000 -e RUVIEW_API_TOKEN ruvnet/wifi-densepose:latest
 # Open http://localhost:3000
+# ESP32 nodes in Docker also need a UDP source guard (RUVIEW_UDP_ALLOW);
+# see docs/user-guide.md "Receiving ESP32 frames in Docker".

 # Option 2a: Live sensing with ESP32-S3 hardware ($9)
 # Flash firmware, provision WiFi, and start sensing:
@@ -223,7 +251,7 @@ huggingface-cli download ruvnet/wifi-densepose-pretrained --local-dir models/wif

 | Consumer | Format used | Status |
 |----------|-------------|--------|
-| Python training / evaluation / embedding extraction | `model.safetensors` | ✅ Works — load with `safetensors.torch.load_file` |
+| Python training / evaluation / embedding extraction | `model.safetensors` | ⚠️ The published file's header is NUL-padded, which the reference `safetensors.torch.load_file` rejects (issue [#1522](https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView/issues/1522)) — pending a corrected re-upload. `csi-embed-v2.safetensors` in the same repo is unaffected and loads normally. |
 | Inspect / re-export the bundle | `model.rvf.jsonl` (line-by-line JSON) | ✅ Works — plain JSONL |
 | Sensing-server `--model <PATH>` flag | native RVF, `model.safetensors`, or `model.rvf.jsonl` | ✅ Native RVF loads directly; safetensors and JSONL auto-convert in memory |

@@ -244,8 +272,8 @@ See the measured benchmarks, witness records, and one-command reproducibility ch
 |------|-------|---------|
 | **MM-Fi pose model (SOTA)** | [`ruvnet/wifi-densepose-mmfi-pose`](https://huggingface.co/ruvnet/wifi-densepose-mmfi-pose) | 82.69% torso-PCK@20 (single) · 83.59% (ensemble+TTA) · 75K-param micro variant 74.30% |
 | **AetherArena benchmark Space** | [`ruvnet/aether-arena`](https://huggingface.co/spaces/ruvnet/aether-arena) | self-correcting, auditable MM-Fi leaderboard |
-| **Full MM-Fi study (honest picture)** | [`docs/benchmarks/mmfi-wifi-sensing-study.md`](docs/benchmarks/mmfi-wifi-sensing-study.md) | pose + action; zero-shot cross-subject ~64%, +~30 s in-room calibration → 72.2% |
-| **Efficiency frontier** | [`docs/benchmarks/wifi-pose-efficiency-frontier.md`](docs/benchmarks/wifi-pose-efficiency-frontier.md) | SOTA-beating WiFi pose in a 20 KB int4 edge model |
+| **Full MM-Fi study (honest picture)** | [`docs/benchmarks/mmfi-wifi-sensing-study.md`](docs/benchmarks/mmfi-wifi-sensing-study.md) | pose + action; zero-shot cross-subject ~64%, labeled in-room calibration → 72.2% |
+| **Efficiency frontier** | [`docs/benchmarks/wifi-pose-efficiency-frontier.md`](docs/benchmarks/wifi-pose-efficiency-frontier.md) | SOTA-beating MM-Fi pose in a ~37 KB int4 model; live ESP32 compatibility not established |
 | **Pretrained encoder** | [`ruvnet/wifi-densepose-pretrained`](https://huggingface.co/ruvnet/wifi-densepose-pretrained) | 82.3% held-out temporal-triplet, 8 KB int4 |
 | **Reproducible proof (Trust Kill Switch)** | [`archive/v1/data/proof/verify.py`](archive/v1/data/proof/verify.py) + [`expected_features.sha256`](archive/v1/data/proof/expected_features.sha256) | one-command deterministic pipeline replay (SHA-256 of output vs published hash) |
 | **Benchmark-proof ADR** | [ADR-168](docs/adr/ADR-168-benchmark-proof.md) | how the numbers are produced and verified |
@@ -487,12 +515,20 @@ Neural Network: processed signals → 17 body keypoints + vital signs + room mod
 Output: real-time pose, breathing, heart rate, room fingerprint, drift alerts
 ```

-No training cameras required — the [Self-Learning system (ADR-024)](docs/adr/ADR-024-contrastive-csi-embedding-model.md) bootstraps from raw WiFi data alone. [MERIDIAN (ADR-027)](docs/adr/ADR-027-cross-environment-domain-generalization.md) ensures the model works in any room, not just the one it trained in.
+The [Self-Learning system (ADR-024)](docs/adr/ADR-024-contrastive-csi-embedding-model.md) provides
+camera-free representation-learning components. Cross-room pose remains a separate, data-gated
+problem: [MERIDIAN (ADR-027)](docs/adr/ADR-027-cross-environment-domain-generalization.md) is
+**Proposed**, while the measured calibration reference requires labeled CSI/keypoint pairs and
+model-specific adapters. See the [model compatibility boundary](docs/user-guide.md#model-and-capture-compatibility).

 ---

 ## 🏢 Use Cases & Applications

+> **Safety boundary:** these are research and prototype applications, not medical devices,
+> emergency systems, or safety-certified controls. Vital-sign and pose outputs require independent
+> validation on the exact hardware, room, subjects, and failure conditions before operational use.
+
 WiFi sensing works anywhere WiFi exists. No new hardware in most cases — just software on existing access points or a $8 ESP32 add-on. Because there are no cameras, deployments avoid privacy regulations (GDPR video, HIPAA imaging) by design.

 **Scaling:** Each AP distinguishes ~3-5 people (56 subcarriers). Multi-AP multiplies linearly — a 4-AP retail mesh covers ~15-20 occupants. No hard software limit; the practical ceiling is signal physics.
@@ -527,7 +563,7 @@ WiFi sensing works anywhere WiFi exists. No new hardware in most cases — just
 | Use Case | What It Does | Hardware | Key Metric | Edge Module |
 |----------|-------------|----------|------------|-------------|
 | **Smart home automation** | Room-level presence triggers (lights, HVAC, music) that work through walls — no dead zones, no motion-sensor timeouts | 2-3 ESP32-S3 nodes ($24) | Through-wall range ~5m | [HVAC Presence](docs/edge-modules/building.md), [Lighting Zones](docs/edge-modules/building.md) |
-| **Fitness & sports** | Rep counting, posture correction, breathing cadence during exercise — no wearable, no camera in locker rooms | 3+ ESP32-S3 mesh | Pose: 17 keypoints | [Breathing Sync](docs/edge-modules/exotic.md), [Gait Analysis](docs/edge-modules/medical.md) |
+| **Fitness & sports research** | Explore motion and breathing cadence without a wearable or camera; reliable posture correction requires a validated compatible pose model | 3+ ESP32-S3 mesh + edge host | Prototype; no live S3 pose accuracy claim | [Breathing Sync](docs/edge-modules/exotic.md), [Gait Analysis](docs/edge-modules/medical.md) |
 | **Childcare & schools** | Naptime breathing monitoring, playground headcount, restricted-area alerts — privacy-safe for minors | 2-4 ESP32-S3 per zone | Breathing: ±1 BPM | [Sleep Apnea](docs/edge-modules/medical.md), [Perimeter Breach](docs/edge-modules/security.md) |
 | **Event venues & concerts** | Crowd density mapping, crush-risk detection via breathing compression, emergency evacuation flow tracking | Multi-AP mesh (4-8 APs) | Density per m² | [Customer Flow](docs/edge-modules/retail.md), [Panic Motion](docs/edge-modules/security.md) |
 | **Stadiums & arenas** | Section-level occupancy for dynamic pricing, concession staffing, emergency egress flow modeling | Enterprise AP grid | 15-20 per AP mesh | [Dwell Heatmap](docs/edge-modules/retail.md), [Queue Length](docs/edge-modules/retail.md) |
@@ -694,7 +730,13 @@ claude --plugin-dir ./plugins/ruview

 Verify the plugin structure: `bash plugins/ruview/scripts/smoke.sh`. Full details: [`plugins/ruview/README.md`](plugins/ruview/README.md).

-For the portable RuView MetaHarness, use `npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.3.1`; the quick commands and fuller explanation are in the collapsed MetaHarness section near the top of this README and in [`harness/ruview/`](harness/ruview/README.md).
+**Live sensing pane (Claude Code mod):** the same marketplace also lists `ruview-live`, a Claude Code mod.
+- Install it with `/plugin install ruview-live@ruview`, or run `npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.9.1 mod` for its path inside the npm package.
+- `/ruview` opens a pane beside the transcript with your CSI nodes and radar, refreshed on a timer, plus a one-line status.
+- It is read-only.
+- Mods are early access; if `/ruview` is missing, start Claude Code with `CLAUDE_CODE_ENABLE_FUNCTION_HOOKS=1`. See [ADR-377](docs/adr/ADR-377-ruview-live-claude-code-mod.md).
+
+For the portable RuView MetaHarness, use `npx @ruvnet/ruview@0.9.1`. The quick commands and a fuller explanation are in the collapsed MetaHarness section near the top of this README, in [`harness/ruview/`](harness/ruview/README.md), and in the [user guide](docs/user-guide.md#ruview-npm-toolkit-ruvnetruview).

 </details>

@@ -719,6 +761,8 @@ Start with the user, build, and calibration guides; expand for the full referenc
 | [Semantic Primitives — Precision/Recall](docs/integrations/semantic-primitives-metrics.md) | Per-primitive F1 on the held-out paired-capture set: someone-sleeping, possible-distress, room-active, elderly-inactivity-anomaly, meeting, bathroom, fall-risk, bed-exit, no-movement, multi-room. |
 | [Claude Code / Codex Plugin](plugins/ruview/README.md) | The `ruview` plugin + marketplace — skills, `/ruview-*` commands, agents, and the Codex prompt mirror |
 | [Portable harness — `npx @ruvnet/ruview`](harness/ruview/README.md) | MetaHarness-minted, host-portable RuView operator harness — `ruview.*` MCP tools + the MEASURED-vs-CLAIMED honesty guardrail enforced in code ([ADR-182](docs/adr/ADR-182-npx-ruview-harness-via-metaharness.md)). A lighter, multi-host companion to the in-repo plugin. |
+| [CSI Frame Selection — Measured](docs/csi-frame-selection-measured.md) | Which rate gate actually buys cross-node pairing, measured on a nine-node ESP32-C6 fleet as a 2x2 factorial in three Latin-square blocks. Selecting frames by 802.11 `rx_seq` roughly doubled pairing (+31.7 pp) while mesh-time alignment bought +0.5 pp, inside noise. Includes the trade it makes, a prediction that turned out wrong, the limits of the measurement, and `run_arms.py` so the comparison can be re-run rather than taken on trust. |
+| [ESP32-C6 Firmware Runbook](firmware/esp32-csi-node/RUNBOOK.md) | What to run, in what order, and what to check: the three-file build that keeps OTA rollback compiled in, a five-key pre-flash gate, which flash regions OTA can and cannot reach, a single-board diagnostic flash with a revert path, and the tunables whose right value depends on your house rather than on the chip. |
 | [Architecture Decisions](docs/adr/README.md) | 205 ADRs — why each technical choice was made, organized by domain (hardware, signal processing, ML, platform, infrastructure) |
 | [Domain Models](docs/ddd/README.md) | 8 DDD models (RuvSense, Signal Processing, Training Pipeline, Hardware Platform, Sensing Server, WiFi-Mat, CHCI, rvCSI) — bounded contexts, aggregates, domain events, and ubiquitous language |
 | [rvCSI — edge RF sensing runtime](https://github.com/ruvnet/rvcsi) | Rust-first / TypeScript-accessible / hardware-abstracted CSI runtime: multi-source ingestion (incl. real nexmon_csi `.pcap` from a **Raspberry Pi 5** / Pi 4 / Pi 3B+ — CYW43455 / BCM43455c0) → validation → DSP → typed events → RuVector RF memory ([ADR-095](docs/adr/ADR-095-rvcsi-edge-rf-sensing-platform.md), [ADR-096](docs/adr/ADR-096-rvcsi-ffi-crate-layout.md), [domain model](docs/ddd/rvcsi-domain-model.md)). Now its own repo — [`ruvnet/rvcsi`](https://github.com/ruvnet/rvcsi) — vendored here under `vendor/rvcsi`; 9 `rvcsi-*` crates on crates.io, `@ruv/rvcsi` on npm, plus a Claude Code plugin. |
@@ -1,8 +1,14 @@
 # RuView Calibration Service (reference implementation)

-Turn a **shared WiFi-CSI pose base model** into a room-specific one with a **30-second labeled
-calibration** and a **~11 KB per-room LoRA adapter**. This is the deployable resolution of the
-cross-subject / cross-environment generalization problem (full study: [ADR-150 §3.3–3.6](../../docs/adr/ADR-150-rf-foundation-encoder.md)).
+Fit a room-specific **~11 KB LoRA adapter** for a shared WiFi-CSI pose base from a short **labeled
+capture**. This is a measured MM-Fi reference path for cross-subject / cross-environment adaptation
+(full study: [ADR-150 §3.3–3.6](../../docs/adr/ADR-150-rf-foundation-encoder.md)); it is not proof of
+plug-and-play adaptation from a live ESP32 stream.
+
+> **Not the proposed MERIDIAN fast path.** Both producers below require paired CSI and keypoint
+> labels, and their tensor shapes and adapter files are model-specific. ADR-027's automatic,
+> unlabeled 10-second MERIDIAN calibration remains **Proposed** and is not implemented as an
+> end-to-end deployment command.

 ## Why

@@ -66,8 +72,8 @@ Adapters are **model-specific**. There are two calibration producers here:
 | `cog_calibrate.py` | cog **conv+MLP** (`pose_v1.safetensors`, 56×20) | `[N,56,20]` | `.safetensors` (`fc1.a`/`fc1.b`/`fc2.a`/`fc2.b`) | Rust `cog-pose-estimation run --adapter` |

 ```bash
-# Produce a cog-format per-room adapter for the deployed Rust pose engine:
-python cog_calibrate.py --base pose_v1.safetensors --data calib.npz --out room.safetensors
+# Produce a cog-format per-room adapter from X:[N,56,20], Y:[N,17,2]:
+python cog_calibrate.py --base pose_v1.safetensors --data cog-calib.npz --out room.safetensors
 # then in the cog runtime:
 cog-pose-estimation run --config <cfg> --adapter room.safetensors
 ```
@@ -36,7 +36,10 @@ def main():
    dev = a.device

    net = PoseNet().to(dev)
-    net.load_state_dict(torch.load(a.base, map_location=dev), strict=False)
+    # Checkpoints are tensor state dictionaries; never invoke pickle object loading.
+    net.load_state_dict(
+        torch.load(a.base, map_location=dev, weights_only=True), strict=False
+    )
    net.add_lora(r=a.rank).to(dev)
    for k, p in net.named_parameters():
        p.requires_grad = k.endswith(".A") or k.endswith(".B")
@@ -25,7 +25,10 @@ def main():
    dev = a.device

    net = PoseNet().to(dev)
-    net.load_state_dict(torch.load(a.base, map_location=dev), strict=False)
+    # Checkpoints are tensor state dictionaries; never invoke pickle object loading.
+    net.load_state_dict(
+        torch.load(a.base, map_location=dev, weights_only=True), strict=False
+    )
    if a.adapter:
        net.add_lora(r=a.rank).to(dev)
        z = np.load(a.adapter)
@@ -10,6 +10,39 @@ func main() {
        exit(1)
    }

+    // One connected-link RSSI sample for the Rust adapter. Keep the legacy
+    // no-argument 10 Hz stream below unchanged for Python callers.
+    if CommandLine.arguments.contains("--scan-once") {
+        guard interface.powerOn(),
+              let channel = interface.wlanChannel(),
+              interface.rssiValue() < 0 else {
+            fputs("WiFi is not connected\n", stderr)
+            exit(1)
+        }
+        let sample: [String: Any] = [
+            // Always the connected link. macOS redacts ssid/bssid without
+            // Location Services; rssi/noise/channel stay real, so mark the
+            // sample as the connected link for the Rust adapter.
+            "connected": true,
+            "ssid": interface.ssid() ?? "",
+            "bssid": interface.bssid() ?? "00:00:00:00:00:00",
+            "channel": channel.channelNumber,
+            "rssi": interface.rssiValue(),
+            "noise": interface.noiseMeasurement(),
+            "timestamp": Date().timeIntervalSince1970,
+            "tx_rate": interface.transmitRate()
+        ]
+        do {
+            let data = try JSONSerialization.data(withJSONObject: sample, options: [.sortedKeys])
+            FileHandle.standardOutput.write(data)
+            FileHandle.standardOutput.write(Data([0x0a]))
+        } catch {
+            fputs("Could not encode WiFi sample: \(error)\n", stderr)
+            exit(1)
+        }
+        return
+    }
+
    // Flush stdout automatically to prevent buffering issues with Python subprocess
    setbuf(stdout, nil)

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "endpoint": "fal-ai/flux-lora",
+  "lora_url": "https://v3b.fal.media/files/b/0aa8c60d/OjaBs6Gi8pMhZqMo79iym_pytorch_lora_weights.safetensors",
+  "prompt": "ruviewstyle room visualization, a living room with a glowing cyan pose skeleton overlay, wifi signal arcs radiating across the space, a vitals readout panel, dark tech aesthetic, synthetic sensor visualization",
+  "scale": 1.0,
+  "source_image_url": "https://v3b.fal.media/files/b/0aa8cf67/JH1qyC3GCKQ9ojkrAUXe9.png"
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="640" height="360" viewBox="0 0 960 540" role="img" aria-labelledby="title desc">
+<title id="title">RuView · WiFi becomes spatial awareness.</title><desc id="desc">RuView-focused animation showing WiFi sensors, spatial perception, Ruflo coordination and an illustrative ruOS sensing workspace. Room occupancy and actions are synthetic examples, not live measurements.</desc>
+<defs><radialGradient id="bg"><stop stop-color="#151518" /><stop offset="1" stop-color="#07080b" /></radialGradient><radialGradient id="aura"><stop stop-color="#edc65a" stop-opacity=".23" /><stop offset=".4" stop-color="#ba8823" stop-opacity=".07" /><stop offset="1" stop-color="#ba8823" stop-opacity="0" /></radialGradient><linearGradient id="gold" x1="0" y1="0" x2="1" y2="1"><stop stop-color="#fff4b1" /><stop offset=".5" stop-color="#ebc456" /><stop offset="1" stop-color="#96702f" /></linearGradient><linearGradient id="panel" x2="0" y2="1"><stop stop-color="#191a20" /><stop offset="1" stop-color="#0d0e13" /></linearGradient><pattern id="grid" width="36" height="36" patternUnits="userSpaceOnUse"><circle cx="18" cy="18" r=".65" fill="#d4c78e" opacity=".22" /></pattern><filter id="bloom" x="-100%" y="-100%" width="300%" height="300%"><feGaussianBlur stdDeviation="4" /></filter><clipPath id="frame"><rect width="960" height="540" rx="18" /></clipPath><clipPath id="line1"><rect x="64" y="155" width="850" height="93" /></clipPath><clipPath id="line2"><rect x="64" y="244" width="850" height="100" /></clipPath><g id="crown" fill="url(#gold)"><path d="M0 5l8 7L15 0l7 12 8-7-4 23H4z" /><rect x="4" y="31" width="22" height="3" rx="1" /></g>
+<style>
+text{font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;fill:#f4f2ed}.mono{font-family:monospace}.muted{fill:#888993}.gold{fill:#e8c565}.scene{opacity:0}.end{opacity:1}.wire{fill:none;stroke:#c2a155;stroke-width:1}.all{animation-duration:18s;animation-iteration-count:infinite;animation-timing-function:cubic-bezier(.22,.65,.3,1)}
+@keyframes intro{0%,17%{opacity:1;transform:translateY(0)}22%,94%{opacity:0;transform:translateY(-12px)}100%{opacity:1;transform:translateY(0)}}
+@keyframes network{0%,20%{opacity:0;transform:translateY(18px) scale(.98)}25%,44%{opacity:1;transform:translateY(0) scale(1)}49%,100%{opacity:0;transform:translateY(-15px) scale(1.02)}}
+@keyframes work{0%,46%{opacity:0;transform:translateY(18px)}51%,66%{opacity:1;transform:translateY(0)}71%,100%{opacity:0;transform:translateY(-14px)}}
+@keyframes finale{0%,69%{opacity:0}74%,92%{opacity:1}97%,100%{opacity:0}}
+.intro{animation-name:intro}.network{animation-name:network;transform-origin:480px 270px}.work{animation-name:work}.end{animation-name:finale}
+@keyframes reveal1{0%,69%{transform:translateY(100px)}77%,100%{transform:translateY(0)}}@keyframes reveal2{0%,73%{transform:translateY(110px)}81%,100%{transform:translateY(0)}}.headline1{animation-name:reveal1}.headline2{animation-name:reveal2}
+@keyframes breathe{50%{opacity:.6;transform:scale(1.12)}}.breathe{animation:breathe 4.5s ease-in-out infinite;transform-origin:480px 239px}
+@keyframes spin{to{transform:rotate(360deg)}}.orbit{animation:spin 18s linear infinite;transform-origin:480px 239px}
+@keyframes send{0%,9%{transform:translate(0,0)}14%,100%{transform:translate(-14px,-19px)}}.cursor{animation-name:send}
+@keyframes type{0%,2%{clip-path:inset(0 100% 0 0)}12%,100%{clip-path:inset(0 0 0 0)}}.typing{animation-name:type;animation-timing-function:steps(26,end)}
+@keyframes task{0%,49%{transform:translateY(25px);opacity:0}55%,100%{transform:translateY(0);opacity:1}}.task{animation-name:task}.task2{animation-delay:.3s}.task3{animation-delay:.6s}
+@keyframes grow{0%,54%{transform:scaleX(0)}63%,100%{transform:scaleX(1)}}.grow{animation-name:grow;transform-box:fill-box;transform-origin:left}
+@keyframes tick{0%,62%{opacity:0}65%,100%{opacity:1}}.tick{animation-name:tick}
+@keyframes trace{0%,22%{stroke-dashoffset:1}38%,100%{stroke-dashoffset:0}}.trace{stroke-dasharray:1;animation-name:trace}
+@keyframes drift{50%{transform:translateY(-10px);opacity:.8}}.dust{animation:drift 9s ease-in-out infinite}
+@media(prefers-reduced-motion:reduce){*{animation:none!important}.scene{opacity:0}.end{opacity:1}.moving{display:none}}
+
+@keyframes signal{0%,13%{transform:translate(480px,205px)}20%{transform:translate(708px,301px)}26%,43%{transform:translate(480px,239px)}49%{transform:translate(215px,155px)}55%{transform:translate(479px,155px)}61%{transform:translate(743px,155px)}72%,93%{transform:translate(782px,307px)}100%{transform:translate(480px,205px)}}
+.signal{animation-name:signal}.signal-glow{animation:shimmer 3s ease-in-out infinite}@keyframes shimmer{50%{opacity:.45}}
+@keyframes haloExpand{0%,12%{opacity:0;transform:scale(.5)}16%{opacity:.7}23%,100%{opacity:0;transform:scale(2.5)}}.clickring{animation-name:haloExpand;transform-origin:708px 301px}
+@keyframes aurora{0%,100%{transform:translate(-30px,10px) rotate(-4deg)}50%{transform:translate(30px,-10px) rotate(4deg)}}.aurora{animation:aurora 18s ease-in-out infinite;transform-origin:480px 270px}
+@keyframes dash{to{stroke-dashoffset:-80}}.stream{stroke-dasharray:2 18;animation:dash 3s linear infinite}
+@keyframes count{0%,52%{opacity:0;transform:translateY(8px)}58%,100%{opacity:1;transform:translateY(0)}}.detail{animation-name:count}
+@keyframes buildLine{0%,51%{stroke-dashoffset:1}64%,100%{stroke-dashoffset:0}}.buildLine{stroke-dasharray:1;animation-name:buildLine}
+@keyframes underline{0%,78%{transform:scaleX(0)}85%,100%{transform:scaleX(1)}}.underline{animation-name:underline;transform-origin:66px 350px}
+@keyframes dock{0%,49%{opacity:0;transform:translateY(14px)}55%,100%{opacity:1;transform:translateY(0)}}.dock{animation-name:dock}
+@media(prefers-reduced-motion:reduce){.signal,.clickring{display:none}}
+
+@keyframes vortexCW{to{transform:rotate(360deg)}}@keyframes vortexCCW{to{transform:rotate(-360deg)}}
+.vortex{transform-origin:480px 270px;animation:vortexCW 36s linear infinite}.counter{transform-origin:480px 270px;animation:vortexCCW 54s linear infinite}
+@keyframes current{to{stroke-dashoffset:-1200}}.current{animation:current 9s linear infinite}
+@keyframes bgEnergy{0%,12%,100%{opacity:.22}22%,40%{opacity:.6}52%,65%{opacity:.4}74%,84%{opacity:.7}94%{opacity:.28}}.bgEnergy{animation:bgEnergy 18s ease-in-out infinite}
+@keyframes wave{0%{opacity:0;transform:scale(.3)}20%{opacity:.35}80%{opacity:.07}100%{opacity:0;transform:scale(1.9)}}.wave{transform-origin:480px 270px;animation:wave 9s cubic-bezier(.15,.35,.5,1) infinite}
+@keyframes glimmer{0%,100%{opacity:.08}50%{opacity:.72}}.glimmer{animation:glimmer 6s ease-in-out infinite}
+@keyframes comet{0%{opacity:0;transform:translate(-160px,70px)}12%{opacity:.65}58%{opacity:.25}75%,100%{opacity:0;transform:translate(1060px,-300px)}}.comet{animation:comet 9s linear infinite}
+@keyframes beam{0%,100%{transform:translate(-150px,0) rotate(-12deg);opacity:0}35%{opacity:.18}65%{opacity:.07;transform:translate(1050px,0) rotate(-12deg)}80%{opacity:0}}.beam{animation:beam 18s ease-in-out infinite;transform-origin:center}
+@media(prefers-reduced-motion:reduce){.dynamic-bg{display:none}}
+
+.all{animation-duration:24s}
+@keyframes work{0%,46%{opacity:0;transform:translateY(18px)}50%,72%{opacity:1;transform:translateY(0)}76%,100%{opacity:0;transform:translateY(-14px)}}
+@keyframes finale{0%,75%{opacity:0}79%,93%{opacity:1}97%,100%{opacity:0}}
+@keyframes reveal1{0%,75%{transform:translateY(100px)}82%,100%{transform:translateY(0)}}
+@keyframes reveal2{0%,78%{transform:translateY(110px)}85%,100%{transform:translateY(0)}}
+@keyframes signal{0%,13%{transform:translate(480px,205px)}20%{transform:translate(708px,301px)}26%,43%{transform:translate(480px,239px)}49%{transform:translate(803px,182px)}55%{transform:translate(803px,235px)}63%,72%{transform:translate(803px,288px)}80%,93%{transform:translate(782px,307px)}100%{transform:translate(480px,205px)}}
+@keyframes browserOpen{0%,48%{opacity:0;transform:translateY(20px) scale(.96)}53%,100%{opacity:1;transform:translateY(0) scale(1)}}.browserOpen{animation-name:browserOpen;transform-origin:380px 230px}
+@keyframes terminalOpen{0%,53%{opacity:0;transform:translateY(14px)}58%,100%{opacity:1;transform:translateY(0)}}.terminalOpen{animation-name:terminalOpen}
+@keyframes terminalText{0%,57%{opacity:0}60%,100%{opacity:1}}.terminalText{animation-name:terminalText}
+@keyframes done{0%,65%{opacity:0}69%,100%{opacity:1}}.done{animation-name:done}
+@keyframes pointerMove{0%,50%{transform:translate(350px,275px)}55%{transform:translate(529px,267px)}59%{transform:translate(570px,325px)}66%,100%{transform:translate(738px,346px)}}.desktopPointer{animation-name:pointerMove}
+@keyframes chartGrow{0%,53%{transform:scaleY(.05)}63%,100%{transform:scaleY(1)}}.chartGrow{animation-name:chartGrow;transform-box:fill-box;transform-origin:bottom}
+</style><radialGradient id="readability"><stop stop-color="#08090e" stop-opacity=".58" /><stop offset=".65" stop-color="#08090e" stop-opacity=".38" /><stop offset="1" stop-color="#08090e" stop-opacity="0" /></radialGradient><linearGradient id="beamGold"><stop stop-color="#e7bf56" stop-opacity="0" /><stop offset=".5" stop-color="#efd57f" stop-opacity=".45" /><stop offset="1" stop-color="#e7bf56" stop-opacity="0" /></linearGradient></defs><g clip-path="url(#frame)"><rect width="960" height="540" fill="url(#bg)" /><rect width="960" height="540" fill="url(#grid)" opacity=".35" /><ellipse cx="490" cy="250" rx="460" ry="320" fill="url(#aura)" />
+<g><g class="aurora" fill="none" stroke="#c6a457" opacity=".11"><ellipse cx="480" cy="260" rx="470" ry="156" transform="rotate(-18 480 260)" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="260" rx="480" ry="166" transform="rotate(-18 480 260)" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="260" rx="495" ry="180" transform="rotate(-18 480 260)" /></g></g><g><g class="dynamic-bg"><g class="bgEnergy"><rect class="beam" x="0" y="-120" width="160" height="850" fill="url(#beamGold)" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="280" ry="150" fill="none" stroke="#dcb55e" stroke-width=".9" class="wave" style="animation-delay:-0s" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="280" ry="150" fill="none" stroke="#dcb55e" stroke-width=".9" class="wave" style="animation-delay:-3s" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="280" ry="150" fill="none" stroke="#dcb55e" stroke-width=".9" class="wave" style="animation-delay:-6s" /><g class="vortex" fill="none"><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="355" ry="160" transform="rotate(0 480 270)" stroke="#b89342" stroke-width=".6" opacity=".3" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="355" ry="160" transform="rotate(0 480 270)" stroke="#f7d884" stroke-width="2" stroke-dasharray="18 6 4 420 65 800" class="current" style="animation-delay:-0.0s" opacity=".65" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="392" ry="184" transform="rotate(19 480 270)" stroke="#b89342" stroke-width=".6" opacity=".3" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="392" ry="184" transform="rotate(19 480 270)" stroke="#f7d884" stroke-width="1.2" stroke-dasharray="18 6 4 420 65 800" class="current" style="animation-delay:-1.5s" opacity=".65" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="429" ry="208" transform="rotate(38 480 270)" stroke="#b89342" stroke-width=".6" opacity=".3" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="429" ry="208" transform="rotate(38 480 270)" stroke="#f7d884" stroke-width="2" stroke-dasharray="18 6 4 420 65 800" class="current" style="animation-delay:-3.0s" opacity=".65" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="466" ry="232" transform="rotate(57 480 270)" stroke="#b89342" stroke-width=".6" opacity=".3" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="466" ry="232" transform="rotate(57 480 270)" stroke="#f7d884" stroke-width="1.2" stroke-dasharray="18 6 4 420 65 800" class="current" style="animation-delay:-4.5s" opacity=".65" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="503" ry="256" transform="rotate(76 480 270)" stroke="#b89342" stroke-width=".6" opacity=".3" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="503" ry="256" transform="rotate(76 480 270)" stroke="#f7d884" stroke-width="2" stroke-dasharray="18 6 4 420 65 800" class="current" style="animation-delay:-6.0s" opacity=".65" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="540" ry="280" transform="rotate(95 480 270)" stroke="#b89342" stroke-width=".6" opacity=".3" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="540" ry="280" transform="rotate(95 480 270)" stroke="#f7d884" stroke-width="1.2" stroke-dasharray="18 6 4 420 65 800" class="current" style="animation-delay:-7.5s" opacity=".65" /></g><g class="counter" fill="none"><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="355" ry="160" transform="rotate(0 480 270)" stroke="#b89342" stroke-width=".6" opacity=".3" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="355" ry="160" transform="rotate(0 480 270)" stroke="#f7d884" stroke-width="2" stroke-dasharray="18 6 4 420 65 800" class="current" style="animation-delay:-0.0s" opacity=".65" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="392" ry="184" transform="rotate(-19 480 270)" stroke="#b89342" stroke-width=".6" opacity=".3" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="392" ry="184" transform="rotate(-19 480 270)" stroke="#f7d884" stroke-width="1.2" stroke-dasharray="18 6 4 420 65 800" class="current" style="animation-delay:-1.5s" opacity=".65" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="429" ry="208" transform="rotate(-38 480 270)" stroke="#b89342" stroke-width=".6" opacity=".3" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="429" ry="208" transform="rotate(-38 480 270)" stroke="#f7d884" stroke-width="2" stroke-dasharray="18 6 4 420 65 800" class="current" style="animation-delay:-3.0s" opacity=".65" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="466" ry="232" transform="rotate(-57 480 270)" stroke="#b89342" stroke-width=".6" opacity=".3" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="466" ry="232" transform="rotate(-57 480 270)" stroke="#f7d884" stroke-width="1.2" stroke-dasharray="18 6 4 420 65 800" class="current" style="animation-delay:-4.5s" opacity=".65" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="503" ry="256" transform="rotate(-76 480 270)" stroke="#b89342" stroke-width=".6" opacity=".3" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="503" ry="256" transform="rotate(-76 480 270)" stroke="#f7d884" stroke-width="2" stroke-dasharray="18 6 4 420 65 800" class="current" style="animation-delay:-6.0s" opacity=".65" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="540" ry="280" transform="rotate(-95 480 270)" stroke="#b89342" stroke-width=".6" opacity=".3" /><ellipse cx="480" cy="270" rx="540" ry="280" transform="rotate(-95 480 270)" stroke="#f7d884" stroke-width="1.2" stroke-dasharray="18 6 4 420 65 800" class="current" style="animation-delay:-7.5s" opacity=".65" /></g><circle cx="10.1" cy="303.9" r="1.3" fill="#ffe4a0Line truncated
+<g class="scene intro all"><circle cx="480" cy="205" r="125" fill="url(#aura)" /><circle cx="480" cy="205" r="28" stroke="#f3d576" stroke-width="1" fill="none" /><text x="480" y="126" text-anchor="middle" font-size="32" letter-spacing="-1">Your room is already sending signals.</text>
+<rect x="215" y="269" width="530" height="64" rx="12" fill="url(#panel)" stroke="#554b31" /><text x="239" y="307" font-size="17" class="mono typing all">Sense. Understand. Act.</text><rect x="689" y="282" width="38" height="38" rx="9" fill="url(#gold)" /><path d="M708 307v-13m-5 5 5-5 5 5" fill="none" stroke="#222018" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" />
+<path class="cursor all" d="M731 323l0 27 7-8 8 1z" fill="#faf8e7" stroke="#151515" stroke-width="1.4" />
+<text x="480" y="382" text-anchor="middle" font-size="11" letter-spacing="3" class="mono muted">WIFI SENSING. NO CAMERAS.</text><g><circle class="clickring all" cx="708" cy="301" r="25" fill="none" stroke="#fae29b" /></g><g><g fill="none" stroke="#e7c467" opacity=".65"><path d="M437 214Q480 161 523 214" /><path d="M420 205Q480 133 540 205" opacity=".4" /><path d="M404 196Q480 108 556 196" opacity=".2" /></g></g></g>
+<g class="scene network all"><text x="480" y="107" text-anchor="middle" font-size="30" letter-spacing="-.7">From radio signals to useful actions.</text>
+<g><path d="M480 239C548 323 639 357 735 350" class="stream" fill="none" stroke="#f1d98f" stroke-width="1.5" opacity=".45" /></g><g><path d="M480 239C420 328 311 358 225 350" class="stream" fill="none" stroke="#f1d98f" stroke-width="1.5" opacity=".45" /></g><g><path d="M480 239C520 143 640 148 714 193" class="stream" fill="none" stroke="#f1d98f" stroke-width="1.5" opacity=".45" /></g><g><path d="M480 239C440 148 322 143 247 193" class="stream" fill="none" stroke="#f1d98f" stroke-width="1.5" opacity=".45" /></g><path d="M480 239C440 148 322 143 247 193" class="wire" opacity=".2" /><path d="M480 239C440 148 322 143 247 193" class="wire trace all" pathLength="1" /><g class="moving"><circle r="7" fill="#f6cf63" opacity=".5" filter="url(#bloom)"><animateMotion path="M480 239C440 148 322 143 247 193" dur="2.4s" begin="-0.0s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></circle><circle r="2.6" fill="#ffeaa1"><animateMotion path="M480 239C440 148 322 143 247 193" dur="2.4s" begin="-0.0s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></circle></g><g class="moving"><circle r="7" fill="#f6cf63" opacity=".5" filter="url(#bloom)"><animateMotion path="M480 239C440 148 322 143 247 193" dur="2.4s" begin="-1.2s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></circle><circle r="2.6" fill="#ffeaa1"><animateMotion path="M480 239C440 148 322 143 247 193" dur="2.4s" begin="-1.2s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></circle></g><path d="M480 239C520 143 640 148 714 193" class="wire" opacity=".2" /><path d="M480 239C520 143 640 148 714 193" class="wire trace all" pathLength="1" /><g class="moving"><circle r="7" fill="#f6cf63" opacity=".5" filter="url(#bloom)"><animateMotion path="M480 239C520 143 640 148 714 193" dur="2.4s" begin="-0.2s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></circle><circle r="2.6" fill="#ffeaa1"><animateMotion path="M480 239C520 143 640 148 714 193" dur="2.4s" begin="-0.2s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></circle></g><g class="moving"><circle r="7" fill="#f6cf63" opacity=".5" filter="url(#bloom)"><animateMotion path="M480 239C520 143 640 148 714 193" dur="2.4s" begin="-1.4s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></circle><circle r="2.6" fill="#ffeaa1"><animateMotion path="M480 239C520 143 640 148 714 193" dur="2.4s" begin="-1.4s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></circle></g><path d="M480 239C420 328 311 358 225 350" class="wire" opacity=".2" /><path d="M480 239C420 328 311 358 225 350" class="wire trace all" pathLength="1" /><g class="moving"><circle r="7" fill="#f6cf63" opacity=".5" filter="url(#bloom)"><animateMotion path="M480 239C420 328 311 358 225 350" dur="2.4s" begin="-0.4s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></circle><circle r="2.6" fill="#ffeaa1"><animateMotion path="M480 239C420 328 311 358 225 350" dur="2.4s" begin="-0.4s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></circle></g><g class="moving"><circle r="7" fill="#f6cf63" opacity=".5" filter="url(#bloom)"><animateMotion path="M480 239C420 328 311 358 225 350" dur="2.4s" begin="-1.6s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></circle><circle r="2.6" fill="#ffeaa1"><animateMotion path="M480 239C420 328 311 358 225 350" dur="2.4s" begin="-1.6s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></circle></g><path d="M480 239C548 323 639 357 735 350" class="wire" opacity=".2" /><path d="M480 239C548 323 639 357 735 350" class="wire trace all" pathLength="1" /><g class="moving"><circle r="7" fill="#f6cf63" opacity=".5" filter="url(#bloom)"><animateMotion path="M480 239C548 323 639 357 735 350" dur="2.4s" begin="-0.6000000000000001s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></circle><circle r="2.6" fill="#ffeaa1"><animateMotion path="M480 239C548 323 639 357 735 350" dur="2.4s" begin="-0.6000000000000001s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></circle></g><g class="moving"><circle r="7" fill="#f6cf63" opacity=".5" filter="url(#bloom)"><animateMotion path="M480 239C548 323 639 357 735 350" dur="2.4s" begin="-1.8s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></circle><circle r="2.6" fill="#ffeaa1"><animateMotion path="M480 239C548 323 639 357 735 350" dur="2.4s" begin="-1.8s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></circle></g><circle cx="480" cy="239" r="98" fill="url(#aura)" class="breathe" /><circle cx="480" cy="239" r="57" fill="#111115" stroke="#6c5830" /><circle cx="480" cy="239" r="66" fill="none" stroke="#eac55e" stroke-opacity=".6" stroke-dasharray="38 170" class="orbit" /><use href="#crown" transform="translate(465 221)" /><rect x="147" y="169" width="200" height="55" rx="10" fill="url(#panel)" stroke="#51462e" /><circle cx="164" cy="191" r="3" fill="#e8c667" /><text x="177" y="195" font-size="18">WiFi sensors</text><text x="177" y="212" font-size="8" class="mono muted" letter-spacing="1.8">CAPTURE</text><rect x="614" y="169" width="200" height="55" rx="10" fill="url(#panel)" stroke="#51462e" /><circle cx="631" cy="191" r="3" fill="#e8c667" /><text x="644" y="195" font-size="18">RuView</text><text x="644" y="212" font-size="8" class="mono muted" letter-spacing="1.8">PERCEIVE</text><rect x="125" y="326" width="200" height="55" rx="10" fill="url(#panel)" stroke="#51462e" /><circle cx="142" cy="348" r="3" fill="#e8c667" /><text x="155" y="352" font-sizeLine truncated
+<g class="scene work all"><g><text x="480" y="92" text-anchor="middle" font-size="28" letter-spacing="-.6">A sensing workspace, powered by RuView.</text>
+<rect x="58" y="113" width="844" height="331" rx="12" fill="#090c12" stroke="#6a5931" />
+<path d="M70 144H890" stroke="#292b31" /><circle cx="76" cy="129" r="3" fill="#dcbf65" /><circle cx="87" cy="129" r="3" fill="#5b5c64" /><circle cx="98" cy="129" r="3" fill="#5b5c64" /><text x="480" y="133" text-anchor="middle" class="mono muted" font-size="9">ruOS / Desktops / ruview-workspace</text>
+<rect x="59" y="145" width="125" height="287" fill="#0c0e13" />
+<use href="#crown" transform="translate(72 158) scale(.4)" /><text x="91" y="170" font-size="15" font-weight="700">ruOS</text>
+<rect x="67" y="209" width="107" height="25" rx="5" fill="#302819" stroke="#63512c" />
+<rect x="76" y="194" width="7" height="6" rx="1" fill="none" stroke="#686b79" /><text x="91" y="201" font-size="10" class="muted">Overview</text><rect x="76" y="222" width="7" height="6" rx="1" fill="none" stroke="#e1c577" /><text x="91" y="229" font-size="10" class="gold">Desktops</text><rect x="76" y="250" width="7" height="6" rx="1" fill="none" stroke="#686b79" /><text x="91" y="257" font-size="10" class="muted">Terminal</text><rect x="76" y="278" width="7" height="6" rx="1" fill="none" stroke="#686b79" /><text x="91" y="285" font-size="10" class="muted">Swarms</text><rect x="76" y="306" width="7" height="6" rx="1" fill="none" stroke="#686b79" /><text x="91" y="313" font-size="10" class="muted">Network</text><rect x="76" y="334" width="7" height="6" rx="1" fill="none" stroke="#686b79" /><text x="91" y="341" font-size="10" class="muted">Usage</text><rect x="76" y="362" width="7" height="6" rx="1" fill="none" stroke="#686b79" /><text x="91" y="369" font-size="10" class="muted">Settings</text><text x="200" y="169" font-size="14" font-weight="700">RuView workspace</text><circle cx="364" cy="165" r="3" fill="#b9cb91" /><text x="374" y="169" font-size="9" class="muted">Running</text>
+<text x="882" y="167" text-anchor="end" font-size="8" class="mono gold">SYNTHETIC DEMO</text>
+<rect x="197" y="183" width="469" height="244" rx="7" fill="#14131a" stroke="#32313d" /><path d="M197 373Q370 180 666 285M197 330Q440 390 666 210" fill="none" stroke="#b49548" opacity=".18" />
+<g class="browserOpen all"><rect x="209" y="195" width="308" height="163" rx="7" fill="#191d26" stroke="#5a5961" />
+<rect x="209" y="195" width="308" height="24" rx="7" fill="#262a33" /><text x="221" y="211" font-size="8" class="mono muted">RuView / Room overview</text><circle cx="503" cy="207" r="2" fill="#e3c477" />
+<text x="225" y="241" font-size="13" font-weight="700">Room activity</text><text x="225" y="257" font-size="9" class="muted">Synthetic scene · Presence and motion</text>
+<rect x="224" y="329" width="83" height="16" rx="4" fill="#4a3d22" /><text x="233" y="340" font-size="8" class="gold">Sensor connected</text><g><path d="M229 270H494V318H229zM390 270v18m0 12v18" fill="#121921" stroke="#727781" stroke-width="1.5" /><path d="M235 278h34v15h-34zM464 280h22v24h-22z" fill="#303843" stroke="#707786" /><circle cx="285" cy="300" r="4" fill="#f0cd70" /><circle cx="285" cy="300" r="16" fill="none" stroke="#d8b353" opacity=".4" /><circle cx="326" cy="287" r="5" fill="#b7cbd0" /><path d="M326 293v12m-7-8h14m-7 8-5 8m5-8 5 8" fill="none" stroke="#b7cbd0" stroke-width="2" /><path d="M292 290Q310 273 326 287M294 306Q312 312 326 302" fill="none" stroke="#e1bd5f" stroke-dasharray="3 5" class="stream" /></g></g>
+<g class="terminalOpen all"><rect x="366" y="287" width="284" height="117" rx="6" fill="#090c12" stroke="#777061" /><rect x="367" y="288" width="282" height="21" rx="5" fill="#25272f" /><text x="380" y="302" font-size="9" class="mono">Terminal</text>
+<text x="380" y="324" font-size="9" class="mono gold">› Room event received</text><g class="terminalText all"><text x="380" y="343" font-size="9" class="mono muted">✓ Presence detected (demo)</text><text x="380" y="358" font-size="9" class="mono muted">✓ Rule checked</text></g><text x="380" y="384" font-size="10" class="mono gold done all">✓ Action ready for review</text></g>
+<rect x="680" y="183" width="207" height="244" rx="7" fill="#12151d" stroke="#33333c" /><text x="695" y="204" font-size="12" font-weight="700">Ruflo agent team</text><path d="M694 216h178" stroke="#34323a" />
+<circle cx="699" cy="235" r="5" fill="#272317" stroke="#be9f54" /><text x="713" y="239" font-size="11">Sense</text><text x="713" y="254" font-size="8" class="muted">Read room events from RuView</text><circle cx="699" cy="288" r="5" fill="#272317" stroke="#be9f54" /><text x="713" y="292" font-size="11">Evaluate</text><text x="713" y="307" font-size="8" class="muted">Check the configured rule</text><circle cx="699" cy="341" r="5" fill="#272317" stroke="#be9f54" /><text x="713" y="345" font-size="11">Act</text><text x="713" y="360" font-size="8" class="muted">Request an approved action</text><g class="done all"><rect x="693" y="381" width="181" height="29" rx="5" fill="#332b1b" stroke="#89713b" /><text x="784" y="400" text-anchor="middle" font-size="10" class="gold">✓ Room event processed</text></g>
+<g class="desktopPointer all"><path d="M0 0v20l5-6 8 1z" fill="#fff2ce" stroke="#18181a" stroke-width="1" /></g>
+<text x="480" y="469" text-anchor="middle" class="gold" font-size="14">Example: room activity → rule check → action review.</text></g></g><g class="scene end all"><ellipse cx="810" cy="290" rx="260" ry="240" fill="url(#aura)" />
+<text x="66" y="133" class="mono gold" font-size="11" letter-spacing="3">RUVIEW PERCEPTION. RUFLO COORDINATION.</text>
+<g clip-path="url(#line1)"><text class="headline1 all" x="61" y="233" font-size="72" font-weight="700" letter-spacing="-3">WiFi becomes</text></g>
+<g clip-path="url(#line2)"><text class="headline2 all" x="61" y="322" font-size="72" font-weight="700" letter-spacing="-3">spatial awareness<tspan class="gold">.</tspan></text></g>
+<path d="M66 382H894" stroke="#3b3528" /><text x="66" y="420" class="mono gold" font-size="17">ruos.cognitum.one</text><text x="892" y="420" text-anchor="end" font-size="10" class="mono muted" letter-spacing="2">BY COGNITUM</text><g><path class="underline all" d="M66 350h310" stroke="url(#gold)" stroke-width="2" /></g></g>
+<path d="M40 490H920" stroke="#26242a" /><text x="40" y="513" class="mono muted" font-size="9" letter-spacing="1.5">RUVIEW + RUFLO + RUOS</text><circle cx="853" cy="509" r="2.5" fill="#dfbf67" /><text x="866" y="512" class="mono gold" font-size="9">READY</text><g><g class="signal all"><circle r="45" fill="url(#aura)" class="signal-glow" /><circle r="10" fill="#ebc65d" opacity=".5" filter="url(#bloom)" /><circle r="4.5" fill="#ffe5a1" /><circle r="8" fill="none" stroke="#e9c56c" opacity=".3" /></g></g></g></svg>
@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "id": "pretrain-1775182186",
-  "name": "pretrain-1775182186",
-  "label": "mixed-activity",
-  "started_at": "2026-04-03T02:09:46Z",
-  "ended_at": "2026-04-03T02:11:46Z",
-  "duration_secs": 120,
-  "frame_count": 5783,
-  "file_size_bytes": 2580539,
-  "file_path": "data/recordings\\pretrain-1775182186.csi.jsonl",
-  "nodes": {
-    "2": 2886,
-    "1": 2897
-  }
-}
@@ -75,8 +75,6 @@ RUN set -e; \
 # Optional bearer-token auth on /api/v1/*: leave unset for LAN-mode (default),
 # set to enforce `Authorization: Bearer <token>` (see bearer_auth module, #443).
 #   docker run -e RUVIEW_API_TOKEN=$(openssl rand -hex 32) ...
-ENV RUVIEW_API_TOKEN=
-
 # HTTP API
 EXPOSE 3000
 # WebSocket
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
-version: "3.9"
-
 services:
  sensing-server:
    build:
      context: ..
      dockerfile: docker/Dockerfile.rust
    image: ruvnet/wifi-densepose:latest
+    # ESP32 CSI must accept LAN UDP; TCP APIs below remain loopback-only.
+    # kics-scan ignore-line
    ports:
-      - "3000:3000"   # REST API
-      - "3001:3001"   # WebSocket
+      - "127.0.0.1:3000:3000"   # REST API
+      - "127.0.0.1:3001:3001"   # WebSocket
      # ESP32 UDP. On Linux/macOS this works with multiple ESP32 nodes out of
      # the box. On Docker Desktop for Windows, multi-source UDP is collapsed
      # to one source IP at the WSL/Hyper-V boundary, so all-but-one node's
@@ -37,6 +37,45 @@ services:
      #   volumes: ["/path/to/models:/app/models"]
      #   MODELS_DIR=/app/models
      - MODELS_DIR=${MODELS_DIR:-data/models}
+      # Auth (issue #864). The entrypoint refuses to start (exit 64) unless
+      # RUVIEW_API_TOKEN is set. Export it before `docker compose up`:
+      #   export RUVIEW_API_TOKEN=$(openssl rand -hex 32)
+      # Bare names pass the host value through only when it is set.
+      - RUVIEW_API_TOKEN
+      # ESP32 UDP ingest (ADR-296, issue #2089). The UDP receiver defaults to
+      # 127.0.0.1, which cannot receive from the published 5005/udp port.
+      # Set ONE source guard and the entrypoint binds 0.0.0.0:
+      #   RUVIEW_UDP_ALLOW=<node-ip-or-cidr>  restrict sources (preferred)
+      #   RUVIEW_UDP_INSECURE_LAN=true        accept the spoofing risk
+      # Docker Desktop and OrbStack on macOS rewrite the source address to the
+      # bridge gateway, so a LAN-subnet allowlist drops every frame. There,
+      # allow the gateway instead:
+      #   docker network inspect <project>_default \
+      #     --format '{{(index .IPAM.Config 0).Gateway}}'
+      #   RUVIEW_UDP_ALLOW=<gateway>/32
+      # The gateway admits anything that reaches the published port, so keep
+      # 5005/udp off untrusted networks.
+      - RUVIEW_UDP_ALLOW
+      - RUVIEW_UDP_INSECURE_LAN
+      - RUVIEW_UDP_BIND
+      # Browsing the UI from another machine also needs the host name or IP
+      # in SENSING_ALLOWED_HOSTS (otherwise 421), and the TCP ports above
+      # published beyond 127.0.0.1.
+      - SENSING_ALLOWED_HOSTS
+    security_opt:
+      - no-new-privileges:true
+    cap_drop:
+      - ALL
+    deploy:
+      resources:
+        limits:
+          cpus: "2.0"
+          memory: 1G
+    healthcheck:
+      test: ["CMD-SHELL", "kill -0 1"]
+      interval: 30s
+      timeout: 3s
+      retries: 3
    # No explicit command needed — docker-entrypoint.sh uses CSI_SOURCE.
    # Override with: command: ["--source", "esp32", "--tick-ms", "500"]

@@ -46,7 +85,21 @@ services:
      dockerfile: docker/Dockerfile.python
    image: ruvnet/wifi-densepose:python
    ports:
-      - "8765:8765"   # WebSocket
-      - "8080:8080"   # UI
+      - "127.0.0.1:8765:8765"   # WebSocket
+      - "127.0.0.1:8080:8080"   # UI
    environment:
      - PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1
+    security_opt:
+      - no-new-privileges:true
+    cap_drop:
+      - ALL
+    deploy:
+      resources:
+        limits:
+          cpus: "1.0"
+          memory: 512M
+    healthcheck:
+      test: ["CMD", "python", "-c", "import socket; socket.create_connection(('127.0.0.1', 8765), 2).close()"]
+      interval: 30s
+      timeout: 3s
+      retries: 3
@@ -22,6 +22,10 @@
 #                  Default is `auto`. Set CSI_SOURCE=simulated when you want
 #                  fake data tagged as such; never set it implicitly.
 #   MODELS_DIR   — directory to scan for .rvf model files (default: data/models)
+#   RUVIEW_UDP_ALLOW / RUVIEW_UDP_INSECURE_LAN — ADR-296 UDP source guard.
+#                  Setting either makes the entrypoint bind UDP on 0.0.0.0 so
+#                  ESP32 frames on the published 5005/udp port can arrive.
+#   RUVIEW_UDP_BIND — explicit UDP bind; overrides the choice above.
 set -e

 # ── Issue #864: fail-closed on default posture ───────────────────────────────
@@ -34,8 +38,8 @@ set -e
 #
 # Escape hatches (operator must opt in explicitly):
 #   * Set RUVIEW_API_TOKEN to a strong secret → auth enabled on /api/v1/*.
-#   * Set RUVIEW_ALLOW_UNAUTHENTICATED=1 → preserves the pre-fix behaviour;
-#     only safe on an isolated trust boundary.
+#   * Set RUVIEW_ALLOW_UNAUTHENTICATED=1 (or true/yes/on, any case) →
+#     preserves the pre-fix behaviour; only safe on an isolated trust boundary.
 #   * Set RUVIEW_BIND_ADDR to a loopback / private interface → unauth is fine
 #     when the socket isn't reachable. The auto-bind nudges toward 127.0.0.1.
 #
@@ -45,7 +49,12 @@ set -e
 case "${1:-}" in
    cog-ha-matter|ha-matter|homecore|homecore-server) ;;
    *)
-        if [ -z "${RUVIEW_API_TOKEN:-}" ] && [ "${RUVIEW_ALLOW_UNAUTHENTICATED:-}" != "1" ]; then
+        # Same spellings the sensing-server accepts for its boolean env flags.
+        case "${RUVIEW_ALLOW_UNAUTHENTICATED:-}" in
+            1|[Tt][Rr][Uu][Ee]|[Yy][Ee][Ss]|[Oo][Nn]) __allow_unauth=1 ;;
+            *) __allow_unauth=0 ;;
+        esac
+        if [ -z "${RUVIEW_API_TOKEN:-}" ] && [ "$__allow_unauth" != "1" ]; then
            # If the operator hasn't overridden the bind, refuse outright on
            # the default 0.0.0.0. If they've nailed it to loopback (or a
            # specific private address they trust), let it run.
@@ -97,6 +106,50 @@ esac
 # server binary so users can just pass flags:
 #   docker run <image> --source esp32 --tick-ms 500
 if [ "${1#-}" != "$1" ] || [ -z "$1" ]; then
+    # ── Issue #2089: UDP CSI ingest posture inside a container ───────────────
+    # ADR-296 defaults the UDP receiver to 127.0.0.1. Inside a container that
+    # bind can never receive from a published port, so no node ever appears.
+    # We bind 0.0.0.0 only when the operator has configured an ADR-296 guard
+    # (RUVIEW_UDP_ALLOW or RUVIEW_UDP_INSECURE_LAN); without one the server
+    # would refuse a routable bind, so we keep loopback and say why instead.
+    # An explicit RUVIEW_UDP_BIND or --udp-bind always wins.
+    # The binary parses RUVIEW_UDP_INSECURE_LAN itself (1/yes/on/true, any
+    # case); here we only need to know whether it is truthy to pick the bind.
+    __insecure_lan=0
+    case "$(printf '%s' "${RUVIEW_UDP_INSECURE_LAN:-}" | tr 'A-Z' 'a-z')" in
+        1|true|yes|on) __insecure_lan=1 ;;
+    esac
+    __udp_bind_arg=0
+    __udp_guard_arg=0
+    for __arg in "$@"; do
+        case "$__arg" in
+            --udp-bind|--udp-bind=*) __udp_bind_arg=1 ;;
+            --udp-allow|--udp-allow=*|--udp-insecure-lan) __udp_guard_arg=1 ;;
+        esac
+    done
+    if [ -z "${RUVIEW_UDP_BIND:-}" ] && [ "$__udp_bind_arg" = 0 ]; then
+        if [ -n "${RUVIEW_UDP_ALLOW:-}" ] || [ "$__insecure_lan" = 1 ] \
+            || [ "$__udp_guard_arg" = 1 ]; then
+            export RUVIEW_UDP_BIND=0.0.0.0
+            echo "[entrypoint] UDP CSI receiver: binding 0.0.0.0 inside the container" >&2
+            echo "[entrypoint]   (a source guard is set: RUVIEW_UDP_ALLOW or RUVIEW_UDP_INSECURE_LAN)." >&2
+        else
+            case "${CSI_SOURCE:-auto}" in
+                simulated|simulate) ;;
+                *)
+                    echo "[entrypoint] NOTE: UDP CSI receiver stays on 127.0.0.1 (ADR-296 default)." >&2
+                    echo "[entrypoint]   Inside a container that bind cannot receive ESP32 frames from" >&2
+                    echo "[entrypoint]   a published 5005/udp port, so no node will appear. To ingest:" >&2
+                    echo "[entrypoint]     -e RUVIEW_UDP_ALLOW=<node-ip-or-cidr>   (restrict sources), or" >&2
+                    echo "[entrypoint]     -e RUVIEW_UDP_INSECURE_LAN=true         (accept spoofing risk)" >&2
+                    echo "[entrypoint]   Docker Desktop/OrbStack on macOS rewrite the source to the bridge" >&2
+                    echo "[entrypoint]   gateway, so the allowlist must name <gateway>/32, not the LAN subnet." >&2
+                    echo "[entrypoint]   See https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView/issues/2089" >&2
+                    ;;
+            esac
+        fi
+    fi
+
    set -- /app/sensing-server \
        --source "${CSI_SOURCE:-auto}" \
        --tick-ms 100 \
@@ -18,9 +18,11 @@ services:
        # only activates when OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT is set.
        SENSING_FEATURES: mqtt,otel
    image: ruvnet/wifi-densepose:otel
+    # ESP32 CSI must accept LAN UDP; TCP APIs below remain loopback-only.
+    # kics-scan ignore-line
    ports:
-      - "3000:3000"     # REST API
-      - "3001:3001"     # WebSocket
+      - "127.0.0.1:3000:3000"     # REST API
+      - "127.0.0.1:3001:3001"     # WebSocket
      - "5005:5005/udp" # ESP32 CSI (see docker-compose.yml for Windows notes)
    environment:
      - RUST_LOG=info
@@ -30,6 +32,20 @@ services:
      - OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT=http://otel-collector:4317
    depends_on:
      - otel-collector
+    security_opt:
+      - no-new-privileges:true
+    cap_drop:
+      - ALL
+    deploy:
+      resources:
+        limits:
+          cpus: "2.0"
+          memory: 1G
+    healthcheck:
+      test: ["CMD-SHELL", "kill -0 1"]
+      interval: 30s
+      timeout: 3s
+      retries: 3

  otel-collector:
    image: otel/opentelemetry-collector-contrib:0.116.0@sha256:70217a89d27c678ead44f196d80aa8c2717cb68d0301dbdc40331dbec0a3e605
@@ -37,10 +53,24 @@ services:
    volumes:
      - ./otel-collector.yaml:/etc/otelcol-contrib/config.yaml:ro
    ports:
-      - "4317:4317"   # OTLP gRPC (also reachable from the host)
-      - "4318:4318"   # OTLP HTTP
+      - "127.0.0.1:4317:4317"   # OTLP gRPC (also reachable from the host)
+      - "127.0.0.1:4318:4318"   # OTLP HTTP
    depends_on:
      - ourios
+    security_opt:
+      - no-new-privileges:true
+    cap_drop:
+      - ALL
+    deploy:
+      resources:
+        limits:
+          cpus: "1.0"
+          memory: 512M
+    healthcheck:
+      test: ["CMD-SHELL", "kill -0 1"]
+      interval: 30s
+      timeout: 3s
+      retries: 3

  # Ourios — OTLP-native log backend (Parquet + Drain-derived template
  # mining + DataFusion). Local-disk storage; the tenant derives from the
@@ -57,10 +87,24 @@ services:
      - OURIOS_QUERIER_ENABLED=1
      - OURIOS_QUERIER_HTTP_ADDR=0.0.0.0:4319
    ports:
-      - "4319:4319"   # query endpoint (http://localhost:4319/v1/query)
+      - "127.0.0.1:4319:4319"   # query endpoint (http://localhost:4319/v1/query)
    volumes:
      - ourios-data:/data
      - ourios-wal:/wal
+    security_opt:
+      - no-new-privileges:true
+    cap_drop:
+      - ALL
+    deploy:
+      resources:
+        limits:
+          cpus: "2.0"
+          memory: 2G
+    healthcheck:
+      test: ["CMD-SHELL", "kill -0 1"]
+      interval: 30s
+      timeout: 3s
+      retries: 3

 volumes:
  ourios-data:
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 |-------|-------|
 | **Status** | Proposed |
 | **Date** | 2026-03-01 |
+| **Updated** | 2026-10-01: macOS 27 also redacts SSID without Location Services; the connected link is kept with a synthetic id, and `auto`+wifi keeps UDP bound (see Amendment 1) |
 | **Deciders** | ruv |
 | **Codename** | **ORCA** — OS-native Radio Channel Acquisition |
 | **Relates to** | ADR-013 (Feature-Level Sensing Commodity Gear), ADR-022 (Windows WiFi Enhanced Fidelity), ADR-014 (SOTA Signal Processing), ADR-018 (ESP32 Dev Implementation) |
@@ -313,3 +314,22 @@ All verification on Mac Mini (M2 Pro, macOS 26.3).
 - ADR-022: Windows WiFi Enhanced Fidelity (analogous platform adapter)
 - ADR-013: Feature-Level Sensing from Commodity Gear
 - Issue [#56](https://github.com/ruvnet/wifi-densepose/issues/56): macOS support request
+
+---
+
+## Amendment 1 (2026-10-01): SSID is also redacted; keep the connected link
+
+**Observed on macOS 27 (M-series Mac, CoreWLAN, unsigned CLI helper).** Without Location Services, `mac_wifi --scan-once` returns `"ssid":""` and `"bssid":"00:00:00:00:00:00"`, while `rssi`, `noise`, `channel` and `tx_rate` are real. The §1 assumption that "SSID + RSSI + channel" survive no longer holds. An unsigned CLI helper never calls `CLLocationManager`, so it never appears in Location Services and cannot be granted access.
+
+Before this amendment, `resolve_bssid` abstained when both identities were blank (to avoid merging unrelated networks), so every macOS scan was dropped and `--source wifi` produced nothing, with no error.
+
+**Change.**
+1. `--scan-once` marks its single sample `"connected": true`. It is always the one connected link, so it cannot collide with another network.
+2. A redacted sample marked `connected` gets a stable, locally administered synthetic BSSID derived from a reserved key plus the channel. The SSID stays empty; none is invented. Unmarked redacted lines still abstain.
+3. `--source auto` that resolves to host WiFi now also binds the UDP receiver, and `wifi_task` yields while the source is a live `esp32`. ESP32 nodes that start after the 2 s boot probe still promote the source, matching the #1004 rule for the simulator.
+4. A missing helper logs one clear error with the build command instead of a warning on every tick.
+
+**Measured (2026-10-01, this change):** `--source wifi` → source `wifi:unnamed`, sensing ticks advance. `--source auto` on a quiet port → `wifi` with `udp_receiver=true`; relaying real ADR-018 frames promoted the source to `esp32`, with all 5 nodes listed.
+
+**Still open:** real BSSID/SSID would need a signed `.app` helper with `NSLocationWhenInUseUsageDescription` that requests authorization. The helper still lives under `archive/v1` with no build step.
+
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 |-------|-------|
 | **Status** | Proposed |
 | **Date** | 2026-03-02 |
+| **Updated** | 2026-10-04 — multistatic fusion combines phase across nodes only when every frame declares the same shared phase reference; independent ESP32 nodes and the amplitude-only server bridge fuse amplitude only and report the reason (`phase_fusion` in `/health/ready`, issue #1752). |
 | **Deciders** | ruv |
 | **Codename** | **RuvSense** -- RuVector-Enhanced Sensing for Multistatic Fidelity |
 | **Relates to** | ADR-012 (ESP32 Mesh), ADR-014 (SOTA Signal Processing), ADR-016 (RuVector Training), ADR-017 (RuVector Signal+MAT), ADR-018 (ESP32 Implementation), ADR-024 (AETHER Embeddings), ADR-026 (Survivor Track Lifecycle), ADR-027 (MERIDIAN Generalization) |
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
 | **Status** | **Accepted** (MQTT track P1–P7 + P8a + P9 + P10 shipped 2026-05-23 in PR #778, 410 lib tests, witness bundle VERIFIED) / **Proposed** (Matter SDK wiring P8b deferred to v0.7.1 per §9.10) |
-| **Date** | 2026-05-23 |
+| **Date** | 2026-05-23 (amended 2026-10-02: P4.5 status note, §11) |
 | **Deciders** | ruv |
 | **Codename** | **HA-DISCO** (MQTT) + **HA-FABRIC** (Matter) + **HA-MIND** (semantic primitives) |
 | **Relates to** | ADR-018 (CSI binary frame format), ADR-021 (ESP32 vitals), ADR-031 (RuView sensing-first), ADR-039 (edge vitals packet 0xC511_0002), ADR-079 (camera ground-truth), ADR-103 (cog-person-count), ADR-110 (ESP32-C6 firmware), ADR-114 (cog-quantum-vitals) |
@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ This means: **adding a new primitive is one file change**. No MQTT schema rev, n
 | **P2** | HA discovery message emitter. New module `mqtt_discovery.rs`. Emits all entity `config` topics on connect + every `--mqtt-refresh-secs`. Schema-validated against HA's published JSON schema. | pending |
 | **P3** | State publication. Subscribe to internal `tokio::broadcast` channel (the one `tx.send(json)` writes to on line 3983 of `main.rs`). Translate `edge_vitals` / `sensing_update` / `pose_data` messages into per-entity state payloads. Apply rate-limit + privacy-mode filters. | pending |
 | **P4** | Integration tests: dockerised mosquitto in CI (extend `.github/workflows/firmware-qemu.yml` pattern), schema-validate every emitted config against HA's `homeassistant/components/mqtt` JSON schemas (pin to a tested HA version). Add a smoke test that brings up sensing-server in `--source mock --mqtt`, subscribes with `paho-mqtt` test client, asserts on entity creation. | pending |
-| **P4.5** | **Semantic inference layer (HA-MIND).** New module `semantic_inference.rs` implementing the 10 v1 primitives from §3.12. Output broadcast channel consumed by both MQTT publisher (P3) and Matter bridge (P8). Per-primitive precision/recall baselines published to `docs/integrations/semantic-primitives-metrics.md`. Unit tests per FSM + integration tests via replay of ADR-079 paired captures. | pending |
+| **P4.5** | **Semantic inference layer (HA-MIND).** New module `semantic_inference.rs` implementing the 10 v1 primitives from §3.12. Output broadcast channel consumed by both MQTT publisher (P3) and Matter bridge (P8). Per-primitive precision/recall baselines published to `docs/integrations/semantic-primitives-metrics.md`. Unit tests per FSM + integration tests via replay of ADR-079 paired captures. | partial — 6 of 10 primitives on the live MQTT publisher; see §11 |
 | **P5** | Docs: new `docs/integrations/home-assistant.md` with screenshots of the HA UI after auto-discovery completes, example HA dashboard YAML (Lovelace card configs), 8 starter blueprints from §3.12.2 (distress notify, wake routine, hallway dim, elderly anomaly alert, meeting lights, bathroom fan, fall-risk escalate, auto-arm security), and the raw-channel example automations: "turn on hall light when presence ON", "send notification on fall_detected event", "log HR/BR to InfluxDB". | pending |
 | **P6** | Ship `--mqtt` in the next sensing-server release (target: v0.7.0). Demo end-to-end on `cognitum-v0` against a Mosquitto add-on running on a Home Assistant OS install. Update README hardware-options table with "Works with Home Assistant" badge. | pending |
 | **P7** | Matter Bridge spike: build a throwaway prototype with `matter-rs` exposing one `OccupancySensor` endpoint + one `GenericSwitch` for fall. Pair against Apple Home, Google Home, and HA's Matter integration. Decision gate: if pairing works on all three, proceed to P8; if blocked, switch to chip-tool FFI and re-spike. | pending |
@@ -667,4 +667,57 @@ Empty as of 2026-05-23. New questions discovered during implementation will be f

 ---

+## 11. Status note: P4.5 semantic states on the live publisher (2026-10-02)
+
+Issues [#2085](https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView/issues/2085) and [#2093](https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView/issues/2093) found that discovery announced 20 entities per device while only 6 ever received state, that `presence/state` was published on every CSI frame, and that HA device ids changed on every restart. The FSMs in `crate::semantic` existed but had no caller outside their tests. This note records what is now wired and what is not.
+
+### 11.1 What changed
+
+- **Semantic primitives run on the live path.** `mqtt::planner` holds one `SemanticBus` per node, sampled at 1 Hz (the rate the FSM constants assume). The bus feeds only the MQTT publisher. Matter does not consume it yet, so the "output broadcast channel shared with Matter" in P4.5 is not built.
+- **Announce only what has a source.** Six primitives are announced: `room_active`, `no_movement`, `elderly_inactivity_anomaly`, `someone_sleeping`, `possible_distress` and `fall_risk_elevated`. Four are not: `meeting_in_progress` needs a 1–20 % motion level, but per-node motion is a three-level classification; `bathroom_occupied`, `bed_exit` and `multi_room_transition` need zones, and the broadcast carries none (the §3.12.5 zone file is not implemented). For the same reason `zone_occupancy` (§3.1) and `pose` are not announced: `pose_keypoints` is never populated on the broadcast, and `persons[].keypoints` are synthesized.
+- **Per-entity availability (§3.6).** An announced entity is `online` only while its input exists: vitals while the calibration-gated estimate is published, `fall` while the node sends `edge_vitals`, `motion_energy` and `rssi` while present, and semantic primitives after the 60 s warmup (sleeping and distress also need breathing or heart rate, fall risk needs the fall detector). Otherwise it is `offline` and no state is sent. Transitions publish at once; all availability topics are re-sent every 30 s.
+- **No default values.** `motion_energy` was always `0.0` (MEASURED: 176 of 176 samples) because the bridge never set it. It now carries the node's `motion_band_power`, or the room value, or nothing. `fall` is driven by the rising edge of `edge_vitals.fall_detected`. Only `sensing_update` produces snapshots, which removes the phantom aggregate device that `edge_vitals` frames created. `present_still` now maps to 0 % motion instead of 100 %.
+- **Rates (§3.7).** Binary states publish on change, plus a 60 s retained heartbeat, as §3.5 already specified. Sensors keep their configured rates.
+- **Stable device identity (§3.8).** The default client id is now `wifi-densepose-<8 hex>`, persisted in `<data-dir>/mqtt_client_id`. §3.8 specified `wifi-densepose-<hostname>`; a persisted random id avoids a hostname dependency and survives hostname changes. `--mqtt-client-id` still overrides it.
+
+### 11.2 Evidence
+
+Unit tests (CODE-DERIVED, run with `cargo test -p wifi-densepose-sensing-server --features mqtt --lib -- mqtt:: semantic::`): `mqtt::planner::tests` covers the entity → state mapping, unavailable-without-source, warmup, on-change with heartbeat at a 73 frame/s input, sensor rates, reset and privacy mode. `mqtt::bridge::tests` covers message-type filtering, fall edges and motion energy. `mqtt::config::tests` covers client-id persistence across two "restarts" in a temp dir, override and malformed-file recovery.
+
+Live measurement (MEASURED, 2026-10-02): one ESP32 node streaming CSI and `edge_vitals` over UDP to a macOS host; `sensing-server --source esp32 --mqtt` against `eclipse-mosquitto:2` in Docker on a non-default port; every topic captured with a `paho-mqtt` subscriber on `#`. "Before" is `03a89793` (main), "after" is this change, built `--release --features mqtt`, same command and window.
+
+```bash
+# Broker: mosquitto.conf = "listener 1883 0.0.0.0 / allow_anonymous true / persistence false"
+docker run -d --rm -p 127.0.0.1:18830:1883 \
+  -v "$PWD/mosquitto.conf:/mosquitto/config/mosquitto.conf:ro" eclipse-mosquitto:2
+# Run A (180 s, then SIGTERM) and run B (restart, 45 s) share one --data-dir.
+# A paho-mqtt subscriber on '#' starts 2 s before each run.
+RUVIEW_API_TOKEN=<random> sensing-server --source esp32 --udp-port 5006 \
+  --udp-bind 0.0.0.0 --udp-allow <node-subnet> --http-port 3000 --ws-port 3001 \
+  --no-mdns --data-dir <dir> --mqtt --mqtt-host 127.0.0.1 --mqtt-port 18830
+```
+
+| Measure (180 s window unless noted) | Before (`03a89793`) | After |
+|---|---|---|
+| HA devices announced in run A | 2 (one phantom aggregate + `-node1`) | 1 (`-node1`) |
+| Entities announced per device | 20 | 15 |
+| Entities that received state (node device) | 6 | 10 |
+| Announced entities without state that still reported `online` | 14 | 1 (`fall`: an event, and no fall occurred) |
+| `presence/state` messages (node device) | 6,814 (37.9 / s) | 4 (one per change, plus 60 s heartbeat) |
+| `motion_energy` values | `0.0` in 176 of 176 | node band power, 177 samples |
+| Device id, run A → run B (restart, same `--data-dir`) | `wifi-densepose-<pid A>` → `<pid B>` (4 devices on the broker after B) | same persisted id in both runs (1 device) |
+| `offline` published on SIGTERM | no | no (unchanged; see 11.3) |
+| Same, plus `--privacy-mode` (75 s, fresh `--data-dir`) | — | 13 entities announced; no `heart_rate`, `breathing_rate` or `pose` topic for that device |
+
+After the change, five announced entities had no state: `heart_rate` and `breathing_rate`, because no calibration had been run; `someone_sleeping` and `possible_distress`, which depend on them; and `fall`, which is an event and no fall occurred. The first four were `offline`. `fall` was `online`, because the node sent `edge_vitals`. Before the change all 14 entities without state still reported `online`. Only one node was streaming during this measurement. #2085 used five nodes and measured about 73 `presence` messages per second per node.
+
+### 11.3 Not done
+
+- Semantic precision/recall on real captures. The figures in `semantic-primitives-metrics.md` have no reproducer in the repository and stay CLAIMED.
+- Zone and threshold files, `--semantic*` / `--no-semantic` flags on `sensing-server`, the `reason` attribute (§3.12.4), and `semantic_events.jsonl`.
+- MQTT last-will and offline-on-shutdown (§3.6). The server registers no LWT and SIGTERM does not publish `offline`, so availability stays as last published after the server stops.
+- Matter consumption of the semantic states.
+
+---
+
 *ADR-115 is the integration story that turns RuView from "another sensing platform" into "drop-in upgrade for any HA install **and** any Matter-controller home." MQTT carries the rich, differentiated telemetry; Matter carries the standardised subset across every controller ecosystem. Numbers 111 and 112 remain reserved per the project ADR-numbering policy.*
@@ -139,6 +139,32 @@ Implement the §3.3 mapping: `effective_class → PrivacyClass`, `cog-ha-matter`
 Add an opt-in `/ws/field` endpoint (or a `field_events` array on `SensingUpdate` behind a flag) carrying the signed `FieldEvent` + a privacy badge. Add an ingest route to `rufield-viewer` (it has none today — `server.rs:63-72`) so it can replay RuView's live feed instead of only `SyntheticSim`. **Gate:** a WS integration test asserting a connected client receives a privacy-badged, signature-verifiable `FieldEvent`; a viewer test asserting the new ingest route renders a live event. The `cognitum` appliance can speak RuField by consuming this endpoint (it already runs `ruview-vitals-worker`); deferred to its own ADR.

 **P4 — fusion composition + multi-modality (ARCHITECTURE, optional).**
+
+> **Update — second modality landed as a library.** Open question 5 below asked
+> whether the second modality should be `rvcsi`. It is **ultrasonic**, because
+> the cost collapsed: `rufield-adapters` now ships `UltrasonicReplayAdapter`,
+> the first adapter for `Modality::Ultrasonic` (registry code 7, empty since
+> v0.1), which parses, validates and signs [BatVu](https://github.com/ruvnet/batvu)
+> range profiles upstream. RuView only has to decide what it will put on a wire.
+>
+> `wifi-densepose-rufield::ultrasonic` is that decision, and it is expressed
+> structurally: the adapter is configured for its 32-bin coarse output (`P1`,
+> egress-safe) rather than its full per-bin frame (`P0`, edge-local), because a
+> consumer cannot un-coarsen a coarse profile whereas a runtime check can be
+> reordered. The `network_egress_allowed` gate still runs and is asserted to
+> drop nothing.
+>
+> Gates: `tests/ultrasonic_gates.rs`, 12 tests — round-trip, signature-verify,
+> fusion ingest, P1 on **both** tensor and observation, structural unreachability
+> of P4/P5, trust-tier refusal in both directions, determinism, whole-file
+> rejection of a malformed recording. Plus one asserting the honest negative
+> result: **an ultrasonic scan produces no fused inferences at all**, because the
+> adapter declines to populate `presence` (one transducer pair cannot tell a
+> person from a coat on a chair) and the engine's feature vocabulary is entirely
+> statements about a body. RuField v0.1 has no predicate for static geometry.
+>
+> Not wired into the running server. P1 shipped as a library before P3 wired it
+> in; this follows the same staging.
 Wire a second modality (cheapest: an `rvcsi`-sourced event, or recorded mmWave) into `RuFieldFusion` alongside the WiFi event, proving cross-modality fusion above ruvsense. **Gate:** a fusion test with two modalities producing ≥1 cross-modal inference, with provenance coverage 100%.

 ---
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@

 | Field | Value |
 |-------|-------|
-| **Status** | Accepted — **implemented** (O1–O9 in `@ruvnet/ruview@0.2.0`; security/community extension in `0.3.0`, ADR-283; source-cited guidance in `0.3.1`): fail-closed schemas and MCP policy, async dispatch, zero runtime dependencies, bounded/redacted local Claude/Codex adapters, reviewed shared brain, source-checked capability guidance, and replay-verified Darwin/Flywheel gate. CI gate: `ruview-harness-flywheel.yml` |
+| **Status** | Accepted — **implemented** (O1–O9 in `@ruvnet/ruview@0.2.0`; security/community extension in `0.3.0`, ADR-283; source-cited guidance in `0.3.1`; guarded Cognitum Spaces OAuth read in `0.4.0`, ADR-325): fail-closed schemas and MCP policy, async dispatch, zero runtime dependencies, bounded/redacted local Claude/Codex adapters, reviewed shared brain, source-checked capability guidance, credential-gated external reads, and replay-verified Darwin/Flywheel gate. CI gate: `ruview-harness-flywheel.yml` |
 | **Date** | 2026-07-02 |
 | **Deciders** | ruv |
 | **Codename** | **RUVIEW-NPM-REVIEW-1** |
@@ -66,10 +66,64 @@ hardware claims.
  timestamps, sequence behavior, calibration, maximum size, and report rate.
 - Validate OpenWrt One first, then BPI-R3 4x4, before considering MT7996/MLO.

+## Amendment 1 — vendor CSI on MT7981, still unvalidated
+
+- **Date**: 2026-09-19, recorded here 2026-10-01
+- **Status**: proposed. One board model (two units). The hardware gates below are still open.
+
+The 2026-07-18 decision said the public `mt76` tree has no supported CSI export,
+and that a firmware change might be required before physical CSI exists. Both
+statements need a narrower reading.
+
+Mainline `openwrt/mt76` still has no CSI export. MediaTek's public OpenWrt feed
+does: vendor id `0x0ce7`, MCU event `0xc2`, patch
+`1001-wifi-mt76-mt7915-csi-implement-csi-support`. On a Wavlink WL-WN586X3
+Rev A (MT7981BA + MT7976CN + MT7531AE) that patch, rebased onto the `mt76`
+revision pinned by OpenWrt 24.10.8, produced complex samples without a firmware
+blob swap. The `0xc2` hook is already in the MT7981 firmware that the OpenWrt
+24.10.8 image carries. The
+rebased patch and the two userspace fixes are in `firmware/openwrt-wn586x3/`.
+
+What the first capture was: one record, 2.4 GHz, 20 MHz, legacy OFDM, 64
+subcarriers, a single chain. CSI arrived only while a client sent frames.
+The rate is client traffic, not a sensor sample clock. The capture is not in
+this repository.
+
+What it was not:
+
+- Not a calibration, a sequence check, a timestamp check, or a repeatability run.
+  The label on the wire is `mediatek:physical-unvalidated`. Plain `mediatek` stays
+  reserved for a frame that has passed those gates.
+- Not a 4x4 array. Each radio is two chains. The four antennas are a 2.4 GHz pair
+  and a 5 GHz pair. Two routers are two receivers. Cross-box phase is not a
+  shared local oscillator, so it is not a beam.
+- Not the OpenWrt One or the BPI-R3. Those remain the upstream-friendly targets
+  in the original decision. The WN586X3 is the board this path was actually run on.
+
+`wifi-densepose-mtk-bridge` translates `mt76-vendor` JSON, or an MtkCSIdump
+datagram, into ADR-267 MTC1 and sends it to the sensing server. The server keeps
+one snapshot and a bounded ring of per-subcarrier amplitude and phase per
+`device_id`. It runs `mediatek-amplitude-heuristic-v0` on mean and peak amplitude,
+and `activity-index-v0` on per-subcarrier fluctuation. Both are `CLAIMED`. Neither
+is the ESP32 vital-sign path.
+
+One measured property supports further work, and nothing more. Offline, on six
+local dump captures from two units (2.4 GHz, HT20, chains rx0 and rx1 of transmit
+stream 0), the cross-chain phase `arg(H0·conj(H1))`, summed over subcarriers,
+moved 0.014-0.039 rad (p50) between adjacent frames for well-sampled
+transmitters. Raw per-chain phase moved about 1.56 rad (p50), which is what
+uniformly random phase gives (MEASURED; reproducer
+`scripts/mediatek-csi-phase-stability.py`). That shows a stable observable inside
+one radio. It does not show that the observable tracks people.
+
+The operator guide is [`docs/mediatek-router-csi.md`](../mediatek-router-csi.md).
+
 ## Links

 - [ADR-123: BFLD capture path](ADR-123-bfld-capture-path-nexmon-and-esp32.md)
 - [ADR-264: RTL8720F radar wire protocol](ADR-264-rtl8720f-radar-wire-protocol.md)
+- [ADR-267: MediaTek MIMO CSI wire protocol](ADR-267-mediatek-mimo-csi-wire-protocol.md)
+- [MediaTek router CSI guide](../mediatek-router-csi.md)
 - [upstream mt76](https://github.com/openwrt/mt76)
 - [OpenWrt One](https://openwrt.org/toh/openwrt/one)
 - [MediaTek OpenWrt feed](https://git01.mediatek.com/openwrt/feeds/mtk-openwrt-feeds/)
@@ -34,6 +34,81 @@ Define `MTC1` version 1 as a little-endian, self-delimiting envelope:
 - Flags distinguish calibrated, saturated, time-synchronized, dropped-predecessor,
  and synthetic frames. Synthetic provenance cannot be cleared by downstream code.

+## Amendment 1 — PPDU types `Legacy` and `Unknown`
+
+- **Date**: 2026-09-19
+- **Status**: proposed. Demonstrated on one WL-WN586X3 capture. Not a maintainer acceptance.
+- **Scope**: `PpduType` discriminants only. The 72-byte header layout, CRC,
+  payload ordering, flags, and caps are unchanged.
+
+### What changed
+
+`PpduType` gains two variants:
+
+| Value | Name | Meaning |
+|---|---|---|
+| 6 | `Legacy` | Pre-HT: 802.11b CCK or 802.11a/g OFDM |
+| 7 | `Unknown` | A PPDU format the producer could not classify |
+
+Values 1-5 (`Ht`, `Vht`, `HeSu`, `HeMu`, `Eht`) are untouched.
+
+### Why
+
+The original set assumed every CSI report would be HT or later. The first real
+MT7981 capture disproved that. A Wavlink WL-WN586X3 (MT7981B + MT7976C) running
+an OpenWrt 24.10.8 image built with the patches in `firmware/openwrt-wn586x3/`
+reported `rx_mode = 1` (`MT_PHY_TYPE_OFDM`) for a client associated on 2.4 GHz
+channel 6 at 20 MHz. The bridge had no way to express it and dropped the frame.
+
+That was a real data loss, not a corner case. MediaTek's CSI driver treats legacy
+OFDM as a first-class mode: `mt7915_vendor_csi_tone_mask` skips only
+`MT_PHY_TYPE_CCK`, and its `mode_map` is keyed by `MT_PHY_TYPE_OFDM`, `_HT`,
+`_VHT` and `_HE_SU`, giving OFDM its own tone-mask group
+(`1001-wifi-mt76-mt7915-csi-implement-csi-support.patch:1070-1088`). Association
+and management exchanges are legacy-rate by design, so a sensing deployment will
+see these continuously.
+
+`Unknown` exists so the enum's gaps (5-7 and 12 in `mt76_phy_type`) and future
+modes are carried explicitly rather than guessed at or dropped. It also covers
+transports that omit the field: the MtkCSIdump UDP datagram carries no `rx_mode`,
+and reporting `Unknown` there is honest where defaulting to a concrete format was
+not.
+
+### Compatibility
+
+- **Forward, not backward.** A decoder built before this amendment rejects
+  discriminants 6 and 7 with `UnknownPpduType`, because the original parser
+  rejects unknown types by design. `TryFrom<u8>` returns `Err` rather than
+  panicking, so an old decoder fails safely — it just drops legacy frames, and
+  does so silently. **Rebuild MTC1 consumers after this codec change.**
+- **Scope is narrower than "the workspace".** `wifi-densepose-hardware` defines
+  three independent `PpduType` enums — `csi_frame.rs` (ESP32),
+  `qualcomm_csi.rs`, and `mediatek_csi.rs` — and this amendment touches only the
+  MediaTek one. Neither of the others changes, so no other vendor bridge is
+  affected. The complete set of `mediatek_csi::PpduType` consumers is:
+  `wifi-densepose-hardware`'s own `mediatek-csi-sim` binary,
+  `wifi-densepose-mtk-bridge`, and `wifi-densepose-sensing-server`, which renders the
+  value with `{:?}` and so needed no code change. In particular the
+  `ppdu_type > 3` bound in `bootstrap_baseline.rs` is fed from the **ESP32**
+  enum via `CsiGridKey::from_frame(&Esp32Frame)`, not from MediaTek frames, so
+  `Legacy` and `Unknown` cannot reach it.
+- Because the variants were added rather than renumbered, and Rust requires
+  exhaustive matches, the compiler locates any consumer that must be updated.
+  Nothing outside the files above needed one.
+- Producers must emit 6 only for frames that genuinely are pre-HT, and 7 only
+  where the format is truly unclassified. Neither is a dumping ground for a
+  mapping the producer has not done.
+- The mapping from `rx_mode` to `PpduType` is now infallible, so no MTC1 producer
+  may drop a frame on PPDU grounds.
+- Unchanged: synthetic provenance still cannot be cleared by downstream code.
+
+### Observed dimensions
+
+The same capture assembled to 1x1x64. That is the client's behaviour, not a
+protocol limit: the handset sent single-stream frames to a 2.4 GHz 20 MHz AP.
+Expect 1x2 or 2x2 on 5 GHz, and size consumers for the chipset profile's
+`max_chains` rather than for what one capture happened to show.
+
 ## Consequences

 ### Positive
@@ -59,3 +134,8 @@ Define `MTC1` version 1 as a little-endian, self-delimiting envelope:
 - [ADR-266: MediaTek Filogic CSI platform](ADR-266-mediatek-filogic-csi-platform.md)
 - [ADR-018: ESP32 binary CSI framing](ADR-018-esp32-csi-frame-protocol.md)
 - [ADR-264: RTL8720F radar wire protocol](ADR-264-rtl8720f-radar-wire-protocol.md)
+- Amendment 1 implementation: `v2/crates/wifi-densepose-hardware/src/mediatek_csi.rs`
+  (codec) and `v2/crates/wifi-densepose-mtk-bridge` (`ppdu_from_rx_mode`). The
+  motivating capture is a lab record and is not in this tree: it contains a
+  client transmitter address and raw CSI. The in-repo check is a fabricated
+  legacy-OFDM record in `wifi-densepose-mtk-bridge/tests/hardware_capture.rs`.
@@ -31,6 +31,26 @@ bounded output/time, secret redaction and realpath-based RuView checkout
 validation. Write mode requires two explicit flags and never uses permission or
 sandbox bypasses.

+## Credentialed external reads
+
+Read-only cloud access is not equivalent to an uncredentialed local read. The
+Cognitum Spaces adapter therefore delegates OAuth and response validation to
+the Rust `wifi-densepose` client, never accepts bearer tokens or API keys, and
+removes the API-key compatibility environment from the child process. Its MCP
+tool is denied unless the server operator grants `credential-use`; MCP callers
+cannot select a credential path or API origin. The adapter uses only an
+installed `wifi-densepose` binary; it never executes Cargo build scripts from
+an auto-detected checkout while holding credential authority. The tool is
+marked open-world and independently rechecks response size, structure, privacy
+class, and prohibited raw fields.
+
+An expiring access token may rotate the stored refresh credential. The MCP
+annotation is therefore non-read-only and non-idempotent even though the cloud
+data operation is read-only. That bounded authentication side effect is
+disclosed in the schema and result. It does not change the cloud operation from
+read-only and confers no write or action authority. ADR-325 remains authoritative
+for the Spaces data and policy boundary.
+
 ## Shared brain

 The public brain is committed JSONL, not a shared mutable database. Canonical
@@ -67,5 +87,6 @@ autonomously promotes or publishes an evolved candidate.
 Contributors can explore RuView with either major local CLI and share durable
 findings without sharing secrets. Improvements become reproducible proposals
 with frozen evaluation evidence. The cost is a larger development-only npm
-lockfile, a 128 KiB unpacked-package budget (the current tarball is below that
-bound), and explicit maintenance of the corpus, genome and gate.
+lockfile, a 160 KiB unpacked-package budget after adding the duplicated host
+playbook and bounded OAuth adapter (the package remains runtime-dependency-free),
+and explicit maintenance of the corpus, genome and gate.
@@ -0,0 +1,231 @@
+# ADR-288: VEIL — a compliant-waveform privacy shield against unauthorized WiFi sensing
+
+| Field | Value |
+|-------|-------|
+| **Status** | Proposed — implemented (P1 reference model) |
+| **Date** | 2026-08-09 |
+| **Deciders** | ruv |
+| **Codename** | **VEIL** — Verifiable Emission-shaping for Identity-Leakage prevention |
+| **Codebase target** | new leaf crate `v2/crates/wifi-densepose-privshield` |
+| **Parent** | ADR-118 (BFLD — the detection layer VEIL is the countermeasure to), ADR-282 (mandatory L0–L5 evidence ladder) |
+| **Relates to** | ADR-120/121 (BFLD privacy class + identity-risk scoring — the trigger source), ADR-141 (privacy control plane / runtime attestation — the audit consumer), ADR-280 (active sensing / governed actuation — VEIL is a defensive sensing action), ADR-185 §13 (`wifi-densepose-aether` — the pure-compute leaf pattern this crate follows) |
+| **Research bundle** | [`docs/research/privacy-shield/`](../research/privacy-shield/) (9 files) |
+| **Tracking issue** | TBD |
+
+## 0. PROOF discipline
+
+Every defense number this crate produces is **SYNTHETIC / evidence level L0**
+(ADR-282): generated by the crate's own model (`identity::Channel`), attacked by
+the crate's own classifier (`attacker::NearestCentroidAttacker`), and scored
+against its own known labels. Nothing here has been validated against real WiFi
+silicon, and the crate contains no radio integration and cannot emit RF. External
+attack/defense results cited from the literature (BFId, LeakyBeam, DySPAN-2026,
+IRShield, FCC statutes) are **EXTERNAL** evidence and labelled MEASURED/CLAIMED in
+the research bundle. The single measured claim about *our own behavior* is the
+pinned deterministic witness in `proof.rs`.
+
+## 1. Context
+
+### 1.1 The gap
+
+IEEE 802.11ac/ax beamforming feedback (BFI) — the compressed Givens-rotation
+angle matrices (φ/ψ) a client sends the AP — is transmitted **unencrypted on the
+management plane**. Any device in monitor mode can capture it for every station
+at once, no network access, and the target need carry no device. The literature
+establishes the severity: **BFId** (ACM CCS 2025) re-identifies individuals from
+BFI; **LeakyBeam** (NDSS 2025) detects occupancy through walls at 20 m from BFI;
+**BeamSense** recognizes activities at up to 99.28%. IEEE Std **802.11bf-2025**
+(published 26 Sep 2025) standardizes the sensing measurement/feedback surface
+these attacks abuse — and a 2023 proposal for a BFI secure-transmission mechanism
+(802.11-23/0782) was **withdrawn**, so the standard shipped with no privacy
+protections.
+
+RuView already has a *detection* layer for this: **BFLD** (ADR-118/121) measures
+the identity-leakage of each frame and gates what leaves the node. But BFLD
+protects *RuView's own outputs*; it does nothing about a **third-party sniffer**
+capturing the room's plaintext BFI off the air. There is no RuView component, and
+per our market survey no shipping product anywhere, that prevents that.
+
+### 1.2 Constraint: compliant waveform controls, never jamming
+
+The defense must preserve normal communications and must not interfere with any
+other station. Jamming (47 U.S.C. §333/§302a) is defined by *adding energy to
+interfere with others' transmissions*. Any acceptable control must shape only the
+node's **own** standards-conformant emission.
+
+### 1.3 The separability insight
+
+Identity leaks through the *fine* cross-subcarrier phase structure of a
+beamforming report; data throughput rides the *dominant* beam direction. These
+are (mostly) separable subspaces — so a transform confined to the fine subspace
+can wreck re-identification while sparing the beam the link depends on. DySPAN-2026
+independently MEASURED that shaping fine-resolution feedback is near-free in
+throughput, corroborating the insight.
+
+## 2. Decision
+
+Ship **`wifi-densepose-privshield`** (VEIL) as a standalone pure-compute leaf
+crate (the `wifi-densepose-aether`/`nvsim` pattern: dependency-free, deterministic,
+WASM-ready, zero coupling to any radio or ingestion path), implementing:
+
+1. **A SYNTHETIC two-subspace BFI model** (`identity.rs`): each identity owns a
+   stable fine-block signature; sessions add environmental nuisance; the comm
+   block is identity-free and carries throughput.
+2. **The protector** (`protector.rs`): compliant waveform controls, primarily a
+   **per-session keyed orthogonal rotation of the fine subspace, composed from
+   extra Givens rotations** — the report's native primitive. Plus feedback
+   quantization/dither, sounding-cadence randomization, and a `SensingDetector`
+   that engages the shield only when sensing activity is observed.
+3. **The adversary** (`attacker.rs`): a passive nearest-centroid re-identifier
+   modeling the BFId threat, with selectable Euclidean/Cosine metrics.
+4. **A throughput model** (`throughput.rs`):
+   `(1 − sounding − feedback_airtime) · C(SNR·(1−ρ))/C(SNR)`, where the residual
+   `ρ` falls with feedback bits and the feedback airtime rises with them — giving
+   a genuine interior throughput optimum in feedback resolution.
+5. **A compliance audit** (`compliance.rs`): the rotation is orthogonal ⇒
+   energy-preserving ⇒ adds no interfering energy ⇒ **not jamming**, turned into a
+   checked `ComplianceReport` (energy ratio ≈ 1.0).
+6. **The experiment** (`experiment.rs`): runs the attacker against unprotected and
+   protected traffic and reports both accuracies vs. chance, plus throughput and
+   compliance, with a single `passed()` verdict.
+7. **The hyper-optimizer** (`optimize.rs`): derives the shipped shield config
+   rather than hand-picking it — the throughput-optimal feedback resolution and
+   the minimum rotation-mixing budget that collapses re-ID robustly (across both
+   attacker metrics and N∈{16,32}), plus a Pareto frontier.
+8. **A deterministic proof** (`proof.rs`): a pinned FNV-1a witness over the
+   reference experiment (the `nvsim`/`verify.py` discipline).
+
+### 2.1 Why the keyed Givens rotation
+
+It is simultaneously **orthogonal** (energy-preserving ⇒ compliant),
+**key-reversible** (the associated AP shares the session key and recovers the true
+precoder ⇒ throughput preserved), and **fresh per session** (a sniffer sees a new
+random rotation of the signature each session and cannot average it back ⇒ the
+enrollment attack collapses; over unknown rotations the signature carries no
+stable discriminative information ⇒ re-ID → chance). It is the shared-secret
+precoding idea (cf. MIMOCrypt) specialized to the identity-bearing subspace.
+
+### 2.2 Measured behavior (SYNTHETIC / L0)
+
+Reference experiment at the hyper-optimized operating point (§opt), default
+scene, N=16 identities, `cargo test`:
+
+| Metric | Shield off | Shield on |
+|---|---|---|
+| Passive re-ID accuracy | 100.0% | **4.7%** (chance 6.25%) |
+| Link throughput ratio | 100% | **97.6%** |
+| Emission energy ratio | — | **1.000000** (compliant) |
+
+All 35 unit/proof tests + doctest pass; the crate builds for
+`wasm32-unknown-unknown` and is clippy-clean.
+
+### opt. Hyper-optimization (`optimize.rs`)
+
+The shipped shield config is the optimizer's output, not a guess, and
+`ShieldConfig::default()` is asserted equal to it:
+
+- **Feedback resolution = 5 bits.** Throughput has an interior optimum in
+  feedback bits (residual falls, feedback airtime rises); the unconstrained
+  optimum is 3 bits (matching DySPAN-2026), and 5 is the throughput-best value in
+  the spec-allowed 802.11 {5,7,9} set.
+- **Givens passes = 96.** The proven minimum for robust collapse — across both
+  attacker metrics *and* N∈{16,32} — is **48**; the shipped 96 is a free 2×
+  privacy margin, since the keyed rotation is derived from the shared secret and
+  never signaled (extra passes cost compute, not airtime). The original
+  hand-picked 112 was 2.3× over-provisioned.
+
+Net vs. the original hand-picked (112 passes / 7 bits): the optimum is strictly
+better on **both** privacy (re-ID 0.047 vs 0.078) and throughput (0.976 vs 0.974),
+and is now verified rather than assumed. See
+`docs/research/privacy-shield/08-optimization.md`.
+
+### harness. Native terminal harness + TUI (`src/bin/veil.rs`)
+
+A custom, dependency-free binary (`veil`) ships with the crate — the in-repo,
+native counterpart to the npm metaharness (ADR-289). It drives the same public
+API the tests use, as an interactive ANSI dashboard plus scriptable subcommands
+(`report`, `sweep`, `optimize`, `adaptive <N>`, `proof`, `doctor`, `tui`).
+Std-only (no `crossterm`/`ratatui`): the TUI is a command-driven redraw loop, so
+it runs in any terminal, pipe, or CI and keeps the crate a pure leaf. It reports
+only SYNTHETIC/L0 numbers and never relabels them. The wasm leaf story is
+unchanged (validated with `--lib`; the bin is native-only).
+
+### sota. 2025–2026 evidence update (verified)
+
+A cited, adversarially-verified SOTA sweep
+(`docs/research/privacy-shield/09-sota-update-2026.md`) refines the threat and
+positioning. Load-bearing points for this ADR:
+
+- **Threat is broader and cheaper than §1.1 stated.** A passive, keyless,
+  single-antenna sniffer at ~20 m and *through walls* can identify people
+  (BFId, 99.5%/N=197, `MEASURED`), read **breathing** from stationary occupants
+  and **keystrokes/PINs** (LeakyBeam / WiKI-Eve / SThief, `MEASURED`), and —
+  decisively — **reconstruct full CSI from the sniffed BFI** (BFIAttack,
+  ≥93% single-antenna, `MEASURED`). VEIL's obfuscation must therefore degrade
+  *reconstructed-CSI* utility, not merely raw-BFI feature noise; because VEIL's
+  rotation is a **secret orthogonal** transform, the attacker has no key and no
+  closed-form to invert — this is now a claim to **test**, not assume.
+- **VEIL's family is independently validated.** AP-side per-packet random
+  unitary on the LTF (LeakyBeam defense, 89.7%→~51%, `MEASURED`) and RIS
+  obfuscation (PrivISAC, 93%→~30%, robust to a retrained multi-location
+  attacker, `MEASURED`) confirm standard-permitted beamforming-surface
+  obfuscation works; DP-Givens quantization (`SYNTHETIC`) offers a formal ε knob.
+- **Compliance precedent.** BeamDancer (IEEE TWC 2024, `MEASURED`) argues
+  native-beamforming obfuscation is 802.11-compliant while jamming/geofencing
+  are not — cite it as precedent. (Its ">96% PDR" figure was **refuted** in
+  verification; do not cite it.)
+- **Security honesty.** Obfuscation shields have published counter-attacks
+  ("Defeating CSI obfuscation", SnoopFi), so VEIL's own shield security is
+  `CLAIMED`, not proven-secure, until it withstands learned de-obfuscation.
+- **Governance gap.** No claim on 802.11bf-2025 privacy provisions survived
+  verification; that pillar remains an open question, not an asserted fact.
+
+The derived, prioritized improvement backlog lives in the SOTA-update file (§4).
+
+## 3. What this explicitly is NOT
+
+- **Not a radio driver.** No RF frontend, no transmit path, no
+  `wifi-densepose-hardware` coupling. VEIL cannot emit and cannot jam.
+- **Not a defense against the associated AP.** That party holds the session key by
+  construction (threat class A3); protecting against a malicious AP is BFLD's
+  detection/privacy-class problem (ADR-118/141), not this shield's.
+- **Not a full motion-obfuscation claim.** A fixed per-session rotation does not
+  hide coarse within-session motion; identity *re-ID* is the guaranteed target,
+  motion is partial/future work.
+- **Not a real-hardware performance claim.** All defense numbers are SYNTHETIC/L0
+  until a two-node capture with a boot/runtime-log witness exists (CLAUDE.md
+  hardware rule; roadmap P5).
+- **Not RF denial or camera-grade anything.**
+
+## 4. Simplifications (honesty boundary)
+
+- The two-subspace split is an abstraction; on real radios comm and identity
+  information are only *approximately* separable, so the real throughput cost of
+  fully hiding identity may exceed the model's ~2%. DySPAN-2026's MEASURED curve
+  bounds it as *small* at fine resolution, not zero.
+- The attacker is nearest-centroid. The collapse argument is classifier-independent
+  (it is about the marginalized signal), but P2/P5 must confirm a learned attacker
+  also collapses.
+- The crate's PRNG is SplitMix64 — deterministic and WASM-safe but **not
+  cryptographic**; a deployment derives the rotation key from the negotiated link
+  secret, never from this PRNG.
+
+## 5. Consequences
+
+- RuView gains the *countermeasure* half of its RF-privacy story: BFLD detects
+  leakage, VEIL acts on it — a defensible, standards-anchored, gap-filling
+  position (see `docs/research/privacy-shield/06-market-and-buyers.md`).
+- The compliance audit gives regulators/auditors a machine-checkable "not jamming"
+  artifact that composes with ADR-141 attestation.
+- Future integration (BFLD `identity_risk` → `SensingDetector`, ADR-280 governed
+  actuation, firmware feedback shaping, two-node hardware measurement) is staged in
+  the research bundle roadmap and deliberately deferred so the model validates in
+  isolation first.
+
+## 6. Validation
+
+```bash
+cargo test -p wifi-densepose-privshield --no-default-features
+cargo build -p wifi-densepose-privshield --target wasm32-unknown-unknown
+cargo clippy -p wifi-densepose-privshield --all-targets
+```
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+# ADR-289: `wifi-densepose-privshield-harness` — a MetaHarness for the VEIL privacy shield
+
+| Field | Value |
+|-------|-------|
+| **Status** | Proposed — implemented (P1) |
+| **Date** | 2026-08-09 |
+| **Parent** | ADR-288 (`wifi-densepose-privshield` / VEIL, the crate this harness assists development on) |
+| **Relates to** | ADR-286 (`wifi-densepose-sar-harness`, the per-crate harness scaffold this one mirrors), ADR-285 (`harness/homecore/`, the WASM-first `@metaharness/kernel` pattern), ADR-182 (`harness/ruview/`, the first minted harness), ADR-282 (L0–L5 evidence ladder) |
+| **Location** | `harness/wifi-densepose-privshield/` |
+
+## 0. PROOF discipline
+
+Every claim below about what is "real" versus "illustrative"/"SYNTHETIC" is
+checked by a test in this harness's own suite (router + flywheel + install-smoke
+ guidance). The dependency-free `guidance` surface is covered by
+`__tests__/guidance.test.ts`, which runs even before `npm install`. Nothing here
+asserts a MEASURED defense result — the harness surfaces the VEIL crate's
+SYNTHETIC/L0 numbers with that label intact.
+
+## 1. Context
+
+`wifi-densepose-privshield` (ADR-288) is the VEIL privacy shield — a new,
+narrowly-scoped crate. Following the pattern ADR-286 set for
+`wifi-densepose-sar`, it gets a dedicated per-crate MetaHarness rather than a
+bespoke setup: the `vertical:coding` scaffold (architect/implementer/reviewer/
+test-writer, `doctor`) with `@metaharness/router`, `@metaharness/flywheel`, and
+Darwin Mode wired in, plus a VEIL-specific, dependency-free `guidance` surface.
+
+## 2. Decision
+
+Land the harness at `harness/wifi-densepose-privshield/`, mirroring
+`wifi-densepose-sar-harness`, with two deliberate improvements:
+
+1. **Dynamic dependency imports.** `bin/cli.js` imports the `@metaharness/*`
+   packages *inside* the commands that need them, not at module top. So
+   `guidance`, `--help`, and the guidance test run with **zero dependencies
+   installed** — useful for offline/air-gapped review and for this repo's CI
+   before `npm install`. Only `init`/`doctor`/`route`/`flywheel` touch the
+   kernel/host/router/flywheel packages.
+2. **A VEIL `guidance` command.** A self-contained, source-cited, read-only
+   capability map (topics: `overview`, `threat`, `countermeasure`,
+   `compliance`, `optimization`, `experiment`), each entry carrying a summary,
+   repo-relative source citations, focused validation commands, and explicit
+   limitations — the `ruview_guidance` shape, specialized to VEIL. It labels all
+   defense evidence `SYNTHETIC/L0` and states plainly that guidance is
+   navigation, not authority.
+
+The standard three self-improvement/cost pieces are wired as real npm
+dependencies (not stubs):
+
+- **`@metaharness/darwin`** (devDependency) — `npm run evolve` / `evolve:dry`
+  mutates the harness's own operating config, keeping only measurable gains.
+- **`@metaharness/router`** — `src/router.ts` wires a real cost-optimal `Router`
+  (`qualityBar: 0.8`, k=1) over two model tiers, with four VEIL-shaped task axes
+  (threatModeling / complianceReview / optimizerTuning / docWriting). Labelled
+  examples are illustrative seed data (honesty note in-file).
+- **`@metaharness/flywheel`** — `src/flywheel.ts` wires the real
+  `runFlywheelGenerations` promotion loop (propose → evaluate → gate → promote,
+  Ed25519-signed, independently replayable) with a SYNTHETIC proposer/evaluator
+  (`dataSource: 'SYNTHETIC'`, no model call), over VEIL policy levers
+  (`complianceReview`, `threatTriage`).
+
+## 3. What this explicitly is NOT
+
+- **Not a VEIL runtime.** The harness does not run a radio, emit RF, or jam. It
+  assists *development* on the crate; it cannot execute the shield on hardware.
+- **Not evolving the crate.** Darwin/Flywheel mutate the harness's own policy
+  (agent prompts, review-checklist depth), not VEIL's Rust code. The crate's
+  actual hyper-optimization (ADR-288 §opt) was done directly, in the crate.
+- **Not a live routing/promotion system.** The router's examples are seed data;
+  the flywheel's proposer/evaluator are deterministic stand-ins — both honestly
+  labelled in-source and in `CLAUDE.md`.
+- **Not a replacement for the crate's gates.** The authoritative check for a
+  VEIL change remains `cargo test -p wifi-densepose-privshield`.
+- **Not a re-labeller.** The harness must never present VEIL's SYNTHETIC results
+  as MEASURED, and never scaffold interference-based ("jamming") defenses — both
+  are hard rules in the harness `CLAUDE.md`.
+
+## 4. Consequences
+
+- The harness ships `guidance`/`doctor`/`init`/`route`/`flywheel`; `guidance`
+  and `--help` work offline (validated here via `node bin/cli.js`), the rest
+  after `npm install` + `npm run build` (CI).
+- `.harness/manifest.json` + `manifest.sha256` are generated with real per-file
+  hashes at creation (unlike ADR-286's scaffold, whose manifest was historical).
+- Scoped to its own name: its plugin, permissions, and (future) MCP surface only
+  read/assist on `wifi-densepose-privshield`. No risk to other harnesses/crates.
+
+## 5. Validation
+
+```bash
+cd harness/wifi-densepose-privshield
+node bin/cli.js guidance --topic overview   # dependency-free
+npm ci && npm run build && npm test          # full suite (CI; needs registry access)
+```
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+# ADR-290: VEIL end-to-end hardware implementation program (multi-provider firmware)
+
+| Field | Value |
+|-------|-------|
+| **Status** | Proposed — P4 scaffolding (build-only); portable core validated on host |
+| **Date** | 2026-08-09 |
+| **Parent** | ADR-288 (VEIL shield), ADR-289 (harness), ADR-282 (L0–L5 evidence ladder) |
+| **Location** | `firmware/privshield/` |
+| **Relates to** | `firmware/esp32-csi-node/` (the CSI sensor/attacker node), ADR-280 (governed actuation), ADR-141 (attestation) |
+
+## 0. PROOF discipline
+
+The **only** artifact validated here is the portable C core
+(`firmware/privshield/core/`): a host test (`make test`) checks energy
+conservation, reversibility, wrong-key failure, and — pinned — that its
+SplitMix64 key schedule is **byte-identical to the Rust crate's** PRNG. That is
+`build`/host-level evidence, not silicon. Every per-provider adapter is a
+**build-only scaffold** with `TODO(hw)` markers: `SYNTHETIC / L0`, no captured
+log, no `MEASURED` claim. Nothing in this ADR asserts VEIL works on real
+hardware; it asserts a *plan and a shared core* to get there (P5).
+
+## 1. Context
+
+ADR-288 shipped VEIL as a deterministic, no-radio Rust model, and the 2025–2026
+SOTA sweep (ADR-288 §sota) confirmed the mechanism's family is real and
+standard-permitted. The open question left was **"does this run on real WiFi
+hardware, and on which?"** — including the user asks: *can OpenWRT / open WiFi
+software implement it, and can ESP32 help scramble signals?* Answering requires
+committing to the platform reality rather than assuming a uniform "firmware"
+target.
+
+## 2. Decision
+
+Stand up `firmware/privshield/` as a **multi-provider E2E program** around one
+shared, validated core:
+
+1. **A portable C shield core** (`core/veil_shield.{h,c}`) — the keyed
+   Givens-rotation obfuscation, `no_std`-friendly C99 (no malloc/libc I/O), with
+   a SplitMix64 key schedule matching the Rust crate so on-air behavior is
+   identical everywhere and every adapter links the *same* math. Host-tested.
+2. **Per-provider adapters**, each built and graded by a hardware research
+   agent, honest about what its stack can actually touch:
+   - **`openwifi/`** (open PHY/MAC on SDR/FPGA) — the highest-capability path and
+     the one that can host the **keyed-reversible** design end-to-end
+     (protector + AP-side compensation). Carries the **P5 measurement protocol**
+     (`MEASUREMENT.md`) that yields the first `MEASURED` result with a witness.
+   - **`openwrt/`** (Linux `mac80211`, mt76/ath9k…) — the commodity path.
+     Sounding-cadence randomization, MU-group and stream-mapping control are
+     feasible from the driver/hostapd; the per-packet unitary on the LTF spatial
+     mapping is firmware-deep on most parts. Partial.
+   - **`nexmon/`** (Broadcom/Cypress C firmware patches) — the commodity
+     C-firmware route; the read path is proven (Wi-BFI/nexmon_csi), the transmit
+     report-shaping path is research-grade/partial.
+   - **`esp32/`** (ESP-IDF) — **not** a feedback protector (the beamforming path
+     is a closed blob): ESP32 shapes CSI *read*, not transmitted feedback. Its
+     legitimate roles are a **sensing detector** (trigger the AP-side shield) and
+     an **RIS controller** (drive an external reconfigurable surface to scramble
+     the sensing direction — the honest way ESP32 "helps scramble", via an
+     external surface, not its own PHY).
+3. **Compliance stance carried into hardware:** every control shapes the node's
+   own standards-conformant emission and preserves energy; the ESP32
+   decoy/cover-traffic idea is documented as *legally sensitive / not
+   recommended* precisely because it edges toward the interference line.
+
+Per-provider feasibility grades live in each subdir README and the top-level
+feasibility matrix; they are the answer to the "which hardware" question.
+
+## 3. What this explicitly is NOT
+
+- **Not validated firmware.** No adapter has run on silicon; there is no witness.
+  The scaffolds compile-*shaped*, not compile-*guaranteed* on their toolchains
+  (which are absent in this environment).
+- **Not a claim that ESP32 can shield beamforming feedback** — it cannot; it is a
+  detector/RIS-controller only.
+- **Not jamming, on any platform.** Compliant waveform shaping only.
+- **Not a MEASURED result.** That is P5, gated on a captured log.
+
+## 4. Consequences
+
+- One validated core, four honest provider scaffolds, and a concrete P5
+  measurement plan — a real path from model to silicon, with the effort/blocker
+  reality made explicit per platform.
+- The shared core keeps every future hardware result consistent with the crate
+  and with each other.
+- Scope stays inside `firmware/privshield/`; no other crate/firmware is touched
+  (the existing `esp32-csi-node` remains the sensor/attacker node).
+
+## 5. Validation
+
+```bash
+cd firmware/privshield/core && make test    # host: energy/reversibility/PRNG parity
+# per-provider builds require their toolchains (ESP-IDF, OpenWRT SDK, Nexmon,
+# Vivado) and real hardware — see each subdir's BUILD/INTEGRATION notes.
+```
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+# ADR-291: Public-benchmark evaluation harness — Widar3.0 ingest, standard split protocols, leakage guards
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation (this PR)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-10
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: training, evaluation, benchmarks, widar, mm-fi, leakage, honesty
+
+## Context
+
+RuView implements the field's key techniques (CSI ratio, BVP features, MAE
+pretraining, rapid adaptation) but reports results only on self-collected data
+with self-defined metrics (e.g. the README's held-out temporal-triplet
+accuracy). A 2026 deep-research sweep of the WiFi-sensing literature found:
+
+1. Cross-domain generalization is the field's central unsolved problem; the
+   only widely reproduced cross-domain result is Widar3.0's BVP benchmark.
+2. MM-Fi (NeurIPS 2023) is the standard WiFi-pose benchmark, with defined
+   cross-subject and cross-environment protocols.
+3. The field had a documented leakage reckoning in 2024–2025: window-level
+   random splits on continuous recordings inflate accuracy (one dataset's F1
+   collapsed from ~90% to ~22% under subject-disjoint splits — Sensors
+   24(10):3159; Signals 6(4):59).
+
+`wifi-densepose-train` already has an `MmFiDataset` NPY loader and a
+deterministic `SyntheticCsiDataset`, but no Widar3.0 ingest, no standard split
+protocols, and no structural leakage guard. CLAUDE.md already requires
+mean-pose baselines and leakage-free held-out splits for pose PCK; nothing in
+the code enforces this.
+
+Without leaderboard-comparable numbers, RuView's claims cannot be ranked
+against published systems, which blocks both scientific credibility and
+commercial (OEM licensing) conversations.
+
+## Options considered
+
+1. **Do nothing; keep self-collected metrics.** Rejected: perpetuates the
+   comparability gap.
+2. **Port a Python eval stack (SenseFi) alongside the Rust pipeline.**
+   Rejected: violates the v2 Rust-workspace direction and adds an unreviewed
+   dependency surface.
+3. **Extend `wifi-densepose-train` with native loaders + protocol machinery.**
+   Chosen.
+
+## Decision
+
+Extend `v2/crates/wifi-densepose-train` with three additions:
+
+### 1. Widar3.0 ingest (`dataset::widar`)
+
+- A parser for the Intel 5300 `.dat` CSI log format ("bfee" records) used by
+  the Widar3.0 raw distribution: framed records with a 3-byte header
+  (2-byte little-endian length + 1-byte code 0xBB), a 20-byte bfee header
+  (timestamp_low, bfee_count, Nrx, Ntx, RSSI a/b/c, noise, agc, antenna_sel,
+  len, rate), and a packed 10-bit-per-component complex CSI payload of
+  30 subcarrier groups. Invalid records are skipped with a warning, not a
+  panic — untrusted file input is validated at the boundary per CLAUDE.md.
+- A `WidarDataset` implementing the existing `CsiDataset` trait, mapping
+  Widar's `Nrx × Ntx × 30` CSI into windowed `CsiSample`s via the existing
+  subcarrier interpolation, with domain metadata (user, room, orientation,
+  gesture) parsed from Widar's documented directory/file naming convention.
+- No network access: the loader reads a local dataset root. Dataset download
+  remains a documented manual step.
+
+### 2. Split protocols (`protocols`)
+
+- A `SplitProtocol` type expressing the standard evaluations: cross-subject
+  (MM-Fi style), cross-environment/room, cross-orientation (Widar style), and
+  random-baseline (explicitly labelled as leakage-prone, for comparison only).
+- Split assignment is a pure function of sample metadata + a seed — fully
+  deterministic, no RNG state.
+
+### 3. Leakage guards (`protocols::leakage`)
+
+- A structural `LeakageAudit` that, given a proposed train/test split,
+  verifies: (a) subject-disjointness, (b) environment-disjointness where the
+  protocol claims it, (c) no two windows from the same continuous recording
+  span both sides of the split. A failed audit is an `Err`, not a warning.
+- PCK/accuracy reporting requires a `MeanPoseBaseline` computed from the
+  training split only, and reports model-vs-baseline together, enforcing the
+  CLAUDE.md rule in the type system rather than by convention.
+- Evaluation output is an evidence-tagged report (`MEASURED` requires a
+  reproducer command line embedded in the report; anything else is emitted as
+  `SYNTHETIC` or `CLAIMED`).
+
+## Consequences
+
+- RuView results become comparable to published numbers (Widar3.0 cross-domain
+  gesture; MM-Fi cross-subject pose) for the first time.
+- The leakage audit will make some existing internal numbers look worse. That
+  is the point.
+- Parsing a legacy binary format adds maintenance surface; mitigated by
+  fixture-based tests with synthetic, deterministically generated `.dat`
+  bytes (no dataset redistribution).
+- Widar's raw distribution is Intel 5300-specific; ESP32-captured data
+  continues through existing loaders. The protocols/leakage machinery is
+  loader-agnostic.
+
+## Validation
+
+- `cargo test -p wifi-densepose-train` — unit tests for the bfee parser
+  (truncated, corrupt, and valid synthetic fixtures), split determinism,
+  leakage-audit rejection cases, and mean-pose baseline math.
+- `cargo bench -p wifi-densepose-train` — criterion benchmark for parser
+  throughput and split assignment on synthetic corpora.
+- No accuracy numbers are claimed by this ADR; it delivers the machinery to
+  produce MEASURED ones.
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+# ADR-292: Wideband 802.11ax CSI ingest — FeitCSI/AX210 adapter and subcarrier-agnostic plumbing
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation (this PR)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-10
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: hardware, csi, 80211ax, ax210, feitcsi, ingest, mat
+
+## Context
+
+RuView's CSI ingest (`wifi-densepose-mat/src/integration/hardware_adapter.rs`)
+supports ESP32 serial streams, the legacy Intel 5300 tool, and Atheros/Nexmon
+paths. All of these are 802.11n-class: ≤40 MHz bandwidth, ≤114 subcarriers,
+2.4/5 GHz.
+
+The 2026 research sweep found the field's center of gravity has moved to
+Intel AX200/AX210 NICs via PicoScenes (closed-source core) and FeitCSI
+(open-source, GPL): 802.11ax CSI at up to 160 MHz / 1992 subcarriers,
+including the 6 GHz band. This is both the research-grade tier today and the
+shape of the data 802.11bf silicon will deliver from ~2026 onward. RuView's
+`wifi-densepose-hardware` crate already models 802.11bf session types, but no
+ingest path can carry wideband CSI into the pipeline.
+
+Without a wideband path, RuView cannot develop against the best available
+signal, cannot compare ESP32-grade results to wideband upper bounds, and will
+meet 802.11bf silicon with no tested plumbing for >114-subcarrier frames.
+
+## Options considered
+
+1. **PicoScenes `.csi` ingest.** Rejected for now: the format is produced by a
+   closed-source core and is versioned/complex; parsing it without a
+   maintained spec invites silent corruption.
+2. **Raw pcap + radiotap parsing.** Rejected: duplicates what FeitCSI already
+   does on-device, and pulls a packet-capture dependency into the pipeline.
+3. **FeitCSI file/stream ingest.** Chosen: FeitCSI is open-source (its header
+   layout is auditable against the source), targets AX200/AX210, covers
+   20–160 MHz including 6 GHz, and emits a compact binary record per frame.
+
+## Decision
+
+Extend `v2/crates/wifi-densepose-mat/src/integration` with:
+
+### 1. `feitcsi` record parser
+
+- A validated parser for FeitCSI's binary CSI record layout (header with
+  CSI buffer length, rate/bandwidth/channel metadata, antenna counts, RSSI,
+  timestamp, followed by interleaved complex CSI). The parser is written
+  against the documented layout, is version-checked, and rejects
+  records whose declared dimensions disagree with the buffer length —
+  untrusted file/stream input is validated at the boundary.
+- Bounded allocation: a hard cap on subcarrier count (4096) and antenna
+  count (8) so a corrupt length field cannot cause unbounded allocation.
+
+### 2. `DeviceType::FeitCsi` in the hardware adapter
+
+- File-replay mode (read a recorded FeitCSI capture deterministically) and a
+  streaming mode fed by an external process writing to a path/pipe. No
+  privileged operations inside the crate: RuView does not configure the NIC;
+  FeitCSI's own tooling owns that, per least-authority.
+
+### 3. Subcarrier-agnostic plumbing
+
+- Ingest carries native subcarrier dimensionality end-to-end and converts to
+  pipeline width explicitly via the existing interpolation/decimation stage,
+  recording the native → pipeline mapping in frame metadata so downstream
+  consumers know the true spectral resolution. Bandwidth (20–160 MHz) and
+  band (2.4/5/6 GHz) become first-class frame metadata.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- RuView gains a research-grade wideband development path and a tested
+  ingest shape for future 802.11bf reporting (truncated CIR is a natural
+  extension of the same plumbing).
+- GPL FeitCSI is used as an external tool, never linked: only its output
+  format is parsed. No licensing contamination of the MIT workspace.
+- The parser tracks an external project's format; version checks fail loudly
+  on mismatch rather than misparse.
+- ESP32 remains the deployed sensor tier; wideband is a development/
+  validation tier. Accuracy claims from wideband captures must be tagged with
+  the capture hardware.
+
+## Validation
+
+- `cargo test -p wifi-densepose-mat` — parser tests over synthetic fixtures:
+  valid records at 20/80/160 MHz shapes, truncated buffer, dimension
+  mismatch, version mismatch, allocation-cap enforcement; adapter replay
+  determinism.
+- `cargo bench -p wifi-densepose-mat` — criterion benchmark for record parse
+  throughput at 1992-subcarrier frames.
+- Hardware validation on real AX210 silicon is explicitly out of scope for
+  this PR and remains required (per CLAUDE.md) before any capture-path
+  hardware claim; the file-replay path is testable without silicon.
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+# ADR-293: Vitals ground-truth rig — reference ingest, time alignment, and agreement metrics
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation (this PR)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-10
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: vitals, validation, ground-truth, bland-altman, evidence, honesty
+
+## Context
+
+`wifi-densepose-vitals` (ADR-021) extracts breathing (0.1–0.5 Hz) and heart
+rate (0.8–2.0 Hz) from CSI. The 2026 research sweep found that every credible
+vitals result in the literature ships with reference-sensor ground truth
+(chest strap, pulse oximeter, ECG, or PSG), and that WiFi heart-rate numbers
+without stated scope (single person, static, line-of-sight, short range) are
+systematically misleading. RuView currently has no way to produce a MEASURED
+vitals number: there is no reference-signal ingest, no time alignment between
+CSI-derived estimates and a reference device, and no agreement statistics.
+
+CLAUDE.md requires accuracy statements to be tagged MEASURED (with a
+reproducer), CLAIMED, or SYNTHETIC. For vitals, MEASURED is currently
+unreachable.
+
+## Options considered
+
+1. **Live BLE/ANT+ integration with reference devices.** Rejected for now:
+   drivers and pairing are a hardware/product concern; the blocking gap is
+   the evaluation math, not the radio link.
+2. **File-based reference ingest + offline agreement analysis.** Chosen:
+   every consumer reference device (Polar, Garmin, oximeters) exports
+   timestamped series; a file boundary keeps the crate dependency-free and
+   the pipeline deterministic.
+
+## Decision
+
+Add a `groundtruth` module to `v2/crates/wifi-densepose-vitals`:
+
+### 1. Reference series ingest
+
+- `ReferenceSeries`: timestamped samples (unix millis + value) for one
+  measurand (`HeartRateBpm` or `BreathingRateBrpm`), with device metadata
+  (make/model, measurement principle). Parsed from CSV (`timestamp_ms,value`
+  with a header line); malformed rows are rejected with row-numbered errors —
+  untrusted file input validated at the boundary. Non-monotonic timestamps
+  are an error, not silently sorted.
+
+### 2. Time alignment
+
+- Constant-offset estimation by maximizing normalized cross-correlation of
+  the estimate series against the reference over a bounded lag window
+  (default ±30 s), on a common resampled grid (nearest-sample, no
+  interpolation of physiological values across gaps larger than a
+  configurable limit).
+- Optional linear clock-drift fit (offset + rate) for long sessions.
+  Alignment parameters are reported, never silently applied.
+
+### 3. Agreement metrics
+
+- `AgreementReport`: n paired samples, coverage fraction (time where both
+  series had valid samples), MAE, RMSE, mean error (bias), Bland–Altman
+  95% limits of agreement, and percentage-within-tolerance (configurable,
+  default ±2 bpm HR / ±1 brpm breathing).
+- Session scope is mandatory metadata: subject count, motion state
+  (static/moving), line-of-sight (LOS/NLOS/through-wall), distance band.
+  A report without scope cannot be constructed.
+
+### 4. Evidence tagging
+
+- `EvidenceGrade::Measured` is only constructible when the report carries a
+  reference device, non-zero paired samples, minimum coverage, and a
+  reproducer command string; otherwise the report grades as `Claimed` (real
+  data, no reference) or `Synthetic` (generated input). This mirrors
+  ADR-291's enforcement-in-types approach and the CLAUDE.md tagging rule.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- RuView can convert vitals claims from CLAIMED to MEASURED with a
+  reproducible offline analysis, session by session, scope by scope.
+- Honest reporting will likely show heart-rate performance below marketing
+  intuition, especially NLOS/moving — that is the purpose.
+- CSV ingest means a manual export step per session; acceptable at current
+  scale, and the format is the de-facto export of consumer reference gear.
+- No clinical claim is implied: agreement statistics against consumer
+  reference devices are engineering evidence, not medical validation.
+
+## Validation
+
+- `cargo test -p wifi-densepose-vitals` — CSV rejection cases, alignment
+  recovery of known synthetic offsets/drifts, agreement metrics against
+  hand-computed fixtures, evidence-grade constructibility rules.
+- `cargo bench -p wifi-densepose-vitals` — criterion benchmark for alignment
+  over hour-scale synthetic sessions.
+- Real-session validation (ESP32 capture + chest strap) remains a follow-up
+  requiring hardware evidence per CLAUDE.md.
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+# ADR-294: WiFi Veil integration — emission-shaping countermeasure as an advisory BFLD dependency
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation (this PR)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-10
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: privacy, bfld, bfi, wifi-veil, countermeasure, dependency
+
+## Context
+
+RuView's BFLD layer (ADR-118, ADR-141) senses via beamforming feedback while
+enforcing structural privacy invariants on data entering the node. The 2026
+research sweep identified the complementary, unaddressed surface: a node's own
+*outgoing* BFI is unencrypted and enables passive third-party
+re-identification (BFId, ACM CCS 2025); IEEE 802.11bf-2025 shipped with no
+privacy mechanism; and no commercial product occupies the countermeasure
+category.
+
+[`wifi-veil`](https://github.com/ruvnet/wifi-veil) (codename VEIL, extracted
+from this monorepo as a standalone crate) models a compliant emission-shaping
+defense: keyed Givens rotations over the fine subspace of compressed
+beamforming reports, energy-preserving (never jamming), reversible by a
+keyed legitimate receiver. The crate is dependency-free, deterministic,
+std-only, WASM-ready, dual MIT/Apache-2.0, and explicitly SYNTHETIC/L0: it
+models waveform controls and never drives a radio.
+
+RuView should consume this capability rather than re-implement it, giving the
+sensing stack a defensive counterpart under one evidence regime.
+
+## Options considered
+
+1. **Vendor the veil sources into a RuView crate.** Rejected: forks the
+   witness-pinned upstream and duplicates maintenance.
+2. **crates.io dependency.** Not yet available (v0.1.0 unpublished at
+   decision time); revisit when released.
+3. **Git dependency pinned to an exact rev, feature-gated in
+   `wifi-densepose-bfld`.** Chosen.
+
+## Decision
+
+- Add `wifi-veil` to `v2/Cargo.toml` `[workspace.dependencies]` as a git
+  dependency pinned to rev `018468b5d2bf41f35c552910f35659830af0eb91`
+  (v0.1.0). Exact-rev pinning preserves provenance and reproducibility for a
+  pre-release upstream; bumping the rev is an explicit, reviewable change.
+- Gate it in `wifi-densepose-bfld` behind a new `veil` feature
+  (`veil = ["std", "dep:wifi-veil"]`), off by default — the default build
+  remains dependency-light and unchanged.
+- New `bfld::veil` module (advisory-only):
+  - `ShieldAssessment`: stable projection of wifi-veil's deterministic
+    attacker-vs-protector `ExperimentReport` (re-ID accuracy shield-off/on,
+    chance level, throughput ratio, energy-conservation audit), always
+    carrying the `SYNTHETIC/L0` evidence label.
+  - `assess` / `assess_default`: run the deterministic experiment.
+  - `optimized_shield`: wrap `hyper_optimize` to derive the
+    optimizer-shipped shield config plus its verifying assessment.
+- Boundaries, stated structurally and in docs:
+  - **Advisory only.** Nothing in the integration emits RF, alters frames,
+    or relaxes any BFLD gate/invariant (I1–I3 untouched).
+  - **Evidence honesty.** Every veil-derived figure is labeled
+    `SYNTHETIC/L0`; no MEASURED claim is possible from this path (hardware
+    validation lives in wifi-veil's own P5 roadmap).
+  - ESP32 nodes cannot shield their own feedback (per wifi-veil's platform
+    matrix); the integration therefore informs posture and reporting, not
+    on-node emission control.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- RuView gains a sense-and-defend posture no commercial offering has, under
+  a single claim taxonomy.
+- First git dependency in the workspace: builds now fetch one pinned
+  external rev. Acceptable: the crate is dependency-free, small, witness-
+  pinned upstream, and license-compatible (MIT OR Apache-2.0 into MIT).
+- Feature-gated consumers (e.g. sensing-server privacy reporting, the
+  desktop UI) can surface shield assessments later without new deps.
+- When wifi-veil publishes to crates.io, switch the workspace entry to a
+  version requirement in a follow-up ADR amendment.
+
+## Validation
+
+- `cargo test -p wifi-densepose-bfld --features veil` — determinism,
+  shield-reduces-re-ID, compliance (energy conservation), chance-band
+  attainment, evidence labeling, optimizer wrapper.
+- `cargo test -p wifi-densepose-bfld` (default features) — unchanged
+  behavior with the feature off.
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+# ADR-295: Source provenance state machine — synthetic can never present as live
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation (this PR)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: provenance, honesty, ui, sensing-server, security
+
+## Context
+
+An August 2026 external review found two provenance defects on the release
+path:
+
+1. The pose-fusion simulator starts in demo mode; on any page port other than
+   3000 the WebSocket target falls back to `localhost:8765`, and if the
+   connection fails the simulator keeps running while the status still reads
+   "ready" — producing a convincing moving visualization with no live CSI
+   (issue 1557).
+2. The main sensing client labels the source **live** when the authenticated
+   status endpoint returns an error for lack of authorization, until a real
+   frame happens to correct it (issue 1526).
+
+The common root cause: source state is a boolean (live vs not), so "unknown"
+collapses to "live". CLAUDE.md requires MEASURED/CLAIMED/SYNTHETIC labeling
+and forbids presenting synthetic output as real.
+
+## Decision
+
+Define one canonical, mutually exclusive `SourceState` enum shared by the
+sensing server and every UI/client that renders a source:
+
+- `Synthetic` — generated data (simulator/replay of synthetic fixtures).
+- `LiveVerified` — frames from an authenticated, attested source.
+- `LiveUnverified` — frames arriving but provenance not yet confirmed.
+- `Stale` — last frame older than a configured freshness window.
+- `Disconnected` — no source.
+
+Rules enforced structurally:
+
+- **`Unknown` is not a state.** Any ambiguous condition resolves to
+  `LiveUnverified`, `Stale`, or `Disconnected` — never `LiveVerified`.
+- A status-endpoint error resolves to `Disconnected`/`LiveUnverified`, never
+  live-verified.
+- The simulator constructs `Synthetic` and cannot transition to any `Live*`
+  state without a verified frame.
+- `Synthetic` is watermarked in every view and every export.
+- Transitions are a pure function of (last-frame-age, auth-status,
+  source-kind) so they are unit-testable without a clock or a socket.
+
+Scope of this PR: the shared `SourceState` type + transition function + tests
+in the sensing server, and wiring of the two identified surfaces (pose-fusion
+simulator status, sensing client source label). Broader UI adoption follows.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- Closes the "synthetic shown as live" and "unknown shown as live" classes.
+- A small breaking change to any consumer currently reading a boolean source
+  flag; mitigated by exposing a compatibility accessor during migration.
+
+## Validation
+
+- Unit tests for every transition, especially: auth-error → not-live;
+  simulator → never live without a verified frame; freshness expiry → `Stale`;
+  watermark present on synthetic export.
+- `cargo test -p wifi-densepose-sensing-server`.
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+# ADR-296: Sensor data-plane hardening — UDP bind control and source allowlist (step one)
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation (this PR)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: security, udp, sensor-ingest, sensing-server
+
+## Context
+
+The CSI UDP receiver binds `0.0.0.0:{udp_port}` unconditionally
+(`main.rs:5706`), with no equivalent of the HTTP `--bind-addr` flag (which
+correctly defaults to `127.0.0.1`), no source allowlist, no message
+authentication, no device identity, and no replay defense. Any host that can
+reach the UDP port can inject a valid-shaped frame, flip an auto-detecting
+server into a live source state, and influence presence/vital/automation
+outputs (issue 1394).
+
+An IP allowlist does not stop LAN spoofing, but bind control plus an allowlist
+is the correct, shippable first step; per-device keys + authenticated
+encryption + monotonic sequence + freshness window + replay rejection is the
+full fix and is larger.
+
+## Decision
+
+**This PR (step one):**
+
+- Add `--udp-bind` (env `RUVIEW_UDP_BIND`), **defaulting to `127.0.0.1`**.
+  Binding to a routable address is now an explicit operator choice, mirroring
+  the HTTP path. Desktop/appliance defaults stay loopback.
+- Add an optional source IP/CIDR allowlist (`--udp-allow`); when set, frames
+  from other sources are dropped and counted. Loopback is always allowed.
+- Emit a startup security log line stating the bind scope and whether an
+  allowlist is active; refuse a routable bind without an allowlist unless an
+  explicit `--udp-insecure-lan` override is passed (parallel to the existing
+  Docker HTTP refusal).
+- Publish a `SECURITY.md`/advisory note describing the threat model and safe
+  deployment.
+
+**Explicitly deferred to a follow-up ADR (step two):** per-device provisioned
+keys, MAC/AEAD, device identifiers, monotonic sequence numbers, freshness
+window, and replay rejection. This ADR documents that gap rather than
+implying the data plane is authenticated.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- Removes the default open-to-LAN exposure with a one-line-safe default.
+- Not spoof-proof on a trusted LAN — the advisory says so plainly, and the
+  override name (`--udp-insecure-lan`) makes the residual risk legible.
+- A behavior change for anyone relying on the old implicit `0.0.0.0` default;
+  called out in the changelog and the startup log.
+
+## Validation
+
+- Unit tests: default bind is loopback; routable bind without allowlist is
+  refused unless overridden; allowlist accept/drop with counting; loopback
+  always allowed.
+- `cargo test -p wifi-densepose-sensing-server`.
+- Real-silicon validation of the LAN path remains required before any
+  deployment claim.
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+# ADR-297: Multi-node semantic correctness — per-node inference, node-keyed rate limiting, stale state
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation (this PR)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: multi-node, mqtt, home-assistant, correctness, sensing-server
+
+## Context
+
+The external review confirmed three defects on the multi-node path — the core
+mechanism RuView uses to reduce blind spots and room dependence:
+
+1. The active `NodeInfo` payload carries RSSI/position/subcarrier/sync but **no
+   per-node classification**; the MQTT mapper reads `node.classification` and
+   falls back to the room aggregate when absent, so every node can publish the
+   same aggregate presence value (issues 1540, 1554).
+2. The MQTT `RateLimiter` is keyed by `EntityKind` only
+   (`mqtt/state.rs:65`), so one node consumes the numeric publish slot and the
+   others are suppressed until the interval expires, while availability still
+   says online (issue 1541).
+3. In the UDP vital path, top-level classification is taken from the
+   latest-arriving node while other features are fused, so with disagreeing
+   nodes room presence can flip at packet frequency (issue 1555).
+
+## Decision
+
+- **Separate the types.** Introduce `NodeInference` (per-node classification +
+  confidence + freshness) distinct from `RoomInference` (the fused room
+  aggregate). `NodeInfo` carries a `NodeInference`; the room aggregate is
+  computed explicitly and never overwrites node state. No silent fallback from
+  node to room.
+- **Key the rate limiter by (node, entity).** `RateLimiter` becomes keyed on
+  `(NodeId, EntityKind)` so nodes no longer starve each other; per-entity
+  behavior per node is preserved.
+- **Deterministic fusion.** Room classification is a pure function of the set
+  of current per-node inferences (e.g. freshness-weighted vote), not
+  last-writer-wins; identical inputs yield identical room state.
+- **Stale entities cannot stay online.** An entity whose backing node has not
+  reported within N expected publish intervals transitions to unavailable/
+  stale rather than holding a frozen value while availability says online.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- Multi-node HA/MQTT output becomes semantically correct; distinct nodes
+  report distinct state and no longer suppress one another.
+- Schema change to `NodeInfo`/the MQTT contract; existing single-node
+  deployments keep working (one node = one inference). Consumers reading the
+  old aggregate-only shape need the migration accessor.
+- Aligns with ADR-295 (freshness) and the review's call for one canonical
+  `NodeInference`/`RoomInference` contract.
+
+## Validation
+
+- Unit/integration tests: per-node classification round-trips through the MQTT
+  mapper with no room fallback; two nodes with different rates both publish
+  (no starvation); disagreeing nodes produce deterministic, non-flapping room
+  state; a silent node's entities go stale, not frozen-online.
+- `cargo test -p wifi-densepose-sensing-server`.
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+# ADR-298: Model release sanity gates — block degenerate and mislabeled model artifacts
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation (this PR)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: models, evaluation, release-gate, honesty, presence
+
+## Context
+
+The external review (corroborating issue 1521) showed the published presence
+head is mathematically degenerate: with L2-normalized embeddings, a weight
+norm ≈ 3.67 against a bias ≈ 8.19 makes the smallest possible logit positive,
+so predicted presence probability is ≥ ~0.989 for every valid input — the
+decision boundary is unreachable and the head is effectively constant. The
+README then labeled a temporal-triplet accuracy (a representation-ordering
+metric) as "presence accuracy" — a category error.
+
+Nothing in the release path catches a constant classifier, an unreachable
+boundary, or a metric-name mismatch. A machine check would have.
+
+## Decision
+
+Add a `model_gates` module (in `wifi-densepose-train`) plus a CI gate that,
+for any classifier artifact proposed for release, fails on:
+
+- **Constant output** — output variance below a threshold across a diverse
+  probe set (including the degenerate-embedding probe from issue 1521).
+- **Unreachable decision boundary** — for a normalized-embedding linear head,
+  check whether `bias` sign dominates `‖weight‖` so the logit cannot change
+  sign; fail if the boundary is analytically unreachable.
+- **Degenerate class balance** — predicted-positive rate at/above a ceiling
+  (e.g. > 99%) on a balanced probe set.
+- **Missing/blank baseline** — a report without a paired mean-pose/majority
+  baseline (ties into ADR-291 `EvaluationReport`).
+- **Metric-name provenance** — a metric may not be surfaced under a task name
+  that does not match its computed kind (temporal-triplet ≠ presence);
+  enforced by making the metric carry its kind and the label derive from it.
+
+Each gate emits a structured, human-readable failure explaining the defect and
+the offending numbers.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- The specific degenerate presence head cannot ship again, and the
+  temporal-triplet-as-presence mislabel is structurally prevented.
+- Some existing artifacts will fail the gate on introduction — intended; they
+  should fail.
+- The gate is heuristic, not a correctness proof; it catches the known
+  failure shapes, not all bad models.
+
+## Validation
+
+- Unit tests: the issue-1521 weights fail the unreachable-boundary and
+  constant-output gates; a healthy synthetic head passes; a temporal-triplet
+  metric cannot be constructed with a presence label.
+- `cargo test -p wifi-densepose-train`; the CI gate runs in the model-check
+  workflow.
+- This ADR does **not** withdraw the already-published artifact (an
+  outward-facing action requiring maintainer sign-off) — it prevents
+  recurrence and documents the model-card correction.
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+# ADR-299: Repository CSI data-incident controls — ignore rules and a pre-commit/CI policy check
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — controls and current-tree remediation implemented; history coordination pending
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: privacy, data-governance, ci, security, incident
+
+## Context
+
+The external review found ~64.6 MB of tracked raw CSI recordings under
+`data/recordings/` and `v2/data/recordings/` (largest an ~61.8 MB overnight
+capture). CLAUDE.md explicitly prohibits committing CSI or person data. The
+`.gitignore` rule pointed only at a pre-rename path
+(`rust-port/wifi-densepose-rs/data/recordings/`) and did not cover the active
+directories, which is how the captures were committed. Raw CSI is person data
+(it encodes breathing, movement, presence), so this is a data incident, not a
+formatting nit.
+
+## Decision
+
+**Implemented now (mechanical, no data-ownership judgment):**
+
+- Fix `.gitignore` to cover `data/recordings/`, `v2/data/recordings/`, the
+  legacy path, and `*.csi.jsonl` / `*.csi.meta.json` globs (done in this PR).
+- Add a policy check (pre-commit hook + CI job) that fails when CSI-format
+  files (`*.csi.jsonl`, `*.csi.meta.json`) or large JSONL captures are staged
+  or present as tracked files, with a message pointing here. Tests may use
+  only synthetic or expressly-consented minimal fixtures.
+
+**Owner-authorized current-tree remediation (2026-08-15):**
+
+- The data owner authorized removal of the six known CSI capture and metadata
+  files from the current tree. The removal is recoverable from Git history and
+  does not claim to erase existing clones, forks, caches, or release artifacts.
+- Any history rewrite remains a separate coordinated incident-response action.
+  It requires an inventory of affected refs and releases, downstream notice,
+  credential and artifact review, and an explicit execution plan.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- No new CSI captures can be committed (ignore + policy check).
+- The six known tracked recordings are absent from the current tree. Historical
+  copies remain until a separately authorized and coordinated history rewrite.
+- CI gains one fast policy job; contributors get a local pre-commit check.
+
+## Validation
+
+- Policy-check unit tests: a staged `*.csi.jsonl` fails; a synthetic fixture
+  under an allowed test path passes; the check is deterministic and offline.
+- Manual confirmation that the new ignore globs cover both active directories.
+- `bash scripts/csi-data-policy-check.sh --tracked` passes after the authorized
+  current-tree removal.
@@ -0,0 +1,189 @@
+# ADR-300: RuView perception substrate — a phased program for the calibration, evidence, trust, and deployment layer
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — program framing; child ADRs carry their own status
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: program, architecture, calibration, evidence, provenance, fusion, fleet, epic
+
+## Context
+
+Three independent analyses converged on the same conclusion in 2026: a deep
+research sweep of the WiFi-sensing state of the art, an external technical and
+industry review, and an internal strategic assessment. All three found that
+RuView's gap is **not another sensing modality** but the horizontal layer that
+turns RF research into repeatable spatial infrastructure — measurement,
+calibration, out-of-distribution awareness, evidence accounting, authenticated
+identity, a canonical spatial model, and fleet deployment.
+
+Several of these primitives already have foundations in the tree and should be
+**unified and made to produce signed, expiring certificates**, not rebuilt:
+
+- `wifi-densepose-calibration` (enrollment, bank, anchor, runtime, specialist).
+- `frame::EvidenceLevel` L0–L5 as mandatory policy (ADR-282).
+- AetherArena benchmark infrastructure — v0 complete, CI-gated, witness ledger,
+  live HF Space (ADR-149); board intentionally empty (benchmark-first).
+- RuField provenance/signature types (ADR-260/262/277/279) and BFLD
+  attestation (ADR-141).
+- `worldgraph` crate; `wifi-densepose-mat/tracking` (tracker, fingerprint).
+- The in-flight ADR-295 (provenance state machine), ADR-296 (authenticated
+  data plane, step one), ADR-298 (model sanity gates) — the first bricks.
+
+## What RuView is optimizing for
+
+Not inference capability — **epistemic reliability**:
+
+```
+signal → observation → calibration → inference → uncertainty → evidence
+       → certificate → policy → governed action
+```
+
+That pipeline is the product. The defensible category is not "RuView perceives
+the physical world" but "RuView determines what machines are justified in
+believing about it, proves why, and constrains what they may do with that
+belief."
+
+### Four non-negotiable program rules
+
+Every child ADR and implementation is bound by these:
+
+1. **UNKNOWN is a first-class output, never an error condition.** A surface that
+   cannot answer says UNKNOWN and stays legible; it does not throw, default to a
+   confident class, or silently hold a stale value.
+2. **Capability certificates bind cryptographically.** Hardware, environment,
+   model, calibration, metrics, expiry, and evidence level are bound under one
+   signature (ADR-318/ADR-305). An unsigned or partially-bound certificate is
+   not a certificate.
+3. **One canonical semantics downstream.** Every surface (MQTT, REST, WebSocket,
+   RuField, Matter, agents, UI) consumes the same Observation → Inference →
+   GovernedEvent types (ADR-306). No transport- or UI-specific reinterpretation.
+4. **Benchmarks expose worst-domain performance and confidence intervals.**
+   Pooled accuracy is never sufficient for promotion (ADR-317).
+
+### Certificate conditionality (the staleness guard)
+
+The central architectural risk is **certificate staleness**: a room can remain
+syntactically calibrated while its RF distribution has drifted enough to
+invalidate the certificate. Therefore a capability certificate is **conditional
+on a continuously evaluated domain signature** (ADR-302), not a one-time stamp.
+Crossing the OOD threshold automatically degrades state and triggers
+recalibration rather than silently continuing:
+
+```
+VALID → DEGRADED → UNKNOWN   (auto-degrade on domain drift; triggers recalibration)
+```
+
+This binds ADR-301 (calibration), ADR-302 (OOD), ADR-318 (certificate), and
+ADR-321 (policy): a degraded/unknown domain must invalidate the affected
+capability *before* a false confident inference reaches an actuator.
+
+### Commercial framing — three primitives, not one product
+
+- **RuView Runtime** — provides perception.
+- **RuView Certify** — establishes what a deployment can legitimately claim
+  (calibration + evidence + capability certificate + policy).
+- **RuView Trust / Fleet** — keeps that claim valid across hardware, firmware,
+  models, and environmental drift (ADR-316).
+
+Certify and Trust are the parts that are hard to commoditize; presence
+detection alone is not.
+
+## Decision
+
+Adopt a **21-primitive phased program**. Each primitive gets a child ADR
+(ADR-301…ADR-321) that owns its detailed decision, status, and validation.
+This ADR owns the framing, the dependency order, and the phase assignment.
+
+### Primitive → ADR map
+
+| # | Primitive | ADR | Phase |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| 1 | Automatic domain calibration | ADR-301 | 1 |
+| 2 | Out-of-distribution detection | ADR-302 | 1 |
+| 3 | Ground-truth synchronization | ADR-303 | 2 |
+| 4 | Evidence engine | ADR-304 | 1 |
+| 5 | Authenticated sensor identity | ADR-305 | 1 |
+| 6 | Canonical spatial ontology | ADR-306 | 1 |
+| 7 | Persistent identity & tracking | ADR-307 | 2 |
+| 8 | Sensor placement optimizer | ADR-308 | 3 |
+| 9 | Active sensing | ADR-309 | 3 |
+| 10 | 802.11bf-native architecture | ADR-310 | 2 |
+| 11 | Real sensor fusion | ADR-311 | 2 |
+| 12 | Long-term spatial memory | ADR-312 | 3 |
+| 13 | Counterfactual inference | ADR-313 | 3 |
+| 14 | Information-gain scheduler | ADR-314 | 3 |
+| 15 | Digital RF twin | ADR-315 | 3 |
+| 16 | Fleet control plane | ADR-316 | 2 |
+| 17 | Real benchmark service (multi-domain scorecard) | ADR-317 | 1 |
+| 18 | Capability certificates | ADR-318 | 1 |
+| 19 | Witness chain | ADR-319 | 1 |
+| 20 | RuView sensor HAL | ADR-320 | 2 |
+| 21 | Decision policy — action authorization | ADR-321 | 1 |
+
+### Dependency order (why phase, not score, drives sequencing)
+
+```
+        ADR-306 spatial ontology ──┐
+        ADR-305 auth identity ─────┼──► ADR-301 calibration cert ──► ADR-302 OOD gating
+                                   │             │                        │
+                                   └──► ADR-319 witness chain             │ (VALID→DEGRADED→UNKNOWN)
+                                                 │                        ▼
+                                   ADR-304 evidence engine ──► ADR-318 capability certificate
+                                                 │                        │ (conditional on domain signature)
+                                                 │                        ▼
+                                                 │              ADR-321 decision policy ──► governed action
+                                                 └──► ADR-317 benchmark scorecard (per-PR gate)
+```
+
+- **Phase 1 (the certificate spine, built now):** foundational roots 303, 302,
+  301, 298 (implemented first, in their own crates); then the dependent wave
+  316, 299, 315, 314, 318. This set is exactly the acceptance test decomposed
+  and is buildable without new hardware (types, logic, signatures, tests). The
+  dependent wave adds the staleness guard (299 auto-degrades 315) and the
+  action gate (318) that denies at the actuator on a degraded/unknown domain.
+- **Phase 2 (integration & operations):** 300 ground truth, 304 tracking, 307
+  802.11bf-native, 308 fusion, 313 fleet, 317 HAL. Depends on the spine.
+- **Phase 3 (higher-ceiling, research-forward):** 305 placement optimizer, 306
+  active sensing, 309 spatial memory, 310 counterfactual, 311 info-gain
+  scheduler, 312 RF twin. Sit on top of the fused world state.
+
+Phase-2 and phase-3 child ADRs are authored as **Proposed** (design intent,
+validation plan) and are not implemented by the phase-1 swarm.
+
+### Acceptance test A — onboarding (from the strategic assessment)
+
+> Connect a new sensor type in an unseen room. Within 30 minutes RuView should
+> identify the hardware (HAL, ADR-320), calibrate the environment (ADR-301),
+> quantify whether it can reliably sense the requested phenomenon (ADR-302),
+> generate a signed capability certificate (ADR-318), expose governed spatial
+> events (ADR-306), and return UNKNOWN whenever evidence falls outside that
+> certificate (ADR-302).
+
+### Acceptance test B — drift invalidation (the staleness guard)
+
+> Deliberately change the room after certification — move furniture, change the
+> AP channel, or substitute hardware. RuView should detect distribution drift
+> (ADR-302), invalidate the affected capability (ADR-318) **before** a false
+> confident inference reaches an actuator (ADR-321 denies with the specific
+> failed condition), emit UNKNOWN, preserve the complete witness chain
+> (ADR-319), and explain exactly which certificate condition failed.
+
+Test B is the load-bearing one: it proves the substrate fails safe, not just
+that it perceives well. Phase 1 makes every clause except HAL testable in
+software; HAL (phase 2)
+closes the "identify the hardware" clause.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- One coherent substrate replaces overlapping ad-hoc schemas; every surface
+  (MQTT, REST, WebSocket, RuField, Matter, agents) eventually consumes the
+  ADR-306 ontology and the ADR-318 certificate.
+- Headline applications (pose/vitals/pointcloud models) are explicitly **not**
+  the investment focus during this program, per the strategic direction.
+- Later ADRs may be revised as the spine lands; that is expected for a phased
+  program and is why phase-2/3 ADRs ship as Proposed.
+
+## Validation
+
+- Each child ADR defines its own tests. The program-level exit is the
+  acceptance test above, run end-to-end once phase 1 lands, and encoded as an
+  AetherArena scenario (ADR-317).
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+# ADR-301: Automatic domain calibration — signed, versioned, invalidatable room fingerprint
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation planned (ADR-300 phase 1)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: calibration, provenance, drift, evidence, honesty, substrate
+
+## Context
+
+This ADR is primitive 1 of the perception-substrate program (ADR-300) and the
+first brick of that program's "certificate spine" (ADR-300 phase 1). It depends
+on the canonical spatial ontology (ADR-306) to name *which space* it
+characterizes, on authenticated sensor identity (ADR-305) to bind a fingerprint
+to *which signed device* produced it, and on the witness chain (ADR-319) to
+anchor the resulting artifact. Its output is consumed directly by
+out-of-distribution detection (ADR-302).
+
+WiFi sensing is only reproducible inside the environment it was tuned for.
+Multipath, furniture geometry, transceiver placement, and AP channel all shape
+the CSI distribution, so a model that reads a room correctly one week can drift
+silently the next. RuView already has the raw ingredients for room-aware
+sensing but not a single portable, signed, expiring artifact that says "this is
+the room, here is when it was measured, and here is the evidence that it is
+still the same room."
+
+Existing scaffolding to build on, not rebuild (`v2/crates/wifi-densepose-calibration`):
+
+- `enrollment` / `anchor` — guided human anchors with an adaptive quality gate.
+- `bank` / `specialist` / `runtime` — a versioned bank of small specialist
+  models and a confidence-gated mixture runtime (`RoomState`), including the
+  crate's existing honest `STALE` degradation when the ADR-135 empty-room
+  baseline drifts.
+- `geometry` / `geometry_embedding` — transceiver-geometry record and its
+  fixed-length conditioning featurization (ADR-152).
+
+What is missing is (a) an *automatic* observe-only characterization phase that
+does not require a human enrollment ritual, (b) empty-vs-occupied baseline
+separation as a first-class pair, (c) a signed, versioned, comparable
+`CalibrationCertificate` artifact, and (d) explicit invalidation on drift rather
+than a soft `STALE` flag buried in the runtime.
+
+## Options considered
+
+1. **Keep calibration internal to the runtime (status quo).** Rejected: the
+   room characterization exists only as in-process state; it cannot be signed,
+   shipped, compared across time, or presented as evidence to ADR-302/ADR-318.
+2. **Build a new calibration crate.** Rejected: `wifi-densepose-calibration`
+   already owns enrollment, the specialist bank, geometry embedding, and the
+   baseline-drift concept. A parallel crate would fork the room model.
+3. **Extend `wifi-densepose-calibration` with an automatic characterization
+   phase and a signed certificate artifact.** Chosen.
+
+## Decision
+
+Extend `v2/crates/wifi-densepose-calibration` with an `autocal` characterization
+phase and a `certificate` artifact module. The target UX is:
+
+> install → observe (~10 min) → room fingerprint → calibration certificate →
+> sensing.
+
+### 1. Automatic characterization (`autocal`)
+
+- An observe-only pass (default ~10 minutes, configurable) that collects CSI
+  without requiring guided human anchors, reusing the `anchor` quality gate to
+  reject frames it cannot trust. It layers on the existing ADR-135 empty-room
+  baseline rather than replacing it.
+- Produces a `RoomFingerprint`: a bounded, fixed-length statistical summary of
+  the room's CSI distribution (subcarrier amplitude/phase moments, multipath
+  structure, occupancy-band energy), plus the `geometry_embedding` when a
+  geometry record is present. The fingerprint is the distance-comparable object
+  ADR-302 measures against; its schema is versioned.
+
+### 2. Empty / occupied baseline pair
+
+- Characterization establishes a paired baseline: an **empty** distribution
+  (no occupant motion) and an **occupied** distribution (motion present),
+  separated by the existing occupancy signal rather than a manual label. Both
+  are stored on the fingerprint so downstream OOD gating can distinguish "the
+  empty room changed" (furniture/geometry drift) from "occupancy statistics
+  changed" (different subject dynamics).
+
+### 3. `CalibrationCertificate` artifact
+
+- A serializable `CalibrationCertificate` binding: the `RoomFingerprint`; a
+  space identifier from the ADR-306 ontology; the signing sensor identity from
+  ADR-305; `captured_at_unix_s`; a monotonic `version`; a schema version; the
+  calibration `tier`; and an `EvidenceLevel` (L0–L5, ADR-282) — an automatic
+  characterization on real captured CSI is at most L1/L2 and is labelled as
+  such, never L3+.
+- The certificate is **signed** using RuField provenance/signature types
+  (ADR-260/262/277/279) and anchored in the witness chain (ADR-319). Signature
+  and witness anchoring are mandatory: an unsigned certificate is not a valid
+  certificate.
+- Two certificates for the same space are **comparable**: `distance(a, b)`
+  returns a bounded fingerprint distance, which is the primitive ADR-302 uses
+  to gate KNOWN → DEGRADED → UNKNOWN.
+
+### 4. Invalidation and continuous drift compensation
+
+- A certificate carries an explicit validity policy: it is invalidated when
+  fingerprint distance against live traffic exceeds a threshold, when the AP
+  channel or transceiver geometry changes, when the signing device identity
+  changes, or on age expiry. Invalidation is an explicit state transition that
+  emits a witness record (ADR-319), not a silent `STALE` flag.
+- Continuous drift compensation runs as a bounded online update of the
+  fingerprint within a **compatibility envelope**: small drift is absorbed and
+  logged; drift beyond the envelope invalidates the certificate and forces
+  re-characterization. Compensation never silently rewrites a signed
+  certificate — it produces a new version, preserving the append-only history.
+
+### Provenance and honesty discipline
+
+- No accuracy number is claimed by this ADR; it delivers the artifact and the
+  distance/invalidation machinery. Any certificate produced from generated CSI
+  is L0/`Synthetic` by construction; the constructor rejects labelling
+  synthetic characterization as measured (ADR-279 invariant 6, ADR-282 ladder).
+- Certificates never leave the edge except through the governed control plane
+  (ADR-277); a room fingerprint is treated as potentially sensitive spatial
+  data, not free telemetry.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- Room characterization becomes a portable, signed, versioned artifact that
+  ADR-302 (OOD), ADR-318 (capability certificates), and ADR-317 (benchmark)
+  can consume without re-deriving room state.
+- The automatic observe-only path lowers deployment friction (no mandatory
+  enrollment ritual) but yields a weaker evidence level than guided enrollment;
+  the certificate states which path produced it so consumers can weight it.
+- Explicit invalidation means RuView will sometimes refuse to sense a changed
+  room until re-characterization. That refusal is the intended honest behavior,
+  surfaced by ADR-302, not a regression.
+- The existing enrollment/bank/runtime path is preserved; `autocal` is an
+  additional entry point that produces the same `RoomFingerprint` object the
+  guided path can also emit.
+
+## Validation
+
+- `cargo test -p wifi-densepose-calibration` — fingerprint determinism from
+  fixed synthetic CSI; empty/occupied separation on synthetic occupancy;
+  certificate signing/verification round-trip and tamper rejection;
+  `distance()` monotonicity on progressively perturbed fixtures; invalidation
+  transitions (channel change, geometry change, age, drift-envelope breach)
+  each emit the expected witness record; constructor rejects synthetic→measured
+  mislabeling.
+- Cross-ADR: an ADR-302 test consumes a certificate and asserts the gating
+  state transitions on a drifted fingerprint.
+- Real-silicon characterization (ESP32 capture over a real 10-minute window)
+  remains a follow-up requiring hardware evidence per CLAUDE.md; a successful
+  build or synthetic run is not hardware evidence.
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+# ADR-302: Out-of-distribution detection — KNOWN / DEGRADED / UNKNOWN gating
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation planned (ADR-300 phase 1)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: ood, calibration, uncertainty, quality, evidence, honesty, substrate
+
+## Context
+
+This ADR is primitive 2 of the perception-substrate program (ADR-300) and part
+of the phase-1 certificate spine. It sits directly downstream of automatic
+domain calibration (ADR-301): the `CalibrationCertificate` and its
+`RoomFingerprint` are the reference distribution this ADR measures against. It
+reuses fusion-layer quality scoring (ADR-137) as one of its inputs and feeds
+its state into the evidence engine (ADR-304) and capability certificates
+(ADR-318).
+
+The central unsolved problem of WiFi sensing is cross-domain generalization: a
+model trained (or calibrated) in one room degrades unpredictably in another, or
+in the same room after furniture moves, the AP changes channel, or the radio
+hardware is swapped. A model that keeps returning confident classifications
+under these conditions is the single most misleading failure mode in the field,
+and it is the failure the strategic assessment (ADR-300) named explicitly.
+Confidence alone is insufficient: a softmax head is perfectly capable of being
+confidently wrong on out-of-distribution input. RuView must be able to say
+"I do not recognize this situation" instead of guessing.
+
+Today RuView has partial signals but no unified gate:
+
+- ADR-301 produces a comparable `RoomFingerprint` and a `distance()` metric.
+- ADR-137 `QualityScore` carries fusion coherence, evidence references, and
+  contradiction flags per fused frame.
+- Model heads emit confidence/uncertainty, but nothing combines domain
+  distance, signal quality, calibration compatibility, and uncertainty into a
+  single decision, and nothing forces a model to stop emitting confident labels
+  when it leaves its calibrated domain.
+
+## Options considered
+
+1. **Threshold on model confidence alone.** Rejected: confidently-wrong OOD
+   predictions are exactly the failure mode; confidence is necessary but not
+   sufficient.
+2. **A per-model bespoke OOD check inside each task head.** Rejected:
+   duplicates logic, cannot be audited uniformly, and does not compose with the
+   calibration certificate or the evidence engine.
+3. **A shared OOD gate that every inference passes through, fusing four signals
+   against the ADR-301 certificate.** Chosen.
+
+## Decision
+
+Add an out-of-distribution gate — implemented in a shared crate consumed by the
+task-head runtime (`wifi-densepose-calibration::runtime` and the model serving
+path) — that attaches a `DomainState` to **every** inference.
+
+### 1. Four inputs, one decision
+
+Each inference carries four measured quantities:
+
+1. **Domain distance** — fingerprint distance (ADR-301 `distance()`) between
+   live traffic and the active `CalibrationCertificate`, split into the
+   empty-baseline and occupied-baseline components so geometry drift and
+   occupancy-statistics drift are distinguishable.
+2. **Signal quality** — reuse the ADR-137 quality scoring signals (fusion
+   coherence, contradiction flags) plus per-frame SNR/validity.
+3. **Calibration compatibility** — is a valid, non-invalidated certificate
+   present for this space (ADR-306) and this signed device (ADR-305)? An
+   expired, invalidated, or device-mismatched certificate is itself a
+   compatibility failure.
+4. **Uncertainty** — the model head's own predictive uncertainty.
+
+### 2. State machine: KNOWN → DEGRADED → UNKNOWN
+
+- **KNOWN** — domain distance within the certificate's compatibility envelope,
+  quality above threshold, certificate valid and compatible, uncertainty low.
+  Confident classifications are returned.
+- **DEGRADED** — one or more signals crossed a soft threshold (e.g. moderate
+  fingerprint drift within the envelope, elevated uncertainty, a tolerated
+  ADR-137 contradiction flag). Classifications are returned but flagged
+  degraded with the specific reason; downstream consumers must treat them as
+  lower-evidence.
+- **UNKNOWN** — the room changed materially (empty-baseline drift beyond the
+  envelope, AP channel change, transceiver-geometry change, hardware/device
+  change, or an invalidated/absent certificate). RuView **stops returning
+  confident classifications** and returns UNKNOWN with the triggering cause.
+  This is the required behavior, not an error.
+
+State transitions are hysteretic (separate enter/exit thresholds) so the gate
+does not flap on noise. The state, the four input values, and the triggering
+cause are all reported — never a bare label.
+
+### 3. Certificate-bound, honest by construction
+
+- The gate is meaningless without a certificate: with no valid ADR-301
+  certificate for the current space/device, the default state is UNKNOWN, not
+  KNOWN. Absence of evidence is treated as absence of capability.
+- The `DomainState` and its inputs are emitted to the evidence engine
+  (ADR-304) as part of every inference record, and are an input to the ADR-318
+  capability certificate (a model's capability is bounded by the domain it can
+  hold KNOWN in).
+- No accuracy number is claimed here; the ADR delivers the gating machinery.
+  The gate's own thresholds are calibration parameters, reported with each
+  decision.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- RuView gains a uniform, auditable answer to "should I trust this inference?"
+  that combines domain, quality, calibration, and uncertainty rather than
+  confidence alone.
+- Deployments will see more DEGRADED/UNKNOWN results than a
+  confidence-only system, especially right after a room changes. That increase
+  is the product working: it is the difference between honest RF perception and
+  confidently-wrong output.
+- Every task head that opts into the substrate must route through the gate;
+  heads that bypass it cannot claim a KNOWN state or earn an ADR-318
+  certificate.
+- The gate couples model serving to the presence of a live calibration
+  certificate, making ADR-301 a hard dependency of confident inference — the
+  intended coupling.
+
+## Validation
+
+- `cargo test` on the OOD crate — state-machine transitions on synthetic
+  fixtures: in-envelope drift stays KNOWN; soft-threshold breach → DEGRADED;
+  empty-baseline drift beyond envelope, channel change, geometry change,
+  device mismatch, and invalidated/absent certificate each → UNKNOWN;
+  hysteresis prevents flapping under injected noise; missing certificate
+  defaults to UNKNOWN.
+- Cross-ADR: consumes an ADR-301 certificate and asserts a drifted fingerprint
+  drives the expected transition; asserts the `DomainState` is present on every
+  emitted inference record consumed by ADR-304.
+- No confident classification is emitted in the UNKNOWN state in any test —
+  enforced as an assertion, not a convention.
+- Real-silicon OOD behavior (moving furniture / changing AP channel on a live
+  ESP32 capture and observing the transition) remains a follow-up requiring
+  hardware evidence per CLAUDE.md.
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+# ADR-303: Ground-truth synchronization — reference sensors as a formal validation plane
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation (ADR-300 phase 2)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: ground-truth, validation, fusion, evidence, benchmark, honesty, substrate
+
+## Context
+
+This ADR is primitive 3 of the perception-substrate program (ADR-300), authored
+as **Proposed** in phase 2: it is design intent and a validation plan, not
+implemented by the phase-1 swarm. It sits on top of the phase-1 certificate
+spine and feeds the evidence engine (ADR-304) and the real benchmark service
+(ADR-317). It generalizes the vitals ground-truth rig (ADR-293) from a single
+measurand to a modality-agnostic plane.
+
+RuView's evidence discipline (CLAUDE.md; ADR-282 ladder) requires MEASURED
+accuracy claims to be backed by an independent reference. ADR-293 built exactly
+this for vitals: reference-series ingest, time alignment (cross-correlation
+lag + optional clock-drift fit), and agreement statistics (MAE/RMSE/bias/
+Bland–Altman/within-tolerance), with an `EvidenceGrade` that is only
+constructible as `Measured` when a real reference, non-zero paired samples,
+minimum coverage, and a reproducer are present. That machinery is measurand- and
+device-shaped: it knows about heart rate and breathing rate.
+
+The substrate needs the same discipline for *every* phenomenon RuView senses —
+presence, count, localization, pose, posture, activity — and for reference
+sources of many modalities (cameras, mmWave, pressure mats, wearables, pulse
+oximeters, microphones, manual labels). The critical design decision is that
+these reference sensors form a **validation plane**, not additional inference
+inputs.
+
+## Options considered
+
+1. **Fuse reference sensors as extra inference inputs.** Rejected on principle:
+   folding cameras/mmWave into the estimator would make RuView's RF claims
+   unfalsifiable — the reference would be training the thing it is meant to
+   check, and a camera-fed result is no longer a camera-free RF result. It
+   would also violate the ADR-282 layering (RuView is probabilistic
+   exteroception, never ground truth) and the honesty rule against presenting
+   fused-with-camera output as WiFi sensing.
+2. **One-off rigs per measurand (extend ADR-293 ad hoc each time).** Rejected:
+   duplicates alignment/agreement code per phenomenon and never yields a shared
+   validation surface for the benchmark.
+3. **A first-class, modality-agnostic `GroundTruth` API that is strictly a
+   validation plane.** Chosen.
+
+## Decision
+
+Introduce a `GroundTruth` API — a modality-agnostic validation plane that
+compares RF inference against independent observation and never feeds it.
+
+### 1. Modality-agnostic reference ingest
+
+- A `ReferenceObservation` generalizing ADR-293's `ReferenceSeries`: a
+  timestamped, typed observation of a `Phenomenon` (presence, count,
+  localization, pose keypoints, posture, activity, heart rate, breathing rate)
+  from a `ReferenceModality` (camera, mmWave, pressure, wearable, pulse
+  oximeter, microphone, manual label), with device/source metadata and the
+  measurement principle recorded.
+- Untrusted reference files are validated at the boundary (row-numbered
+  rejections, non-monotonic timestamps are errors), reusing ADR-293's ingest
+  discipline. Camera/mmWave references arrive as exported label/keypoint
+  streams, not live model feeds.
+
+### 2. Synchronization
+
+- Generalize ADR-293's time alignment (bounded-lag normalized cross-correlation
+  + optional linear clock-drift fit) to arbitrary measurands on a common
+  resampled grid, with no interpolation across gaps beyond a configurable
+  limit. Alignment parameters are always reported, never silently applied.
+- Spatial synchronization where relevant: reference observations are expressed
+  in the ADR-306 spatial ontology so an RF localization/pose result and a
+  camera/mmWave observation are compared in one coordinate frame.
+
+### 3. Agreement as validation, not fusion
+
+- A modality-appropriate `AgreementReport` per phenomenon: continuous
+  measurands reuse ADR-293's MAE/RMSE/bias/Bland–Altman/within-tolerance;
+  categorical/detection phenomena (presence, activity) report confusion-matrix
+  metrics; spatial phenomena report localization error percentiles and pose
+  PCK **with the mandatory mean-pose baseline and leakage-free split**
+  (CLAUDE.md; ADR-291).
+- Session scope is mandatory metadata (subject count, motion state, LOS/NLOS/
+  through-wall, distance band) — a report without scope cannot be constructed,
+  as in ADR-293.
+
+### 4. Evidence and isolation guarantees
+
+- The plane is one-directional by type: the inference path has no read access
+  to `GroundTruth` at runtime. A build/test-time isolation check (and the type
+  boundary) prevents a reference observation from becoming an estimator input.
+- Reports carry an `EvidenceLevel` (ADR-282) and an `EvidenceGrade`
+  constructible as `Measured` only with a real reference, paired samples,
+  coverage, and a reproducer (ADR-293 rule). Reports feed the ADR-304 evidence
+  engine and are the substrate ADR-317 scores against.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- Every phenomenon RuView senses gets the same MEASURED-vs-independent-observer
+  discipline vitals already has, in one shared surface.
+- Keeping references strictly as validation preserves the falsifiability and
+  the camera-free identity of RF results; it costs the (tempting) accuracy a
+  camera-fused estimator would show, which is the correct trade.
+- Reference capture is an operational burden (a camera/mmWave rig per validated
+  session); acceptable because it is a validation activity, not a runtime
+  requirement, and it is what turns CLAIMED into MEASURED.
+- Because this is Proposed (phase 2), the API shape may be revised once the
+  phase-1 spine (ADR-301/299/301/303) lands and the benchmark (ADR-317)
+  exercises it.
+
+## Validation
+
+- Unit tests (planned): modality-agnostic ingest rejection cases; alignment
+  recovery of known synthetic offsets/drifts across measurands; agreement math
+  per phenomenon against hand-computed fixtures; pose PCK path requires a
+  mean-pose baseline and rejects leaky splits; evidence-grade constructibility;
+  the isolation check fails a build that wires a reference into the inference
+  path.
+- Cross-ADR: an ADR-317 benchmark scenario consumes `GroundTruth` reports as
+  its scored reference; ADR-304 ingests the agreement reports as evidence
+  records.
+- Real-session validation (RF capture synchronized with a real camera/mmWave/
+  pressure/wearable reference) is the phase-2 exit and requires hardware
+  evidence per CLAUDE.md; a synthetic run is not hardware evidence.
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+# ADR-304: Evidence engine — MLflow for physical sensing
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation planned (ADR-300 phase 1)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: evidence, provenance, ledger, accuracy, drift, benchmark, honesty, substrate
+
+## Context
+
+This ADR is primitive 4 of the perception-substrate program (ADR-300) and a
+central pillar of the phase-1 certificate spine. It consumes the domain state
+from out-of-distribution detection (ADR-302) and the calibration age from the
+calibration certificate (ADR-301), it is the store that capability certificates
+(ADR-318) are minted from, and it is the accuracy source the real benchmark
+service (ADR-317) reads. In phase 2 it ingests agreement reports from the
+ground-truth plane (ADR-303).
+
+The strategic assessment (ADR-300) judged this primitive **more commercially
+important than another pose architecture**: what unblocks OEM and integrator
+conversations is not a higher headline number but a defensible, auditable record
+of how a model actually performs, per room, per device, per subject, over time.
+MLflow made ML experiments trackable; physical sensing needs the equivalent for
+deployed accuracy, drift, and evidence level — an append-only ledger, not a
+dashboard that overwrites yesterday's number.
+
+RuView already has the constituent evidence types; what is missing is the ledger
+that unifies them per deployment context:
+
+- RuField provenance/signature types (ADR-260/262/277/279) — the signed,
+  provenance-bearing record types to reuse rather than reinvent.
+- The AetherArena witness-ledger pattern (ADR-149) — an append-only,
+  witness-anchored ledger of scored results, the structural template here.
+- `frame::EvidenceLevel` L0–L5 (ADR-282) — the mandatory evidence tag every
+  record carries.
+- ADR-302 `DomainState`, ADR-137 `QualityScore`, ADR-301 certificate version
+  and age — the per-inference signals to accumulate.
+
+## Options considered
+
+1. **Log accuracy to flat files / metrics dashboards.** Rejected: mutable,
+   un-signed, un-scoped, and not comparable over time — the exact gap.
+2. **Reuse a general experiment tracker (MLflow itself).** Rejected: it is
+   experiment-time, not deployment-time; it has no notion of room/device/
+   subject context, calibration age, evidence level, or signed provenance, and
+   it would add an external service dependency contrary to the substrate's
+   edge-first, dependency-light direction.
+3. **A native append-only evidence ledger reusing RuField record types and the
+   AetherArena ledger pattern.** Chosen.
+
+## Decision
+
+Build an **evidence engine**: a per-`(room, device, subject)` append-only
+accuracy ledger that every model automatically writes to.
+
+### 1. The evidence record
+
+- An `EvidenceRecord` keyed by context — space id (ADR-306), signed device id
+  (ADR-305), and subject id where consented and available — carrying: model
+  version; calibration certificate version and **age** (ADR-301); the ADR-302
+  `DomainState` (KNOWN/DEGRADED/UNKNOWN) and its four inputs; the ADR-137
+  quality signals; predictive uncertainty; and, when a reference is present
+  (ADR-303), the agreement result (accuracy, false-positive rate). Each record
+  carries exactly one `EvidenceLevel` (L0–L5, ADR-282).
+- Records are **append-only** and signed with RuField signature types
+  (ADR-260/262/277/279); the ledger is anchored in the witness chain (ADR-319),
+  following the AetherArena witness-ledger pattern (ADR-149). No record is ever
+  mutated in place — a correction is a new record.
+
+### 2. Per-context accuracy accounting
+
+- The engine maintains, per `(room, device, subject)` context: measured
+  accuracy (only where an ADR-303 reference backs it — otherwise the record is
+  CLAIMED/SYNTHETIC, never MEASURED), false-positive rate, drift trajectory
+  (fingerprint distance over time from ADR-301), the fraction of inferences in
+  each domain state, calibration age distribution, and model-version history.
+- Aggregation is a pure function over the append-only log at a queried time —
+  the ledger is the source of truth; summaries are derived, never authoritative
+  (mirroring CLAUDE.md's "source over summaries" rule).
+
+### 3. Honesty enforced in the record
+
+- The engine cannot upgrade an evidence level; a level is set by the record's
+  provenance at write time (synthetic input → L0/`Synthetic`; no reference →
+  CLAIMED; reference + reproducer → MEASURED), reusing the ADR-282/ADR-291/
+  ADR-293 constructor discipline. A benchmark or certificate reading the ledger
+  gets the honest level, not an optimistic rollup.
+- No benchmark numbers are invented by this ADR; it delivers the ledger and the
+  accounting. Empty contexts report "no evidence," which downstream (ADR-318)
+  must treat as no capability.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- RuView gains a single auditable answer to "how well does this model actually
+  work, here, on this device, for this subject, and how fresh is the
+  calibration?" — the artifact OEM/integrator diligence actually asks for.
+- ADR-318 capability certificates become derivable (a certificate is a signed
+  attestation over a slice of the ledger) and ADR-317 gains a real accuracy
+  source per PR instead of self-reported numbers.
+- The append-only, signed design has storage and key-management cost; bounded
+  by per-context retention policy and by reusing the existing RuField/witness
+  infrastructure rather than a new store.
+- Some contexts will show sparse or unflattering evidence. Surfacing that is the
+  point; the engine must never paper over a thin context with a global average.
+
+## Validation
+
+- `cargo test` on the evidence-engine crate — append-only invariant (no
+  in-place mutation; corrections are new records); per-context aggregation math
+  against fixtures; evidence-level is set by provenance and cannot be upgraded;
+  signature round-trip and tamper rejection; witness anchoring; empty-context
+  queries return "no evidence" not a fabricated number.
+- Cross-ADR: ingests ADR-302 `DomainState` and (phase 2) ADR-303 agreement
+  reports; an ADR-318 test mints a certificate from a ledger slice and an
+  ADR-317 test reads accuracy from the ledger.
+- Real-deployment evidence (a populated ledger from live ESP32 captures with
+  ADR-303 references) is the maturity milestone and requires hardware evidence
+  per CLAUDE.md; a synthetic ledger is L0 by construction.
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+# ADR-305: Authenticated sensor identity — RF chain of custody
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation planned (ADR-300 phase 1)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: security, identity, provenance, sensor-ingest, attestation, phase-1
+
+## Context
+
+This ADR is a child of **ADR-300** (perception substrate program) and owns
+primitive #5, *authenticated sensor identity*. In the ADR-300 dependency DAG it
+is a spine root that, together with **ADR-306** (canonical spatial ontology),
+feeds **ADR-301** (calibration certificate) and **ADR-319** (witness chain).
+
+RuView's inference outputs are only as trustworthy as the measurements that
+produced them, yet today a measurement's origin is essentially assertional. The
+UDP data plane accepts frames from any reachable host: **ADR-296** shipped step
+one — a loopback-default bind (`--udp-bind`) and an optional source
+IP/CIDR allowlist — and explicitly deferred to a follow-up ADR "per-device
+provisioned keys, MAC/AEAD, device identifiers, monotonic sequence numbers,
+freshness window, and replay rejection." **This ADR is that step two.** ADR-296
+correctly documented that an IP allowlist does not stop LAN spoofing; a
+cryptographic device identity is what closes that gap.
+
+Foundations already exist in the tree and must be reused rather than rebuilt:
+
+- `wifi-densepose-rufield` provides `DeviceId`, `Signature`, `SignatureBlock`,
+  `FrameProvenance`, `ProvenanceClass`, and `SignatureVerifyError` — the type
+  vocabulary for a signed frame.
+- `wifi-densepose-bfld` provides `CapabilityAttestation` and
+  `PrivacyAttestationProof` (BFLD attestation, ADR-141) — the device-side
+  attestation surface.
+- **ADR-295** defines the source-provenance state machine and freshness
+  (`SpatialStateFreshness`); a monotonic sequence and freshness window slot
+  into that machine rather than duplicating it.
+
+The gap is not new primitives but an **end-to-end chain of custody**: a frame
+must be traceable as `device → signed measurement → sequence → timestamp →
+calibration → inference → signed event`, with every link verified at the
+ingest boundary per CLAUDE.md ("validate untrusted input at every network,
+hardware, and FFI boundary; default to least authority").
+
+## Options considered
+
+1. **Stop at ADR-296 (bind + IP allowlist).** Rejected: ADR-296 itself names
+   this insufficient on a trusted LAN; any on-subnet host can still spoof a
+   device.
+2. **TLS/DTLS transport authentication only.** Rejected: authenticates the
+   *channel*, not the *measurement*. It does not survive store-and-forward,
+   does not bind a sequence number into the signed object, and gives the
+   downstream evidence/witness layers nothing to re-verify offline.
+3. **Per-device signing keys with a signed measurement envelope, monotonic
+   sequence, and freshness window, reusing the RuField/BFLD types.** Chosen.
+
+## Decision
+
+Introduce an **authenticated frame envelope** carried through the sensing
+server, built from existing RuField/BFLD types.
+
+### 1. Per-device provisioned identity
+
+- Each radio (ESP32-S3/C6 node or adapter) is provisioned with a keypair; the
+  device holds the private key, the server holds the enrolled public key bound
+  to a `DeviceId`. Provisioning is an explicit, authorized enrollment step — a
+  device is untrusted until an operator enrolls its public key. Private keys are
+  never logged or committed (CLAUDE.md credential rule); the ESP32 side follows
+  `firmware/esp32-csi-node` key-handling notes.
+- The enrollment record binds `DeviceId → public key → capabilities`
+  (via `CapabilityAttestation`, ADR-141), so a device can only assert
+  measurements for phenomena it is attested to sense. This is what **ADR-318**
+  (capability certificate) later consumes.
+
+### 2. Signed measurement envelope
+
+- A frame on the wire becomes a `SignatureBlock` over the canonical
+  serialization of `{DeviceId, sequence, timestamp, measurement-hash}`. The
+  measurement itself (CSI/CIR payload) is covered by the hash so tampering is
+  detectable without embedding the whole payload twice.
+- Verification uses `Signature`/`SignatureVerifyError` from
+  `wifi-densepose-rufield`. A frame that fails signature verification is
+  dropped and counted, exactly as ADR-296 drops disallowed sources — an `Err`
+  at the boundary, never a warning that proceeds.
+
+### 3. Monotonic sequence + freshness (replay defense)
+
+- Each device maintains a strictly monotonic per-device sequence number. The
+  server tracks the last accepted sequence per `DeviceId`; a non-increasing
+  sequence is rejected as a replay.
+- A freshness window bounds `timestamp` against the server clock skew budget;
+  stale frames are rejected. This reuses ADR-295's `SpatialStateFreshness`
+  rather than inventing a parallel notion of staleness, and composes with
+  ADR-297's stale-node handling.
+
+### 4. Chain of custody into the event
+
+- On successful verification the frame's `FrameProvenance` records the verified
+  `DeviceId`, sequence, and timestamp. Calibration (ADR-301) and inference
+  annotate their transforms, and the emitted spatial event (ADR-306 ontology)
+  carries a signed provenance lineage. `ProvenanceClass` still enforces the
+  synthetic/measured invariant from ADR-282/ADR-279 (invariant 6): a measured
+  chain of custody can never be aliased to synthetic and vice-versa.
+- This end-to-end signed lineage is the substrate the **ADR-319** witness chain
+  serializes and the **ADR-318** capability certificate points at as evidence.
+
+### Compatibility
+
+- The envelope is **opt-in per deployment** and negotiated at enrollment. An
+  un-enrolled single-node desktop deployment keeps working unauthenticated
+  behind ADR-296's loopback default; a routable, multi-node, or fleet
+  deployment (ADR-316) requires enrolled identities. The startup security log
+  (ADR-296) is extended to state whether frame authentication is active.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- LAN spoofing and replay — the residual risks ADR-296 named plainly — are
+  closed for enrolled deployments. The measurement, not merely the channel, is
+  authenticated, so the guarantee survives store-and-forward into the witness
+  chain.
+- Enrollment/key-management is now an operational responsibility (provisioning,
+  rotation, revocation). This is documented as a deployment step; key rotation
+  and revocation lists are specified here but their fleet distribution is
+  owned by ADR-316.
+- Signature verification adds per-frame CPU cost at ingest; bounded and
+  measured in validation below. It is a deliberate cost for a verifiable chain
+  of custody.
+- A schema addition to the frame contract; un-enrolled deployments are
+  unaffected, and the migration accessor mirrors ADR-297's approach.
+- **No spoof-resistance claim is MEASURED until validated on real silicon**
+  (CLAUDE.md hardware rule): a passing unit/integration suite demonstrates the
+  logic, not the fielded device path.
+
+## Validation
+
+- Unit tests (`cargo test -p wifi-densepose-sensing-server`,
+  `-p wifi-densepose-rufield`): valid envelope accepted; bad signature
+  rejected and counted; non-monotonic sequence rejected as replay; out-of-
+  window timestamp rejected; un-enrolled `DeviceId` rejected; measured/synthetic
+  provenance aliasing rejected (ADR-279 invariant 6).
+- Integration test: a captured/synthesized multi-frame stream produces a
+  verifiable `device → … → signed event` lineage that ADR-319 can serialize and
+  re-verify offline.
+- Benchmark (`cargo bench`): per-frame verification cost, to bound ingest
+  overhead.
+- **Real-silicon evidence required** before any deployment-grade
+  authentication claim: a captured boot/runtime log from an enrolled ESP32 node
+  signing frames end-to-end. A successful build or simulator run is not
+  hardware evidence.
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+# ADR-306: Canonical spatial ontology — one Site→…→Event model for every surface
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation planned (ADR-300 phase 1)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: ontology, worldgraph, schema, mqtt, matter, rufield, phase-1
+
+## Context
+
+This ADR is a child of **ADR-300** and owns primitive #6, *canonical spatial
+ontology*. In the ADR-300 DAG it is a spine root alongside **ADR-305**
+(authenticated identity) and feeds every downstream primitive that must speak
+about *where* and *what*: **ADR-301** (calibration), **ADR-307** (tracking,
+consumes `Track`/`Person`), **ADR-319** (witness chain), and every external
+surface named in the ADR-300 consequences (MQTT, REST, WebSocket, RuField,
+Matter, agents).
+
+RuView currently expresses "where something is" in several overlapping,
+per-surface schemas: the MQTT/Home-Assistant mapper has its own node/room
+shapes (**ADR-297** just introduced `NodeInference`/`RoomInference` to
+disambiguate node vs. room state); the `worldgraph` crate models a spatial
+graph; RuField carries `SemanticProvenance`; Matter/HomeKit has its own area
+model. The same physical fact — "a person is in the kitchen" — is re-encoded
+differently on each surface, and the review called for "one canonical
+`NodeInference`/`RoomInference` contract" (ADR-297 consequences). Without a
+single semantic model, every new surface multiplies the translation matrix and
+each translation is a place where provenance and evidence level (ADR-282) can
+be silently dropped.
+
+Substantial scaffolding already exists and must be **reused/extended, not
+rebuilt**. `v2/crates/worldgraph/wifi-densepose-worldgraph` already defines:
+
+- `WorldNode` variants including `Room { area_id, name, bounds_enu, floor }`,
+  `Zone { parent_room, … }`, `Wall { rf_attenuation_db }`, and `Doorway`.
+- `WorldEdge` variants including `Observes { quality, last_seen_unix_ms }`,
+  `LocatedIn { since_unix_ms }`, `AdjacentTo { via_doorway }`, and `Supports`.
+- `WorldGraph`, `WorldGraphSnapshot`, `WorldId`, `SemanticProvenance`,
+  `PersonPosition`, and a HomeCore `area_id` linkage join key (ADR-127).
+
+The `worldgraph` crate is therefore the natural home for the canonical model.
+What is missing is (a) the full `Site → Building → Floor → Space → Zone`
+containment spine above `Room`, (b) first-class `Sensor`, `Object`,
+`Observation`, `Track`, and `Event` node types, (c) one canonical serialization
+that every surface consumes, and (d) a documented migration path from the
+existing per-surface schemas.
+
+## Options considered
+
+1. **Leave each surface with its own schema; add adapters pairwise.** Rejected:
+   O(surfaces²) translations, and provenance/evidence loss at each hop.
+2. **Invent a new top-level ontology crate.** Rejected: `worldgraph` already
+   models rooms, zones, walls, doorways, observation edges, and HomeCore
+   linkage; a parallel crate would fork the world model.
+3. **Extend `worldgraph` into the canonical ontology and make every surface a
+   projection of it.** Chosen.
+
+## Decision
+
+Adopt **one canonical spatial ontology**, hosted in the `worldgraph` crate,
+that every RuView surface reads from and writes to.
+
+### 1. The containment spine and entity types
+
+Define the full node taxonomy as an extension of the existing `WorldNode`:
+
+```
+Site ▸ Building ▸ Floor ▸ Space ▸ Zone
+                                   └─▸ { Sensor, Person, Object,
+                                         Observation, Track, Event }
+```
+
+- `Site`, `Building`, `Floor`, `Space` are new containment `WorldNode`
+  variants above the existing `Room` (mapped to `Space`, keeping its `area_id`
+  and `bounds_enu`) and `Zone`. `Wall`/`Doorway` remain as topological
+  elements. Containment reuses the existing `LocatedIn`/`AdjacentTo` edge
+  vocabulary; a new `PartOf` edge expresses the pure hierarchy
+  (Zone `PartOf` Space `PartOf` Floor …).
+- `Sensor` is the entity **ADR-305** authenticates (`DeviceId` as its stable
+  identity) and **ADR-320** (HAL, phase 2) describes the hardware of. `Person`,
+  `Object`, `Observation`, `Track`, and `Event` are first-class nodes.
+  `Observes`/`LocatedIn` edges already carry quality and dwell timestamps.
+- `Track` and `Person` are defined **here** as the ontology contract that
+  **ADR-307** (persistent tracking) produces and updates. `Observation` is what
+  an authenticated frame (ADR-305) becomes after calibration (ADR-301), and
+  `Event` is the governed output that ADR-318 certifies and ADR-319 witnesses.
+
+### 2. Canonical serialization
+
+- A single, versioned serialization (serde-based, stable field names) is the
+  one wire/at-rest representation. Every surface — MQTT/Home-Assistant, REST,
+  WebSocket, RuField observations, Matter/HomeKit, agent queries — is a
+  **projection** of this model, not an independent schema. `NodeInference` and
+  `RoomInference` (ADR-297) become projections of `Sensor→Observes` and the
+  `Space`-level fused inference respectively, so ADR-297's node/room separation
+  is preserved by construction rather than re-encoded per surface.
+- Every node and edge carries `SemanticProvenance` and exactly one
+  `EvidenceLevel` (L0–L5, ADR-282 policy): the evidence ladder travels *with*
+  the fact across every projection, so no surface can silently upgrade or drop
+  it.
+
+### 3. Migration path
+
+- Each existing per-surface schema gets a documented, tested bidirectional
+  mapping to/from the canonical model, plus a migration accessor for consumers
+  reading the old shape (mirroring ADR-297's migration accessor). Surfaces are
+  cut over one at a time; a surface is "canonical" once its projection is the
+  only encoder it uses. Until cutover, the mapping layer is authoritative and
+  round-trip-tested so no fact is lost in translation.
+- The `worldgraph` HomeCore `area_id` linkage (ADR-127) remains the join key
+  between the ontology's `Space` and external area registries.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- The translation matrix collapses from O(surfaces²) to O(surfaces): each
+  surface implements one projection. New surfaces (ROS 2, OpenUSD, OPC UA per
+  ADR-282's roadmap) plug in as additional projections.
+- Provenance and evidence level are carried uniformly; a fact cannot cross a
+  surface boundary and lose its lineage or its L-level.
+- A schema change reaching every surface; managed by the versioned
+  serialization and per-surface migration accessors. Single-node deployments
+  keep working (one `Sensor`, one `Space`).
+- The ontology is a *representation*, not an inference engine: it says nothing
+  about *how* a `Track` or `Event` is produced — that is owned by ADR-307,
+  ADR-301, ADR-302, and the model layer. This ADR does not itself make any
+  accuracy claim to grade.
+- Extending `worldgraph` grows one crate's surface rather than forking a second
+  world model; the geo/worldmodel sub-crates continue to build on the same node
+  vocabulary.
+
+## Validation
+
+- Unit tests (`cargo test -p wifi-densepose-worldgraph`): containment-spine
+  construction and invariants (a `Zone` is `PartOf` exactly one `Space`, a
+  `Space` on exactly one `Floor`, etc.); round-trip serialization of every node
+  and edge type; every node/edge carries exactly one `EvidenceLevel`.
+- Migration tests: each per-surface schema maps to the canonical model and back
+  with no loss of provenance or evidence level; `NodeInference`/`RoomInference`
+  (ADR-297) project and re-project identically.
+- Contract test: a single canonical `Event` renders correctly through the MQTT,
+  REST, and WebSocket projections from one source of truth.
+- No accuracy numbers are claimed; this ADR delivers the shared representation
+  the rest of the phase-1 spine writes into.
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+# ADR-307: Persistent identity & tracking — privacy-preserving probabilistic tracks
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation (ADR-300 phase 2)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: tracking, identity, privacy, fusion, worldgraph, phase-2
+
+## Context
+
+This ADR is a child of **ADR-300** and owns primitive #7, *persistent identity
+& tracking*. In the ADR-300 DAG it is a phase-2 primitive sitting on the
+phase-1 spine: it **consumes the ADR-306 ontology** (producing and updating the
+`Track` and `Person` node types defined there), it relies on **ADR-305**
+authenticated identity so that the observations it associates have a verified
+origin, and its outputs are governed `Event`s that ADR-318/ADR-319 can certify
+and witness.
+
+The product need is to reason about *persistent entities* — "person_7 entered
+the kitchen, then the hallway, then the bedroom" — across radios, modalities,
+rooms, and time. The hard constraint is that this must happen **without
+establishing civil identity**. RuView is camera-free (ADR-282), and a
+persistent pseudonymous track must never become, or be joinable to, a real-
+world named individual. This is a privacy property to be enforced *by
+construction*, not a policy footnote.
+
+Substantial scaffolding already exists in
+`v2/crates/wifi-densepose-mat/src/tracking` and must be **reused/extended, not
+rebuilt**:
+
+- `SurvivorTracker`, `TrackedSurvivor`, `TrackId`, `TrackerConfig`,
+  `TrackLifecycle`, and `TrackState` — a multi-target tracker with lifecycle
+  (tentative/active/lost/terminal) and a `TrackId` backed by a UUID
+  (`as_uuid`).
+- `KalmanState` with `predict`/`update`, `position`, `velocity`,
+  `position_uncertainty`, and `mahalanobis_distance_sq` — the motion model and
+  gating distance.
+- `CsiFingerprint`, `DetectionObservation`, `AssociationResult`, and the
+  `can_reidentify`/`matches`/`mark_rescued`/`rescue` re-identification surface —
+  the appearance/fingerprint channel for track continuity.
+
+What is missing is (a) continuity **across radios, modalities, and rooms** (the
+tracker today reasons within a node/room context), (b) a **persistent** entity
+that survives track loss and hand-off between spaces, and (c) an explicit
+**privacy boundary** that guarantees no civil-identity binding.
+
+## Options considered
+
+1. **Per-room independent trackers, no cross-room identity.** Rejected: cannot
+   express "person_7 moved kitchen → hallway → bedroom"; loses the entity at
+   every room boundary.
+2. **Global identity keyed on a strong biometric fingerprint.** Rejected: a
+   fingerprint strong enough to re-identify across long gaps trends toward a
+   civil-identity-grade biometric — exactly what the privacy constraint
+   forbids.
+3. **Probabilistic persistent tracks with bounded, decaying pseudonymous
+   association, built on the existing MAT tracker.** Chosen.
+
+## Decision
+
+Extend `wifi-densepose-mat/tracking` into a **cross-domain persistent track
+layer** that produces ADR-306 `Track`/`Person` nodes.
+
+### 1. Persistent probabilistic entity
+
+- A persistent entity is a pseudonymous `Person` node (ADR-306) with a stable
+  synthetic id (e.g. `person_7`) backed by the existing `TrackId`/UUID. It
+  aggregates one or more `SurvivorTracker` tracks over time and space and holds
+  a **probabilistic** continuity belief — association is never asserted as
+  certain, and every hand-off carries a confidence.
+- Continuity across a track-loss gap reuses the existing re-identification
+  surface (`can_reidentify`, `CsiFingerprint`, `AssociationResult`), extended
+  with a **time- and distance-decayed** association prior so that confidence in
+  "same entity" falls with the size of the gap. Beyond a bounded horizon the
+  association is dropped and a new pseudonym is minted rather than forcing a
+  join — under-linking is the privacy-safe failure mode.
+
+### 2. Cross-radio / cross-modality / cross-room continuity
+
+- Association operates over the ADR-306 ontology graph: `Observes` edges from
+  multiple `Sensor`s and `AdjacentTo`/`Doorway` topology constrain plausible
+  hand-offs (a person can only move between adjacent spaces). The existing
+  `mahalanobis_distance_sq` gating extends to a fused observation across
+  modalities rather than a single node's detections.
+- Fusion here is track-level association; the underlying multi-modality fusion
+  (radar/mmWave per ADR-063, multistatic per ADR-029, and real sensor fusion
+  per ADR-311) supplies the observations. This ADR depends on those for the raw
+  cross-modality evidence and does not re-implement sensor fusion.
+
+### 3. Privacy boundary (by construction)
+
+- **No civil-identity binding.** The persistent id is a synthetic pseudonym
+  with no field, edge, or join key to any name, account, phone, MAC, or other
+  civil identifier. The type carries no such field, so binding is impossible in
+  the schema, not merely discouraged.
+- The `CsiFingerprint` used for re-identification is **bounded and decaying**:
+  it is scoped to short-horizon continuity, is not persisted as a long-term
+  biometric template, and expires. This keeps re-identification useful for
+  "same person across the hallway" while structurally unable to serve "this is
+  the same person who visited last month."
+- Every `Track`/`Person`/`Event` produced carries `SemanticProvenance` and an
+  `EvidenceLevel` (ADR-282), and honors the ADR-277/ADR-280 edge governance and
+  ADR-141 attestation — a pseudonymous track is still governed P-class data.
+  Tracking accuracy is a per-domain claim to be tagged MEASURED/CLAIMED/
+  SYNTHETIC with a reproducer; **this ADR claims no accuracy number.**
+
+## Consequences
+
+- RuView can express persistent, cross-room trajectories for automation and
+  analytics while remaining camera-free and civil-identity-free.
+- The privacy-safe failure mode is **under-linking** (mint a fresh pseudonym
+  when unsure), which will fragment a trajectory across long gaps or sparse
+  coverage. This is a deliberate trade: a fragmented pseudonym is safe, a
+  wrong civil-identity join is not.
+- Extends an existing tracker rather than forking one; single-room single-radio
+  deployments keep the current behavior (one entity = one track).
+- Cross-modality quality depends on ADR-311/ADR-063/ADR-029 landing; until then
+  continuity is WiFi-primary and its limits are stated, not hidden.
+- Being phase 2, this ADR is design intent; it will be revised as the ADR-306
+  ontology and ADR-305 identity spine finalize.
+
+## Validation
+
+- Unit tests (`cargo test -p wifi-densepose-mat`): decayed association prior
+  (confidence falls with gap; drops beyond horizon → new pseudonym);
+  topology-constrained hand-off (no association across non-adjacent spaces);
+  schema check that a `Person`/`Track` carries no civil-identifier field.
+- Integration test against a synthetic multi-room, multi-radio scenario:
+  a scripted walk kitchen → hallway → bedroom yields one persistent pseudonym
+  with per-hand-off confidence, and a deliberately ambiguous crossing produces
+  two pseudonyms rather than a false join.
+- Evidence discipline: any tracking-continuity accuracy is reported only with
+  the ADR-291 leakage-free protocol and an evidence tag; no number is asserted
+  here.
+- Privacy review: confirm no persisted long-term biometric template and no
+  civil-identity join path, as an explicit checklist item before any pilot.
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+# ADR-308: Sensor placement optimizer — floorplan + inventory → recommended positions
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation (ADR-300 phase 3)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: placement, planning, rf-twin, coverage, worldgraph, phase-3
+
+## Context
+
+This ADR is a child of **ADR-300** and owns primitive #8, *sensor placement
+optimizer*. In the ADR-300 DAG it is a phase-3, research-forward primitive that
+sits on top of the fused world state and is tightly coupled to **ADR-315**
+(digital RF twin): the twin provides the propagation simulation this optimizer
+plans against. It reads the **ADR-306** canonical ontology for the physical
+scene and, after install, compares its predictions against ADR-302 observability
+and the ADR-318 capability certificate.
+
+The problem it solves is the single most common cause of a bad RuView
+deployment: sensors placed by guesswork. Whether a room can be reliably sensed
+depends on AP/sensor geometry relative to walls, Fresnel-zone clearance,
+multipath structure, and where people actually move. Today an installer has no
+principled way to answer "where do I put the two nodes I have so the kitchen is
+observable?" — and no way, after install, to know whether reality matched the
+plan. This is a genuine **differentiator**: it turns RuView from "sense
+whatever the given placement happens to allow" into "recommend the placement
+that makes the requested sensing feasible."
+
+Relevant existing assets to build on rather than duplicate:
+
+- The `worldgraph` crate models the physical scene the optimizer plans over:
+  `Room`/`Space` with `bounds_enu`, `Wall { rf_attenuation_db }` (drywall ≈ 3
+  dB, brick ≈ 12 dB), `Doorway`, and `Zone` — enough geometry and coarse RF
+  attenuation to seed a coverage model, plus `Sensor` nodes (ADR-306) for
+  candidate positions.
+- **ADR-315** (RF twin, phase 3) is the propagation/multipath simulator; this
+  optimizer is a *consumer* of the twin, not a second simulator.
+- **ADR-302** (OOD/observability) and **ADR-318** (capability certificate)
+  define what "reliably sense the requested phenomenon" means, so the optimizer
+  can optimize against the same observability metric the runtime later gates on.
+- **ADR-029** (multistatic) and **ADR-063** (mmWave fusion) inform which link
+  geometries are useful for which phenomena.
+
+## Options considered
+
+1. **Static placement guidelines in docs (e.g. "one node per room, opposite
+   the door").** Rejected: ignores the specific floorplan, wall materials, and
+   the actual hardware inventory; gives no uncertainty and no post-install
+   feedback.
+2. **Full electromagnetic solver per site.** Rejected for the default path:
+   too heavy for an installer workflow and overkill relative to the coarse
+   `rf_attenuation_db` scene RuView actually has; reserved as an optional
+   high-fidelity backend inside ADR-315.
+3. **A coverage optimizer that consumes the ADR-315 RF twin over the ADR-306
+   scene, then validates predicted vs. measured observability after install.**
+   Chosen.
+
+## Decision
+
+Define a **placement optimizer** that takes a floor plan (ADR-306 scene) and a
+hardware inventory and recommends sensor positions, then closes the loop after
+install.
+
+### 1. Inputs
+
+- The ADR-306 canonical scene: `Space`/`Zone` bounds, `Wall` segments with
+  `rf_attenuation_db`, `Doorway` topology, and any already-placed `Sensor`
+  nodes.
+- A hardware inventory: the count and type of available radios (ESP32-S3/C6
+  nodes, mmWave, adapters) with their capability envelopes (what each can
+  sense, per ADR-318 / ADR-320 HAL descriptors).
+- A sensing objective: which phenomenon must be observable in which
+  `Space`/`Zone` (presence, vitals, pose), expressed against the ADR-302
+  observability metric.
+
+### 2. Prediction
+
+- For a candidate placement, query the **ADR-315 RF twin** for simulated RF
+  coverage: path loss through `Wall` attenuation, **Fresnel-zone clearance**
+  between link endpoints, and coarse **multipath** structure. From that derive
+  an **expected observability** and an **uncertainty** for each objective in
+  each space — reusing the same observability definition ADR-302 gates on so the
+  plan and the runtime speak one language.
+- Search over candidate positions (the inventory bounds the count; the scene
+  bounds the geometry) to recommend the placement that maximizes objective
+  observability, reporting expected observability **and its uncertainty** per
+  space — never a single confident number for a simulated result.
+
+### 3. Post-install loop
+
+- After install, compare **predicted vs. measured** observability using the
+  ADR-302 runtime observability signal from the freshly enrolled (ADR-305),
+  calibrated (ADR-301) sensors. Where measurement disagrees with prediction,
+  recommend adjustments (move, re-aim, add a node) and feed the residual back
+  to improve the ADR-315 twin's scene parameters (e.g. a wall's effective
+  attenuation).
+
+### Evidence discipline
+
+- Predicted coverage is a **simulation** (evidence level L0 per ADR-282) and is
+  labelled `SYNTHETIC`; it is a *recommendation*, never a sensing claim.
+- The predicted-vs-measured comparison is the only place a `MEASURED` statement
+  appears, and only with a reproducer and real-silicon observability data
+  (CLAUDE.md hardware rule). The optimizer never presents a simulated coverage
+  map as evidence that a room *is* being sensed.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- Installers get a principled, floorplan-specific placement plan and, crucially,
+  a post-install check that says whether reality matched the plan — a
+  differentiating capability over guess-and-check deployment.
+- Quality is bounded by the fidelity of the ADR-315 RF twin and the coarseness
+  of the `worldgraph` scene (2D walls, coarse attenuation). The optimizer
+  reports uncertainty rather than overstating a coarse model; higher fidelity
+  is an ADR-315 concern.
+- Hard dependency on ADR-315 (twin), ADR-302 (observability metric), and
+  ADR-306 (scene); this ADR does not build a simulator or an observability
+  metric of its own.
+- Being phase 3, this is design intent sitting on the fused world state; it is
+  expected to be revised as ADR-315 and the phase-1 spine land.
+- No claim that recommended placement *guarantees* sensing — it maximizes
+  modelled observability subject to inventory and geometry, with explicit
+  uncertainty.
+
+## Validation
+
+- Unit tests: coverage/observability prediction is a deterministic function of
+  scene + placement + twin parameters; Fresnel-zone and wall-attenuation math
+  against known analytic cases; search returns the modelled-optimal placement on
+  small synthetic scenes.
+- Integration test: on a synthetic floorplan with a known-good and a
+  known-bad placement, the optimizer ranks them correctly and reports higher
+  uncertainty for the marginal case.
+- Post-install loop test: injected predicted-vs-measured disagreement produces a
+  sensible adjustment recommendation and a twin-parameter residual.
+- Field validation (deferred, real-silicon): predicted vs. measured
+  observability on an instrumented real site, reported as `MEASURED` with a
+  reproducer. Until then all coverage output is `SYNTHETIC`/L0. No coverage or
+  accuracy number is asserted by this ADR.
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
+# ADR-309: Active sensing — closed-loop RF experiment control
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation (ADR-300 phase 3)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: active-sensing, control-plane, closed-loop, information-gain, actuation, phase-3
+
+## Context
+
+This ADR is a child of **ADR-300** and owns primitive #9, *active sensing*. In
+the ADR-300 phasing it is a phase-3 primitive that sits on top of the fused
+world state produced by **ADR-311** (real sensor fusion) and is driven by the
+information budget of **ADR-314** (information-gain scheduler). It is authored
+as **Proposed**: design intent and validation plan, not a phase-1 build.
+
+The default posture of every current RuView path is **passive**: RF traffic
+happens for its own reasons (a device transmits, a beacon fires), RuView
+observes whatever CSI/CIR arrives, and the pipeline extracts what it can from
+that incidental signal. The strategic assessment behind ADR-300 named the next
+step: move from *RF-happens → observe* to **RuView-controls-RF → observe the
+response → optimize the next measurement**. That turns sensing into a
+closed-loop experiment — the system chooses what to measure to resolve the
+uncertainty it currently has, rather than accepting the measurements the
+environment happens to offer.
+
+Substantial control-plane scaffolding already exists and must be
+**reused/extended, not rebuilt**:
+
+- **ADR-280** (active sensing / programmable perception, *implemented* in
+  `ruview-unified/src/control.rs`) already defines the governed control surface
+  this ADR closes the loop over: `SensingTask` (evidence-aware, fail-closed
+  admission), `SensingAction` + `InformationGoal` (a deliberate act of
+  evidence-gathering against a stated hypothesis, bounded by a `PrivacyClass`
+  P0–P5 ceiling), `ActiveSensingPlanner` (age-of-information scheduler),
+  `CoherentSensorGroup` (coherent fusion fails closed), and `request_actuation`
+  → `ActuationReceipt` for governed RIS/movable/fluid-antenna actuation.
+- ADR-280 explicitly recorded that **information-gain *estimation* is not
+  implemented** — "the planner uses staleness heuristics, not mutual
+  information; RIS drivers, actual multi-AP coherence measurement, and OTFS
+  waveform control are hardware-dependent roadmap items." ADR-309 is the ADR
+  that closes exactly those gaps, in coordination with ADR-314.
+
+The missing piece is not the actuation surface — ADR-280 built that and made it
+fail closed — but the **loop**: a controller that reads the current fused-state
+uncertainty, selects a *controllable measurement configuration* expected to
+reduce it most, requests it through the ADR-280 governed surface, observes the
+response, and updates its belief before choosing the next measurement.
+
+## Options considered
+
+1. **Stay passive; only schedule which incidental observations to keep.** This
+   is roughly today's `ActiveSensingPlanner` (staleness-priority over regions).
+   Rejected as the endpoint: it optimizes *attention* over uncontrolled RF, not
+   the *measurement* itself. It remains the fallback when nothing is
+   controllable.
+2. **Open-loop measurement scripting** (a fixed sweep of channels/bandwidths).
+   Rejected: a fixed sweep spends the RF/energy/privacy budget the same way
+   regardless of what is already known; it cannot concentrate measurement where
+   uncertainty actually is.
+3. **Closed-loop experiment control** — read uncertainty, pick the controllable
+   configuration with highest expected information gain per unit cost/privacy,
+   actuate through the ADR-280 governed surface, observe, update, repeat.
+   Chosen.
+
+## Decision
+
+Adopt **closed-loop RF experiment control** as a phase-3 controller layered on
+the ADR-280 surface. RuView selects and drives the controllable degrees of
+freedom of the RF measurement, then optimizes the next measurement from the
+observed response.
+
+### 1. Controllable degrees of freedom
+
+Define an `ExperimentControl` vocabulary over the configuration axes RuView can
+influence on hardware that exposes them (each axis is optional and
+capability-gated by ADR-320's HAL, so an ESP32-only deployment simply has an
+empty controllable set and degrades to the passive planner):
+
+- **Channel / band** and **bandwidth** (which spectrum to probe; reuses the
+  ADR-292 wideband subcarrier-agnostic metadata).
+- **Packet timing / cadence** (when to solicit a sounding, and at what rate).
+- **Antenna / chain selection** (which subset of a distributed aperture to
+  activate — bounded by the ADR-280 `CoherentSensorGroup` compatibility proof).
+- **Beam / RIS configuration** (which rooms and people become observable —
+  governed exactly as ADR-280 §6 requires, via `request_actuation` and an
+  `ActuationReceipt`).
+- **802.11bf measurement parameters** (TB/non-TB, reporting config) once
+  ADR-310 exposes standardized sensing as a native measurement type.
+
+### 2. The loop
+
+```
+fused-state uncertainty (ADR-311)
+        │
+        ▼
+info-gain ranking of ExperimentControl options (ADR-314)
+        │  select argmax  E[ΔI] / (cost, energy, privacy ceiling)
+        ▼
+governed request  (ADR-280 admit_task / request_actuation, fail-closed)
+        │
+        ▼
+observe response → update belief (ADR-311) → repeat
+```
+
+The controller never bypasses the ADR-280 admission and actuation gates: every
+solicited measurement is a `SensingTask`/`SensingAction`, every environment
+change is an `ActuationReceipt`, and every step composes with the ADR-277
+policy engine. Information gain is what **ADR-314** supplies (the mutual-
+information estimate ADR-280 deferred); ADR-309 owns the *control loop* that
+consumes that estimate and drives the hardware.
+
+### 3. Governance and honesty boundary
+
+- Actuation and solicitation stay fail-closed and privacy-ceilinged: a
+  closed-loop experiment cannot widen the P0–P5 ceiling of the task it serves,
+  and cannot steer a beam into a zone that does not grant the purpose (ADR-280
+  `actuation_requires_policy_authorization`).
+- Any accuracy or "traffic-reduction" claim from the closed loop is tagged
+  **MEASURED** only with a named reproducer over a stated scenario, **SYNTHETIC**
+  for simulated apertures, and **CLAIMED** otherwise. Real multi-AP coherent
+  measurement and RIS actuation remain **hardware-dependent** and require
+  real-silicon evidence (a captured runtime log) before any hardware claim, per
+  CLAUDE.md. No number is invented here.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- Sensing becomes an experiment: RuView spends its RF/energy/privacy budget on
+  the measurements that most reduce current uncertainty, instead of processing
+  whatever incidental traffic arrives.
+- The loop is only as strong as its two dependencies: ADR-311 must expose a
+  usable uncertainty surface and ADR-314 must produce trustworthy information-
+  gain estimates. Where either is absent, the controller degrades to the
+  ADR-280 staleness planner rather than acting on a fabricated gain estimate.
+- Controllability is hardware-bounded. On commodity ESP32 sensors the
+  controllable set may be limited to cadence; the full loop (bandwidth, antenna,
+  beam) needs NICs/RIS that expose those axes, surfaced through ADR-320.
+- This ADR adds a controller; it does not re-open ADR-280's raw-export or
+  actuation-governance decisions, which remain authoritative and fail-closed.
+
+## Validation
+
+- Design-level acceptance (phase 3): a simulated closed loop over a synthetic
+  scene reduces terminal fused-state uncertainty faster than (a) the passive
+  ADR-280 staleness planner and (b) an open-loop fixed sweep, at equal
+  measurement budget — reported **SYNTHETIC**, with the scenario and seed named.
+- Governance tests: every solicited measurement and actuation in the loop is
+  admitted through the ADR-280 fail-closed path; a loop step that would exceed
+  the task's privacy ceiling or steer into an ungranted zone is denied.
+- Degradation test: with an empty controllable set (ESP32-only), the controller
+  falls back to the staleness planner with no error and no fabricated gain.
+- Hardware validation of bandwidth/antenna/beam actuation is explicitly out of
+  scope until real silicon exposes those axes and produces a captured log.
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+# ADR-310: 802.11bf-native architecture — standardized WLAN sensing as native measurement types
+
+- **Status**: Proposed (ADR-300 phase 2)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: 80211bf, wlan-sensing, standards, measurement-types, hal, phase-2
+
+## Context
+
+This ADR is a child of **ADR-300** and owns primitive #10, *802.11bf-native
+architecture*. In the ADR-300 phasing it is a phase-2 integration primitive: it
+sits on the phase-1 spine (authenticated identity ADR-305, spatial ontology
+ADR-306, evidence engine ADR-304) and **feeds ADR-320** (the RuView sensor HAL),
+which is the clause of the acceptance test that "identifies the hardware." It is
+authored as **Proposed**.
+
+**IEEE 802.11bf-2025 ("WLAN Sensing") was published 2025-09-26** — verified
+against the IEEE SA record in `wifi-densepose-hardware` (`ieee80211bf/mod.rs`
+header, "evidence grade MEASURED", ADR-152 §1.1). Standardization is complete
+for sub-7 GHz and >45 GHz (DMG) bands: formal sensing measurement setup,
+measurement instances, feedback/reporting, and sensing-by-proxy (SBP). This
+changes RuView's strategic frame: rather than treating every WiFi measurement as
+an *opportunistic* extraction from incidental traffic, RuView can be the **open
+reference sensing stack around the standard** — the day commodity silicon
+exposes it.
+
+Substantial scaffolding already exists and must be **reused/extended, not
+rebuilt**. `v2/crates/wifi-densepose-hardware/src/ieee80211bf/` already models
+the standardized procedure surface as forward-compatible types (ADR-152/153):
+
+- `types` — `SpecProfile` version gates, `SensingRole`/`TransceiverRole`,
+  `MeasurementSetupParams`, `SensingCapabilities` negotiation, and required
+  `ConsentMode` governance metadata on every setup.
+- `messages` — `SensingMeasurementSetupRequest/Response`,
+  `SensingMeasurementInstance`, `SensingMeasurementReport`, `CsiReportPayload`,
+  `SbpRequest/Response`, `SensingSessionTermination`.
+- `session` — a deterministic FSM (`Idle → SetupNegotiating → Active →
+  Terminating → Idle`) with rejection paths, single-role enforcement, and SBP
+  proxy mode; `table` (responder-side setup registry); `transport` (the
+  `SensingTransport` seam, a `SimTransport` test double, and an
+  `OpportunisticCsiBridge` that maps today's opportunistic CSI onto the
+  standardized report path).
+
+The module's own honesty note is authoritative and carried forward here: it is
+**not a certified 802.11bf implementation**, and **no commodity silicon — ESP32
+included — implements the standard yet**; the OTA frame binding lands when a
+chipset exposes it. Wideband ingest plumbing is already in place too: **ADR-292**
+(FeitCSI/AX210) carries native subcarrier dimensionality end-to-end and records
+the native→pipeline mapping, and noted that "truncated CIR is a natural
+extension of the same plumbing."
+
+What is missing is architectural, not protocol scaffolding: normalized CSI is
+still treated as *the* WiFi input. The standardized sensing measurements
+(TB/non-TB soundings, truncated CIR / PDP reports) are modeled as protocol
+messages but are **not yet first-class native measurement types** that flow
+through calibration (ADR-301), fusion (ADR-311), and the ontology (ADR-306) on
+equal footing with normalized CSI.
+
+## Options considered
+
+1. **Keep 802.11bf as a protocol model only; always down-convert its reports to
+   normalized CSI at ingest.** Rejected: truncated CIR/PDP carry range-resolved
+   multipath structure that flattening to a CSI matrix discards; it also wastes
+   the standard's native report semantics.
+2. **Fork a parallel "bf pipeline" alongside the CSI pipeline.** Rejected:
+   duplicates calibration, fusion, ontology, and evidence plumbing, and re-opens
+   the O(surfaces²) translation problem ADR-306 exists to close.
+3. **Promote standardized sensing measurements to native measurement types
+   inside the existing pipeline**, with normalized CSI as one measurement type
+   among several. Chosen.
+
+## Decision
+
+Adopt an **802.11bf-native architecture**: standardized WLAN sensing
+measurements become **additional native measurement types**, alongside — not
+replacing — normalized CSI.
+
+### 1. Native measurement types
+
+- Define the standardized reports the `ieee80211bf` module already models
+  (TB and non-TB soundings; truncated CIR; PDP) as first-class
+  `MeasurementType` variants that the pipeline carries end-to-end, each tagged
+  with its `SpecProfile` and band. Normalized CSI remains one such type; the
+  `OpportunisticCsiBridge` remains the path for silicon that only offers
+  incidental CSI.
+- Truncated CIR/PDP reuse the **ADR-292** subcarrier-agnostic / native-
+  dimensionality plumbing (truncated CIR is the stated natural extension); the
+  native→pipeline mapping is recorded in frame metadata so downstream stages
+  know the true range/spectral resolution of a bf report vs. an interpolated CSI
+  frame.
+
+### 2. Ontology and governance binding
+
+- Each standardized measurement becomes an ADR-306 `Observation` node from an
+  ADR-305-authenticated `Sensor`, carrying `SemanticProvenance` and exactly one
+  `EvidenceLevel` (L0–L5, ADR-282). The `ieee80211bf` `ConsentMode` metadata —
+  required on every setup — composes with the ADR-277 policy engine, so a
+  standardized session is admitted under the same governance as any other
+  sensing task (ADR-280).
+- SBP (sensing-by-proxy) sessions attribute the report to the proxying and the
+  sensing entities distinctly, so provenance is not laundered through the proxy.
+
+### 3. HAL feed (ADR-320)
+
+- The capability set a device advertises — which `MeasurementType`s, bands,
+  bandwidths, roles, and `SpecProfile` it supports — is exactly the descriptor
+  **ADR-320** (HAL) needs to "identify the hardware." ADR-310 defines that
+  capability descriptor as the projection of `SensingCapabilities`; ADR-320
+  consumes it. A device that implements no bf profile advertises only the
+  opportunistic-CSI capability.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- RuView is positioned as the open reference stack *around* the standard: when a
+  chipset exposes 802.11bf, its native reports flow through calibration, fusion,
+  ontology, and evidence with no bespoke pipeline — the plumbing is already
+  tested against `SimTransport` and synthetic fixtures.
+- Normalized CSI is demoted from "the WiFi input" to "one measurement type,"
+  which is the correct framing for a multi-measurement future and prevents the
+  bf path from being a second-class citizen.
+- **No hardware claim is made or implied.** No commodity silicon implements
+  802.11bf yet; this ADR wires the *types and flow*, tested in simulation. Any
+  OTA/native-report accuracy claim requires real silicon evidence (a captured
+  log) per CLAUDE.md, and any wideband number must be tagged with the capture
+  hardware (ADR-292). No benchmark number is invented here.
+- This ADR does not re-open ADR-152/153's decision to avoid OTA frame binding
+  until silicon exists; it consumes that surface and adds the pipeline
+  integration.
+
+## Validation
+
+- `cargo test -p wifi-densepose-hardware` — existing `ieee80211bf` FSM,
+  table, and transport tests continue to pass; new tests assert that a
+  `SensingMeasurementReport` (TB and non-TB) and a truncated-CIR/PDP report
+  round-trip through the pipeline as native `MeasurementType`s.
+- `cargo test -p wifi-densepose-mat` — truncated CIR ingest reuses the ADR-292
+  subcarrier-agnostic path and records the native→pipeline mapping; dimension/
+  version validation on standardized reports mirrors the FeitCSI parser gates.
+- Ontology/governance tests: each standardized measurement becomes an ADR-306
+  `Observation` from an ADR-305-authenticated `Sensor` with one `EvidenceLevel`;
+  `ConsentMode` composes with ADR-277 admission; SBP attributes proxy vs. sensor
+  provenance distinctly.
+- HAL contract test: the ADR-320 capability descriptor is derivable from
+  `SensingCapabilities`; a bf-less device advertises only opportunistic CSI.
+- All measurement-type flows are simulation-tested (`SimTransport`, synthetic
+  fixtures); OTA binding and any hardware accuracy claim remain out of scope
+  until real silicon exposes the standard.
@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+# ADR-311: Real sensor fusion — uncertainty-aware, multiple observations → one world state
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation (ADR-300 phase 2)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: fusion, uncertainty, multimodal, world-state, ontology, phase-2
+
+## Context
+
+This ADR is a child of **ADR-300** and owns primitive #11, *real sensor fusion*.
+In the ADR-300 DAG it is a phase-2 integration primitive: it **consumes ADR-306**
+(canonical spatial ontology) and **produces the single fused world state** that
+the phase-3 primitives build on — **ADR-312** (long-term spatial memory),
+**ADR-313** (counterfactual inference), and **ADR-315** (digital RF twin). It is
+authored as **Proposed**.
+
+The defining invariant is not "support more modalities" but the *shape of the
+output*: **multiple observations must resolve to one probabilistic world state,
+not many feeds into a visualization.** A dashboard that shows a WiFi layer, a
+mmWave layer, and a BLE layer side by side is not fusion; it pushes the
+reconciliation onto the human. Real fusion produces one uncertainty-aware state
+that every downstream consumer reads, with each contributing observation's
+provenance and confidence still recoverable.
+
+Substantial scaffolding already exists and must be **reused/extended, not
+rebuilt**:
+
+- **ADR-063** (60 GHz mmWave ↔ WiFi CSI fusion, *Proposed*) established the
+  first cross-modal fusion case: pairing noisy CSI-derived vitals with clinical-
+  grade mmWave FMCW radar (Seeed MR60BHA2 over UART, with a **live hardware
+  capture** logged on 2026-03-15). ADR-311 generalizes that pairwise case into
+  an N-modality, uncertainty-aware fusion.
+- **ADR-137** (fusion-engine quality scoring, *Accepted — partial*) already
+  built the auditable-quality building block: it identified that the multistatic
+  fusers (`wifi-densepose-signal/src/ruvsense/multistatic.rs`,
+  `wifi-densepose-ruvector/src/viewpoint/fusion.rs`) discarded the evidence they
+  used, and specified a single auditable record — "this fused output is
+  trustworthy because X, Y, Z, but be aware of contradiction C" — with evidence
+  references and contradiction flags. ADR-311 reuses that record as the
+  provenance/quality carrier of the fused state.
+- **ADR-280** `CoherentSensorGroup` (fail-closed coherent fusion) and
+  **ADR-306** `Observation`/`Track`/`Event` node types are the input and output
+  vocabulary respectively.
+
+What is missing is the **uncertainty-aware combiner across heterogeneous
+modalities**: a fusion stage that takes authenticated observations from WiFi,
+BLE, UWB, mmWave, acoustic, IMU, lidar, and cameras (only where policy permits),
+each with its own uncertainty, and emits one probabilistic `WorldState` — with
+per-observation contradiction flags, not a stack of independent feeds.
+
+## Options considered
+
+1. **Per-modality feeds rendered together** (today's implicit model on some
+   surfaces). Rejected: it is visualization, not fusion; contradictions are
+   never reconciled and there is no single state to reason over.
+2. **Hard-switch "best modality wins"** (e.g., always prefer mmWave vitals over
+   CSI vitals). Rejected: throws away corroborating evidence and cannot express
+   *disagreement* — the very thing ADR-137's contradiction flags exist to
+   surface — and degrades badly when the preferred modality is absent or OOD.
+3. **Uncertainty-weighted probabilistic fusion into one world state**, reusing
+   ADR-137's auditable quality record and ADR-280's fail-closed coherence gate.
+   Chosen.
+
+## Decision
+
+Adopt **uncertainty-aware multimodal fusion** whose invariant output is one
+probabilistic world state.
+
+### 1. Inputs: authenticated, ontology-typed observations
+
+- Inputs are ADR-306 `Observation` nodes from **ADR-305-authenticated** sensors.
+  Supported modalities: WiFi (CSI / 802.11bf native reports via ADR-310), BLE,
+  UWB, mmWave (ADR-063), acoustic, IMU, lidar, and cameras. Cameras and any
+  higher privacy-class modality enter fusion **only where the ADR-277 policy
+  engine permits** — camera-free coverage is a RuView invariant (ADR-282), so
+  cameras are an opt-in, policy-gated input, never assumed present.
+- Each observation carries its own uncertainty and exactly one `EvidenceLevel`
+  (ADR-282). An observation flagged out-of-distribution by **ADR-302** is
+  down-weighted or excluded per its OOD verdict rather than silently averaged in.
+
+### 2. Combiner: uncertainty-weighted, contradiction-aware
+
+- Observations are combined by their uncertainty into one probabilistic
+  `WorldState` over the ADR-306 entities (`Person`, `Object`, `Track`, and the
+  per-`Space` inference). The combiner does **not** collapse disagreement: when
+  modalities conflict beyond their stated uncertainty, the fused output carries
+  ADR-137 **contradiction flags** and the evidence references that produced
+  them, so a consumer can see *that* WiFi and mmWave disagree and *why*.
+- Coherent multi-node fusion inherits ADR-280's fail-closed
+  `CoherentSensorGroup` gate: no coherent combination unless sync, phase, and
+  geometry compatibility are proven; otherwise the group degrades to incoherent
+  combination rather than producing confident nonsense.
+
+### 3. Output: one world state, provenance preserved
+
+- The output is a single `WorldState` written into the ADR-306 ontology, with
+  every fused value retaining recoverable per-observation provenance and the
+  ADR-137 quality record. This is the state ADR-312/310/312 consume; they read
+  one probabilistic world, not a modality stack.
+- The fused state carries an aggregate uncertainty and an evidence level derived
+  from its inputs (never upgraded above the weakest contributing L-level for a
+  given claim).
+
+## Consequences
+
+- Downstream primitives (spatial memory, counterfactual, RF twin) build on one
+  probabilistic world state with uniform uncertainty and provenance, instead of
+  re-implementing reconciliation per consumer.
+- Contradictions become first-class signal, not noise: ADR-137's record means a
+  disagreement between mmWave and CSI is surfaced and auditable, which is also
+  what lets ADR-302 and the evidence engine (ADR-304) reason about reliability.
+- Fusion is uncertainty-honest: an OOD or low-evidence observation is
+  down-weighted, not averaged in as if trustworthy; a fused claim never presents
+  a stronger evidence level than its weakest necessary input.
+- **No accuracy or "camera-grade" claim is made.** ADR-063's mmWave path has a
+  real-silicon capture; the multimodal combiner's accuracy is not asserted here.
+  Any fused-accuracy number requires a named reproducer tagged MEASURED /
+  SYNTHETIC / CLAIMED, and WiFi sensing is never presented as camera-grade
+  (CLAUDE.md, ADR-282). No number is invented.
+- Cameras remain a governed, opt-in input; enabling them does not weaken the
+  camera-free coverage guarantee for deployments that exclude them.
+
+## Validation
+
+- `cargo test -p wifi-densepose-ruvector` / `-p wifi-densepose-signal` — the
+  ADR-137 quality record and contradiction flags travel with the fused output;
+  the ADR-280 `CoherentSensorGroup` gate still fails closed under
+  clock/phase/geometry violation.
+- Fusion invariant test: N modality observations over one scene resolve to a
+  single `WorldState` node in the ADR-306 ontology (not N feeds), with
+  per-observation provenance recoverable and one aggregate evidence level.
+- Uncertainty tests: a high-uncertainty or ADR-302-flagged-OOD observation is
+  down-weighted/excluded; conflicting modalities produce a contradiction flag
+  rather than a silently averaged value; the fused evidence level never exceeds
+  the weakest necessary input.
+- Governance test: a camera or higher-privacy modality is admitted into fusion
+  only when the ADR-277 policy engine permits; otherwise it is excluded and the
+  fused state notes the exclusion.
+- Any accuracy comparison (e.g., fused vitals vs. mmWave-only) is reported with
+  its evidence tag and reproducer; none is asserted in this ADR.
@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
+# ADR-312: Long-term spatial memory — learn the normal physics of a location
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation (ADR-300 phase 3)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: spatial-memory, ruvector, anomaly-detection, temporal, world-state, phase-3
+
+## Context
+
+This ADR is a child of **ADR-300** and owns primitive #12, *long-term spatial
+memory*. In the ADR-300 phasing it is a phase-3 primitive that sits on the fused
+world state produced by **ADR-311** (real sensor fusion) and **ties to ADR-315**
+(digital RF twin): spatial memory is the *learned normal* that a twin can
+simulate against and that anomaly detection compares against. It is authored as
+**Proposed**.
+
+The capability is to **learn the normal physics of a location** so anomalies
+surface *without training a detector for every anomaly*. Concretely, the system
+should learn statements like: "a chair is normally here"; "this bedroom is
+usually occupied between these hours"; "the RF propagation of this space
+changed"; "this machine's vibration signature changed"; "a new reflector
+appeared." None of these is a labeled anomaly class — they are *deviations from
+a learned baseline of normality*. This is the difference between supervised
+anomaly detection (which needs examples of every failure) and **baseline-relative
+anomaly detection** (which needs only a well-characterized normal).
+
+Substantial substrate already exists and must be **reused/extended, not
+rebuilt**:
+
+- **RuVector** (`v2/crates/wifi-densepose-ruvector`) is the designated substrate
+  in the ADR-282 layer stack ("persistent objects, Gaussian fields, scene
+  graphs, temporal memory"). It already provides the vector/temporal machinery
+  this ADR needs — HNSW indexing (`hnsw.rs`, `hnsw_quantized.rs`), an event log
+  (`event_log.rs`), coverage and estimator surfaces, and the `crv`/`mat`
+  temporal sub-modules — so long-term spatial memory is a *consumer and
+  organizer* of RuVector primitives, not a new store.
+- **ADR-306** supplies the entity vocabulary the memory is indexed by (`Space`,
+  `Object`, `Sensor`, `Track`, `Event`); **ADR-311** supplies the fused,
+  uncertainty-carrying `WorldState` snapshots that memory accumulates over time.
+- **ADR-135** (empty-room baseline calibration) and **ADR-301** (automatic
+  domain calibration) already establish a *calibration-time* baseline of a
+  space; ADR-312 extends that from a one-shot baseline to a **continuously
+  learned, time-of-day-aware** model of normal.
+
+What is missing is the **temporal normality model**: a per-`Space` learned
+distribution of fused world states over time (including periodicity — hour of
+day, day of week), plus RF-propagation and modality-signature baselines, against
+which a live fused state is scored for deviation.
+
+## Options considered
+
+1. **Supervised anomaly classifiers per anomaly type.** Rejected: it needs
+   labeled examples of every anomaly (fall, intrusion, machine fault, moved
+   furniture), which do not exist for most spaces and do not transfer between
+   rooms; it also cannot catch a *novel* anomaly it was never trained on.
+2. **Single static baseline** (the ADR-135 empty-room snapshot, used forever).
+   Rejected as the endpoint: it cannot express *when* a space is normally
+   occupied, cannot track slow legitimate drift (furniture rearranged on
+   purpose), and flags every diurnal change as anomalous.
+3. **Continuously learned, time-aware normality model on the RuVector
+   substrate**, scoring live fused state against learned normal. Chosen.
+
+## Decision
+
+Adopt a **long-term spatial memory** that learns each location's normal physics
+on the RuVector substrate and scores live fused state against it.
+
+### 1. What "normal" is learned over
+
+Per ADR-306 `Space` (and the entities within it), accumulate the ADR-311 fused
+`WorldState` over time into a learned normality model covering:
+
+- **Occupancy / activity periodicity** — the distribution of presence and
+  activity by hour-of-day and day-of-week (the "bedroom usually occupied certain
+  hours" case).
+- **Static scene layout** — persistent `Object` positions and the expected
+  reflector set (the "chair normally here" / "new reflector appeared" cases),
+  building on the ADR-135/298 baseline.
+- **RF-propagation baseline** — the space's normal multipath/propagation
+  signature (the "RF propagation changed" case).
+- **Per-modality signatures** — e.g., a machine's normal vibration/acoustic/IMU
+  signature (the "vibration signature changed" case).
+
+Each learned baseline carries its own uncertainty and an `EvidenceLevel`
+(ADR-282); a baseline learned from replay is L1, from a field pilot L4, and is
+never presented above the evidence of the observations it was learned from.
+
+### 2. Substrate: RuVector, temporally compressed
+
+- The memory is stored and indexed on RuVector (HNSW for nearest-normal recall,
+  the event log for the temporal stream, the temporal sub-modules for
+  compression). Long-horizon history is temporally compressed — recent detail
+  retained, older history summarized — so memory cost is bounded rather than
+  growing linearly forever.
+- The memory is *keyed by* the ADR-306 ontology, so "normal for this `Space` at
+  this hour" is a first-class query, and slow legitimate drift updates the
+  baseline (with provenance) instead of accumulating as permanent anomaly.
+
+### 3. Anomaly = deviation from learned normal
+
+- A live fused `WorldState` is scored against the applicable learned baseline
+  (matched by space and time context). A deviation beyond the baseline's
+  uncertainty is surfaced as an ADR-306 `Event` — *without* a per-anomaly
+  detector — carrying the baseline it deviated from, the deviation magnitude,
+  and its evidence level. Whether that event is actionable is a policy/consumer
+  decision (ADR-277), not this layer's.
+- The learned normal is exactly what **ADR-315** (RF twin) can simulate against:
+  the twin proposes an expected state, spatial memory supplies the learned
+  actual-normal, and their divergence is a physically grounded anomaly signal.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- Anomaly detection generalizes: a space gets deviation detection from its own
+  learned normal, so a novel anomaly (never labeled anywhere) still registers as
+  a deviation, and the model transfers to a new room by *learning that room's*
+  normal rather than importing a foreign detector.
+- Bounded memory: temporal compression keeps long-horizon memory finite; the
+  trade-off is that fine detail of old history is summarized, which is acceptable
+  for a normality baseline.
+- Legitimate change is not a permanent false positive: slow drift updates the
+  baseline with provenance, distinguishing "furniture deliberately rearranged"
+  (baseline shifts) from "reflector appeared unexpectedly" (deviation event).
+- **No accuracy claim is made.** Deviation-detection quality is not asserted
+  here; any detection-rate or false-positive number requires a named reproducer
+  tagged MEASURED / SYNTHETIC / CLAIMED, and a health/safety framing stays within
+  the ADR-282 bounded-claims discipline (decision support, not diagnosis). No
+  number is invented.
+- The memory is governed: learned baselines are observations of a space, subject
+  to the same ADR-277 retention/privacy policy as the fused state they summarize;
+  no raw P0 RF is retained to build a baseline.
+
+## Validation
+
+- `cargo test -p wifi-densepose-ruvector` — the normality model builds on the
+  existing HNSW/event-log/temporal primitives; nearest-normal recall and
+  temporal-compression bounds are exercised on synthetic streams.
+- Baseline/deviation tests: a synthetic scene with a known injected change (moved
+  `Object`, altered propagation, altered modality signature) produces a deviation
+  `Event` against the learned normal *without* a per-anomaly detector; an
+  unchanged diurnal cycle produces none (no false positive on normal periodicity).
+- Drift test: a slow legitimate change updates the baseline (with provenance)
+  rather than emitting a persistent anomaly; an abrupt change does emit one.
+- Evidence test: a learned baseline carries the evidence level of its source
+  observations and is never presented above it; retention honors ADR-277.
+- Twin-linkage design check (with ADR-315): divergence between a twin-simulated
+  expected state and the learned normal is expressible as a deviation signal.
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+# ADR-313: Counterfactual inference — generative spatial reasoning
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation (ADR-300 phase 3)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: inference, generative, counterfactual, rf-twin, fusion, uncertainty, phase-3
+
+## Context
+
+This ADR is a child of **ADR-300** (perception substrate program) and owns
+primitive #13, *counterfactual inference*. In the ADR-300 DAG it is a phase-3,
+research-forward primitive that sits on top of the fused world state: it
+**consumes ADR-311** (real sensor fusion) for the current fused estimate and
+**ADR-315** (digital RF twin) for the twin's expected measurement
+distributions. It is design intent, authored as Proposed, and is expected to be
+revised as the phase-1 spine and the phase-2 fusion layer land.
+
+RuView today reasons discriminatively: a task head maps measurements to a label
+or a pose. That answers "what does the classifier say?" but not the questions an
+operator actually asks — *would these RF measurements still make sense if nobody
+were present? Does one person explain the observation better than two?* Those
+are counterfactual questions, and a classifier cannot answer them because it has
+no model of what a measurement *should* look like under a hypothesized world
+state. A discriminative head asked about an empty room simply emits its
+best-effort label; it cannot say "the observation is better explained by
+absence."
+
+The step this ADR proposes is toward a **generative spatial model**: given a
+hypothesized scene state (occupancy, count, coarse positions) and the ADR-315
+twin's propagation model for the deployment, predict the *expected* measurement
+distribution, then score how well each hypothesis explains the observed
+measurement. The best-explaining hypothesis — including the *nobody-present*
+null hypothesis — is the answer, and the margin between hypotheses is a
+first-class uncertainty signal.
+
+Relevant existing assets to build on rather than duplicate:
+
+- **ADR-311** (fusion) already produces the fused world estimate and its
+  covariance; the counterfactual layer scores hypotheses *relative to* that
+  estimate rather than re-fusing raw measurements.
+- **ADR-315** (RF twin) is the generative forward model — per-deployment
+  geometry, radio locations, and expected measurement distributions. This ADR
+  is a *consumer* of the twin's forward simulator, not a second simulator.
+- **ADR-302** (OOD/observability) already owns the `UNKNOWN` verdict; the
+  null-hypothesis ("nobody present better explains this than any occupancy
+  hypothesis") and the "no hypothesis explains this" case route through ADR-302,
+  not a parallel gate.
+- `frame::EvidenceLevel` L0–L5 (ADR-282) and the ADR-304 evidence engine
+  account for the resulting confidence.
+
+## Options considered
+
+1. **Keep only discriminative heads.** Rejected: cannot express absence,
+   cannot compare "one person vs. two" as competing explanations, and gives a
+   confident label even when no world state explains the data.
+2. **A second, independently trained generative network with its own forward
+   model.** Rejected for the default path: duplicates the ADR-315 twin's
+   propagation model, invites the two models to disagree, and multiplies the
+   surface that must be validated. Reserved only if the twin's analytic forward
+   model proves insufficient for a phenomenon.
+3. **A hypothesis-scoring layer that uses the ADR-315 twin as the forward model
+   and the ADR-311 fused state as the hypothesis prior, routing low-margin and
+   null-dominant cases to the ADR-302 UNKNOWN verdict.** Chosen.
+
+## Decision
+
+Define a **counterfactual inference layer** that scores a small set of scene
+hypotheses against observed measurements using the digital RF twin as the
+generative forward model.
+
+### 1. Hypothesis set
+
+- Hypotheses are drawn from the ADR-311 fused state and its neighbourhood: the
+  current estimate, the **null hypothesis** (nobody present), and a bounded set
+  of nearby alternatives (±1 occupant, shifted position). The fused estimate
+  supplies the prior so the search stays small and grounded rather than
+  enumerating an open world.
+- The hypothesis space is expressed over the **ADR-306** canonical ontology
+  (`Space`/`Zone`, occupant count, coarse position), so a counterfactual result
+  is a governed spatial statement, not an opaque score.
+
+### 2. Forward model and scoring
+
+- For each hypothesis, query the **ADR-315 twin** for the expected measurement
+  distribution given that scene state and the deployment's propagation model.
+  Score the observed measurement's likelihood under each hypothesis's expected
+  distribution.
+- The answer is the maximum-likelihood hypothesis; the **margin** between the
+  top hypotheses (and between the top hypothesis and the null) is the
+  confidence signal, carried into the ADR-304 evidence engine.
+
+### 3. Routing to UNKNOWN
+
+- When the null hypothesis dominates, the layer reports *absence*, not a
+  low-confidence occupancy label.
+- When **no** hypothesis explains the observation well (all likelihoods low, or
+  the winning margin below threshold), the result routes to the **ADR-302**
+  `UNKNOWN` verdict — the observation is outside what the twin can explain, and
+  the honest output is "I cannot account for this," never a forced label.
+
+### Evidence discipline
+
+- Twin-predicted distributions are a **simulation** (evidence level L0 per
+  ADR-282) labelled `SYNTHETIC`; a counterfactual verdict inherits the evidence
+  level of its weakest input and is never presented as camera-grade ground
+  truth (CLAUDE.md honesty rule).
+- Any accuracy statement about counterfactual discrimination (e.g. "distinguishes
+  one occupant from two") requires the mean-pose-style baseline discipline of
+  CLAUDE.md, a leakage-free held-out split, and a reproducer before it may be
+  tagged `MEASURED`. This ADR asserts **no** such number.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- RuView gains the ability to answer absence and "which explanation is better"
+  questions that discriminative heads structurally cannot — a step toward
+  generative spatial reasoning and a differentiator for security and
+  facility-monitoring applications where *absence* is the valuable signal.
+- Quality is bounded by the fidelity of the ADR-315 twin's forward model and the
+  ADR-311 fused prior; the layer reports margins and defers to ADR-302 UNKNOWN
+  rather than overstating a coarse model.
+- Hard dependency on ADR-311 (fused state and covariance) and ADR-315 (forward
+  model); this ADR builds neither a fusion engine nor a propagation simulator of
+  its own.
+- Being phase 3, this is design intent sitting on the fused world state; it is
+  expected to be revised as ADR-311 and ADR-315 land, and it is not implemented
+  by the phase-1 swarm.
+
+## Validation
+
+- Unit tests: hypothesis likelihood scoring is a deterministic function of
+  observed measurement + hypothesis + twin parameters; the null hypothesis wins
+  on a synthesized empty-room measurement; a two-occupant measurement scores the
+  two-occupant hypothesis above the one-occupant hypothesis on a controlled
+  synthetic case.
+- Integration test: measurements the twin cannot explain (out-of-model
+  scattering) drive the layer to the ADR-302 UNKNOWN verdict rather than a
+  forced occupancy label; margins propagate into the ADR-304 evidence engine.
+- Held-out discrimination (deferred, real-silicon): one-vs-two and
+  presence-vs-absence discrimination on a leakage-free held-out split with a
+  mean-pose baseline, reported as `MEASURED` with a reproducer. Until then all
+  counterfactual output is `SYNTHETIC`/L0. No discrimination accuracy number is
+  asserted by this ADR.
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+# ADR-314: Information-gain scheduler — sample the most informative radios
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation (ADR-300 phase 3)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: scheduling, active-sensing, information-gain, edge, energy, fusion, phase-3
+
+## Context
+
+This ADR is a child of **ADR-300** (perception substrate program) and owns
+primitive #14, *information-gain scheduler*. In the ADR-300 DAG it is a phase-3,
+research-forward primitive that sits on top of the fused world state and
+**pairs with ADR-309** (active sensing): ADR-309 decides *what to probe*
+(waveform, sensing task); this ADR decides *which radios/modalities to spend
+budget on next*. It is authored as Proposed and is not implemented by the
+phase-1 swarm.
+
+With multiple sensors, processing every stream at full rate is wasteful: many
+radios are, at any moment, contributing little to the current estimate while
+consuming compute, energy, and bandwidth — the three scarce resources on the
+edge nodes RuView targets (ESP32-S3/C6 and small gateways). Treating all sensors
+equally is precisely the design that does not survive a real deployment of
+"hundreds of sensors."
+
+The scheduler assigns each candidate sensor/modality a value
+
+```
+Value(sensor) ≈ expected uncertainty reduction / (compute + energy + bandwidth)
+```
+
+and spends the next sampling/processing budget on the highest-value sensors.
+Expected uncertainty reduction is estimated *before* paying for the measurement,
+which is why the scheduler needs a model of what each sensor is likely to tell
+it — supplied by the fused state's covariance and the RF twin's forward model,
+not by actually sampling.
+
+Relevant existing assets to build on rather than duplicate:
+
+- **ADR-311** (fusion) maintains the fused state and its covariance — the
+  current uncertainty the scheduler is trying to reduce. Expected uncertainty
+  reduction is computed against that covariance, not a private one.
+- **ADR-315** (RF twin) provides the per-sensor forward model used to predict a
+  candidate measurement's expected informativeness before sampling.
+- **ADR-320** (RuView sensor HAL, phase 2) exposes each radio's real
+  compute/energy/bandwidth cost descriptors; the denominator is read from the
+  HAL, not guessed per platform.
+- **ADR-309** (active sensing) is the paired actuator: the scheduler ranks
+  sensors, ADR-309 chooses the probe on the chosen sensor.
+- **ADR-302** (observability) defines the phenomenon the estimate is *for*, so
+  the scheduler prioritizes uncertainty reduction on the objective that matters,
+  not on nuisance dimensions.
+
+## Options considered
+
+1. **Round-robin / process-everything scheduling.** Rejected: burns edge
+   compute and energy on redundant streams and does not scale to large fleets;
+   the strategic and external reviews named exactly this as an edge-deployment
+   blocker.
+2. **Static priority per sensor type (e.g. always prefer mmWave).** Rejected:
+   ignores that a sensor's *current* informativeness depends on the scene and
+   the present uncertainty — a well-placed WiFi link can dominate an occluded
+   mmWave node in a given moment.
+3. **A value-of-information scheduler that ranks sensors by expected uncertainty
+   reduction per unit cost, using the ADR-311 covariance and ADR-315 forward
+   model, with costs from the ADR-320 HAL.** Chosen.
+
+## Decision
+
+Define an **information-gain scheduler** that allocates the next
+sampling/processing budget across available radios by value of information.
+
+### 1. Value function
+
+- For each candidate sensor/modality, estimate **expected uncertainty
+  reduction** on the ADR-302 objective by evaluating how much a predicted
+  measurement (via the **ADR-315** forward model) would shrink the **ADR-311**
+  fused-state covariance — a value-of-information estimate made *before* paying
+  for the measurement.
+- Divide by the sensor's **cost** — compute + energy + bandwidth — read from the
+  **ADR-320** HAL descriptors. The exact weighting of the three cost terms is a
+  deployment policy (a battery node weights energy heavily; a wired gateway
+  weights bandwidth), configured, not hardcoded.
+
+### 2. Allocation
+
+- Rank candidates by value and spend the budget on the top set, subject to a
+  configurable floor that guarantees each sensor is sampled at least
+  occasionally (so a sensor whose value is currently low is not starved into
+  permanent blindness and can be re-evaluated as the scene changes).
+- The scheduler emits an allocation, not a measurement; **ADR-309** active
+  sensing chooses the probe/waveform on each selected sensor, and the fusion
+  layer (ADR-311) incorporates the result.
+
+### 3. Governance and honesty
+
+- Skipping a sensor for a cycle is a *deliberate* reduction in coverage; the
+  scheduler records which sensors were sampled so downstream evidence (ADR-304)
+  reflects the actual sensing that occurred, and observability (ADR-302) can
+  raise `UNKNOWN` for a zone that went under-sampled rather than reporting a
+  stale estimate as current.
+
+### Evidence discipline
+
+- Expected-uncertainty-reduction estimates are model predictions from the
+  ADR-315 twin (simulation, L0 per ADR-282, `SYNTHETIC`); a scheduling decision
+  is a resource choice, never a sensing claim.
+- Any energy/latency/throughput improvement figure requires real-silicon
+  measurement with a reproducer before it is tagged `MEASURED` (CLAUDE.md
+  hardware rule). This ADR asserts **no** efficiency number.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- Edge deployments spend scarce compute, energy, and bandwidth where they buy
+  the most certainty, making "hundreds of sensors" operationally tractable — a
+  capability the reviews flagged as critical for edge deployment.
+- Quality is bounded by the accuracy of the ADR-315 forward model (informativeness
+  prediction) and ADR-320 cost descriptors; a poor forward model degrades to
+  near-round-robin, which is safe but not optimal. The sampling floor bounds the
+  worst case.
+- Hard dependency on ADR-311 (covariance), ADR-315 (forward model), and ADR-320
+  (cost descriptors), and paired with ADR-309; this ADR builds none of those.
+- Being phase 3, this is design intent sitting on the fused world state and is
+  expected to be revised as ADR-309, ADR-311, ADR-315, and the ADR-320 HAL land.
+
+## Validation
+
+- Unit tests: the value function is a deterministic function of covariance +
+  forward model + cost descriptors; a sensor predicted to reduce objective
+  uncertainty more per unit cost ranks above one that reduces it less; the
+  sampling floor guarantees eventual re-evaluation of a low-value sensor.
+- Integration test: on a synthetic multi-sensor scene, the scheduler reduces
+  objective uncertainty faster per unit modelled cost than round-robin, and
+  raises ADR-302 UNKNOWN for a deliberately starved zone rather than reporting a
+  stale estimate.
+- Field validation (deferred, real-silicon): energy/latency/throughput on an
+  instrumented multi-node deployment, reported as `MEASURED` with a reproducer.
+  Until then all informativeness and cost figures are `SYNTHETIC`/L0. No
+  efficiency number is asserted by this ADR.
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
+# ADR-315: Digital RF twin — persistent per-deployment RF model
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation (ADR-300 phase 3)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: rf-twin, digital-twin, propagation, calibration, spatial-memory, worldgraph, phase-3
+
+## Context
+
+This ADR is a child of **ADR-300** (perception substrate program) and owns
+primitive #15, *digital RF twin*. In the ADR-300 DAG it is a phase-3,
+research-forward primitive that underpins several other phase-3 primitives:
+**ADR-308** (placement optimizer) plans against the twin's propagation model,
+**ADR-313** (counterfactual inference) uses it as the generative forward model,
+and **ADR-314** (information-gain scheduler) uses it to predict per-sensor
+informativeness. It ties directly to **ADR-301** (calibration), **ADR-308**
+(placement), and **ADR-312** (long-term spatial memory). It is authored as
+Proposed and is not implemented by the phase-1 swarm.
+
+RuView today has no persistent, per-deployment model of the RF environment.
+Calibration state, observed multipath, and radio geometry exist transiently
+inside a running session; when the process restarts or a change happens
+overnight, there is nothing that says "this is what this room's RF looked like
+yesterday." Without a persistent baseline, a physical change — furniture moved,
+a wall opened, a machine relocated, an intruder present — has nothing to be a
+*delta against*. It is just a different measurement, indistinguishable from
+noise or drift.
+
+The **digital RF twin** is that persistent baseline: a per-deployment model
+holding
+
+- **geometry and radio locations** (from the ADR-306 scene / worldgraph),
+- **propagation history** and **observed multipath** structure,
+- **calibration state** (from ADR-301),
+- **expected measurement distributions** for each link and phenomenon.
+
+Once the twin exists, a physical change becomes a **measurable delta against the
+twin** rather than an unexplained measurement. This is what connects RuView to
+facility management (what changed in this space?), security (is there an
+unexplained presence?), robotics (has the map drifted?), and industrial
+monitoring (did the plant layout change?) — the applications the strategic
+assessment named as the value beyond a single detector.
+
+Relevant existing assets to build on rather than duplicate:
+
+- The `worldgraph` crate already models the physical scene — `Room`/`Space`
+  with `bounds_enu`, `Wall { rf_attenuation_db }`, `Doorway`, `Zone`, and
+  `Sensor` nodes (ADR-306). The twin *annotates and persists* this scene with RF
+  state; it does not invent a second geometry.
+- `wifi-densepose-calibration` (enrollment, bank, anchor, runtime, specialist)
+  holds the calibration state the twin persists; the twin references and
+  versions calibration records, it does not reimplement calibration.
+- **ADR-312** (long-term spatial memory, phase 3) is the persistence and
+  temporal-history substrate; the twin is a *structured occupant* of that
+  memory, not a separate database.
+- **ADR-305** (authenticated identity) and **ADR-295** (provenance) mean the
+  measurements that update the twin carry verified lineage, so a delta is
+  attributable rather than anonymous.
+
+## Options considered
+
+1. **No persistent RF model (status quo).** Rejected: every change looks like
+   noise; nothing supports "what changed since yesterday?", which is the
+   question the facility/security/industrial applications actually ask.
+2. **A full electromagnetic digital twin (per-site ray-tracing / FDTD kept in
+   sync in real time).** Rejected for the default path: far heavier than the
+   coarse `rf_attenuation_db` scene RuView actually has and impractical on edge
+   hardware. A high-fidelity solver is retained as an *optional backend* the
+   twin can call, not the baseline.
+3. **A persistent, per-deployment RF model layered over the ADR-306 scene and
+   ADR-312 memory: geometry + radio locations + calibration state + observed
+   multipath + expected measurement distributions, updated by verified
+   measurements, exposing changes as deltas.** Chosen.
+
+## Decision
+
+Define the **digital RF twin** as a persistent, versioned, per-deployment model
+of the RF environment, layered over existing scene, calibration, and memory
+assets.
+
+### 1. State the twin holds
+
+- **Geometry and radio locations** referenced from the ADR-306 / worldgraph
+  scene (not copied).
+- **Calibration state** referenced and versioned from
+  `wifi-densepose-calibration` (ADR-301), so the twin knows *which* calibration
+  a stored distribution was captured under.
+- **Observed multipath and propagation history** — a bounded temporal summary
+  of per-link channel structure, stored in ADR-312 spatial memory.
+- **Expected measurement distributions** per link and phenomenon — the forward
+  model ADR-308, ADR-313, and ADR-314 consume.
+
+### 2. Update and delta
+
+- Verified measurements (ADR-305 identity, ADR-295 provenance) update the twin's
+  distributions online, bounded by ADR-301 calibration validity. A new
+  observation is compared to the twin's expected distribution; the **delta** —
+  and its statistical significance against the twin's own variance — is the
+  primary output. A change large relative to the twin's modelled variance is a
+  *detected physical change*, not noise.
+- The twin is **versioned**: a calibration event, a deliberate geometry edit, or
+  an accepted physical change advances the twin version, so history is
+  auditable and a delta is always relative to a named baseline.
+
+### 3. Consumers
+
+- **ADR-308** queries the twin's propagation model to plan placements.
+- **ADR-313** uses the twin's expected distributions as the generative forward
+  model for hypothesis scoring.
+- **ADR-314** uses per-sensor expected informativeness from the twin.
+- Facility/security/robotics/industrial integrations read the twin's change
+  deltas as governed ADR-306 spatial events.
+
+### Evidence discipline
+
+- The twin's expected distributions and any propagation simulation are
+  **simulation** (evidence level L0 per ADR-282), labelled `SYNTHETIC`. A delta
+  computed against them is a model-relative statement.
+- A change/anomaly detection *claim* (e.g. "detects furniture-scale changes")
+  requires real-silicon measurement against a leakage-free protocol with a
+  reproducer before it is tagged `MEASURED` (CLAUDE.md hardware rule). The twin
+  never presents a modelled expected distribution as evidence that a physical
+  state *is* the case; it presents a *delta and its significance*. This ADR
+  asserts **no** detection-accuracy number.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- RuView gains a persistent per-deployment baseline, turning "a different
+  measurement" into "a measurable, attributable, versioned change" — the bridge
+  from a sensing runtime to facility management, security, robotics, and
+  industrial monitoring.
+- The twin is the shared forward model for ADR-308/310/311, so those primitives
+  speak one propagation model rather than three inconsistent ones — a
+  deliberate reason to build the twin before its consumers mature.
+- Quality is bounded by the coarseness of the worldgraph scene and the fidelity
+  of the forward model; the twin reports deltas *with significance against its
+  own variance* rather than asserting confident change detection on a coarse
+  model. The optional high-fidelity backend is where higher accuracy lives.
+- Hard dependency on ADR-306 (scene), ADR-301 (calibration state), and ADR-312
+  (persistence); it reuses `worldgraph` and `wifi-densepose-calibration` rather
+  than rebuilding geometry or calibration.
+- Being phase 3, this is design intent; it is expected to be revised as the
+  phase-1 spine, ADR-311 fusion, and ADR-312 memory land.
+
+## Validation
+
+- Unit tests: the twin's expected distribution is a deterministic function of
+  scene + calibration + propagation history; delta computation and its
+  significance against stored variance are correct on synthetic distributions;
+  versioning advances on calibration/geometry/accepted-change events and history
+  is retained.
+- Integration test: on a synthetic deployment, an injected physical change (a
+  wall attenuation shift) produces a significant delta against the twin while
+  ordinary noise does not; the delta surfaces as a governed ADR-306 event with
+  provenance (ADR-305/292).
+- Field validation (deferred, real-silicon): change detection on an instrumented
+  real deployment with a controlled physical-change protocol, reported as
+  `MEASURED` with a reproducer. Until then all twin distributions and deltas are
+  `SYNTHETIC`/L0. No detection-accuracy number is asserted by this ADR.
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+# ADR-316: Fleet control plane — provisioning to audit trails
+
+- **Status**: Proposed (ADR-300 phase 2)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: fleet, operations, provisioning, firmware, updates, audit, identity, phase-2
+
+## Context
+
+This ADR is a child of **ADR-300** (perception substrate program) and owns
+primitive #16, *fleet control plane*. In the ADR-300 DAG it is a phase-2
+integration-and-operations primitive that sits on the phase-1 spine: it
+**consumes ADR-305** (authenticated sensor identity) for per-device identity and
+enrollment, and **ADR-318** (capability certificate) for the signed models,
+calibration validity, and capability envelopes a device is allowed to run. It is
+authored as Proposed and is not implemented by the phase-1 swarm.
+
+The external and internal reviews both named the same operational gap: RuView
+has strong per-device primitives but no **release identity** and no **bill of
+materials** binding a fielded sensor to the exact firmware, model, and
+calibration it is running — and no plane to manage that across many devices.
+Without this, a handful of nodes is fine but *hundreds* of sensors become an
+operational nightmare: no coherent way to provision, roll certificates, verify
+firmware compatibility, distribute signed models, track calibration lifecycle,
+watch health, stage updates, roll back, diagnose remotely, enforce data
+retention, or produce an audit trail. This ADR addresses that release-identity /
+BOM gap directly.
+
+The scope is deliberately the **control plane**, not the data plane. The
+authenticated measurement path is **ADR-296** (bind + allowlist) plus **ADR-305**
+(signed envelope); this ADR governs the *devices and artifacts*, not the
+per-frame stream.
+
+Relevant existing assets to build on rather than duplicate:
+
+- **ADR-305** already defines per-device keypairs, the `DeviceId → public key →
+  capabilities` enrollment record, key rotation and revocation *semantics* — and
+  explicitly deferred their **fleet distribution** to this ADR. The control
+  plane is the distribution and lifecycle layer over ADR-305 identity, not a new
+  identity scheme.
+- **ADR-318** (capability certificate) defines the signed, expiring artifact a
+  device is authorized to run; the fleet plane is what *distributes, stages, and
+  revokes* those certificates and the signed models they point at.
+- **ADR-301** (calibration) owns calibration validity/expiry; the fleet plane
+  tracks calibration *lifecycle* across the fleet (which nodes are due, which are
+  stale) rather than redefining calibration.
+- **ADR-319** (witness chain) provides the append-only, re-verifiable record;
+  fleet audit trails are witness-chain entries, not a parallel log format.
+- **ADR-320** (RuView sensor HAL, phase 2) provides hardware/firmware capability
+  descriptors used for firmware-compatibility checks before staging an update.
+- `wifi-densepose-bfld` `CapabilityAttestation` (ADR-141) is the device-side
+  attestation the plane checks against declared cohort capabilities.
+
+## Options considered
+
+1. **Manual per-device operations (SSH/flash by hand).** Rejected: does not
+   scale past a handful of nodes, produces no release identity, no audit trail,
+   and no safe rollback — exactly the operational nightmare the reviews named.
+2. **Adopt a generic third-party IoT device-management platform wholesale.**
+   Rejected as the core: generic platforms do not understand RuView's signed
+   capability certificate, calibration validity, or witness chain, and would
+   fork trust away from the phase-1 spine. A generic transport/agent *may* be a
+   backend, but identity, certificates, and audit remain RuView's.
+3. **A RuView-native control plane layered on ADR-305 identity, ADR-318
+   certificates, ADR-301 calibration lifecycle, and ADR-319 audit — covering
+   provisioning through rollback and retention.** Chosen.
+
+## Decision
+
+Define a **fleet control plane** that manages RuView sensors and their signed
+artifacts across their lifecycle, built on the phase-1 identity/certificate
+spine.
+
+### 1. Release identity and bill of materials
+
+- Each fielded device has a **BOM record** binding `DeviceId` (ADR-305) → exact
+  firmware version → signed model set → active capability certificate (ADR-318)
+  → current calibration record (ADR-301) → HAL/hardware descriptor (ADR-320).
+  This *is* the release identity the reviews found missing: given a device you
+  can state precisely what it is running and prove it is signed.
+
+### 2. Provisioning, certificates, firmware compatibility
+
+- **Provisioning** is the authorized ADR-305 enrollment step at fleet scale:
+  minting a keypair, registering the public key and capabilities, and issuing
+  the initial ADR-318 certificate. A device is untrusted until provisioned.
+- **Certificate lifecycle**: issue, rotate, expire, and **revoke** ADR-318
+  certificates and the ADR-305 keys behind them; revocation lists are
+  distributed here (the distribution ADR-305 deferred).
+- **Firmware compatibility**: before staging a firmware or model, check the
+  target's ADR-320 HAL descriptor and ADR-141 capability attestation so an
+  incompatible or under-capable device is never sent an artifact it cannot
+  honestly run.
+
+### 3. Cohorts, staged updates, rollback
+
+- Devices group into **cohorts** (by site, hardware, capability). Updates —
+  signed models and firmware — roll out **staged** (canary → cohort → fleet)
+  with health gates between stages, and **roll back** to the previously recorded
+  BOM on a failed health check. Only signed artifacts are ever staged.
+
+### 4. Health telemetry, remote diagnostics, retention, audit
+
+- **Health telemetry** and **remote diagnostics** report device liveness,
+  calibration staleness (ADR-301), certificate expiry (ADR-318), and error
+  state — read-only diagnostics by default, mutations authorized explicitly.
+- **Data retention** policy is enforced per cohort, and P0/CSI/person data never
+  leaves the edge except under the ADR-277/280 governance already in force
+  (CLAUDE.md: never commit or exfiltrate CSI/person data).
+- Every lifecycle action — provision, rotate, revoke, stage, roll back — is
+  written as an **ADR-319 witness-chain** entry, giving a re-verifiable **audit
+  trail** rather than a mutable log.
+
+### Authority and least privilege
+
+- The control plane is default-deny (CLAUDE.md: default to least authority).
+  Provisioning, key rotation, revocation, staging, and rollback are each
+  separately authorized operations; no fleet action is implied by another.
+  Credentials and private keys are never logged or committed.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- Hundreds of sensors become operable: coherent release identity, signed-artifact
+  distribution, staged updates with rollback, and a re-verifiable audit trail —
+  closing the release-identity / BOM gap the reviews raised.
+- The plane concentrates operational authority; that is mitigated by
+  default-deny, per-action authorization, signed-only artifacts, and
+  witness-chained audit. A compromised plane must still forge signatures the
+  phase-1 spine verifies.
+- Hard dependency on ADR-305 (identity), ADR-318 (certificate), ADR-301
+  (calibration lifecycle), ADR-319 (audit), and ADR-320 (firmware/HAL
+  compatibility). This ADR distributes and sequences those artifacts; it does
+  not redefine identity, certificates, calibration, or the witness format.
+- Being phase 2, this is design intent depending on the spine; it is expected to
+  be revised as ADR-318, ADR-319, and ADR-320 land.
+- **No fielded fleet-operation claim is MEASURED without real-silicon evidence**
+  (CLAUDE.md hardware rule): staged update and rollback on real nodes require a
+  captured runtime log. A passing simulation is not fleet evidence.
+
+## Validation
+
+- Unit tests: BOM records bind identity/firmware/model/certificate/calibration
+  consistently and reject inconsistent bindings; certificate issue/rotate/revoke
+  transitions are correct; a firmware-incompatible target is refused staging;
+  every lifecycle action emits a well-formed ADR-319 witness entry.
+- Integration test: a synthetic cohort undergoes a canary→cohort→fleet staged
+  update; an injected health failure triggers rollback to the prior BOM; the
+  full sequence is re-verifiable from the witness chain offline; a revoked
+  certificate is rejected fleet-wide.
+- Security test (`npm run test:security` analogue for the plane): default-deny
+  is enforced; unauthorized provision/rotate/revoke/stage is rejected and
+  counted; no credential or P0 data appears in telemetry or audit output.
+- Field validation (deferred, real-silicon): a real multi-node staged update and
+  rollback with a captured boot/runtime log, reported as `MEASURED` with a
+  reproducer. Until then all fleet-operation results are simulator-level. No
+  fielded reliability number is asserted by this ADR.
@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+# ADR-317: Multi-domain benchmark scorecard — regressions cannot hide behind pooled accuracy
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation planned (ADR-300 phase 1)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: benchmark, aetherarena, ci-gate, evidence, honesty, domain-generalization, substrate
+
+## Context
+
+This ADR is primitive 17 of the perception-substrate program (ADR-300) and the
+per-PR enforcement edge of the phase-1 certificate spine. In the ADR-300
+dependency DAG it reads accuracy from the evidence engine (ADR-304), consumes
+the domain state produced by out-of-distribution detection (ADR-302), scores
+against calibration certificates (ADR-301), and is anchored in the witness chain
+(ADR-319). It is the surface that makes the rest of the spine testable on every
+change to sensing code.
+
+A single pooled accuracy number is the classic way a domain-generalization
+regression hides. A model can raise mean PCK or mean presence accuracy while
+quietly collapsing on unseen rooms, unseen devices, or stationary subjects —
+exactly the conditions WiFi sensing fails in and exactly the conditions a
+pooled average washes out. The strategic assessment (ADR-300) named this: what
+distinguishes infrastructure from a demo is that a regression on *any* operating
+domain is caught before merge, not discovered in the field.
+
+RuView does not need a new benchmark to do this. AetherArena is already
+**v0-complete infrastructure** (ADR-149): a deterministic scoring engine
+reusing `wifi-densepose-train` (`src/ruview_metrics.rs`, `src/ablation.rs`,
+`src/eval.rs`, `src/proof.rs`), a `PROOF_SEED=42` determinism substrate that
+SHA-256-hashes outputs against an expected hash, an append-only witness ledger,
+and a live Hugging Face Space. ADR-145's ablation harness already computes
+presence accuracy, localization error, FP/FN, latency percentiles, a
+privacy-leakage score, and **cross-room degradation**. The board is
+intentionally empty (benchmark-first). What is missing is not a scorer but a
+**scorecard format** that reports per-domain rather than pooled, and a
+**sensing-crate CI gate** that runs it on every PR.
+
+## Options considered
+
+1. **Keep the single pooled score / `RuViewTier`.** Rejected: it is exactly the
+   surface a per-domain regression hides behind; a Gold tier can coexist with a
+   broken unseen-room slice.
+2. **Add a new benchmark repo/harness for domains.** Rejected: AetherArena's
+   scorer, determinism binding, and witness ledger already exist and are the
+   right engine; a parallel harness would fork the scoring substrate and its
+   anti-gaming/leakage discipline.
+3. **Extend the AetherArena scorer with a per-domain scorecard and wire it as a
+   per-PR sensing-crate gate.** Chosen.
+
+## Decision
+
+Reuse the AetherArena scorer and witness ledger (ADR-149) and add two things: a
+**multi-domain scorecard** format and a **sensing-crate PR gate** that produces
+it.
+
+### 1. The multi-domain scorecard
+
+The scorecard reports each capability broken out by operating domain, never
+pooled into one figure. The v0 domain axes:
+
+- **Presence**: `room-known`, `room-unseen`, `device-unseen`, `stationary-10m`
+  (a stationary subject at range — the canonical WiFi failure case).
+- **Pose**: `matched`, `subject-unseen`, `room-unseen`.
+- **OOD rejection**: the rate at which genuinely out-of-distribution input is
+  correctly returned as UNKNOWN by ADR-302 (a capability, not a failure) and
+  the false-UNKNOWN rate on in-distribution input.
+- **Calibration drift**: fingerprint-distance trajectory against the ADR-301
+  certificate over the scored window, and the fraction of inferences in each
+  ADR-302 `DomainState` (KNOWN / DEGRADED / UNKNOWN).
+
+Each cell carries exactly one `EvidenceLevel` (L0–L5, ADR-282). A slice scored
+on synthetic input is L0/`Synthetic` by construction; a slice on a leakage-free
+held-out real split is graded higher and only then may a per-domain number be
+labelled MEASURED. Pose PCK cells additionally require the mean-pose baseline
+and a leakage-free held-out split (CLAUDE.md) or they are not reported as pose
+accuracy at all.
+
+### 2. Per-domain regression gate
+
+- The gate compares each scorecard cell against the merged-baseline scorecard
+  stored in the AetherArena witness ledger. A regression **in any single
+  domain** beyond its configured threshold fails the PR, even if the pooled
+  average improved. Improvement on `room-known` cannot buy a regression on
+  `room-unseen`.
+- Thresholds are per-domain and per-capability; the unseen/stationary/OOD
+  domains carry the strictest budgets because they are the ones a pooled score
+  hides. The baseline is append-only and witness-anchored — a new baseline is a
+  new signed ledger entry, never an in-place overwrite (ADR-149 ledger pattern,
+  ADR-319 anchoring).
+
+### 3. Sensing-crate CI wiring
+
+- Every PR that touches a sensing crate runs the scorecard across all domains
+  under the ADR-011/ADR-149 determinism binding (`PROOF_SEED=42`), so the run
+  is reproducible and tamper-evident. The gate is added to
+  `.github/workflows/` as an authoritative check.
+- The held-out real split remains private and is never accessible to synthetic
+  generation, augmentation, or calibration (ADR-149 leakage constraint, ADR-282
+  rule d). Submitters/PRs provide a model, not predictions on data they hold.
+
+### Provenance and honesty discipline
+
+- No benchmark numbers are invented by this ADR. It delivers the scorecard
+  format, the per-domain gate, and the CI wiring; the numbers come from the
+  ADR-304 evidence ledger and the AetherArena scorer on real data, labelled at
+  the honest evidence level. Empty domains report "no evidence," which the gate
+  treats as no coverage — never as a pass.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- A domain-generalization regression can no longer merge behind a flattering
+  pooled average; the failure mode that most distinguishes fielded sensing from
+  a demo is caught at PR time.
+- Every PR touching sensing pays a per-domain scoring cost. Bounded by reusing
+  the existing deterministic scorer and by tiered compute (CPU smoke vs full
+  score, ADR-149), but it is a deliberate cost for per-domain safety.
+- The empty AetherArena board fills with honest, per-domain, evidence-labelled
+  results rather than a single headline tier — consistent with the
+  benchmark-first posture and with ADR-282's ecosystem positioning.
+- Some domains will show weak or absent coverage. Surfacing that per-domain is
+  the point; the scorecard must never paper over a thin domain with a pooled
+  number.
+- The program-level acceptance test (ADR-300) is encoded here as an AetherArena
+  scenario, closing the loop once the phase-1 spine lands.
+
+## Validation
+
+- `cargo test` on the AetherArena scorer extension — per-domain slicing math
+  against fixtures; per-domain regression gate fails on a single-domain
+  regression while pooled improves, and passes when all domains hold; empty
+  domains report "no evidence," not a pass; every cell carries exactly one
+  `EvidenceLevel`; synthetic slices are L0 by construction.
+- Determinism: a scored run reproduces its SHA-256 hash under `PROOF_SEED=42`
+  (ADR-011/ADR-149 binding); the baseline scorecard is append-only and
+  witness-anchored (ADR-319), never mutated in place.
+- CI: the sensing-crate gate runs on a PR touching a sensing crate and blocks a
+  planted single-domain regression.
+- Real-data scorecards (a leakage-free held-out split with ADR-303 references)
+  are the maturity milestone; a synthetic scorecard is L0 and no per-domain
+  number is MEASURED without a reproducer per CLAUDE.md.
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+# ADR-318: Capability certificates — validated-for-this-environment claims
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation planned (ADR-300 phase 1)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: capability, certificate, evidence, provenance, signature, honesty, substrate
+
+## Context
+
+This ADR is primitive 18 of the perception-substrate program (ADR-300) and,
+per the strategic assessment, among the strongest ideas in the program: it is
+where the whole certificate spine becomes a consumable contract. In the ADR-300
+dependency DAG it **consumes the evidence engine (ADR-304)** — a capability
+certificate is a signed attestation minted over a slice of that ledger — the
+**calibration certificate (ADR-301)** for the environment it is validated
+against, and the **RuField signature types (ADR-305 / ADR-260/262/277/279)** to
+sign it. It reports domain state via ADR-302 and is anchored in the witness
+chain (ADR-319).
+
+RuView must stop making unconditional capability claims. "Supports presence" is
+not a true statement — presence detection works in some rooms, on some hardware,
+for some subject dynamics, and fails on a stationary subject at range in an
+uncalibrated room. A capability is only ever *validated for a specific
+environment*, and the honest unit of that claim is a signed, expiring
+certificate, not a feature flag in a README.
+
+The ingredients now exist across the phase-1 spine: ADR-304 accumulates
+per-`(room, device, subject)` accuracy, false-positive rate, drift, and domain
+state; ADR-301 produces the signed room fingerprint the environment is keyed to;
+ADR-305 provides the authenticated device identity and `CapabilityAttestation`
+(BFLD, ADR-141) that bounds *what a device is even attested to sense*; ADR-282
+provides the mandatory `EvidenceLevel`. What is missing is the artifact that
+binds them into a single, verifiable "validated here, until then" claim and the
+consumer-side rule that refuses capabilities lacking one.
+
+## Options considered
+
+1. **Static capability flags / a `supports_presence` boolean.** Rejected: it is
+   the exact dishonest claim — environment-independent, unsigned, non-expiring,
+   and false the moment the room, device, or subject dynamics differ.
+2. **Report raw ledger accuracy to consumers directly.** Rejected: the ledger
+   (ADR-304) is the source of truth but not a portable, signed, bounded contract;
+   handing consumers raw records pushes evidence-weighting and expiry logic into
+   every consumer and drops the single verifiable object.
+3. **Mint a signed, expiring `CapabilityCertificate` over an ADR-304 ledger
+   slice, and make consumers refuse capabilities without a valid one.** Chosen.
+
+## Decision
+
+Introduce a signed **`CapabilityCertificate`**: a bounded attestation that a
+specific capability has been validated for a specific environment, for a bounded
+time.
+
+### 1. The certificate
+
+A serializable `CapabilityCertificate` binding:
+
+- `capability` — the phenomenon (e.g. `presence`, `pose`), which must be within
+  the device's ADR-305/ADR-141 `CapabilityAttestation` (a device cannot be
+  certified for something it is not even attested to sense).
+- `room` — the ADR-306 space identifier, tied to the ADR-301 calibration
+  certificate version the validation was performed against.
+- `hardware` — the ADR-305 authenticated `DeviceId` (and, in phase 2, the
+  ADR-320 HAL descriptor of the sensor).
+- `model` — the model version scored.
+- `calibrated_date` — the calibration certificate age at validation time.
+- `moving_recall`, `stationary_recall`, `false_presence_per_24h` — the measured
+  operating metrics, sliced from the ADR-304 ledger for this exact context (not
+  a global average), each honestly labelled. These are per-capability; a pose
+  certificate carries pose metrics with the mean-pose baseline and a
+  leakage-free split (CLAUDE.md) or it is not issued.
+- `valid_until` — an explicit expiry; a certificate is never open-ended.
+- `evidence_level` — exactly one L0–L5 (ADR-282). A certificate minted from a
+  synthetic ledger slice is L0/`Synthetic`; a MEASURED metric requires an
+  ADR-303 reference and a reproducer. The certificate cannot upgrade the level
+  of the ledger it is minted from (ADR-304 honesty rule).
+- `signature` — a RuField `SignatureBlock` (ADR-305 / ADR-260/262/277/279) over
+  the canonical serialization; an unsigned certificate is not a valid
+  certificate. The certificate is anchored in the witness chain (ADR-319).
+
+### 2. Minting
+
+- A certificate is minted from a slice of the ADR-304 evidence ledger for one
+  `(room, device, subject-class, model)` context. If the ledger reports "no
+  evidence" for that context, **no certificate is issued** — absence of evidence
+  is never a capability. Minting is a pure function over the append-only ledger
+  at mint time; the metrics are frozen into the signed object.
+- Expiry (`valid_until`) is derived from calibration validity (ADR-301) and an
+  evidence-freshness policy: a certificate cannot outlive the calibration it was
+  validated against, and drift beyond the ADR-301 envelope invalidates both.
+
+### 3. Consumer refusal rule
+
+- Applications and surfaces **refuse to consume a capability that lacks a valid
+  certificate for the current environment**. "Valid" means: signature verifies,
+  `room`/`hardware`/`model` match the running context, `valid_until` is in the
+  future, and the referenced calibration certificate is itself still valid
+  (ADR-301 not invalidated). A failed check yields UNKNOWN via ADR-302, not a
+  best-effort guess.
+- This makes the ADR-300 acceptance clause "quantify whether it can reliably
+  sense the requested phenomenon → generate a signed capability certificate"
+  a hard gate rather than a hope.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- RuView can no longer claim a capability it has not validated for the caller's
+  environment; the honest failure — "not certified here" → UNKNOWN — is
+  surfaced by construction rather than by discipline.
+- OEM/integrator diligence gets a single verifiable artifact ("presence,
+  validated in *this* room, on *this* device, with *these* recall/false-alarm
+  numbers, until *this* date, at *this* evidence level, signed") — the strongest
+  commercial output of the spine.
+- Certificates expire and get refused; some environments will have no
+  certificate and therefore no capability until validated. That refusal is the
+  intended honest behavior, not a regression.
+- Key management and expiry policy are operational responsibilities, reusing the
+  ADR-305 enrollment/rotation and ADR-301 validity machinery rather than new
+  infrastructure; fleet distribution of certificates is owned by ADR-316.
+- No capability number is invented here; every metric on a certificate is sliced
+  from the ADR-304 ledger at its honest evidence level.
+
+## Validation
+
+- `cargo test` on the certificate crate — mint from a ledger slice produces the
+  frozen metrics; "no evidence" context yields no certificate; signature
+  round-trip and tamper rejection; `valid_until` and calibration-linked expiry
+  enforced; consumer refusal on room/hardware/model mismatch, expiry, or
+  invalidated calibration resolves to UNKNOWN (ADR-302), not a guess; evidence
+  level is inherited from the ledger and cannot be upgraded; a certificate
+  cannot be issued for a capability outside the device's ADR-305/ADR-141
+  attestation.
+- Cross-ADR: an ADR-304 ledger fixture mints a certificate; an ADR-302 test
+  asserts an expired/mismatched certificate gates to UNKNOWN; the ADR-300
+  acceptance test consumes a minted certificate end-to-end.
+- Real-deployment certificates (minted from a populated ledger with ADR-303
+  references on live ESP32 captures) are the maturity milestone and require
+  hardware evidence per CLAUDE.md; a certificate minted from a synthetic ledger
+  is L0 by construction.
@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
+# ADR-319: Witness chain — epistemic infrastructure for physical AI
+
+- **Status**: Accepted — initial implementation planned (ADR-300 phase 1)
+- **Date**: 2026-08-11
+- **Deciders**: ruv
+- **Tags**: provenance, witness, evidence, signature, epistemics, ontology, substrate
+
+## Context
+
+This ADR is primitive 19 of the perception-substrate program (ADR-300) and a
+spine root of its phase-1 certificate stack. In the ADR-300 dependency DAG it
+**extends the source-provenance state machine (ADR-295)** and the RuField
+provenance types, **ties to the signature machinery (ADR-305 /
+ADR-260/262/277/279)**, and anchors the artifacts produced by ADR-301
+(calibration certificates), ADR-304 (evidence records), ADR-317 (benchmark
+scorecards), and ADR-318 (capability certificates). In phase 2 it carries the
+independent-corroboration link from ADR-303.
+
+The strategic assessment (ADR-300) framed RuView's real product as **epistemic
+infrastructure for physical AI**: the value is not the claim "a person is
+present" but the *auditable reasoning* behind it. A bare boolean output discards
+everything a downstream system needs to trust or contest it — which radio
+observed it, what DSP evidence supported it, which model inferred it, whether an
+independent sensor agreed, what spatial state it updated, and what policy acted
+on it. Once the answer is a boolean, "why do you believe that?" has no answer.
+
+RuView already has the pieces of a chain but not the chain itself. ADR-295
+defines a canonical `SourceState` (`Synthetic` / `LiveVerified` /
+`LiveUnverified` / `Stale` / `Disconnected`) with `Unknown` structurally
+forbidden from collapsing to live. ADR-305 defines the signed
+`device → measurement → sequence → timestamp → … → signed event` chain of
+custody. RuField carries `FrameProvenance`, `SemanticProvenance`, and signature
+types; the AetherArena witness ledger (ADR-149) demonstrates an append-only,
+witness-anchored ledger. What is missing is a single **staged, signed envelope**
+that travels the whole pipeline and records, at each stage, the confidence and
+provenance of that stage.
+
+## Options considered
+
+1. **Keep provenance as scattered per-stage fields (status quo).** Rejected:
+   `FrameProvenance`, `SourceState`, calibration state, and model uncertainty
+   live in different structures and are re-encoded per surface; there is no
+   single object a consumer can re-verify offline to answer "why."
+2. **Log a free-form audit trail alongside the output.** Rejected: mutable,
+   unsigned, and not structurally tied to the output — the classic
+   dashboard-that-overwrites-yesterday failure the evidence engine (ADR-304)
+   already rejects.
+3. **A staged, signed witness envelope carried through the pipeline, each stage
+   appended and signed, anchored in an append-only ledger.** Chosen.
+
+## Decision
+
+Define the **witness chain**: a staged, append-only, signed envelope that
+accompanies an observation from radio to policy decision. Instead of emitting
+"person present," RuView emits a chain whose stages are:
+
+```
+RF observation ▸ DSP evidence ▸ model inference ▸ independent corroboration
+              ▸ spatial state ▸ policy decision
+```
+
+### 1. The staged envelope
+
+- Each stage is a signed record carrying its **confidence** and its
+  **provenance**:
+  - **RF observation** — the ADR-305 authenticated frame envelope
+    (`DeviceId`, sequence, timestamp, measurement hash) and its ADR-295
+    `SourceState`. This is the root link; a `Synthetic` root can never present
+    as a `LiveVerified` one (ADR-295 invariant).
+  - **DSP evidence** — the deterministic signal features and the ADR-137
+    quality signals that support (or fail to support) an inference.
+  - **model inference** — the model version, its raw output, and its predictive
+    uncertainty; the ADR-302 `DomainState` (KNOWN / DEGRADED / UNKNOWN) gate
+    result, so a low-confidence or out-of-distribution inference is recorded as
+    such, not silently promoted.
+  - **independent corroboration** — the phase-2 ADR-303 agreement link
+    (a reference/second modality that agreed or disagreed); absent in phase 1,
+    the stage records "no corroboration," never a fabricated one.
+  - **spatial state** — the ADR-306 ontology `Observation`/`Track`/`Event` the
+    inference updated, carrying `SemanticProvenance` and its `EvidenceLevel`.
+  - **policy decision** — the governed action taken (or withheld), with the
+    certificate (ADR-318) it relied on.
+- Each stage carries exactly one `EvidenceLevel` (L0–L5, ADR-282); the envelope's
+  effective level is the **minimum** across its stages — a synthetic root or an
+  unreferenced inference caps the whole chain, so the chain cannot claim more
+  than its weakest link.
+
+### 2. Signing and anchoring
+
+- Each stage is signed with RuField signature types (ADR-305 /
+  ADR-260/262/277/279) over the canonical serialization of that stage plus the
+  hash of the prior stage, so the chain is tamper-evident end to end and any
+  broken link is detectable. The completed chain is anchored in an append-only,
+  witness-anchored ledger following the AetherArena pattern (ADR-149); it is the
+  same anchoring ADR-301/ADR-304/ADR-317/ADR-318 write into.
+- The chain is **append-only**: a correction is a new chain referencing the
+  prior one, never an in-place edit (mirroring ADR-304 and CLAUDE.md's "source
+  over summaries").
+
+### 3. Offline re-verification
+
+- A consumer with the enrolled public keys (ADR-305) can re-verify a chain
+  offline: check each stage signature, check each prior-stage hash, and read the
+  per-stage confidence and evidence level — answering "why do you believe this?"
+  without trusting the emitting host. This is the property store-and-forward
+  channel authentication (rejected in ADR-305) cannot provide.
+
+### Provenance and honesty discipline
+
+- The witness chain never manufactures confidence: a stage that lacks evidence
+  records the absence. A `Synthetic` root, a missing corroboration, or an
+  UNKNOWN gate is carried faithfully and caps the chain's evidence level. No
+  accuracy number is invented here; the chain records the numbers the other
+  primitives produce at their honest level.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- Every RuView output becomes contestable and auditable: a downstream physical-AI
+  system can inspect the reasoning, weight it by per-stage confidence, and reject
+  a chain whose weakest link is too weak — the defining property of epistemic
+  infrastructure the strategic assessment asked for.
+- The certificate spine (ADR-301/301/314/315) gains a single anchoring substrate;
+  each of those artifacts is a specialization of a witness record rather than a
+  bespoke signed blob.
+- Carrying and signing a staged envelope adds per-observation size and CPU cost;
+  bounded by reusing RuField signatures and the existing ledger, and by the
+  minimum-level rule keeping the object honest rather than exhaustive.
+- The chain will frequently reveal weak links (synthetic root, no corroboration,
+  DEGRADED gate). Surfacing that is the point; the envelope must never smooth a
+  weak stage into a confident summary.
+
+## Validation
+
+- `cargo test` on the witness-chain crate — stage-by-stage signature round-trip
+  and tamper rejection (a mutated stage or a broken prior-stage hash fails
+  verification); effective evidence level equals the minimum across stages; a
+  `Synthetic` root caps the chain and cannot present as `LiveVerified`
+  (ADR-295 invariant); an UNKNOWN gate (ADR-302) and a "no corroboration" stage
+  are recorded faithfully; append-only correction produces a new chain
+  referencing the prior one.
+- Cross-ADR: an ADR-305 signed frame lineage serializes into a chain that
+  re-verifies offline with only the enrolled public keys; ADR-301/301/314/315
+  artifacts anchor into the same ledger.
+- Real-deployment chains (from live ESP32 captures with ADR-303 corroboration)
+  are the maturity milestone and require hardware evidence per CLAUDE.md; a
+  chain rooted in synthetic input is L0 by construction.